Тёмный

Utility Maximization with a Cobb-Douglas Utility Function 

Economics in Many Lessons
Подписаться 69 тыс.
Просмотров 316 тыс.
50% 1

This video shows how to maximize utility subject to a budget constraint. Channel donations are much appreciated:www.paypal.com...

Опубликовано:

 

20 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 105   
@darkacademiax_
@darkacademiax_ Год назад
Why do professors make this sound sooooo complicated. This is so straight forward thank you. ❤
@princeagyei6095
@princeagyei6095 Год назад
thank you very much honorable i nearly dropped economics because of this, but after watching this video over and over again within 24 hrs ive understood, thank you my new lecturer
@baileychoy9831
@baileychoy9831 8 лет назад
This viedo just saved my Econ grade!!
@proudmalaysian24
@proudmalaysian24 Год назад
i cannot comprehend why my lecturer make it so hard to understand, you are truly a saviour, may god bless you sir
@swarnasishsaha9681
@swarnasishsaha9681 Год назад
This working is actually very straightforward and helpful. The textbooks on the other hand, not so much
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons Год назад
I appreciate your comment!
@angelli8762
@angelli8762 6 лет назад
this is so easy and staight forward, why does textbook mess up everything and make them so complicated???
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
Sorry, but this calculation is awkward. Just divide MUx by MUy and you`re done! This trick works always by CD-utility. I don not this instructor knows this!
@CharityKyabanasha
@CharityKyabanasha 2 месяца назад
Ohooooo thanks have understood this it's very simple I used to struggle alot but now everything is very simple ❤❤❤❤
@peppa_pig_
@peppa_pig_ 6 лет назад
it takes my long-winded professor an hour and a half to explain these concepts.....thank you
@sarojdani3201
@sarojdani3201 3 года назад
Very good explanation. Hardly good quality videos are uploaded with good explanation.👍
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 3 года назад
Thanks!
@n.morgan1428
@n.morgan1428 4 года назад
You just saved my whole midterm. Than you!
@mikaelrecine9486
@mikaelrecine9486 7 лет назад
You're the best! Thank you for helping me finally complete my assignment!
@himadrinag5332
@himadrinag5332 7 лет назад
Is this really a Cobb-Douglas function ? I knew that CDFs are of the form U = X^a . Y^(1-a) But here the exponents are summing up to 0.75.
@leoyu577
@leoyu577 6 лет назад
Himadri Nag Yeah I was wondering about that as well!
@yifanbao8264
@yifanbao8264 5 лет назад
I feel like this is more of a CES method.
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
@@yifanbao8264 utility is ordinal, so it does not matter if you take x^0,5*y^0.25 or x^2*y or x^(2/3)*y^(1/3) try. But only the last one is homothetic which leads in an aggregation for social welfare to a concave utility possibility curve, but all this important stuff is not said in the video, it is just stupid calculation with no explanaition!
@farhaanahmed8924
@farhaanahmed8924 Год назад
Thank you so much, my university lecturers and textbooks have a combined utility of 0.
@getaway1085
@getaway1085 Год назад
consumer has the utility function: u(x,y) = 5x + 6xy + y2 + 38x + 18y a) Determine the marginal utility for the two commodities. Is more always better for the consumer? b) The consumer has a budget of £40. A unit of the x commodity costs £10 and a unit of the y commodity cost £5. Write down the budget equation. c) The consumer wants to maximize his utility subject to his budget constraint. Write down the Lagrangian for this problem. d) Calculate x, y and e) Calculate the utility maximization,
@getaway1085
@getaway1085 Год назад
Show me result
@TheSamthaman24
@TheSamthaman24 9 лет назад
l love you,I love you,I love you
@bethwelkimutai5026
@bethwelkimutai5026 6 лет назад
Great video thank you for sharing this knowledge I can now better my economics grade
@edmondlleshi8683
@edmondlleshi8683 Год назад
There is an error in the equation.When you multiply by 4 both sides, the left side is not anymore multiplied by 1/2 but just by 2 because 4/2=2.
@jodiancampbell3939
@jodiancampbell3939 9 лет назад
Why did you differentiate with respect to X for du/dy? I thought it would have been .5y .5-1, with X held constant
@banstaman
@banstaman 8 лет назад
Probably too late to know, but deriving it results in: x^.25 * .5y^.5-1, but you can move that all the way to the front of the equation, it won't make a difference. It's just much easier to work with that way.
@tjopat3866
@tjopat3866 Год назад
Another classic Chuck Fin massive W
@pavanialahakoon6315
@pavanialahakoon6315 Год назад
Most important lesson.thank you soo much
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons Год назад
You are very welcome!
@marcusbowman6214
@marcusbowman6214 3 года назад
Hi thanks for the great explanation ! I have a quick question. when you take the partial derivative with respect to x ,for example, why don’t you treat y as a constant which would equal 0.
