Upgraded F-15C EAGLE Vs 6 North Korean Mig-29 | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS |

Подписаться 577 тыс.

Просмотров 121 тыс.

50% 1

Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-s...
APEX PCs: apexpartner.app/redirect/Grow...
Aim-152 MOD: www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
Join the channel if you wish to support
/ @growlingsidewinder
If You'd like to Support the Channel on Patreon:
/ growlingsidewinder
Join my Discord:
/ discord
Social Media
________________________________________________________
Instagram: / growling_sidewinder
Twitter: / growlingaim9
Facebook: / growlingaim9
Amazon Links for the products I use if you're interested:
_________________________________________________________
Link for Thrustmaster 16000M: amzn.to/2PQGYf2
Link for Trackir 5: amzn.to/2VSN4kt
Link for Warthog throttle/stick: amzn.to/2Vbfhyp
Contact me:
GrowlingSidewinder@hotmail.com
Disclaimer: Please Note that I use sound effects to enhance my videos for dramatic effect and hopefully give the viewer more immersion and also I use reshade for some better colors. (you can download reshade yourself and use it to make your DCS look like mine).
Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core 3.4GHz (4.9GHz Max Boost)
Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS Elite WiFi
Memory: 128GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE RGB PRO 3200MHz (4x32GB)
System Cooling: CORSAIR H100i PRO XT RGB
Graphics Cards: NVIDIA 10GB GeForce RTX 3080
Operating System: MS Windows 10 Professional
Operating System Drive: 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe
Hard Drive: 2TB Samsung 980 PRO
Power Supply: CORSAIR AX1600i ATX Titanium
Tobii Head and Eye Tracking: www.tobii.com/
Virtual Reality: Pimax 8KX
HeadTracker: Trackir5
Thrustmaster F/A-18C Hornet stick and Warthog Throttle.
Thrustmaster TRP pedals.
On this channel we like to do a lot of dogfighting most videos are some sort of dogfight between 2 different aircraft as we explore their different capabilities. From time to time I like to dabble in Virtual Reality, I think VR is a great new technology and I love to show that stuff off for the channel from time to time.
If you enjoy war thunder or Microsoft flight simulator 2020 or even dogfighting in Battlefield 2042, consider getting yourself into Digital Combat Simulator by Eagle Dynamics, the Combat side of Aviation with the BVR and Dogfights really provides a different and interesting perspective on aviation. You can fly all kinds of combat aircraft including the F-16, F-15, F-14, JF-17, Su-27, Mig-29, Mirage and the F-18 Hornet along with many other aircraft and helicopters like the Ka-50 and Mi-8.

Игры

Опубликовано:

14 ноя 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 273

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/ Thanks for watching guys and if you have any ideas for more videos with the Aim-152 please let me know in the comment section we might be able to do something with your idea...ok thanks again guys I'll see you in the next one, much love.

@MississippiKid96 Год назад

F22 vs mig 31 BVR .. I just wanna see what it takes to kill that big bird

@gtperfection1596 Год назад

Please do a fantasy fight were a f22 tries to intercept a blackbird

@MississippiKid96 Год назад

@@gtperfection1596 get in line buddy I been asking for raptor vs foxhound for months.

@MississippiKid96 Год назад

@@gtperfection1596 and the raptor needs to pass a preliminary test of beating the foxhound (BVR?) before it can take on the jet the foxhound was intended to hunt

@bruhwizard1472 Год назад

Nothing do do with Aim-152. F-22 vs (any aircraft) aircraft in increasing numbers. ex: F-22 vs 1 F-16 -> F-22 vs 2 F-16s -> F-22 vs 3 F-16s etc.. Untill the F-22 loses. Doesnt have to be F-16, can be any aircraft

@itsjustjuan8239 Год назад

F-22 vs entire North Korean Air Force

@SwingArmCity Год назад

Entire air force? F22 vs all of North Korea!

@onyx6847 Год назад

that was the entire north korean air force lol

@Reggie757 Год назад

All tree of y'all.

@thecobra45 Год назад

@@Reggie757 don’t forget the like 8 mig 21s they have 😂

@3tacoman Год назад

Do it !

