War in Ukraine Summarized 2023 | Animated History 

:(

Please do a video on the battle of Guadalcanal when you get a chance now that’s a story that deserves to be told. What those Marines and Army Dogs went through is insane. Cut off and Completely surrounded by the Japanese Navy. 😅😬

your sources are obviousy exclusively western. this video is a waste of time, one might as well just watch CNN...

Man... You really pulled out all the stops on this one. Full blown cherry-picking cope. I mean, yeah, sure, if you ignore all the men Kiev lost, and all the money and irreplaceable hardware the West has thrown away, and all of the territorial gains that have been negated by Russian advances in the past 3 months, sure, yeah, Ukraine is "still hanging on." Not to mention the sanction wars that have all backfired on the West. Meanwhile, the Russo-Chinese economic alliance is dethroning America all across the globe. But yeah, whatever. 🥴

Got to say Armchair historian is very Biased IN THIS VIDEO. Talks about how far right members are fighting in Donetsk military, MEANWHILE Barely MENTION OF AZOV BATTLION, Well known to be anti semitic far right battalion. Amnesty International put a statement out that UKRAINE used civilians as SHIELDS. I also thinks it’s hilarious that he has Ukraine attacking around Mariupol, while it shows Russia directly attacking apartment buildings is so propaganda, cause Ukraine also attacks civilians and example would be the bridge connects Crimea. Ukraine killed three civilians while trying to destroy the bridge. Meanwhile Russia has already rebuilt 65 percent of Mariupol and Men living there, don’t have to worry about being drafted in the meat grinder.

😂😂😂

For real

Iran Iraq war in eastern Europe

except ww1 didnt have nazis

WW1 but smaller trenches (seriously why tf are they so small you can barely walk in there)

You know what that means in a couple of years...

I know right alot of people were surprised even Russians

your losing to men with shovels

@@aber_kadaber1034Ukraine says that to Russia as a propaganda

1/10 ragebait way too used and its far from true

Literal ww1 tactics. IF IT AINT BROKEEE DON'T FIX IT ORAHHHHH!

Yea fr this has been waaaaaay different like 5 years ago

Adolf Hitler?

@@deaghostyt2217Austria-Hungary

dunno man, seems to me he pretty much recycling a few of animation couple of times, and many of the animations just "there" without any meaningful point to support the narrative, sure it's pretty much better on graphics than back then, but for me it's pretty much enjoyable watching AH videos from couple of years ago

It looks like he got funding from some CIA cutout, to spew corporate propaganda that goes against what actually happened.

True dat

EA and Microsoft totally waiting for the war to end to spam all those new Ukraine War games stuffed full of microtransactions.

it hghly reminds me of the WARGAME series :D

@@pll3827call of duty: Eastern Assault

I think every part of war is sad to watch

While I agree with you, people were saying the same thing when tanks, planes, machine guns, barbed wire, bolt action rifles, white gunpowder, assault rifles, dynamite, camouflage, trench digging and other advanced ordinances were introduced to the battlefield

I agree with you that drone warfare in itself is a bad addition as it turns the war into more of a game and limits the risks involved the the operator. But in causality drone warfare is cheap, easy, and reduces the risks to the user. It gives many more options and gains to the side that uses them unlike the wars of old that didn't have drones. Drones are the future that will be used in any conflict in our era and beyond there is no turning back. An we all know these very drones will be used on not only soldiers but on the very citizens of their own country in time. Any tool of war that's cheap, easy to use and can cause great effect will be highly sought after and used. What we see today is the infant stage of drone warfare, what comes later will be far more terrifying as more weapons are integrated for use on drones, AI is added and drone designs become more lethal though options and load outs.

How is a drone any different than someone getting shot by a sniper? Or an artillery shell hitting them? All kinds of things can happen when someone is running away or chilling on watch. Explosions and bullets are explosions and bullets dude drones are not that special. They're just annoying. The only thing that drones have really changed is that tanks are not as effective and everybody sees everything you can't really hide movements from the enemy. Other than that dying is dying you make it sound like dying to a drone is any different than anything else. It's not.

