Vincent Bugliosi: Why Did Oswald Assassinate JFK? 

@Sports Guru The mob is the second patsy.

@Sports Guru The stupidity of the Conspiracy nuts, I bet you voted for TRUMP!!

Watch The Trial of Oswald. It's all out there for anyone to see. Nothing odd about it.

@@dks13827 is that trial suposed to be definative?

@@larryhall7998 Boy, you sure are compassionate, tolerant, and open minded... Do you just hurl that at everyone you disagree with?

Yes, the question as stated in the title was "why did Oswald assassinate JFK?" and at the end of the video he says we'll never know the answer to that question. So the title is BS and watching the video is a waste of viewers time

And what better way to quell the conspiracy beast and stop the propulsion than by putting a video up about Oswald's alleged motive and then just saying "Eh, guess we'll never know lmfao."

Good on Bug for admitting that.

@@doctorratinho imagine getting fucked up over a title. You must care way too much about how titles should be worded or something. You could've easily just gone about your day, but no, you got mad over a fucking youtube title that you probably wont ever see again. Great work, bud

What he’s saying is we can’t know the motive unless spoken by the guilty party, and even then they have to be credible which Oswald was not. He’s clearly saying that based upon the evidence, the killing of JFK was motivated by the killing of the ultimate representative for the Capitalist system. He argues this by pointing to Oswald’s behaviours and words.

Because I didn't do it.....Bugliosi is a documented liar....see works of Lisa Pease and Jim D'Eugenio

@@justinblackface6969 😆

He was total failute, at the highest moment of his life he didn't take the credit!

jrizzle drizzle, ... I don't see why you think that's odd and problematic. LHO never went to trial. He was never in front of the camera that much and that long. Maybe he thought he could beat the rap and wanted to give himself a chance to beat the charges in court. He was in police custody for only a total of 36 hours before he was gunned down by Ruby in the basement of The Dallas Police Department. A day and a half! That's nothing. O. J. Simpson, to this day, still maintains his innocence.

@@Bamruff62 I see your point

So who specifically shot Kennedy and with what weapon? Mob, Government, CIA, LBJ, Secret Service, Police are groups not people. I want a name and weapon and evidence. Ex: LHO shot JFK with manlicher Carcano rifle from the sixth floor window of the TSBD building. Witnesses saw him as he was shooting and his fingerprints were found on the weapon.

Yeah Calm is suspicious because Everyone else was not. They just watched the president's head explode. That's why the witness remembered that.

@@JH-qy8no Lucien Sarti, Howard Hunt.

Well said, reclaiming the trashcan

The stupidity of the Conspiracy nuts, I bet you voted for TRUMP!!

tom p maybe he denied it because he knew it would cause what it has caused. Mis-trust with government, a bunch of ideas of what really happened, no definitive answer , conspiracy theories, and people talking about it for years and years. If he admitted his guilt, the story would have lost interest quickly

Unless he wanted to do it and get away with it. How much greater that would be in O's mind... The act, not the credit, say. Or to be found not guilty like OJ, and then confess once double jeopardy barred retrial. OJ could confess to killing Nicole today and not be tried criminally for murder, for example.

LHO's denial of guilt, and the emotion with which he denied guilt, do indeed flatly refute the BS claim that LHO did it because he wanted to become famous. Such individuals not only do *not* deny their guilt; they proudly declare it to all who will listen. And neither would such a person take a chance of botching his opportunity by not taking his shot at the President when the limo was slowing down to a near stop, coming straight at him, on Houston, before it turned onto Elm Street and started accelerating away from him with tree limbs obstructing his view. But the fact that absolutely disproves the notion that LHO had any kind of motive to kill JFK was the fact that he was a Communist (ideals) _sympathizer_ . JFK did not have a reputation in Dallas of being an anti-Communist hero, who had a habit of threatening war with the USSR. In fact, it was precisely the opposite, and LHO was very knowledgeable student of politics. If he was a Commie-symp who wanted to go down in history as a noble assassin, then he would have killed some nationally known politician who was heartily embraced by the John Birch Society. Not Kennedy, whom the JBS viewed as "Wanted For Treason" for not invading Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis. _Nothing_ that we know about Oswald supports the utterly irrational claim that he had any motive to kill Kennedy. He was completely innocent of the crime.

You would have to be brain dead to fall for Bugliosi's crap.

Vern, yours is the weakest argument form known to logic. Only someone "braindead" would use it to avoid supporting his own claims. Gosh! You make refutation easy.