@totalnerd5674 Год назад

NK pilots: Fighting for their life F-15: Just another day at the office...

@boejiden7093 Год назад

Yea, they cant even go defensive because kimmy will think they’re running away. So they have no choice but to take a million dollar missile to the face.

@OKimcallinit Год назад

Watching Bismarck's rundown of the F-5, he mentioned that at one point countries could get 7-10 F-5s for the price of one F-15. So now I'm curious as to how many F-5s it would take to bring down your Eagle

@jayminer9416 Год назад

THIS!!!!!

@Imugi007 Год назад

The Raytheon version is obviously the superior missile. Longer range and the ability to go cold while the missile is still pressing the bandit without an additional pod reducing maneuverability and speed enhances the survivability and the kill probability... It's a no brainer imo. I mean how big would that pod have to be to illuminate a bandit at 60+ miles? Idk just seems a bit far-fetched to me.

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

I agree I think the pod is very optimistic and I think it’s also very dependent on u as the pilot not causing masking issues as you go cold, which would break the lock, it’s just another thing to worry and think about.

@Imugi007 Год назад

@@GrowlingSidewinder yeah I was thinking about that too. What happens if the pilot dives to the ground and the bandit stays high? It would have a hard time looking back and up at a bandit without getting masked by the aircraft...

@denvermiller5091 Год назад

@@GrowlingSidewinder I assume the pod would also make it a no-go on any aircraft relying on stealth? Or are the missiles not even intended to be used with the 22 or 35?

@dude6935 Год назад

@@denvermiller5091 Given that they were developed for the F-14, I doubt the 22 was even in concept at the time.

@_vortech_ Год назад

@@dude6935 the 22 was definitely on the drawing boards at the time if the 117 was on the drawing boards during Vietnam. In fact, the 117 was operational in the early 80's during the Panama conflict - which means it probably was flying before then. We have stuff on the drawing boards right now that e won't know of or see until 20-30 years from now.

@ATP-Flo Год назад

How that last AIM120C came off the rail looked super weird. 😂

@JebHoge Год назад

There's a piece of concept art out there that shows an F-14 with these triple racks in the tunnel in the place of the Phoenixes and the illum pod on a glove pylon.

@jpmedia6941 Год назад

Never knew DCS existed until i came across your channel...love the content!

@timbaskett6299 Год назад

Same here, but I'm hooked now!!

@kristindanielcarrington3318 Год назад

Bro, you gotta fly the ME-262 against the Mig-15! Keep being awesome and keep the F-14 Tomcat videos coming!

@jameskester7745 Год назад

I've been saying 262 vs warthog

@BleucheeseHero Год назад

Man you always upload just before I get home from work. Fantastic to watch your videos to unwind. Chefs kiss

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

I appreciate you brother, much love.

@thetbnrtitanium007 Год назад

Hey GS thanks for making another BVR video! Keep them coming!

@NavySturmGewehr Год назад

Just in time. You seem to publish right around my lunch time! Fantastic!

@brianwright9514 Год назад

What I read said the GD version also had an electro-optical seeker in addition to it's semi-active radar homing. I thought that was pretty interesting.

@terminusarms113 Год назад

Loving the long videos GS, definitely going to be watching this channel on repeat while I do homework in the near future

@davidfecak9569 Год назад

More of these, broheem! Awesome stuff. Thank you

@SHARPSPEED Год назад

This little series of GS vs North Korea is ~the best~. I kinda hope he goes worse and worse with his aircraft until he's going against them with something like a F-86 Sabre or even an ME 262.

@jamlarna Год назад

Fox 1 for you fox 2 for you fox 3 for you ........ Everyone gets Foxes 🤣🤣🤣

@kristindanielcarrington3318 Год назад

GS, James just called you the Oprah of the DCS world. 😂🤣😂

@PhycoKrusk Год назад

Honestly, these two versions of the AIM-152 don't feel like they were intended to fill the same role. The Hughes/Raytheon (/McDonnell-Douglas) version is clearly intended to be very long range and fast while requiring the least amount of guidance from the mothership possible; great for targeting cruise missiles and bombers. The General Dynamics/Westinghouse version was intended to be reasonably long range, agile, and inexpensive; great for missile trucks and use against enemy aircraft (the use of an electro-optical sensor for terminal guidance is an especially interesting choice).

