everyone has to use their own method......the starting point is to have a methodology that gives you one number for class and one for speed for each horse. I sorta agree with you i think track varients exsist on occassion but are often exaggerated by most people in both their degree and importence. Early speed late speed are usally a type of linear/inverse relationship....that are able to depict a horses abilities over ANY surface.....will continue
the speed figures dont take into account how difficult the run was (bumps..traffic..etc.), correct? Also do they use the actual distance run? If wayy outside, that is a longer run. Shouldnt that be factored in? or at least noted. So it isnt true speed. Speed is distance over time. they dont use the true route distance. I use Brisnet and like how they supply historical reports. *Also, you talk ab graphics, but we see no graphics on the screen. Do you mean graphics in front of only you?