@@bestieswithtesties Sniper puts himself in danger by being on the field of battle with in range of the enemy to strike back at them if they see them or notice their location. They can be dealt with directly and quickly. Artillery is on the battle field with in X range. New tech can detect, track and locate and counter fire which makes artillery risky as a sniper. All things can happen to those that retreat and do not surrender you are fair game to be dealt with by any means necessary thats the fact of war. But in most wars expect those fought by russia and some 2ed and e3rd world countries. As a modern country they respect and accept surrendering combatants and follow the international laws that all countries should follow in war. Again not all countries do follow those rules those tend to be 2ed world and third world countries and warlords. But what makes drones different. You are not actively in danger while operating and can be hundreds to thousands of miles behind the lines. Making it harder to track and eliminate the operator more so if they are mobile. Using said tech makes it feel like a vid game in how it operates an descentizes your thought process that you actually killed someone(s) and the reality check that you pulled the trigger on someones life. As the whole process seams unreal compared to seeing your results right in front of you while fighting on the line. Lastly drones will become a cost effective norm over time in price, man power, efficiency and many advantages you normally don't have on foot and easily accessible. As our tech grows and advances less human interaction will be needed and drones are just the step in the right direction to use AI and simpler algorithms to do the same job as a well trained solider. It costs thousands to millions to train a solider fully and a min of 4 years for a skilled combatant. But a child of the age of 7yr old or older and less then 2-8 hrs of training can fly a drone and think it was a video game. We already have 3-4yr olds operating their parents tablets and cell phones to watch kid shows online. How hard do you think it would be for young children to get hooked on a cool flying sim you can crash your plane into things. Side note: The real horror hasn't started yet with drones. We will soon see commercial drones being modified and being equipped with explosives and used for terrorist acts while being mobile and very hard to catch and locate due to mobility. Currently there are no countermeasures set up to defend against this. Unless something was set up in advance and even then the current tech isn't readily available. The world is seeing how effective drones are in Ukraine its just a matter of time before those idea's are used by bad actors only wanting chaos.

that isn't going to make a major difference in the war

they were already defacto nato ngl

The snow speaks Finnish

Russia nominated for best NATO salesperson of all time

Yes, more insanity.

HOLY JESUS!

Vsauce for general

Yo lol

Or am I? 🤨

Isn't that Reznikov

It's taken a dip for sure. Shoulda took the US's tactical advice on this one waiting to regroup was the worst thing they coulda done. They needed to keep pushing while they still could.

Not only that but They only reached the 1st line of defense. Which Russia have 7 defensive lines. Also 2024 is worst for them...

@@larrymunn5279didn’t help that Ukraine was so committed in taking Adveeka/Bahkmut, the US advised in not sending in so many men, but Ukraine’s military leadership continued on and it lost so many well trained, battle harden men, they really never recovered after that operation.

​@@unitedwestanddividedwefall3521I think our us politicans are basically emptying out Ukraine so they can move there later because they like the demographics

@@xIcyStarzz-yz7myThey won’t be moving there, they just wanted a country to weaken Russia for the time being. Backfired horrendously.

Facts bruh but it’s funny to read 💀💀

@@evanh.9420 Need to agree. Had a good laugh with some of them lol

They deleted my comment mocking the bots

always my friend.......god damn everytime........

Probably because propaganda shouldn’t be masked as an objective recount

War works like that.

@@Alastair_Adana🥱

nah, its not going to be take a look at the gaza video's comment section

thats an amazing idea tbh

There is a video about Yugoslav wars

@@mareksojak4726 He Might have Ment the Balkan Wars Between Bulgaria Serbia And Greece against the ottomans and then all of them teaming on bulgaria

youtubes not gonna like that lol

The comment section would be wild

I hate to be THAT guy, but for it to be ww1 you'd need at least a total war beetwen European union and Russia. With nuclear weapons on the discussion it's impossible because both has it

To be fair they did have helicopters since 1907, the mk1-4 were heavy tanks, and they had gossip magazines by 1916. We're just seeing their evolved counterparts now.

@@ReikerForgeThey did not have helicopters since 1907. They did, however, have pigeons, airplanes, and zeppelins, which could be considered as predecessors

Yeah

He mentions it at the end of

Why on Earth did they launch that offensive without any air support?

​@jacksontaylor290 foolish politicians demanding "results" I'd wager. The long war favored ukraine, mass assaults are a stupid idea for them.

​@@stillcantbesilencedevennowwhy long war favored Ukraine though?

Russia too has a military industrial complex to feed

Take a look at whats happeneing this year so far. Russia is pushing further in all fronts albiet very slowly, a collapse on some front might happen. Or not idk I just look at the map changes

Trump will end it Q1 2025.