@skip888888 Год назад

Nicely done !! My son loves it when you goes against green NK mig 29

@mildmanneredthinkingman9323 Год назад

Another great video thanks @Growling Sidewinder. When do you think we will see you spar with the YF-23/pilot one?

@blackorange5091 Год назад

We definitely want more videos from the Raytheon 152!!❤

@saquist Год назад

I want to see a C130 loaded with 30 Aim120s

@StromBugSlayer Год назад

Maybe try these experimental missiles against the Mig 31?

@rmp5s Год назад

I would think having a pod like that (or some other way to maintain lock over a full 365°) would be something ALL planes would have...

@kalle5548 Год назад

Problem is that you would have to somehow offset the radar since it can't see through the plane or radiate the pilot, but I think russian aircraft have something like that in the rear, and the Gripen AESA radar has the ability to tilt to increase gimbal lock

@rmp5s Год назад

@@kalle5548 Even if it were just a small radar in a "tail cone" that the front radar could "hand off" to...something like that where you could literally go totally cold and still guide a TWS missile in without the enemy having any idea. I would think that would be QUITE the advantage...

@kalle5548 Год назад

@@rmp5s In theory yeah, but I think such a system would struggle with reliability and providing power for the radar, but I'm not really an expert so I can't say

@rmp5s Год назад

@@kalle5548 Yea, I dunno. I'm sure they don't do it for some reason.

@fins-n-skins7524 Год назад

Like your flying 33rd FW Eagle tail, those are now Oregon ANG

@Rose_Butterfly98 Год назад

I like the Raytheon one more too. Even ignoring fox 1 vs fox 3, the ramjet just gives it better long range performance. Having those multi missile racks is nice though.

@jameskester7745 Год назад

Next time you have the warthog out, you should try it against a ME-262

@timbaskett6299 Год назад

I've thought of this scenario. I like the idea.

@Yagasaki_no_Nagoya Год назад

Anybody else think north Korean pilots could learn more from these videos than their own military training

@planetfun85 Год назад

At least they are flying real jets.

@professional_retard955 Год назад

Cool video buddy keep them up

@timbaskett6299 Год назад

I was thinking about my "modernized" version of the Raytheon model, one thing I would do is probably propose a coffee can sized solid rocket booster to improve the speed and slightly extend the range and energy.That one MiG-29 made for an interesting scenario. It would be funny if the missile when pitbull on the punched off drop tank. 🤣

@liammackenzie9283 Год назад

I feel like the GDW proposal would have been the better design IF they moved to a regular active radar seeker head instead of the SARH course update to IR terminal phase idea. The sheer quantity you can carry, combined with the F-14's outstanding loiter time, would make for unbeatable endurance in the CAP role.

@JReesh Год назад

I love these BVR videos!

@Cheese0615 Год назад

Thanks. GS. I am happy to watch this video.

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

I appreciate you taking the time to watch, much love.

@100dfrost Год назад

I got your, stated more than once, reference about why the 29's didn't shoot back or flare, but I thought I'd ask again anyway .. um .. what were we talking about? Another great video, thanks.

@gusigb2677 Год назад

GS - I think a really popular idea for you would be a tier list of the jets inside DCS.... who's with me???

@garethfairclough8715 Год назад

GS is going to keep doing this, going back in aircraft sequence until he ends up back with the F86, I swear!

@timbaskett6299 Год назад

I'd like to see a guns only F-86 vs. F-16 video. Grandpa vs. Grandson!!

@generfeld Год назад

"okay, that's everybody" so funny how you summed up this missile's success rate

@abbaerfani9007 Год назад

Great job by you again. You didn't even drop your full tank and they all gone

@AdamosDad Год назад

While in the Navy, I hated Westinghouse gear, and liked Raytheon. Going into this I said you going to die, you proved to me there is more ways than one to skin a cat.