You are a genius, I guess!

Were there many Communists in the ranks of the Marine corps, then or now?

@@rustyshackelford9156 well this is an opinion but I suspect there would not be

That he has a crush on Kamala Harris.

AND A DUMB ONE AT THAT

The truth!...and he does just that!

That does seem to fit Bug doesn't it? Maybe he's projecting.

His interrogation summations are in the warren commission report. Educate yourself

@@johncooper7663 Are you serious?! "summations"...I want to hear the unedited audio...not what someone summed up...especially not from the W.C.

@@DrLongBear There was no audio. That’s why. The only audio is the press conference. As if Oswald was set up they would have a press conference. You people 🙄

@@johncooper7663 I logged in with a different email...sorry for any confusion. The statement was sardonic, i.e., mocking or cynical, sarcastic, to make myself clear...I know there was no audio. WHY? I cannot think of a single time when law enforcement doesn't record interviews contemporaneously...either in stenographic fashion, or be video, or by recorder, but Dallas P.D. claimed not to have a audio recorder...which only a buffoon would believe...and there were plenty of reporters hanging around outside who had recorders on them...Oswald was interviewed for hours and not one single cop had a clue to go out and get what they said they did not have...ask a reporter...I am betting if one were asked he or she would have wet him or herself with the excitement of playing a role in the crime of the century by providing the recorder that was used to interrogate the "alleged assassin of the president"...and where do you get off with the "you people" statement?! You have a lot of nerve and appear to be a keyboard cowboy, taking shots at people who in my case, will certainly fire back with facts and reasoning and logic...is that too tough for you buddy? If so, get your facts right, and do not assume someone, anyone, knows less than you know...frankly, I hear sarcasm in the very RU-vid handle you proudly use...so, you acquaint, or equal yourself to and with D.B. Cooper, do you?! If so, you best grab a parachute...you are going to need one at this rate. Have a quiet evening. and a blessed holiday season.

Oswald owned that rifle, the bullets all came from it, why was Oswald the only depository worker to flee the assassination scene? only to pop up in a cinema, with a dead cop in his trail. All investigations point towards Oswald.

@@steaks652 And he was a marxist, people who are anti-police. It sounds impossible for him to be a patsy.

@Ricky Bowen that's the same point i've been arguing too

All the evidence points to Oswald there is zero evidence of conspiracy or another gunman and that's just the fact of life that you cannot accept

Are you talking about a position he allegedly took during a speaking event at a university in 1975? I mean, not nearly the amount of work he put into researching, writing, and speaking on JFK

@@AirmanRugby6 Helter Skelter......

@@kristofftaylovoski60 What about Helter Skelter? Again, he actually worked on that case and delved deep into the evidence.

@@AirmanRugby6Till Death Us Do Part?? any other books I should be reading??

@@kristofftaylovoski60 Bret Hart’s “Hitman: My Real Life in the Cartoon World of Wrestling”

The shooters were probably dead before sundown that same day. They couldn't afford to have them running around knowing what they knew. As for the intellectual authors, some of them may still be alive. But the important thing is not the actual people, but the powerful hidden or double-faced institutions that planned it. This was clearly an inside job if ever there was one.

Warren Commission Exhibit 24 Vol 16, Pg 94-105

*diary, not “direy!” Now I know why it took you sooooo long too find out about his diary!

Possible

You are being a wussy boy!..Vince took some hard-earned delight, in lampooning some of the pro-conspiracy crowd--using factual information that cannot be denied! He had every right to do so...and if you actually believe that he did not introduce "anything of substance", then YOU are terribly sad!

Those were Ruby's own words!

Donnelly Thomas yea but ruby had lot more to say but wouldn't talk unless they moved him. They refused...therefore we will never know

according to Ruby's sister Eva (whom he visited many times that Friday and Saturday) he was unconsolable about JFK and worried about Jackie and their kids. He had a very impulsive, emotional, violent streak and a wanna-be like LHO. No conspiracy theory involving Ruby can explain why he slept through Oswald's announced transfer time of 10am Sunday morning. Had LHO been moved then Ruby would have missed him. It was only luck that the a postal worker came in to verify LHO postal box and add to the questioning of LHO that his transfer was delayed. Ruby wandered over to the police station after wiring money at the Western Union at 11:17am, just 90 seconds before the transfer. That's not a very good conspiracy by the plotters. Ruby also took his favorite dog to the Western Union and left him in the car. Would a person planning to kill LHO do this? Very, very unlikely. But the sleeping in past the transfer shows it was not planned. It was spur of the moment.