@@brydonthunderi think russias goal is to let ukriane and and the west exhuast it self of things like the counter offensive while only taking territory when they can do so with minimal casalites russia know eventual the west will have nothing left to send or ukranie will have no one left to send and they can get what they want at the table

"why the ninth battle of bakhmut will be the breaking point of the Ukranian army"

PAUSE

“Yeah, I’m gunna go” “They say it’s healthy for your hair” (Spider-Man, Family Guy)

She doesn’t seem happy whenever I break my record.

13 minutes

17 mins is mine, my girlfriend is worried about the score going lower but I am locked in on the grind

Wars like these usually last 5-6 years with the decisive years being the 4th and 5th one. We've yet to see what's actually going to happen.

The way to Kharkiv is not so far could be that the russians try to encircle it and ukranians can only do something against by deploying large forces and reserves which makes them vulnerable at other parts of the frontline. If Kharkiv falls ukranian morale will be severly damaged

@@mk18397 UA litterally have nothing to put there. They said that they put last reserves there which many of them are just 40% ready. Also new UA mobilisation law makes you think a bit. They already lost, its just agony for them but money must flow to USA you know.

pretty funny to hear how much he glossed over the immense failure of Ukraines 2023 Summer Offensive

​@@borea.jpg_ it's because he's pro Ukrainian. Soon it's gonna be funny to watch him not make more videos about this

Yeah, Black Rock is loosing. Lol!

@@keith48993 oh my god fr, not many people will get your point, but so fr!

addivka has a population of 20,000 before war. idk if that really matters

@@mikhailclark7529 it's not about population. Avdiivka was one of the so called "fortress cities" (e.g. Bakhmut). Those cities very HEAVILY fortified before the war all the way back since 2014! if you go on google maps and see old satelite photos, you can still see bunkers and trenches there. This conflict is MUCH deeper and longer than you think brother :)

not for long

Same lol

😅same

How about the actual Nazi symbols for the Ukrainian actual Nazi battalion?

By that logic the Red Cross is evil because they have a snake. They're mercs, you'd be singing their praises and saying "that logo is sick AF" if they had joined Ukraine.

@@KAZVorpalLARP Nazies

​@@KAZVorpalAt this point, I'm pretty sure both sides are fielding extremist groups. Manpower is manpower in war. Similar to how most political parties attempt to cooperate more during war, best to win against a foreign power cooperate with your competition than losing your country.

@@gayorsomethingidk553 разница лишь в том, что на Украине это массовое явление, люди с нацистской символикой становятся героями и примером для подражания. А в России есть только ДШРГ Русич - небольшое подразделение, которое не героизируют на государственном уровне. Даже не упоминают об этом, будто бы стыдясь.

Agreed. Russia's strategy the whole time has been to wait for the West to get bored of Ukraine and move onto something else, which it has done. All of Ukraine's effort had to be forced into proving tangible gains to keep attention on them, and stop the Republican narrative that America is just getting involved in another unwinnable war - hence the ridiculous clickbaiting of their entire counteroffensive for months beforehand. Of course, arguably, even success in Zaporizhzhia would not have swayed the West to take Ukraine more seriously. Russia is still doubling down and further gearing up their economy for a long war, and Trump is determined not to allow Biden to claim any foreign or domestic policy successes over his term to boost his own chances of re-election - as everyone can see from the Republicans consistently blocking Ukraine aid, and even increased spending countering illegal immigration. Idk what this year is going to bring, but I imagine the West pressuring Ukraine to accept a ceasefire - and we all know how well Russia accepts internationally brokered ceasefires (Minsk II ahem ahem)...

@@joestephen3756 Obama: Crimea goes back to Russia, Donbass become sovereign states Trump: Ukraine loses to militia in Donbass, no Russian intervention Biden: Special military operation in Ukraine You better hope Trump wins in November because the alternative is long war with 10% for the big guy and more quid pro quo with the aid money. "If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the billion dollars" - Joe Biden to Ukraine, Jan 2020

@asavelakuse6865. That's what Russians actually want to because it will reduce the casualties and also to trap Ukrainan. Hence most Ukrainan faces empty trenches and some even got mines on it. But I think Russians are not standing, rather advancing.....

They also gained more land than Ukraine does in summer offensive.

The only reason why either side hasn’t had a breakthrough is because neither side has air support so its just WW1 all over again.

​@@user-rv4bp4oq7eanother bot account I see. Kherson region. Kharkov.

