War Thunder, PLEASE Don't Do This. 

I'm honestly tryna see some more German prototypes i find them pretty cool but if we are talking just America then maybe the m38 greyhound

​@@jonathanemmanuel832prototype tank for anything thats not Russia How dare you

@@freedeoxide yes anything but russian :)

How about one of the mid 1960s turreted variants of the M113 or M114? What about that enormous, and weird looking, ATGM that Britain put together in the 1950s? Ikara or something.

@@jonathanemmanuel832 would you like another prototype with a big gun No im not talking about the 2A4 With a 140mm gun but something for Russia again

real

Remember, Sweden exists

Who are you kidding. They need to add multiple things between 2.7-9.0. nothing between those BRs is even remotely viable as an SPAA. The twin bofors barely do decent at tank killing and suck at anti air due to Gaijins incompetence, and the M163 is just absolutely trash, it can't do anti tank let alone anti air, it's effective range is 800m and that's assuming it even gets a lock or even does damage.

Name two SPAA they can add to that BR.

​@@fire_drake12.arc.24since when did anti-air become anti tank

the Swedes got a King Tiger because they used it as a range target so there's a chance it could happen.

though honestly I'm surprised the "Fury" M4A3E8 is not in the British tech tree yet.

Yeah and it’s a terrible addition. Sweden buying a Tiger 2 only to shoot at it for 10 years is not a good reason to add it

Lets add M1 abrams, leopard 2a6, m3 bradley, marder and cv90. By the way, we can add the whole US tech trees to Russia because Alaska used to be Russian, until the US purchased it. So a piece of america used to belong to Russia, therefore if we apply the logic of UK having Indian vehicles, we are in law to do this.

@@horpet389oh but you forget America was once British so Britain can have every American vehicle too

BRO THAT IS HARSH

Holy shit, you cooked him, but why?

That's fair tbh

They gotta do something about 32% win rate for top tier US

Idk why this is even a possibility, like why?

This vid is stupid. He knows nothing. Doesnt own highbtier

@@darugdawg2453because I do not own a new dodge vehicle, can I not point out the shortcomings of stelantis in the shitty designs? Plz make sense

@@josezuniga4968 bros sucking that gaijin kool aid down like a fentanyl addict.

What's it called in-game? You piqued my interest

@@LastGoatKnightthe Viyajanta is what it’s called

I think the bhishma is lame and stupid, why not add something actually unique and interesting for an indian tank *Like the Arjun*

@@RedVRCCArjun looks like a piece of sheet metal and plus I think the bhisma is good because no one really knows Indian tech so no one’s gonna try it out and waste months or ge for squadron points

@@user-cs3qh1uv5y at least it would be unique tho and not more copy paste Its ammo selection especially would be kinda interesting. It gets thermobaric HE ammo, ATGMs, and some sort of APHE or PELE round with funny name.

T77 lets goooo

The m163 at 7.7 is a watergun and the m19/m42 are just straight up worse than their swedish and french bofors equipped equivalents, not to mention the stuff germany and russia has. Realistically speaking the capability gap is more like 3.0 to 9.0, and the fact that back then the VEAK 40 with its proxy 40mm rounds was 0.3 lower than the sgt york is absurd. Gaijin truly hates america

M42/M19 are on level with Swedish versions, due to the fact we get abysmal small amounts of ammo (144 on L62, 104 on Lvkv42), , plus only one barrel. Also, absolutely zero volumetrics nor armour. Similar story with VEAK when it had proxies (And whom does Gayjin hate?!), it was giant, paper thin box with zero volumetrics, albeit ammo reserve was ok

Change that range to 2.7-9.0. nothing between those BRs are even remotely competitive SPAA. And I'm sorry but .50cal damage isn't enough beyond 3.0, even if you have 4 of them.

​​@@Cyanfox3006swedish 40mm tend to either have a higher fire rate or much much better anti-tank capabilities. At least they are always better at something, the twin US bofors are terrible at everything. Doesn't matter that it has 2 guns or a bunch of crew when it still isn't good for anything beyond dying. It would be better if gaijin was competent and got the reciprocating fire correct but they can't. Also the veak is a giant paper thin box just like the York. Difference at one point was they are equal in capabilities where it mattered, only difference was the veak got a lower BR for no good reason. People kept saying the radar on the York was better because it had longer range (which doesn't matter if your search is 12km if you can't engage anything beyond 4km) and it had separated radars (which also really doesn't matter as long as you can lock in 3rd person all the same, because let's be real nobody is going to be multitasking enough to pay attention to what else is on radar while actively shooting at another plane.)

Ahaha the StuG IV would be nice

LOL!

thats the problem, war thunder may do another lazy move by trading each others veichles 🤦🤦

Lmao imagine the Russian captured Abrams with the upside down gun... That one would be kinda funny but please let's hope they stay away from this whole thing...

@@jfv2312 The only thing we need from the whole Ukraine conflict in War Thunder is the COPE CAGE modification.

@@TomislavPuklin-x5m Actually, one of the leaks contained T 80 obr.2023, sooo...

Gaijin would literally add the T-14 Armata before ever thinking about adding a mid tier AA for the US.

All great picks!! Especially the T69

get the British Challenged as well

I don’t want it, it makes no sense, the U.S. doesn’t even use any for service, like why? If they want to add something interesting give us some light tank prototypes ore something.

​@@rickfastly2671the wolfhound IS a light tank prototype though.