@dkc4u Год назад

It’s an interesting concept. I wonder how it would work on a bomber like a B1 or maybe AWAX

@ImperiumLibertas Год назад

We almost certainly have long range loitering munitions for A2A area denial deployable from bombers. The technology is there. I'd be more surprised if we didn't have it.

@chefboyarb Год назад

I could get a sense of how the tracking pod would work. Especially if they designed it with 2 faces on both ends that could possibly rotate

@jettblack9696 Год назад

Love your vids as always please do more f15 vids

@Ginuwine-kx2iv Год назад

Video is much appreciated, you make for a great instructor (Obi-wan) lol.

@brewtownonesix Год назад

Is it possible in DCS to use an F35/F22 as a sensor suite and a couple of F15EX as gun trucks against like, 20 mig 29s?

@jhare18 Год назад

No Match at All. A highly trained and skilled fighter pilot plus an amazing Loaded Fighter Jet equals victory.

@xpk0228 Год назад

these NK mig 29s seems to became GS's favorite targets to shoot at for trying out new things

@johnryanmuldoon3631 Год назад

AMRAAM debuted during Desert Storm. Where it defeated six targets in combat for 13 shots taken at beyond visual ranges-roughly a 46 percent success rate.

@miquelescribanoivars5049 Год назад

Did it? I heard its first air to air kill was in 1992.

@perrykivolowitz7323 Год назад

I wonder if a better strategy would have been to salvo the AIM 152s first beyond the MiG range so you could have maintained nose hot for a long time then used the Fox 3s for the residual.

@thecoolmagnet3785 Год назад

that last amraam was COOL

@Filipino_guy1 Год назад

Became an ace in 9:16 minutes (if you included all of the Cinematic shots)

@cyberdemigod Год назад

Make videos on tactics using sparrows And some sparrows only dogfights!! Also sparrows in f22! Both bvr and merges

@michaellamb2819 Год назад

I’d be surprised if they even have 6 air worthy mig-29s

@christoney2491 Год назад

I can see one benefit of using the pod for initial guidance, and that's the ability to quickly upgrade. Just replace the pod with an upgraded version and ouila, better guidance. Much easier than replacing the seeker units on all of the missiles. Not to mention, cost savings on not having to miniaturize components. The downside is if your aircraft buys it, then your missiles probably won't get you revenge for your death. LOL

@cloudforest4087 Год назад

What a show!

@n0kodoko143 Год назад

catching up on the content!

@zacharyjohnson8037 Год назад

From my understanding (which is very little so cut me some slack) with fox 1s could an F35 with datalink assist with illuminating the bandits? So the friendly can go defensive earlier without risking losing the lock.

@hoss3433 Год назад

I'm just getting into DCS so far I am really enjoying it. Am trying to get somewhat ok in one jet. I don't have many yet at this point been working on f14 and f16. Yeah I'm gettin my ass kicked but oh well it's fun

@johnhermann7498 Год назад

I am trying to figure out how that pod, mounted on the inboard left wing station, was able to continue to illuminate that target on the right side of the aircraft through that huge aluminum cloud you were flying ... And how can it be a "Phoenix replacement" when it has no where near the range of a -54 let alone an AMRAAM .... I would stick with the Hughes version....

@Stuff749 Год назад

You should do f18 vs 6 NK migs

@funkytownjedi Год назад

Love the eagle and hornet 😇

@longtimber Год назад

I could see the Congress/Military going for the pod if the lack of electrics in the missiles made them significantly less expensive; the pod is reusable, missile heads are not.

@davedeville6540 Год назад

Here’s an idea: Why not fit the illumination pod on a missile and just shoot the missiles and release the pod and run away or reposition and flank the enemy?

@mcflyingfury Год назад

Hey GS, so me and my friend just recently got into DCS, and we've been doing F-15C vs MiG29S duels. We tried some BVR, and while I was able to win consistently with the F-15C, I noticed that my AIM120s never seemed to hit him more than 10 miles away, he was able to completely outmaneuver them at any longer ranges. Can you explain this? Everything I've learned and seen about the AMRAAMs tells me that they should be able to hit targets at least 20-30 miles away.