​@@user-rj4gu5oh3klmao russia got total air support, look the number of Fab-500 they drop on ukrainian position, the ka-50 destroying ukrainian ifv and transport troop on summer offensive

Almost like creating history videos about very recent events is not a good idea

the plane (in the end) did indeed crash

_"plane crash"_

Its was offically a "Plane Crash" as stared by russian officials. But we all know hat happened

iirc the most credible reason for the plane crash was a hand grenade that was set off mid-flight

Doesn't look like much of the plane crashed so much as disintegrated in mid-air.

Important to note that Ukraine still refuses to allow exhumation of bodies of Wołyń genocide and started trade war against their western neighbours while asking these same neighbour for support in war

​@@nacelnikprosiak1260 I didn't know that about Wolyn. That's messed up. And even today, banderist thugs are strutting around Warsaw, Lodz, harassing people, etc. smh

@@nacelnikprosiak1260Stop yapping

Absolutely, crooked perspective

Honestly, I was shocked

Yes, Bakhmut was a cherrypicked Ukranian victory...

How are they cherry-picking? Russia didn’t have that many victories in 2023 compared to Ukraine. Remember, this video is dedicated solely to the war’s progress in 2023. Russia’s renewed offensive is not part of that time frame.

@@ExtantPersonOverall they undermine Russia's successes and make it seem as if Ukrainian forces capturing some settlement or tiny village was a major blow to them, not only that but any defeat the ukranains have they always credit it to ''bad weather'' or some other circumstance belittling the Russian army

​@@patrickwelch3859 Notably Finland was on its own throughout the Winter War. Not so much here. Not even close.

​@@varunrajesh6516Not completely on their own, many volunteers from all over Europe (especially Sweden, Norway and Denmark) came to Finland's help

​@@patrickwelch3859 Meh. Choose your overlord. I'd rather NOT be tied to russia/china/iran.

​@patrickwelch3859 well the Soviet obejective in finland was to anex finland. They had to settle with taking the defensive line of finland and basically no important lands. And WW2 was what changed things, have WW2 not happen the effect of the winter war would have been just a russian humiliation and forcing finland to join the tripartite pact. So if the Ukranian war is going to mirror the winter war then expect russia ro settle for the Donbass and perhaps crimea after being humilliated and then Ukraine entering NATO. And expect if there's a ww3 somehow ends the same way as ww2 which is highly unlikely.

@@fearlesspotato3429 now now. It's entirely plausible ww3 will end with suns being dropped, just like ww2.

Won't help tho since we don't live in the past

yeah kinda sad, he is using British and Ukranian MOD, as a source, while they are known to spread complete lies like shovels, trees and bushes disrupting UKR counteroffensive and what not, I doubt we will get a realistic casuality count from either side for atleast the next 20-30 years

Lets look at the russian point of view: nazi, nazi, naziiiii. Done

Not really good recap of 2023 it was the worst years for Ukraine with this one as well, the offensive in the kherson region was a total failur gaining 30km^2 of Land for 3/4month of fighting while russia is regain those Land and gaining Land faster than Ukraine.

​@@kg7162Ukraine managed to pull off two major offensives before that.

after the counter offensive the death ratio of russians and ukraine is no longer 3 to 1, but 1.5 to 1. explains so much about the death of boys just for robotyne and adiivka. the counter offensive took too much casualties man. with the critical manpower shortage rn, seems like 50 billion worth of Western weapons arent gonna shoot themselves dont they? all of these equipment with no one to operate will just go to storage and wait for it to be located and get iskandr'ed

@@evananthony1395 ukranians lost more then 1 million people already while BBC and UA SBU couldnt find more then 50 000 Russian names KIA. Another thing prooving this is new mobilisation law in Ukraine.

You mean in like 20 years? No way in hell either side is admitting how many men they lost now

​@@urdnotwrex6969 😂 Man I'm sorry but your numbers are a joke. Russia has lost at least 300 thousand men and Ukraine at this point has lost more like 650-750 thousand. I'm not pro-Kiev by any means but come on bro lol.

​@urdnotwrex6969 oh yeah, Russia has only lost 50k.... cmon dude. At least try.

??

The video literally came out the day you left this comment, what do you mean?

@@czevzi Are you slow? Have you at least seen the title? 🤣

@@WeoXCY It's presented from the current perspective, so by "aged well" you mean the war itself? Because your irony would imply the video itself aged badly, that's all.

@@czevzi "Aged well" was definitely written by me to emphasize author's vision on conflict. Nobody refers to the video itself but to the context of the video. Isn't it obvious?

