Waldorf M - Part II (no talking) 

Thank you Anthony.

@@Rareos no, thank you !!! 🍰😃

Rareo simply fantastic You use synth with freeedom, love it Thx for post!

it is very beautiful.

I agree, this is pure sound design and musical application gold.

Glad you two like it.

You didn't like the Iridium or Quantum?

@@Rightly_Divided Interface seem very capable but you can do pretty much on it as you can on Pigments. I have to say- I hate their sound.

@@MikolaiStroinski well I can respect that

???? What about the Microwave I, Microwave II, Microwave XT????

Agreed! ..and I love the layout of this the more I use it. World’s different from the Quantum as well, I have an Iridium and apart from the form factor it’s like they come from two different manufacturers

absolutely, although that preset he made though i did not do it justice in the video... it's soooo nice. Thanks again Vlad.

Thanks Bowen, definitely will be working some of these recording into tracks.

Not that much tweaking i guess, seems there is magic whichever way you turn, and i think it's in the oscillators, they are so textural and robust and quite some consonance with the filters, as in there is lots of agreement between them and the osc, combined with that aliasing, at times crunchy quality the tone can be really captivating. I haven't even started using it with effects or other processing, external filters, etc... but i think that's going to be special. As for modulation, I thought i wouldn't love it, as I have synths with the matrix or mod matrix pages and am into that, but I'm finding this method to be simple, quite fast actually, easy to get used to. I guess it's because the big encoder in the middle feels good, turns nicely to quickly move pages and is near to the menu sub-menu buttons so the experience feels pretty intuitive. I'm enjoying it more and more every time i sit down with it.

I did end up getting one, and I was not disappointed. My only complaint is that it took me a while to remember the abbreviations for some of the modulations, but it’s mostly very intuitive or easy to learn.

Hey Antoine, thanks. These all started from presets which were tweaked, some of them more than others. Also many are just the same preset tweaked even more to make a different sound.

@@Rareos That’s brilliant, it sounds magnificent.

I am not aware of a desktop synth that has a hold feature. Because it's related to the MIDI data. You need a sequencer or a MIDI keyboard. So, it's up to them. For you might be interesting that the envelopes can have very long release times for super slowly decaying notes.

the arp has a "hold" parameter, but you have to set the time very slow, but fast enough that it actually plays

There is no effects section at all.

Hard to say, I think it depends on taste as they would all fit. M can do some really interesting soundscapes and textures as well as very slow and long modulations, however of course Iridium can as well. I have finding M layers with other synths in a very nice way, Its lovely with the summit. But If I really had to choose only one I’d go with Iridium. I write that as an Iridium and M owner.

@@Rareos Thank you for your thoughts. PS - I very much enjoyed Parts I and II as musical performances!

@@Rareos would you choose the iridium over the M because of the many different options? You make the M sound so good I’m leaning toward the M.

Unfortunately i saved nothing, but trying to develop that habit now ;) Thanks though!

A lot of them in the video were based on tweaking factory patches, so don't worry.

@@vladimirsalnikov5806 Good to know, thanks Vlad!

Update , just got the Waldorf M and i can say WOW , exceeded my expectation !

A bit of both i guess. To be fair at the levels the Burl was seeing here it probably wasn't being much other than good, clear AD conversion.

@@Rareos truth. did you check out that 3rd wave PPG synth coming soon?

Maybe soon, just 4 hours of multi-tweaking footage to sift through.

on it.

sorry my bad ;)