US Navy Los Angeles class SSN: How does it Compare to China's Type 093 SSN? 

This is the most honest and unbiased defense Channel on RU-vid.

That Was My Tour Recreation Vehicle . Crab .

Good analysis. I like this defense channel. Probably the best I have seen to date. Very professional and you try to be as objective as possible.

Yes… love your videos… detailed and unbiased…

I know which sub I'd sooner face up against...certainly wouldn't be the Los Angeles class of sub...from the first to last of class, the Americans have perfected the submarine platform through all derivatives of the 688 boats, I'm quite certain pegging a platform that has been in service for 20-30+ years, is a bit rich, but nonetheless worthy of comparison. Interesting how much the Type 95 looks strikingly similar to the Virginia class subs...there's a shock 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Good video regardless, as are most, good work and a 👍🏽👍🏽

Does us need littoral subs.hell yeah

Did anybody find out what really happened to that Type 93?

You could go to Bremerton grab the Los Angeles before it gets scrapped and it would blast the Chinese sub outta the water

#178973 John Robert Bruffett Junior USA 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 thanks

Your figures on all flights of the 688 are incorrect. I know this because I served on a 688-I, the SSN-761, USS Sprindfield. Granted, we do not know what the capabilities of the Type 93 of all variants are, but neither does the public know what those capabilities are of any flight of the 688, whether improved or not...unless you served on one. If you are saying that the type 93 would be a match for any flight of the 688 based on your figures presented, especially for the flight 3 688I, you would not want to face off against them. And you are comparing a 688 designed for the cold war against Russia, of which the 688 still excels today, against a Type 93 which is China's latest. The type 93 is considerably further behind than 15 years against American submarine technology, especially agaist the Virgina class.

Hiteck