And the Ukranian soldiers uploaded videos about how inneficient and costly was the operation

@SniperFallen06 I know because I see Ukrainian soldiers in my work place. One thing I can say is that they are getting older and older. In 2022, the Ukrainians who came to our workplace were mostly men in 2030s now ( when I last saw them in 2023 ) were mostly 40s and some even 50s. It is tragic, and I find these western propaganda outlets pathetic. They want to fight Russia till the last Ukrainians.

What is funnier about all of this, not only Russia has regained most of the empty fields they grinded in 4 months but they have advanced more in 7 days in Kharkov than they did in 3 months in Zaporozhye LOL and only using recon groups, and those same people now are saying that the Russians failed LMAO

@RenanMendes-zd8hj they rather cover the sun with their hand and say " Look the sun is gone " .

The fact they only did that, and still not entirely while being the self proclaimed second best army in the world is not an achievement, but I guess the bar gets lower and lower while making Ukraines higher and higher. But I suppose they are "fighting all of Nato with shovels against the fourth reich reborn" so its justified. Each day the imperialist keeps at its 3 days very special millitary operation is a victory. But hey lets the whataboutisims, shovel comments and 😂😂😂 emojis start once more THIRD year in a row, that will certainly make their victory against less than percent of Natos budget more likely. Damn if I am willing to root for autocrats if that means sticking it to the current party in power in my country like a contrarian even I can stand against both equally

When your army is leaded by a literal economist (at least now) and old soviet autocrats serfs (for 2023 and before) whose biggest achievement has been an around 20km penetration in the 2 years ans 3 months special millitary operation so far against less than 10 percent of Natos budget,partially of old stock, its hard to find victories and be "less biased" against hordes who even suck at imperialisim beyond killing everything with artillery and glide bombs then send in the infantry in waves until they run out of bullets or enery at a turtles pace.

@@alexcorvuscazador5596 Be careful, underestimating an enemy is the main reason why you lost wars like Vietnam. Not all countries have the same mentality and the same willingness to make sacrifices, regardless of the multiple reasons, which for some are more valuable than for others; To think that the Russians would become discouraged for the same reasons that a NATO country would, is a huge mistake and they may regret it sooner or later. Recognizing the strengths and victories of your rivals, regardless of how they are obtained, is the greatest weapon you have to defeat them later, as is recognizing your own defeats; If you don't understand it, I recommend reading someone like Sun Tzu, because then you will understand that knowing yourself and your enemy will ensure you win a thousand battles.

Who is you? I am not even american. I am not underestimating them I am looking at the facts they have moved 20km on the widest point in in 2 years and 3 months. If you need a history lesson and read books please do so as the US stopped out Vietnam due to polical pressure , look at the casualties its not even close. If they had stayed longer and lost that would be another issue. Underestimation is the reason why Russia has extended this special millitary operation to three years and their adapting has not translated to any gain as long as their leadership remains as corrupt a ever. As long as Ukraine has will and manpower nothing sill change based on Russias autocratic charatheristics.

@@alexcorvuscazador5596 You are wrong if you think that every victory translates into the total destruction of the enemy army, the fact that you degrade the achievement of Vietnam by ending up winning that war, regardless of the means or results, says a lot about you; victory is a victory in the end. You may not be American or even not from the European Union, but I perceive in you enough subjectivity with the subject not to be; It is true that Ukraine has achieved something impressive and that regardless of how it ends, Russia can now consider the war a failure because of what it has cost them and for not achieving the objective (which was not to conquer land, but to subjugate Ukraine to keep it under its control), however that is no reason not to recognize merits regardless of whether they are few or great. Aren't you aware of the War? The Russians have adapted little by little and are now attacking the North through Kharkov, succeeding in destroying the rear logistics by precision attacks with drones and artillery, something they lacked at the beginning (if they had had it before, they would have done more damage when starting the war). The point of recognizing the positive evolution of your enemy helps to carry out more effective countermeasures, but also in terms of the news that is given to the public, it also helps to convince people that this war is a serious matter and that therefore that must continue to be helped with more weapons. If he keeps talking only well about the Ukrainians, he will only make the allied countries fall into apathy. Furthermore, you talk about Russia, but since 2022 Ukraine has not been able to advance a higher amount of mileage than what you criticize the Russians for; On the other hand, Russia continues to expand its war economy, while Europe and the United States remain industrially hesitant and rather than gaining ground, they are losing it. Therefore, recognizing your rivals allows you to be objective in the end, not as you do when you only want to impose the perspective that Russia is just failures; They may be wrong, but even with those they have had successes and allied help comes better when you recognize your enemy's possibilities.