Ruby was a piece of Mobbed Up Garbage who was neck deep in the Assassination!

ZION orders

Yes Magic Bullets,neurospasms,jet effects now sound so reasonable! Tons of mysterious deaths,but hey The Govt. is always right in this case. and every suspicious thing is just coincidence...according to this cretin.

@@vernpascal1531 oh vern, you have been proven ignorant so many times yet you keep on chirping. ...get a life

@@johncooper7663 Agreed .Vern is a major wind bag .

@@barryirvin2417 it's like talking to a rock. He is too far gone

@@johncooper7663 I've got you in my sights

he said he was in tyler tx, bull////.

I believe it was George H.W. Bush, W's father who said that..

Because 3 later to be Presidents had their finger prints all over this conspiracy .Bush who was in Dallas that day ,Nixon who was their and later gave 2 different accounts of where he was ,and Ford who helped cover it up. As part of Earl Warrens cover up.

It was the elder dude...man, people in this comment section are bone-heads!

A report you've never read.

I think he was playing a game with the cops, and to a certain extent the press. In the footage that exists of him, he comes off as very smug. But again, there's no way of knowing for sure.

Because in the end, he was just a cop killer.

@@superchitownhustler a patsy

You just destroyed this guy's argument, nicely done

Yeah that doesn't make sense

Jon you are right on...two oswalds yep. Roger craig saw one get into rambler....the other guy[name escapes me]who gave him a ride that morning saw him headed out on Elm street. Talk about a Nightmare on Elm. Love Armstrong's work.

You sir, are a mis-informed fool.

No. Only one person claimed that he saw Oswald get into a Rambler station wagon, in front of the grassy knoll, 15-20 minutes after the shooting, by which stage people had calmed down and were searching the knoll. And his name is Robert Craig. He didn’t come out with this claim until a long time later, and made other dubious claims. Ergo: It’s a joke claim with no credibility. Either Craig is imagining things or he made it up for money.

@fobrien1. I saw that episode of Conspiracy Theory and Jesse Ventura OWNED Mr. Bugliosi! I later saw Bugliosi on a show called Hardball and he was debating with the guy who wrote The Devil's Chessboard and Bugliosi kept disappearing every time they went to commercial! He just can't stand the truth.

Cct .Not true he did talk about the case with Ventura which side was you on?

It's amazing how you continue to throw out your lies about Bugloshi cant pull the eyes over this guy.Cleaning of the limo nope.

We know what questions Will Fritz asked Oswald and Iswakd did say he eat lunch with 2 colored boys.

You say Buglioshi appeared on a panel accusing Lane as impersonating Will Fritz I eff ould like to see some documentation of that dont think it's TRUE. Buglisho says in his book he debated Lane 3 times guess was not recorded he says ince he was attempting to show what a fraud Lanes representation of the call with Markham was that Lane threatned to sue.You do know Lane refused to turn over this recording to the WC only when assured they would not prosecute him for he would release it .It was embarrassing how he lead Markham a lady with an eight grade education.It is true that Mark Lane introduced himself to Markham as such .But we really dint know what he said to her before the tape started do we ? If Buglisho actually said that hou can bet your ass he had good reason.

The only person Lee's punk ass conspired with was his own reflection in the mirror. Ditto with Ruby. Conspiracy kooks can't handle the simplicity of it all.

So simple, how Oswald changed the parade route, ordered military units to stand down, made the driver slow the limo down to less than 10 mph, fired the luckiest shots in rifle history, escaped the building without anyone noticing, shoots a police officer despite being that close to not getting caught for committing the greatest murder of the twentieth century, ran into the theater without paying so he could get busted for that, and still have the composure to call himself a patsy. So simple, how Ruby decided he wasn't about that mob life anymore, that he'd rather take revenge on Kennedy's alleged killer so Jackie wouldn't have to see him at a trial, turned the majority of the Dallas PD into a bunch of bumbling idiots, shot Oswald without an ounce of resistance from any of the 20 or so police officers in the room, and then while in jail confessed that he's apart of a larger conspiracy before dying mysteriously. So simple. Your government figured it all out for you. Go back to sleep, America.

LOL!

@@harbingerofsalt The stupidity of the Conspiracy nuts, I bet you voted for TRUMP!!