@@r1zmy i thought the wolfhound would be a great addition to the game

@@rickfastly2671 a T90 would be fun for America but at the same time not I know people don't want it but I kinda do great to have another tank in my line up

So it could have been a inside joke between some of the devs?

We’ll have to wait and see

Ukrainian army never had T-90A, it is a Russian tank, not Soviet

I dont like that the map is less linear than it was. it was so fun before

You do know the us got t90s in the 2010s right ?

@@nikolaideianov5092 and what this has to do with my coment?

@@Barten0071 im saying its not historical on an us t90a Becose you ive posted this comment on a video about us getting a t90

💀 Clearly never played a Russian or Chinese MBT if you're expecting them to take hits and not turn into a rocket.

​@@spray916you clearly have never actually played the game, or you do and aren't good at it, giving people easy shots on you in your Russian and Chinese tanks and then thinking it's the tank that's bad.

The t90s are dogshit lol

@@lt.lettuce2023 they may have a garbage reverse speed, breech armor, and reload rate. But it still has some decent mobility, a small/low profile, bloody 3BM60, and a high thermal generation gunner sight. It also has that goofy 850mm tandem barrel launched ATGM. It’s easily one of, if not THE best 10.7 tanks currently. (Although there’s not many 10.7s to compare it to lol)

@@bendawg8-wi4dr the mobility is bad, the armor is terrible, the reverse gear gets you killed, the thermals don't matter, no gun depression makes you unviable on most maps, reload isn't competitive, It's just not good. it's not better than the t80b at 10.3, and it most definitely is not the best 10.7 lol.

@@lt.lettuce2023 tf you mean it’s not better than the T-80B? The hell are you on bruv…

@@bendawg8-wi4dr mobility is so much more important than just armor. "Some" reverse gear and a better top speed will save your ass and even get you more kills so much more than you realise. The 80b literally broke the game for ages with how busted it was lol

what do you mean Challengers blow up "easily"? only like 4 have been lost and it was to an airstrike

@@thesnazzycomet Well then you gotta look at how many challys they even received. Not many that's for sure. But all it took was 1 lancet to ammorack it. Honestly it doesn't seem like challys got better survivability than a t72, at least the ones they received

​@@R4FSANone was destroyed by a mine, the most recent took 2 ATGMs no problem before getting ammo racked because of open hatches

@@floofles9473 Yeah, no. And how recent is the most recent one you're talking about? The most recent one I can find is 1 month ago getting 1 tapped by a Lancet. Not a great image for a (overhyped) tank

@@R4FSAN unlikely. A Challenger 2 took over 70 RPG hits during the Second Gulf War. The Challengers Ukraine received were stock, lacking all the armour upgrades and likely poorly crewed

There are three variants of it as far as I know the pz 68, the 68/75 and the 68/88

Ok play it See for your self

Not more artillery. I am so sick of artillery.

@@Nick-rs5ifKarl Gerat is the dreams come true event mark my words

@@user-cs3qh1uv5y that would be awesome. sturmtiger on crack

I want to see actual artillery guidance systems ​@@user-cs3qh1uv5y

From what I know they simply purchased the t90 from the ukranians

How? One word. *M o n e y*

The us has a lot of soviet planes From the mig17 to the mig29 And i think su27s more recently

@@theporschetiger Fair enough

@@nikolaideianov5092 I knew about the MiG-17 and Mig-29 but according to an aviator friend of mine that works and lives in USA, Su-27 was never there, tho Mi-8 has a potential of being seen in USA at some point but can't really find any reliable info on that

Game balance could just go to hell. We already have top tier us fighting us. In lower tiers shermans are in every tier. Adding same vehicles to opposing nations will just create mix like in world of tanks.

@@wtuwotl as im saying than adding anything Russia to any nation except Russia shouldnt be a thing Same for other nations

@@flareamv5503 there are only 2 reasons i think a nation should get another's tank. if its a unique model of such, ie: Italian firefly, or if its there to make a line up more fleshed out that the home nation just dosnt have irl; German bulldog. other reasons are iffy at best

@@flareamv5503 exactly, but gaijin is legit only doing this for money.

​@@rickfastly2671 or to try to fix the current us win rate Same they did with germany

plz no

gw tiger is paper tonk *never mind hull was finished

never

My would be the British type 15 anti-submarine frigate

the T-90 in the question got acquired long time before that war, I don't remember if it was sold to the USA or captured in Syria by the rebels and then send to USA

same with russian t-80 that ended in USA

@@antek-sq8tl No. Ukrainians sold it to the Americans, it has Ukrainian markings such as the white-cross sign they have ➕

Well the US used Soviet jets

​@@garrettmiller1355soviet sabre then?

sound like bias trial to me

So why wasnt this such a provlem for 10.0 ussr ? They have soo many premuims at that br

No? Its the best at short range where you dont have time to aim weak points Preferable on city maps for which depression doesnt matter

Try the Amx-30's they literally get bullied every match. No Stab, Lacking Dart, Limited thermals, and such

​@@northythefosk7501don't tell me, tell those who cry over the Abrams

Every nation at 9.3 gets full uptiers 100% of the time

​@@Iden_in_the_Rain but as far as I know, feel free to correct me, Japan has the biggest issue there. Correct me if I'm wrong

@@LastGoatKnight I’ve experienced 100% uptiers at 9.3 with Italy, so idk