There's one component that always gets missed in these comparisons: Vanguard ETFs do securities lending under the hood whereas providers others don't. Wish channels like this made that more visible to beginners and novices. The fees make little effect with securities lending enhancing return.
Didn’t mention size of the etf? I believe they only work if they get to a certain size and a smaller etf can go bust. There is some security in the scale of the larger ones which is a factor if you want to leave your investment there for decades. If an eft goes under you have to declare capital gains as you cash out your holdings. Same goes if you want to swap etfs. Plus the larger ones trade with higher volumes and tighter buy and sell spreads. Also the largest etfs tend to have greater market power to reduce fees over time. If one dominates and can lower fees to next to zero, this will snowball and create a monster, perhaps driving the other similar etfs out of the market altogether. Are they really all the same and all going to be relevant in 30 years?
It's good to remember that the past is not the future. While the ASX was a top performer in the 20th Century, it doesn't mean will it will continue remain so in the 21st. Since 2010, the ASX performance has been half that of the S&P500.
