Update 1.7 | Victoria 3 

We try to show and feature as much as we can both in the update video and feature videos, not everyone looks at Dev diaries or finds it easier to watch/listen to information! (I prefer listening to things myself so I understand it)

thanks reddit

Thanks for taking your time on this. Balancing and bugfixing this must have been a lot of work! Huge respect!

@@Victoria3Official Better tell me, why was brigade management cut out of the game and, in fact, the brigades removed from the map? Why is there such an arcade marine system in the game? Don't you think it would be a good idea to discuss such edits with the community before cutting from the shoulder?

And it should have been there from the start

@@reverendnon5959 a lot of the things from this update should ve been added from the start...

​@@reverendnon5959 But it's here now, so hurrah!

@@reverendnon5959better late than never. But yeah. With all these changes v3 now feels out of early access

Yes, having rich countries' pops buying foreign debt to earn a hefty extra would be amazing. And would encourage you not to destroy some countries as their debt would be fueling your pops demands.

@@aaronhpa exactly! I really feel like debt should play a bigger role in the core economic loop, especially when you consider it's role during the period! In the same way they own buildings, pops could be able to buy and own shares of the investment pool funds (which could be renamed to something more appropriate) that then could be borrowed by both pops and governments, national or foreign. That would add a whole new dimension to diplomacy. A foreign government defaulting on it's debt could cripple your economy, prompting you to either adopt an agressive diplomatic stance to protect the interests of your capitalists and aristocrats, or dealing with the economical and political consequences of inaction, such as an economic recession, civil unrest, insurrections, etc. What a dream!! Considering they liked my comment, maybe they're working on something along those lines hahah 👀👀 I hope

@@AntonioZL it would be also interesting how they adaption of debt, historically nations usually inherited debt, in exchange for prestige and having a easier time with managing the new areas(it would be really awesome if a popup happened where if you annex a nation, you can take their debt to gain some prestige and them less rebellious?)

What more could you want? The war is great as is asides navy

@@roser5372that the batallions dont randomly tp away?

There's at least 100 issues. ​@@roser5372

@@roser5372 i think watching a war without interaction is boring in vic 3

@@avecoir I'm almost sure that this was changed in 1.7. Take a look at the dev diaries in the forums.

It really is cool, I didn't realise how much I liked it until seeing how connected a building was!

building 3.8trillion opium plantations in china ❤❤❤

​@@cooldudewithcoolname9447* in India and sending it to China.

Happy Friday Victorians!

Thank you! It helps being given lots of feedback from players!

Thank you, I'll pass this on to our UX designers!

Not to mention colonial administrations, although the ability to change their culuture would be nice, I don’t want a french Senegal as the german Empire

@@SirBalageG you could just annex them and then release them again then it will be german senegal with german culture but yhea that takes a bit of time

@@Raphael-wy8yh too much infamy for annexing each African colony to then just release them again, I'd much more prefer to either combine the two different administrations or just change the culture if I don't have colonial administration yet

I don't see how Great Wars need a special mechanic. They happen organically, as the game goes on. Alliances form, bigger wars start, the development of trench warfare and machine guns naturally leads to the grinding reality of WW1. I don't see why Great Wars actually need to be a thing. I would appreciate a dynamic war naming system, though, and you could just have big enough wars named like they were in Vic2, but it's really not all that necessary.

Same for me, I love this game

I agree having that would be nice, rn its already half in game but yeah I totally agree

I would argue you will want to see low profit / unprofitable buildings more. With profitable buildings, you just look at them and go... nice. There is no action to be taken. With low profit, you might want to look at it and try to fix it in some way.

@@M1Nt3Nk3RThis is true, having to click twice on the market to filter from surplus to deficits is annoying. Luckily it saves so you only have to click it twice when reloading the save.

Understandable. Nothing feels as satisfying as drawing borders based on nothing than easiness :D

Eai meu nobre

@@ElielLaerte-zj2pi que coincidência meu nobre

@@zombiefirebot6066pois é meu nobre kkkk

você por aqui ô louco, bom parece que só tem eu e você De br por aqui infelizmente e a paradox não costumam responder português brasileiro andei reparando isso é triste querido Jack ver isso 😭😭

North America or Europe should be the next DLC

big needed change, once a front opens up the game makes it seem like bringing in all your troops to the front is easy. there should be a way to contest or delay the arrival of troops especially when you can have instances in the game where GPs can just bring 300k troops across oceans to fight in China without much losses.