@@dme1016 Believers in the official BS can't handle the fact that their government screwed them good and proper. For one, if JFK hadn't been murdered, 54,000 US servicemen would not have died in Vietnam. That alone speaks volumes. How's that for simplicity? In fact, it's so simple, the CIA is still holding thousands of files that can't be revealed 60 years on.

This is somewhat a summation I've gotten, although he may have been going to meet up with Alpha66 members at a safe house just off the transfer bus route. O would have then had a place to belong, Cuba, since Russia didn't want him.

GR LOW ....IT IS APPARENT THAT YOU HAVE NOT DONE YOUR HOMEWORK

Oswald was a fake communist. He ran guns and trained anti-Castro Cuban nationalists. Oswald was working closely with Banister and Ferrie, who were virulent anti-communists.

Are you serious?

I agree that Oswald killed JFK. However, according to the Dallas Police report, Oswald had $13 in his pocket which was not nearly enough to get him to the border.

And... it didn't take place in California.

he also said he didn't have to come up with one, but he did. He's also not saying that's what his motive was, he's purely speculating

yes

Too shut him up , he would have spilled the beans about all the people he was connected to , his handlers in the CIA , and all the military connections, ruby , tippet the lot , that’s why he was eliminated by Jack Ruby with the help of a small percentage of the DPD .

No!..Try reading Vince's large section of his book, dealing with every aspect of Jack Rudy's life and times. You are being intellectually lazy.

A poor marksman in the marines is still far better than your average joe. Mind you he actually shot 4 times, the first one was as kennedy turned onto Elm St, which struck a lightpole and then hit the concrete. Then the 3 other shots are history

@@catalinadog157 hitting a standing object is hard, let alone a moving one. Still that doesn't explain the head going back n to the left.

@@webtheweb again, he was in the marines, definitely not deployed but learned how to shoot moving targets at the bare minimum. It’s extremely hard, I’ll agree with you on that. It could’ve just been luck for that moving target, who knows. What I personally think that movement could be is just a muscle or involuntary thing, rather than another shot from somewhere. I’m not eliminating the chance of a second shooter, it’s fairly possible, but personally, I will most likely think Oswald did it

@@catalinadog157 explain to yourself the head going back and to the left in the zapruder film

@@webtheweb like i said in the previous comment, the backwards motion could possibly be an involuntary muscle spazam thing--or something like that lmao, like a knee-jerk reaction--and the left could easily be it slumping over, bodies just do that

Why do you believe the third shot was a hollow point?

@@9Ballr Hollow point or Mercury filled projectile tip...because it exploded.

@@DrLongBear If the third shot was a hollow point bullet, which shot left the large bullet fragments found in the limo that were traced to Oswald's rifle?

