hi dear, Dr. I passed step one with your awesome videos. At the beginning of the day, I watched all of your videos and I did it three times. now I jump into step 2. LOL. I wish I could prepare summery laminated sheets like you do. In any case, I would like to thank you.
I’m an Spanish speaker living in Ireland and I’m preparing for MRCPI exams but there is not much information available so I studied with your videos. I got my results today , I passed my 1st written part.. and I can’t be happier.. I just want to thank you for all your videos although it’s not the same exam as USMLE it has some similarities.. thanks again Dr Randy.
Thank you so much Sir! I passed the step 1 and it wouldn't have been possible without youuu!! It's not just the study videos but also the motivation ones that have helped me! Thank youuu once again!
Dear Sir Dr.Neil , really appreciate your help and support us during this journey, I used your biostat videos for my step 2 & passed last week : got 245 🎉also for step 1 , looking forward more content from you for our study for step 3 , THank you so much , much love 😇😇😇
Hello Dr. Neil, I appreciate the videos you make for us. I found your RU-vid channel by looking for easy ways to understand bio-stats, which was my nightmare. Your bio-stats videos and short rapid review were gold during my step study, which is one of the reasons I passed STEP 1. Thank you so much for what you do for us!
Dr.Neil Your channel is One of the best channels that help medical students for their USMLE exams. I really appreciate your all videos that you prepared to help us and understand all the challenging questions.❤❤❤
Thankful to God ! Who has blessed us with such an amazing and dedicated teacher ...you're literally always ready ,going an extra mile to make complicated topics way easier...HATS OFF TO YOU!
Thank you for all your video. I'm trying to find your notes but can't, i got only bio-stat. How can I download your notes? They are really useful for me in this process. Thank you!!!
Hello!! I have am having a a hard time with this question. Could you please make a video on it? I am not sure what the diffeence between choices B and C A clinical study compares several cut points for a new biomarker for bacterial bloodstream infection among adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) against blood culture results. Analysis shows that a biomarker value ≥2.6 ng/mL has a sensitivity of 32% and a specificity of 96% for predicting bloodstream infections. Which of the following conclusions about the study results is correct? Answer choices: A* Based on a cut point of ≥2.6 ng/mL, 4% of adult patients in the ICU with bacterial bloodstream infections will be correctly identified. * B. Based on a cut point of ≥2.6 ng/mL, 4% of adult patients in the ICU without bacterial bloodstream infections will be incorrectly identified. C. Based on a cut point of 22.6 ng/mL, 96% of adult patients in the ICU with bacterial bloodstream infections will be correctly identified. * D. Based on a cut point of ≥2.6 ng/mL, 96% of adult patients in the ICU without bacterial bloodstream infections will be incorrectly identified.
Thanks for the wonderful video. I had a doubt, in case of papilloedema with no neurodeficits, we prefer doing LP before CT? But shouldnt CT be preceeding LP always?