@popmordiscos Год назад

In earlier videos he talked about this, fist the range depends on the speed and altitude that the missile was launched at, in therms of what he said in other videos the kind of "kill zone" of the AIM120 is about 10 miles at sea level, 20 miles at around 20k feet and 30 miles at around 30k feet. Keep in mind that the initial speed of the missile also affects this metric and it also does not take into account any weird bugs or the use of countermeasures.

@GlitchyGamers18 Год назад

What’s your altitude? If on the deck the max range will be ten miles but all missiles will lose their kill capability if the enemy goes into a crank or notch

@mcflyingfury Год назад

@@popmordiscos That's assuming you turn around though right? I haven't really been going cold, just flying perpendicular and making the missiles lose lock, but it seems to be working too well lol

@mattfleming86 Год назад

@@mcflyingfury No. You going cold will not change the missiles initial velocity. Altitude and are your friends!

@popmordiscos Год назад

@@mcflyingfury Oh I think in that case what you are doing is called notching, it basically means that at low altitude radars lose lock when you fly perfectly perpendicular to the radar, it is a disadvantage of how some radars see through ground clutter

@bryanwalthall5483 Год назад

The fact that you had to fire the AIM-120s before you shot off the AIM-152s says it all. Yesterday's version is definitely superior.

@gerretoutdoors3710 Год назад

There is a reason they are called missiles and not hittles

@wombatz8210 Год назад

Do you have a clickable cockpit for the F-15C because I looked everywhere and couldn't find one

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

no, the F15 is what is called "flaming cliffs 3" which means it doesn't have a clickable cockpit. There is a mod out there that makes the cockpits of FC3 aircraft clickable but I've never tried it so I can't say if its worth getting or not.

@dallaswood4117 Год назад

In all these one vs X number of bandits where the one wins I want to see the multiple aircraft coming in from different directions

@nocturneJOJO Год назад

I wonder, how many Aim-152 (either version) could you mount on the F15EX Eagle II?

@benn454 Год назад

Missiles for days? Missiles for days.

@heretolevitateme Год назад

I wonder how many hard points would have to be devoted to drop tanks just so you'd have enough time to launch all the missiles?

@nocturneJOJO Год назад

@@heretolevitateme I suppose there's also some limit to the amount of weight it can carry, isn't it?

@liammackenzie9283 Год назад

What sort of tests have you done with the GDW proposal? I've had 70-80 mile kills with them with no issue.

@comradetrump Год назад

You got a loose wire you better secure.

@c.ladimore1237 Год назад

i know chaff is reflective for radar and flares are for thermal, but i never see chaff on this channel, only flares. also seems like they can carry a lot of flares, so what is the ratio one can/should carry?

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

you will almost never SEE chaff, I use it all the time (so do the bandits) but its tiny foils of radar reflective material (as you said) which means when they get dumped you basically can't "see" them. so for the ratio that's up to the pilot and the mission they can take as much or as little chaff or flare as they like but I would imagine it's a lot more chaff than flare (flares are only if you are about to merge and that's not really supposed to happen ideally) unless you're air to ground like an A10 in which case you will bring a lot of flare in case of manpads. You see it's very mission dependant.

@dougmuti3850 Год назад

So the JDW missle is not Datalink capable with an AWACS??

@SIXS82ns8w Год назад

Can you simulate South Korea F35A vs North Korea MIG29?

@giftmorzel6318 Год назад

try this vs a eurofighter with meteors.. should make a good challenge

@zahnatom Год назад

the f-15 would be at a massive disadvantage...

@giftmorzel6318 Год назад

@@zahnatom it's not the plane..

@2bidfilmsguy Год назад

How did you get these to run on the f15, I would love to know

@Overneed-Belkan-Witch Год назад

It's not the plane, it's the DCS pilot

@Ericrollers Год назад

What mods do you use graphics wise?

@markstott6689 Год назад

I wouldn't fancy carrying a load of the General Dynamics 152's. All it takes is a glitch with the targeting pod and you're screwed. Who's going to want to keep their nose pointed at 6 Mig 29's for any length of time? Not me thanks.