@@9Ballr There were many more fragments and actual projectiles then has been made known to the public. I have over 112 Gigabytes of Printed, audio and video materials on the JFK Assassination...the beginning of any research must start with empty assumptions...instead of conclusions tayloring the evidence, evidences must produce the conclusions if we are to be correct with our results. We are told it was one guy with three bullets and no one else was involved...no one...ponder the thought...could there have been more? Perish the thought...really?! I am sharing some proveable facts with you, from some excellent sources...I have sited them all for you...some links are lengthy but well worth any effort. Good Luck! This is the story of a bullet - a spent, misshapen, but otherwise intact, bullet - that a Navy doctor said was found late at night, on the floor, in the back of John Kennedy’s limousine. No one seems to want to acknowledge it. Today, a majority of Americans assume the government lied about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. New evidence seems to prove they are right. Here is the story of the bullet - a spent, misshapen, but otherwise intact, bullet - that James Young, a Navy doctor, said was found late at night, on the floor, in the back of Kennedy’s limousine. He inspected it himself. The bullet was found by two chief petty officers who, during the autopsy, were sent to retrieve any skull fragments they could find in the limousine. They came back with three pieces of bone, and the bullet. The skull fragments were reported - but not the bullet. Years later, when reviewing a memoir he wrote in 1963, Young thought about that bullet, and tried to find some mention of it in the Warren Commission Hearings. To his dismay, he found nothing. In 2000, he wrote to President Gerald Ford to ask him about it. After all, Ford had been on the Warren Commission. But Ford said he knew nothing about it either. In 2001, two Navy historians interviewed Young who gave them a highly detailed account of the events of November 22, 1963, some of which he witnessed personally. And he mentioned the bullet. Recently, Dr. Randy Robertson, a board member of the Assassination Archives and Research Center (AARC) came upon Young’s papers at a Navy website. This was an exciting discovery. To understand the significance of this discovery, readers need to know that - according to the official record - only one whole bullet was recovered, the “magic bullet” found on Governor John Connally’s stretcher. And, agents found inside the limousine what is presumed to be two parts of one broken bullet. Numerous very small lead fragments were also found in the limousine, Connally’s wrist, and Kennedy’s brain. If close inspection of the bullet allegedly found in the back of the limousine were to show that it was not fired from Lee Harvey Oswald’s rifle, this would prove to be a threat to the official narrative of a lone assassin. Here, Robertson describes in an email how he came upon this apparently suppressed evidence: “I was surfing the internet and somehow stumbled upon the Navy Live website. I found the What Price A Rose piece [the memoir] and found it intriguing because although I had heard of Young I never knew he attended the autopsy…” Robertson is referring to excerpts of the memoir - none of which included the part about the bullet. But he delved further: “After that I found the earlier piece Navy Medicine and the Kennedy Assassination which contained the dynamite about the bullet… “After that it was detective work. I FOIA’ed the transcripts and received them and found out the actions Young had taken to find out what had happened to the bullet he had seen and corroborate what he had told the Navy interviewers. That led me to the Ford Library and the wonderful letter.” Robertson remains cautious about this discovery since only one witness corroborates Young’s claims - the petty officer who found the bullet. Below you will find Ford’s bewildering response. For the convenience of the reader, I have retyped vital parts of Young’s letter to Ford, and Ford’s response. Letter From James Young to Gerald Ford (Excerpted) Dear President Ford, I was active-duty Navy and assigned to the White House as White House Physician in 1963, when President Kennedy was assassinated… Knowing that you were on the Warren Commission at that time, I am writing to you confidentially, to see if you have any knowledge about an issue which has puzzled me for years… My particular problem is a description of what occurred at the autopsy. During the autopsy examination, Dr. Jim Humes, then the Chief of Pathology at Bethesda Naval Hospital, and two other pathologists stated that some pieces of President Kennedy’s skull bones were missing. In order to reconstruct the President’s head for burial, Dr. Humes wanted to find those pieces which were missing. Dr. Burkley and I requested two of our corpsmen who were assigned to our White House medical unit, to go to the Executive Office Building where the Secret Service had placed the “Queen Mary,” [sic] the open convertible in which President Kennedy had been shot, for bone fragments. Two of the corpsmen left and returned sometime later with three varying sized pieces of President Kennedy’s skull bones. In addition, they brought back in an envelope a spent misshapen bullet which they had found on the back floor of the “Queen Mary”[sic] where they had found the pieces of skull bones. The bullet and pieces of skull were given to Dr. Jim Humes. I have never seen anything written about that spent bullet in the Warren Report or elsewhere. Do you recall any testimony or comments which would clarify my concerns? Ford’s reply was typical government B.S. Projectiles and fragments were found all over. Here’s one source you may want to review…it will ask you to prove you are human…but that should be no problem...right? www.mathewsopenaccess.com/full-text/real-time-and-in-situ-measurement-of-rifling-angles-with-a-hand-held-digital-device-a-technical-implication-to-the-jfk-assassination-case In another instance, one witness saw a bullet strike the edge of a manhole cover and bury itself into the grass on Elm…he informed law enforcement and a search was conducted…one man in a suit, referred to as “agent,” was seen examining the grass area where the witness said he saw the bullet bury itself. When the “agent” stood up his hand was cupped and he placed the cupped hand in his pocket…in truth, we don’t know whether a bullet or bullet fragment was picked up…there was no report of the investigation, nor of any findings…however, the witness insisted he saw what he saw…it was ignored by everybody but those who tend to want to look more closely at anything their government tells them. And…finally, please review this site: www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1978/12/22/experts-track-mystery-jfk-bullet/8fd930bf-a0ab-4c07-8a26-d5cc3993239b/

Dude,your CT is way too long to explore credence…

Oswald's love for Castro caused him to shoot Kennedy? Lol

BINGO!!!

@@rustyshackelford9156 quite possibly, and it's not necessarlily his only motive. But murderers don't need rational motives either. What was Hinkley's motive for shooting Reagan, why did Squeeky From shoot Ford, why did the Vegas sniper shoot people? Many of these ex-marines like the Vegas shooter and LHO had screws loose or had horrible lives, either before entering the marines, or after being traumatized in combat and being discharged. He wanted and tried to shoot Walker, got rejected by Marina on the evening of Nov 22, and was frustrated by everything in his life. He would have eventually shot someone.