@@alexcorvuscazador5596 You are clearly a illegal US immigrant or a Ukrainian untralnationlist based on how you are conducting yourself.

well, have you watched the video?

@@GuestKid511 Lossing all of your best and elite divisions in the battle of Bakhmut just so to not have enough forces for the grand summer offensive (the one that Zelensky has proudly proclaimed to the entire world) is not a win or brilliant in anyway like what the video is trying desperately to show. Anyone with a working brain can clearly see this is a death trap from the start, NATO's advisors have repeatedly warned Zelensky and we all know what happened in the end.

@@viethoangtruong54 diviosns? what are you talking about, Ukraine had brigades there not entire divisions

​@@AnthonyLopez-lb2bdok but still they Lost entier brigade

Remember that this is strictly about 2023. The situation was looking a lot more hopeful for Ukraine then than it is now.

War. War never changes.

Honestly pretty expected considering the type of terrain it is. Iran-Iraq War is the best comparison albeit with drones too. It's not like Russia and Ukraine were gonna fight each other from space or something. That's a US & China war situation.

Ww1 but with drones

​@@varunrajesh6516us & china and i Hope not, will be the equivalent of the Pacific War 2.0 with super Sonic missile, island hopping campaing, cyber Warfare

Bro get your ass out of here with that pfp

​@@eigintasbaranauskas7519 Lol triggered

@@sullathehutt7720 Yeah, at least I'm not defending despots

Yeah like zelensky banning people from leaving his country or forcibly conscripting men in his country by taking them into vans... ​@@eigintasbaranauskas7519

@@eigintasbaranauskas7519 Well, Zelensky jailed his opposition and refused to do elections. UHHHHHHH

Casualties are not all necessary deaths. I'm not sure about that number for Iraq, but it is possible. 1 million deaths in 20 years, but I'm not sure about total casualties.

Really. It's police op. Main target - notorious narcodealer in old green t-shirt.

Russia didn't immediately take out all civilian infrastructure like us did in Iraq

Well of course there are less civilian casualties. Ukraine conscripted pretty much every civilian near the front. There are simply not enough civilians near the front to lose more than 20k

This video stinks of Nafo cope

And no one in Russian MoD has ever said that. It is in fact general Miller of the Pentagon who said that. It seems someone deliberately uses disinformation to fool his own viewers.

Russia literally did thought they'd do it, and they failed specularly.

@@guyman1570 90k bro... they just wanted to repeat the Crimea annexation and avoid long warfare, but NATO encouraged Ukraine to fight with everything they had. the Russians dug in and built a 7 layered line of defense along the frontline, which was one of the reasons for the failure of the Summer Counter Offensive for Ukraine.

Why would you make a play for all major Ukrainian cities then?

@@superdjack5538ukraines force broke and ran to sepritist militas in 2014 i think that proby what led to the gross over confidince if he whould hae invaded with 5-600,000 troops i bet hed of won by now

Yes, this is more of a dishonest propaganda piece, than honest and accurate history.

I assumed that the man power shortages was more prevalent in 2024.

I agree with the 2024 comment but still. Average DRAFT age is 43. They are not free volunteers lol

The biggest issue I have is the lack of criticism of Bahkmut hold out, and the part where he implied Russia is using NeoNazi units lol

@Sterlingcape Laughs in Azov. When has Putin ever said Bolshevik'ism/Stalin'ism was good. Shits crazy. He says "those with a heart miss thr USSR. Those with a brain would never want it to return".

Can't wait for more biased content from this channel!*

​@@robertminigame just dont watch it you dont like it. Use your brain damn

@@ChisledFish430 its not if i like it or not bro

​@@ChisledFish430AH shouldn't call himself a "historian" then

@@robertminigame Ruski cope

wait i dont get it

The video is a surface level callback to what happend during 2023. I've watched the entire video and everything said can be matched and verified against reliable data. There is literally nothing in this video with a certain spin or narrative. It is simply stating what happend during 2023. Given that the video is at such a high "altitude", if you will. A lot of nuance is lost. But the video touches on many key notes during 2023.

@@kruger7796 "meant to secure Ukraine in a matter of days" Is that true? I cant find anybody saying that except western sources. The only similar quote I can find from Russians are talking about nuking Kiev.

@@attilamarics3374 "western sources" lol. Putin literally said he could take Kiev in 2 weeks.