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 3 года назад
Example. Let U = XY + Y. Take Partial derivative of U with respect to X (we treat Y as a constant). For the sake of argument, say Y = 5 (a constant) and replace Y with 5 in the equation above, so U = 5X + 5. Take the derivative of this last equation wrt to X: dU/dX = 5 + 0 = 5. Now, replace 5 with Y, so dU/dX = Y and you get the correct partial derivative of the utility function with respect to X.
@piercebedell5923
@piercebedell5923 3 года назад
Thank you, this was very helpful.
@patthazard6044
@patthazard6044 2 года назад
Thanks for the heads up😪
@anndiaz-exposito3924
@anndiaz-exposito3924 3 года назад
BETTER THAN THE TEXTBOOK
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
No!!!! Because the why is missing! It is just stupid wicked calculation, with no deeper inside!
@yayassanyang4516
@yayassanyang4516 11 месяцев назад
I like the way you lecture
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 11 месяцев назад
I appreciate that. Thank you!
@gx1313131
@gx1313131 8 лет назад
thank god, your video just saved me.
@disintegratev6951
@disintegratev6951 Год назад
really easy to understand, thank you! And some white noise for free :D
@preciousntobeng328
@preciousntobeng328 Год назад
Thank you so much 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼. ❤️
@tomwebster7500
@tomwebster7500 10 месяцев назад
Absolute legend!!!
@dagmawiyohannes7405
@dagmawiyohannes7405 4 года назад
Suppose a particular consumer has 8 birr to be spent on two goods, A and B. The unit price of good A is 2 birr and the unit price of B is 1 birr. The marginal utility (MU) she gets from consumption of the goods is given below. Quantity 1 36 30 2 24 22 3 20 16 4 18 12 5 16 10 6 10 4 A) Based on the cardinal analysis, what is the combination of the two goods that gives maximum utility to the consumer? B) What is the total utility at the utility maximization level? Expert's answer I need the answer pls
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 4 года назад
This video should help:ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ELxWo0esLzo.html
@emmanuelroosevelt6840
@emmanuelroosevelt6840 4 года назад
I'm so happy, you helped me so much..
@liviantus
@liviantus 8 лет назад
thank youuuuuuuuuuuu your the best saved me thank you thank you can you do example like that on income and substitution effect
@Ausiedundan
@Ausiedundan 2 года назад
Thank you so much!!
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 2 года назад
You are welcome!
@collinskibet2992
@collinskibet2992 3 года назад
Thank you 😊 you have helped me alot
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
Why you do not just say that p_y=2p_x and 0.5 the coefficient at x is twice 0.25 the coefficient of y and therefore you directly see, without any calculation by symmetry of the problem that y=x???
@eugeneokiri6617
@eugeneokiri6617 3 года назад
awesome. thank you very much
@tr3vorbwir343
@tr3vorbwir343 2 года назад
Thank you so much man🇺🇬
@nuaminemoges6170
@nuaminemoges6170 3 года назад
Very helpful
@ruchikumari6658
@ruchikumari6658 3 года назад
Thank_You so much
@kumaripooja9847
@kumaripooja9847 4 года назад
Thank you very much
@taqi7109
@taqi7109 11 месяцев назад
I love you from the bottom of Mariana Trench
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 11 месяцев назад
Thank you so much!
@bernardcotton721
@bernardcotton721 7 лет назад
merci pour cette video cobb douglas utility function: it also works with 3 variables (private goods , leisure, public goods); see philip graves; merci à youtube !
@danuka9639
@danuka9639 2 года назад
Superb 🔥
@Yokchen
@Yokchen 5 лет назад
You save me life
@rachelmace7683
@rachelmace7683 6 лет назад
Thank you sooooo much
@daydreamer2315
@daydreamer2315 5 лет назад
simple. Thanks
@bianca83
@bianca83 6 месяцев назад
I still do not understand why he differentiated with respect to x for du/dy. It makes this whole thing less intuitive to follow.
@Samirkoful
@Samirkoful 6 лет назад
Thanks man!!!
@migzwrld909
@migzwrld909 2 года назад
thank you
@enriquesanzposse6197
@enriquesanzposse6197 9 лет назад
very useful, but from where did you got that cobb douglas equation, how do you calculate it?
@billyoung8118
@billyoung8118 8 лет назад
I'm sure it is far too late for you to get this answer now, but I wanted to respond. The Cobb-Douglas equation is a really big deal in advanced economics classes. Its form is: Y=A*Labor^(beta)*Capital^(alpha). In this case, they changed the formula a bit to become U=X^a*Y^b (with a and b being constants). It has a lot of uses, for instance to show how to continue to grow a business when efficiency really can't be improved (machines and workers can only work so fast). There are entire books written about that formula and entire programs of study in masters degrees devoted to it. It is really not possible to go into enough detail here, as this formula is really the mac-daddy of economics equations.
@richardhufnagle5438