I think it’s the Marxist dilemma in politics, which is that nobody is the perfect politician and therefore they’re expendable. How do the BLM and ANTIFA crowds react to the u er liberal mayors of Seattle, Portland, Chicago, and New York? They fucking hate them, and even attack them when they kowtow. I think Oswald, as a Marxist, would get a genuine kick out of people that idolize JFK defending him. This is a guy that killed a cop, then punched another cop before pulling out his gun during an arrest…then claimed police brutality leaving the theatre. I mean, consider the Roe v. Wade protest where buddy tries to ignite officers, light them on fire, and while he’s arrested the witnesses of that act yell for him to be released and shout police brutality. The Marxists are inherently self destructive. BLM is a great example of this, and the motivated reasoning used to defend blatant criminals is similar to that used to defend Oswald. The conspiracy theorists only have innuendo, baseless allegations, and emotional appeals.

Oswald was a fake communist. He ran guns and trained anti-Castro Cuban nationalists. Oswald was working closely with Banister and Ferrie, who were virulent anti-communists.

The paraffin test run by the DPD came out negative. Oswald did not fire a gun that day. He was just the fall guy.

@@piscesman54 If you check the real test,it shows he did when tested,again,that damn movie,plus the trajectory can only come from that window…

@@piscesman54 are you sure?

@@shanet5604 That was simply an impossible shot. Nobody was able to ever replicate it, let alone go through muscle and bone tissue of two different people and the seat of a car. That is the most boldfaced fraud ever to have been foisted upon the American people. In the rest of the world, almost nobody believes it.

Is it possible, yes and likely. Governor Connally said he heard a shot turned to look then turning back around was hit (did not hear that shot) and heard the 3rd shot. The shots occurred in too rapid of succession to be one shooter.

Lol what?

He said he didn't shoot anyone and didn't own that rifle.

yeah because that is not what any other criminal would say...

Most of criminals say they didn´t do it.

You are taking his statement out of context.

Bug is a prosecutor, his real beliefs can be set aside.

It appears not exactly aimlessly. Speculation is he would go to meet Alpha66 members at a house just off a (transfer) bus route. Then would have gained acceptance of the group and continued to Cuba. This way he gets out of the US (again).

hilarious

The sincere words of a Dedicated Troll! You guys are so obvious now that it's Puke-able!!

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary Keep trolling a conspiracy in the Kennedy case. You've had 57+ years of dismal failure. Need another half-century or two?

Pure BS on your part.

Read the book and don't be lazy.

prove he didn't

Mustang Power Thats not really how things work, Oswald has to be proven to have done it, Colin thinks the evidence isnt there

Then Colin should be more specific.

@@joejones5653 right lmao thats my problem with these conspiracy theorist idiots. the second you ask for proof they have none but they are so quick to shut down claims with actual evidence.

Yep.

Your comment is correct but it highlights something else, Bugliosi talks like a typical lying lawyer, not someone who is interested in the facts. He is trying to marginalise anyone who does not swallow the lies they are fed by the government. My god does anyone believe the government any more?

Garbage time!

Agree!

@realexcuse - hahahahahahahaha

Oswald's stage to get his message out would have been the trial. He would have basked in the spotlight and tried to put the government on trial.

Oswald was a marxist, JFK was a conservative, clearly the motive was political

@@stevenkeller452 Oswald was posing as a marxist. It was part of the plot. But they backstabbed him. He realized after the shooting he had been framed as the fall guy.

@Kristoff Taylovoski. LOL! I think you're being sarcastic?

I would hope he is zandor . as markham has been proven to be at best very unreliable .

@fobrien1. Oh yes, I know all about Markham. She was a kook.

New punctuation for sarcasm --> ¡ and ¿

John A. Yes ur right. It was the Easter bunny🙃😜😼😳😀😂😅

Your brain went dead a long time ago.

No, he did not. Oswald was a patsy, just like he managed to say before he was killed and gotten out of the way of the public finding out the truth. It's a deep and twisted scenario, as well as the murders of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy.

Who do you think was involved besides Oswald

@@morganbanefort181 The Cuban/Soviet governments. I believe he was the lone shooter. That’s not the extent of the conspiracy.

@@morganbanefort181 According to the conspiracy theorists, VP Johnson and his wife, Governor Connelly and his wife, the Secret Service, the FBI, the Mafia, the CIA, the Federal Reserve, the Teamsters Union, the Dallas County Sheriff's Department, the Dallas police department, the Cubans, the Russians, everyone on the Warren Commission, everyone in Dealey Plaza, anyone who knew anyone who knew Oswald.

