Warhammer Quest the Adventure Card Game Gameplay Runthrough 

+Michael Ng yup, i was a dummy.... even though i checked the rules during play, i misread them! paulo has already added a note to the video and in the show notes about this :)

I think you're right

+Roskoe Gordineer check out merch.rahdo.com whcih is a site i don't tell people about, but if anyone asks, it's there :)

+rahdo thank you so much !!! i am stocking up on merch!! keep up the amazing work!

+Benjamin Hernandez (TIGBUN) I don't think that's what Richard is talking there... He's saying what will happen in the Enemies Phase and in that step because the 3 enemies in the Shadows have "Advance" they will engage with one of the Heroes

Yes they will engage a hero, because of advance. But Richard says that they do so in order of their attack value. That's not true, the players and choose which one engages them.

yeah, heartbreaking :(

+David Power don't untap until you take the time to reset them :)

+rahdo so they stay exhausted till you use the "prepare icon" card where as enemies reset after the peril phase ? is that right? lol

+David Power sounds bout right! :)

cheers. i dont actually own the game physically but been playing through tabletop simulator on pc haha. buying the real game next pay day :)

Hi! We can't find where does the rulebook say that. It only says that the enemies deal their full damage (4 in the skeletal horde case) minus the shields in the rolled dice. But we think the wound tokens in the enemy card doesn't reduce the attack of the enemy. We also can't find it in the official FAQ. Thanks!

The unofficial FAQ says that skeletal horde in this particular case deals 0 damage (see under ATTACK ACTION), not 2 (like I say) or 4 (like you say). boardgamegeek.com/thread/1482162/unofficial-faq This thread, however, shows that people can't agree: boardgamegeek.com/thread/1506613/skeletal-horde-did-i-play-right In any case, I haven't seen anyone else but you wanting to have it deal 4 damage. "Attack" on the card is interpreted as "attack value" which has been decreased due to the damage tokens on the card.

I will treat It like you said. Thanks for the explanation!

People on bgg never agree on anything. It is very simple. Just remember that resolving dice != resolving hero turn. hero phase: look at effective attack value, as they were at the start of the hero turn; not just the printed value in blue diamond. FFG is terribly incompetent at writing any rulebook. Their errata and FAQ are equally bad. They also introduce these weird chance elements, see AHLCG. And they get worse over time. I don't think the game system itself is invented by FFG not attibutable to them.

@@normann1974 not really. If you follow that thread it ends with a reference to the official ruling, that says full damage. 4.

no idea, but if you ask here: boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/254591/heroes-terrinoth/forums/0 you'll probably get a good answer :)

+Robert Mitchell ru-vid.com/group/PLmQverenaaqKhNob7BKr4VH6YYSrv2Vv5 :)

+Seasons (TL;DR at the bottom) In My opinion I prefer Warhammer ACG because cooperation and strategy is alot more prominent. the way the actions on the heroes are set up to benefit yourself and your buddies. By helping them refresh and exhausted card, helping them engage an enemy, giving them success tokens to use for a later action or curing them of some ill effect. So you get some good synergy going. so everyone is pretty involved. As for Pathfinder (I have and only played Rise of the Rune Lords version) ACG, I really wanted to love this game but to me personally it got stale fast because it is more so a solo group game. In a nut shell, Everyone will split up and choose 1 location deck out of the various that there are and explore the area deck ( which is a luck of the draw kind of thing) to find the main villain and if hes not in said location you "close it off". The reason why everyone should split up and explore each location solo is because the game has a timer and if the main villain is not found before the timer ends. The heroes lose. So its more time efficient to spread out and explore each location on your own. And you can aid friends most of the time by using blessings which generally happens. which gives them a re-roll on different kinds of skill checks. Or maybe a skill of yours helps attack creature at their location. i feel this just does not keep people engaged. And from what I noticed in my sessions when its players turn everyone else just kind of sits their day dreaming or on their phone until the person at the location needs a blessing. and once they do or do not receive one everyone else just kinda does their own thing again until its their turn to explore their location. whether or not they fixed this in the newest sets of the Pathfinder I do not know since i have not bought another set since the First set Rise of the Rune Lords was released. TL;DR In short Warhammer ACG (IMO) has better cooperation and overall group involvement because of they way the actions for each hero are set up to aid each other and progress through each location as a GROUP as compared to Pathfinder ACG which everyone usually just solos different locations requesting help if they need it while trying to find the main villain. and ultimately meeting up at the end.

+Carlos Castrejon yeah, you pretty much got it. unless your frienss really like the PACG it can fet pretty mundane. i personally love playing that game solo co trolling 3characters. WQ is way more active and cooperitve also its more of a dungeon crawl and uses dice in a fin way not just a stat check.

+sharethepudding honestly I think I had more fun playing solo with a few heroes to myself on Pathfinder. so I agree with you on that.

+Mark Raymund Anorico Araya i actually drew comparison to it in the final thoughts iirc :)

+Alithia451 Not nearly as similar as people make it out to be.

+Alithia451 jeah the game mechanic looks really close to LotR (no wonder its from fantasy flight as well ;D)

+Alithia451 Somewhat. It has elements similar to it but also similar to say Pathfinder Adventure Game.

I have both. To me this is Lotr LCG streamlined. I regret it has no expansions. I find it better than Lotr LCG despite collecting it still but it needed a bit more scenario's to truly 'flourish'.

Yeah I hate the lost the rights to this. I'm SO glad it has 6 scenarios in the box. Otherwise this would be a HUGE failure. But I grabbed it for $25 and no regrets at all! :)

+Fractal_Mind it is correct for the delve setup i believe: "Shuffle 15 open Tier I enemies and 9 open Tier II enemies". nothing about standard or elite, so everything's fair game :)

+rahdo, check page 12 of the rules reference guide. Under quest setup it reads" • If a quest sheet instructs players to include an “open standard enemy,” add one random standard enemy of the same tier as the current quest. These enemies are not grouped into sets. • If a quest sheet instructs players to include an “open elite enemy,” add one random elite enemy of the same tier as the current quest. These enemies are not grouped into sets." I hope that helps! Thanks for the video!

@@fractal_mind8191 Cards override rules. You forgot that. Rahdo is correct.

+sharethepudding this is designed to have self contained campaigns with resetting characters, i'm afraid...

that'll teach me to comment before i watch the video haha. still this game sounds right up my alley, thanks for the run through.

faq.rahdo.com question #1

Ah, thanks for the link. Also great video, i bought the game a few weeks ago as an shorter alternative to the original Warhammer Quest and your videos have played a substantial role in teaching me the rules and game-play mechanics. Also now whenever i play as the bright wizard i refer to her as Jen to throw people off. Once again thanks for the videos and keep it up.

+FishofMuu that would make more sense! :)

beagle lair!

yeah, apparently FFG lost the license for warhammer, but they're restarting the game system with Heroes of Terrinoth

i wonder if HoT will be compatible with WQ....

rahdo nope. you'll see why ;)

@@thelastmotel I asked the very same question, people said no.

No legs.

check the show notes :)

evaluating circumstances and making decisions is the gameplay :)

You are right, sorry if this offended you any way.