@@gregorypaul7898no he did not, even american high officials said that no russian said anything about a certain period, the only source is from “the times” the same news that showed a video of a leopard tank getting hit by a drone and called the video “russian tank gets obliterated by ukranian drone”

He did. It just doesn't look like it on a map because the amount of land gained is tiny

@@p00bix go be a bot somewhere else :(

he hates Putin

I’m gonna be honest, the gains are tiny on the map, just about a mile every few days. War sucks.

​​@@p00bix Ukrainian gains are and were even smaller... also Oleshky was never taken by Ukraine.

This vidioe is more from the Ukrainian prospective tbh

@@Som_maper Doesn't matter in the end! After all, Russians will win by a long shot, as they have done since the beginning of the smo. 😇

Well said.

A town it was more a settlement and still russia regain the 30km^2 of Land Ukraine took

Yeah, pretty sad it doesn't really give out any insight into the war, just another piece of media that regurgitates the most common Pro-Ukraine views

Don’t you know? Bakhmut was only strategically important UNTIL Russia took it.

@ShadowReaper-pu2hx And with Avdiivka

​@@ShadowReaper-pu2hxah yes the non strategical city, that became Stalingrad for zelensky and throwing every man and best brigade to defend the city no matter the coast

This is a clearly propaganda video, he will only praise one side of the war so to speak.

Uh no? It happened because republicans in America, specifically Mike Johnson, are team russia and held up aide to Ukraine for months. They literally did not have enough ammo to stop the russians. Pretty much the only reason russia can accomplish anything at all, both defensive and offensive, is because they can rain down massive amounts of artillery on Ukrainian positions. The Ukrainians on the other hand started running low on artillery when republicans held up much needed aide for months allowing the russians to advance much easier.

@@bestieswithtesties That is, you once again confirm that without the help of the United States and NATO, our “police force” (as it was in the early stages of hostilities), the operation would have been a success, Zelensky would have signed the conditional “Minsk-3”, which would have ended the conflict back in 2022 year and would not have led to the death of thousands of people on both sides of the barricades and less destruction that occurred over these two years? You know, on the other hand, I would like to express some gratitude to the US leadership. Thanks to them, we were finally able to move away from a certain focus on cooperation with the West because we were finally convinced of its total hypocrisy, and with grief we are moving towards building our political position in the world. I hope that when Western and Ukrainian politicians ask for peace, ours will only raise a pig cutter over their heads with a malicious smile.

@@bestieswithtesties Typical ukrobot has to blame Murica for Ukraines failures Then again, you guys just parrot Zelensky. "If the US doesn't keep giving in to our demands, it'll be _your_ sons and daughters dying in Ukraine"

​​​​@@dimikius7100If Ukraine stops figting, there will be no Ukraine. If Russia stops fighting, there will be no war. Supporting genocidal maniac is just crazy.

@@The-Enclave Geniuses, we were completely satisfied with the option of a neutral Ukraine, which was a buffer between NATO and our borders (which, by the way, is beneficial for Ukraine itself in all aspects, but unfortunately, people have been in power there for a long time who reflect your selfish interests, and not the interests of their people) . We are not to blame for the fact that Kyiv was not going to comply with the Minsk agreements with a slow, but still confident transition to the world that everyone needs (guys, both the Europeans and the Ukrainians themselves have more than once openly stuffed themselves with weapons that Europe and the United States supplied there in full ignoring any warnings from the Russian Federation and provoking us to support the decision of the Ukrainian leadership to join NATO, which led to a forceful solution to the problem (which was completely unprofitable and unnecessary for Russia). Even when hostilities began, only the Russian leadership negotiated, stopped the advance of troops, opened green corridors for civilians, which the Armed Forces of Ukraine actively used while politicians delayed the negotiation process, and then openly abandoned the Russian Federation and continued hostilities. As a result, the forced police operation turned into a bloody massacre in which there are no true winners, there are only losers and broken destinies. And you know, I’m sure that right now you’re thinking, “Heheh, stupid Putin bot,” so I’ll say it straight. It is YOU who are to blame for this war. It is YOU who benefit from the death of thousands of people on both sides. It was YOU who ignored us and assured the Ukrainians that it would be an easy walk, giving them weapons and sending them to a deliberately suicidal war. It is YOU who supply weapons there that only prolongs the agony of the Ukrainian leadership and increases the number of victims on both sides. It was YOU who forbade them to negotiate, which could have ended the war earlier and largely on terms that suited Ukraine. The blood of ALL who died during the war is on YOUR hands, and YOU will not get away with it. I hope that our leadership will not conduct any dialogue with either the United States or Europe, you have finally shown your colors in relation to Russia, then don’t complain.