@Lil & Em: Yes, you go ahead and ignore the vast preponderance of evidence which points to Oswald and to no other person or group. Ignore it at the peril of your own ignorance.

@@stddisclaimer8020 Science now proves he didn't do it. Ignore it at your own peril and believe the well documented cover up was all incompetence

@@tetheredsystems Your kind of "Science" can easily prove that even the Easter Bunny is real. Of course those who insist that the Bunny is a fantasy are part of a vast, sinister coverup. Yeah, that's the ticket. You're delusional and paranoid, and you know nothing about the Kennedy case.

@@stddisclaimer8020 You mean the kind of science where autopsy doctors physically measure a hole in the back of the head at the EOP, only to have it migrate 4 inches higher years later? That takes some believing in breathtaking incompetence

Because he is a patriot, and wants the people to hear the actual truth of the murder...You are the disgrace!

Whether you believe Files or not.. Oswald never fired a shot..

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary James Files, Malcolm Wallace, Christian David, Lucien Sarti, Charles "Chuckie the Typewriter" Nicoletti, Guy Bannister, David Ferrie, William Greer, George Hickey, E. Howard Hunt and Roscoe White -never fired any shots that day, but Oswald fired three of them, two hitting the mark.

@@apointofinterest8574 And then you woke up...

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary Nah, idiots like that never wake up. They'll believe the official BS until their dying day.

@@apointofinterest8574 Get real !

So are you saying there was more to it than just Sirhan Sirhan? Who was the infamous lady in the polka dot dress? Is there much controversy surrounding RFK's death?

@@pentameteriamb6196 "Is there much controversy surrounding RFK's death?" That is a loaded question, pun intended. Just for starters: Sirhan's revolver held a maximum load of 8 bullets.......however an audio recording of the shooting reveals 13 or so shots fired. Eye and ear witness: Donald Schulman, then an employee of CBS News, told the police that he had seen one of the security guards present also fire his weapon.

Thomas Noguchi performed what has been deemed the most perfect autopsy in American history due to the attention to detail and multiple expert observers present. Present at the autopsy were Dr. Noguchi, Neurosurgical Team, Hospital Staff Pathologist, and consultants from the Armed Forces institute of Pathology as well as Forensic and medical photographers. The Coroner concluded the following: The Senator was shot at 4 times from behind his body. One shot missed him and passed through his jacket shoulder Three shots hit RFK. The Senator was shot at 4 times from behind his body. Wound #1 “The fatal shot”: Direction from Right to Left, slightly to front and upwards. No exit. Entered behind right ear. The bullet was recovered in fragments only and could not be matched due to fragmentation. Wound #2: “Through and Through” of right shoulder, with no deflection within the body - it went in a clean line from entering the back, exiting the front. The direction was Right to Left, back to front and upward. The bullet was not recovered. There were gun powder granules on the dermis. Wound #3: The “neck bullet”. This bullet entered Just below Wound #2 entry, entering near the shoulder blade (scapula). A“ deformed” .22 caliber bullet was recovered at the 6th Cervical vertebra (neck/spine). Direction Right to Left, back to front and upward. The bullet is marked TN31 by Coroner Noguchi. . Powder residue was found with heat and blast effects visible Every single witness to Sirhan shooting in the pantry placed the muzzle of the gun, in Sirhan’s outstretched arm, no closer than 1.5 feet in front of RFK. Coroner Thomas Noguchi has consistently stated publicly that he did not determine that Sirhan Sirhan shot Senator Kennedy. During Grand Jury testimony he testified that his preliminary estimate was the muzzle of the gun was only 1-3 inches from RFK. Later he confirmed this with tests. (Coroner's Report p. 40). After the Grand Jury testimony, the District Attorney rushed up to Noguchi and asked if he meant“ feet”, not “inches”. Noguchi answered “My goodness, it’s an inch, not feet, because of the black powder behind the ear.”[1] The fact that District Attorney John Miner asked this of Noguchi on the day of the Grand Jury hearing indicates he knew there was a serious discrepancy between what the witnesses were saying about where Sirhan was positioned and the scientific findings of the Coroner. [1] Pease, Lisa A Lie to Big to Fail, The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, 2018 Feral House at p.69, citing Moldea, Dan The Killing of Robert Kennedy, 1995 WW Norton & Company 2006 edition, at p. 92

@@mmagic3534 good lord not yet another loony conspiracy theory

@@chestrockwell6807 "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

@Bryan Mack I dont care about your opinion. I want to see proof so it is an irrelevant question. No Carcano bullet has ever gone through bones, flesh and cloth and emerge pristine UNLESS it was shot into water, into softwood like pine or into cotton. If you think otherwise please furnish the proof. All the tested bullets mushroomed.