@sharkgaming3929 Год назад

Eurofighter with Meteor vs F15 with Aim 152

@Unknown-gi1uj Год назад

Is there a reason you roll when firing, something i notice alot, is how unstable you are when firing. Is the the effect of the missile or just muscle memory you have acquired. Ultimately i wouldnt suspect it has a major effect on the missile, but in a dog fight... Just something i noticed.

@ShuvGh Год назад

We'd like to see F22 vs mig 31 BVR. ❤️

@383mazda Год назад

Do they have a fox 1 missile that can be passed from airplane to airplane for guidance?

@Jojo_Bee Год назад

Need F-15EX in DCS next, I guess... 🤔

@mrbagel8751 Год назад

Still patiently waiting for GS to fly the f-4

@Miles26545 Год назад

Don’t think there is one yet

@mrbagel8751 Год назад

@@Miles26545 there is

@nfss5110 Год назад

Super hornet, F35, gripen,etc?

@theelectricgamer9889 Год назад

Day 103 of asking for F-16 vs F-20/F-5 dogfight

@kippnashleymiller3752 Год назад

You might have to say, “pretty please with sugar on top” in order to see your request.

@TitusFFM Год назад

He is Canadian so call him a Marple head maybe he will react 😂

@Yamuva3 Год назад

Yea u not getting it dawg😂

@A_mouse_that_is_pink Год назад

The motivation of this man

@hyunterks Год назад

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

@beatboxbuggi6884 Год назад

What happened to that guy asking for F-35 vs Super Hornet for like 100 days? Where’d he go? Perhaps I should carry on his fight...

@draygoes Год назад

Hey, would you be willing to link the mods you're using in each video in the videos description? I know that's a bit of extra work, but it would really help me and probably some others out. Love the content.

@jdbarnes5987 Год назад

I’ve got an idea my bro. Polish F-16s vs Russian fighters, bandit unknown. Polish vipers scrambling to intercept at news of Russian attack on their territory. Vipers mission is to repel attack forces but not pursue and escalate outside of Polish territory. You do not know the enemies motivations you are there to defend home airspace as long as necessary.

@Shadowslayer347 Год назад

Do they have the F-15EX on this?

@dumitrumelniciuc8183 Год назад

how to tell apart if there is a fox2 or fox3 fired at your aircraft?

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

fox3 will give you RWR notification. fox2 will not.

@dumitrumelniciuc8183 Год назад

now I know :), thanks@@GrowlingSidewinder

@darreloutland4604 Год назад

I'd go with Raytheon before the video is over because of the range and the fact you've got to keep target painted...common sense to me..

@notHere8801 Год назад

What altitude is your aircraft considered in the cons?

@kevine.136 Год назад

Whenever it starts make con trails in the sky. The exact height varies on location, temperature, and humidity

@DeeSnow97 Год назад

happy belated mig loss monday for everyone

@Stinger522 Год назад

Raytheon version all day. Raytheon version all the way. You should try shooting the AIM-152 from the Raptor next.

@philparnell757 Год назад

Now imagine an e or ex model...

@vtolgorgon4080 Год назад

"Fox-1 and a Half"

@levidotson6610 Год назад

Based on the range comment I’m guessing the migs only have Alamo’s not adders

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

Even if they had the -1 adders they’d still be slightly out ranged by the c5 amraam.

@AirCicilia Год назад

Seeing how much different the GD version is from the Raytheon one, they should be given different designations. I'd suggest the AIM152 for the former and AIM172 for the latter.

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

loool well I think the idea is that they were both competing to become the official Aim152 the other was going in the trash.

@AirCicilia Год назад

@@GrowlingSidewinder I understand that, but jokes aside, back in the 70s when General Dynamics and Northrop were competing for the new fighter program, their respective prototypes were called the YF-16 and YF-17 (which was redesigned into the F-18 and was adopted by the US Navy) respectively. Same thing in the early 90s between the YF-22 and the YF-23. Then again, maybe that protocol just doesn't apply to ordnance.

@GrowlingSidewinder Год назад

oh I see what you mean, ya that's a fair point. I'm not sure actually you're right that its weird when you use the aircraft examples. I wish I could think of another missile program to see if they keep the same name or not but I don't know of any other than the 152 program.