How though? They lost Kharkiv and Kherson and lots of Land around it.

@@user-yh1nm1vy3i those arent the only areas in ukraine...

@@user-yh1nm1vy3ithose were in 2022

​@@user-yh1nm1vy3i Russia relaunched attack towards Kharkov...

​@@robertminigameg@@yfo copies about ucocane is insane😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

They are still a country. Fighting all of Russia

@@niixodus not for much longer, let me guess, zelensky is waiting for Steiner's counter attack?

@@christianworkman8108 Time will tell.

@@niixodusEven Ukrainian commanders are saying if Russia opens another front in the Sumy region they are fucked.

Lmfao, remember ukraine doing trailer for their counter-offensive? Also, this IS 2023, not 2024. Ukraine was "fine" and "stable" in 2023.

Fr

Yeah, it's a Ukraine proto-propaganda piece....Ukraine took twice the beating Russia did, evidenced by its continued loss on thr battlefield, but this propagandist only mentions Russian losses, while Ukraines are x2

I know you’re used to Russian propaganda but this is called unbiased media

@@fireironthesecond2909 Yeah, defenetly pro-western and pro-Ukrainian media in youtube is the place for unbias opinion. Keep belive in that.

@@fireironthesecond2909armchair historian is one of the trashiest biased channel on youtube

​@@fireironthesecond2909 tell that to king and generals

"but"?

Absolutely agree

How come?

Watching this video, makes me feel like watching CNN or BBC propaganda.

@@nenadnikolic6142 For real... sadly. I was hoping ACH would do a neutral analysis

neither will happen

At this point the Russians will be at the gates of Kharkiv city, Sloviansk, and kramatorsk than Ukraine retaking Crimea. There are rumors that Russia will reopen the Sumy front, so if that happens then a there’s a guaranteed Kiev front that will force Ukrainian forces to be more stretched out. If there’s a second Sumy and Kiev front then I bet that most units will be concentrated defending the Capital and the 2nd most important city, this could allow the Russians to capture Chasiv yar and advance to other areas including Kupiansk, sloviansk, kramatorsk, provkorsk, Zaparozhia city. This year will be the worst year for Ukraine, after this year Ukraine might as well gg

The only ways such a thing could happen is if 1) russia collapses into civil war and Ukraine doesn't (extremally unlikely) 2) Russia gives up the fight Vietnam style and negociates crimea and dombass back (Not very likely but we'll have to see if russia starves in a few years or not) Theres basically no chance for ukraine to actually beat russia militarily while theres also not a lot of chances for russia to beat Ukraine militarily. This war seems to be decided by who stayes in the fight for longer. And since ukraine is fighting for their existance while Russia is fighting for their waining status I'd say theres more chances that ukraine will endure longer than russia.

@@fearlesspotato3429Idk if you’ve seen videos but there has been plenty of videos of men resisting Conscription in Odesa. If that doesn’t sound like a looming uprising idk what doesnt.

@@user-rj4gu5oh3k I've seen many videos of great many things. I've seen Ukranians soldiers executing surrendering Russian soldiers only for the dead Russian soldiers to find a more comfortable pose while dead and I've seen videos of supposed Ukranian officers demanding the execution of zelensky. When it comes to internal affairs of Ukraine I tend to doubt DIP (Deceptive imagery persuasion) I prefer to judge actions and so far I've seen none.

Why would RU-vid take down CIA propaganda?

Even Kings and Generals is better than this

Russian economy isn't collpasing because they are running on their money stock which has been reduced by 50% Plus, their oil and gas export are at loss because of how low they sold it to China and India

Doesn't really matter, both are interchangeable since as you said, theyre the same thing

he's bies at least he, not as bias as Lazerpig.

They recovered almost 80% of the equipment, compared to russias current rate of 30%. Adivika is about as strategically important as the alpine front between France and Germany in WW I.

@@1996Horst 80% recovery.. you really believe that number..80% of destroyed equipment were recoverable...sure thing bud bakmut wasn't strategic, adivika isn't strategic..Krasnohora/riftka won't be strategic strategic,,nor Chas avir

@et9949 you have a serious mental disability considering that you managed to misidentify 99% of what I said. Kinda amazing. Hut also explains everything you said so far

in that counter offencive the ratio of ukraine deaths and russia deaths were 30,000-110,000 (UN sourse) while the kremlin says it was 44,000-48,000

Ukraine will be deploying the 62nd reddit tank brigade, and the 71st twitter motor rifle company to plug the gaps.