@Bryan Mack It was a doctored bullet placed on the stretcher at Parkland Hospital. It was never at Dealey Plaza.

If you are dishonest enough to accept magic Bullets and a mountain of other germane evidence.

We will never know the answer to that question because he didn't do it.

You are yelling fire....but there is none

Donald Duck and the CIA did it.

@Lil & Em "Unfortunately" for you two, the acoustical evidence of which you speak was itself "disproved" by the NRC (National Research Council) in 1982. The impulses that the acoustic scientists thought were gunshots were in reality not. The open microphone which supposedly picked up the shots was not even near Dealey Plaza, and the supposed “shots” actually happened about a minute after the actual shooting.

@@stddisclaimer8020 You have no idea what you're talking about. The study was redone and proven that Dallas police overdubbed another recording over the shots

​@@tetheredsystems Are you in the habit of asserting things you can't prove because they never happened? The so-called 4th shot audio evidence is garbage, debunked by the NRC.

@@stddisclaimer8020 You are obviously unfamiliar with any new studies on the topic. You also obviously have no interest either

@@stddisclaimer8020 Unlike this user, you were alive in 1963 and it shows by the amount of brainwashing you've endured. It also shows that you bury your near-empty head in nothing but government-approved materials, and believe all that you read like a submissive little sheep. You've nothing meaningful to say; your comments only recycle old canards, long debunked and dismissed. That's why you're MUTED. Post back and your comment won't even be seen much less read by this user. You'll be talking to yourself, which will seem to you a very familiar activity.

It certainly was NOT proven that he did, in a court, beyond all reasonable doubt

@@Autshot20 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5vuyi_dbpEQ.html

this should clear a lot of things up

@@Autshot20 if you look at the direction of the bullet that hit jfk it came from the opposite direction from where the bullet came from

There is more to it than that. Why would Oswald completely deny it when he was caught? Also jack ruby was in the mafia and he said to a police officer “I’m here to see the fireworks” or something along the lines of that, just minutes before Kennedy was killed. There’s something that they are lying about.

Yeah, that's why Oswald denied that he killed JFK and Tippet.. Because he wanted to be Famous for Denying the Murder of the President and a Police Officer!! Sounds stupid enough..

@@genericchannel5217 Just read a whole chapter on Jack Ruby he was not in the mafia. I will tell you what Ruby was he was a hustler.Read his.brothers WC testimony as I just did if you think he was in the mafia.As far as Oswald is concerned his defense mechanism set in.He wanted to feast in the glory fir a while hence the one fisted salute.Its so damn obvious every law enforcement official in Dalkas knew it why dont you?

@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary What sounds stupid is your explanation.When Oswald got caught his defense mechanism set in.He surely did not want to die it was a 100 percent certainty that his sentence would have been death.Plus he wanted to bast in the glory hence the one fisted defiant salute.Its so damn obvious. Every law enforcement office in Dallas knew Oswald was quilty within 24 hrs why dont you?

@@randyharris3175 No, they did not know. They just pinned it on him because they were already looking very incompetent in their failure to protect the president.

Why did he shoot and kill an officer, and then punch another officer while pulling out his gun during the arrest…then claim police brutality after being arrested and led out of the theatre. He was an insane Marxist. Look at the criminalistic maniacs of the BLM riots, hell just recently at the Roe v Wade protests a man tried to light officers on fire and the protesters tried to get officers to not arrest him claiming police brutality. You’re applying rational thought to irrational beings.

@@davis7099 If you actually believe that Garbage that you just spewed out, I got some Gold Bars made out of Mud that I wanna sell you!!

That has been dealt with in his book...God, you people are so uninformed on many aspects of this case!

Yeah, I've gotten away with stuff I should not have... the other day I used a laundromat dryer and thought of cleaning the lint filter after, but said "screw it" and walked out.

bugliosi was a professional liar

Do a little research into bugliosi's past. He definitely had some psych issues.

Are you also on gov pay? Spouting out the same idiotic comment over and over again?

You heard wrong!