@richardhufnagle5438 7 лет назад
how do you get the beta and alpha though still very confused on this equation.
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
@@billyoung8118 Sorry but CD first semester and has nothing to do with advanced stuff. Its just the geometric mean, or you ask for a function with substitution elasticity of 1
@quanvu2100
@quanvu2100 7 лет назад
thank you so much yes yes yes
@khayalamimahlalela7904
@khayalamimahlalela7904 4 года назад
Thanks man
@nikogg93
@nikogg93 5 лет назад
Not a Cobb-Douglas, exponents must add to 1
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 5 лет назад
The exponents do not need to sum to 1; each exponent only needs to be a positive constant.
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! utility is ordinal, therefore the exponents does not need to add up to 1!!! You Prof should have told you!
@oasisrocks
@oasisrocks 2 года назад
Need help. Why didn't we multiply everything with 4 at 4:06
@johniechronicles3297
@johniechronicles3297 3 года назад
Just saved a brother
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 3 года назад
That is great!
@jojazenande8852
@jojazenande8852 5 лет назад
i dont understand why did we have to multiply by 4 and the exponents are not equal to 1
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 5 лет назад
It's fine if the exponents do not sum to 1--the example is still in Cobb-Douglas format. I multiplied both sides by 4 to get rid of the 4 in the denominator on the right hand side of the equation; on the left hand side, 4 x 0.25 = 1.
@raihankhan4374
@raihankhan4374 6 лет назад
OMG THANK YOU WHY TF does the textbook have like 50 pages just to explain these simple steps. I hope this is right tho sounds to good to be true
@HiPh0Plover1
@HiPh0Plover1 7 лет назад
error @ 4:31 4* .25x-.75y.5= x.25 and 4y.5 not just y .5
@jpratt8676
@jpratt8676 7 лет назад
Happy Turtle The 4 is outside the fraction and it's implied that it is multiplying the whole thing but that is an astute observation
@oasisrocks
@oasisrocks 2 года назад
@@jpratt8676 but he never actually multiplies with the 4 on the left side. My question is why doesn't cross multiplying not work.
@edgarallanpoe8309
@edgarallanpoe8309 5 лет назад
thanks lad
@betitg8681
@betitg8681 Год назад
Tnxs🙏🙏
@SweetAlexMore
@SweetAlexMore 7 лет назад
Can anyone help here? What if im given an income (m = 20), and prices of both goods (px = py = 1), and told the slope of a nicely convex indifference curve at bundle (10, 10) = -2. How do I work out the utility function, or the budget, or work out the best bundle she can buy?
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
u=x^a*y^b m=p_x*x+p_y*y -> x*=[a/(a+b)]/p_x and x*=[b/(a+b)]/p_y this should have been told you in your first semester in microeconomics! Do not forget this!!!
@bonangmafokate9922
@bonangmafokate9922 8 лет назад
Thanks bra
@AlokJadva
@AlokJadva Год назад
So you don’t need a Lagrangean for this ?
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons Год назад
No, only if your instructor requires it.
@lucsolberg8466
@lucsolberg8466 5 лет назад
SAVIOR!
@ellykalchenko323
@ellykalchenko323 5 лет назад
i love you) thank you
@age.b46
@age.b46 2 года назад
please show me this solution U= -4Q2+80Q
@avinashkour9966
@avinashkour9966 5 лет назад
Gud explain sir .....👍thnx
@simonblay773
@simonblay773 5 лет назад
This solution looks a little confusing. COBB DOUGLAS WITH THE EXPONENTS NOT UP TO 1.
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 5 лет назад
There is no requirement for the exponents on a Cobb-Douglas function to sum to 1. The exponents only need to be positive.
@bernhardkoster3095
@bernhardkoster3095 2 года назад
do you know the difference between cardinality und ordinality look it up!
@joetom1023
@joetom1023 Год назад
Can i share a question and you do it for me
@impolitikful
@impolitikful 6 лет назад
I thought U = square of x*y ?
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 6 лет назад
A utility function can take on many different forms. U = square root of X*Y is just another example of a Cobb-Douglas utility function. The general Cobb-Douglas form can be written as U = (X^a)(Y^b).
@impolitikful
@impolitikful 6 лет назад
thanks
@thekayespace
@thekayespace 3 года назад
Hi! why is it -.75?
@EconomicsinManyLessons
@EconomicsinManyLessons 3 года назад
The exponent on the X variable after the derivative is X^(0.25 - 1), which simplifies to X^(-0.75)
@thekayespace
@thekayespace 3 года назад
Thank you. Also, this video really helps me. ❤️
Далее
Deriving Compensated (Hicksian) Demand Functions
13:22
Просмотров 164 тыс.
Cobb Douglas Production Function
10:50
Просмотров 292 тыс.
Cobb-Douglas Utility Function
9:54
Просмотров 39 тыс.
2. Preferences and Utility Functions
41:24
Просмотров 929 тыс.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Utility Maximizing Bundle
9:26
Просмотров 256 тыс.
lagrangians in economics: constrained optimization
10:17
MRS for Cobb Douglas Utility: The EASY WAY!!!
5:27
Просмотров 215 тыс.