It's even more clear that judge glanville was biased. The state would have never agreed to this amount of the defenses objections. They would have argued it down even while knowing the statements were either speculation or irrelevant. And judge glanville would have surely allowed it...smh
How did this woman get to be a Judge?...that strange laughing she does on the bench is so irritating!! Holding these Defendants for almost 2 yrs under this incompetent Court is sooooo freakin UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!! Dismiss the whole damn case!!!
Cases dont get dismissed because the DEFENSE prolongs the case with delays, false allegations and frivolous motions then claims "Its taking too long..unfair"!! Doesnt work like that
This judge is acting more like a lawyer than a judge. She is informing prosecutors how to word it and giving examples. She should stick to judge rules or step down. I am tired of this case. From the beginning it should of been dismissed case
This judge is almost as bad as the last. She’s minimizing the prosecutorial misconduct. She’s minimizing the impact this breach has on the jury. She actually thinks she can unring the bell on coercion. She said she called woody onto the stand to ask if he felt coerced. Never asked about it. She’s not trustworthy.
because there has been NO misconduct by the State..there has just been manipulation, false allegations, delay, disruption and bull5hit by the DEFENSE that is slowing this case down
@@Laugh_always.havefun. this Judge is doing he SAME jb and has demanded the SAME things as the LAST Judge...the difference is the DEFENSES isnt disrespecting the authority of her court!!
Melnick was right about demanding federal immunity! This judge is also lying to Woody! Simone told him the statute of limitations is up federally. It is not on some crimes! He needs to tell them he wants federal immunity or he is pleading the 5th and he has that right because they cannot refuse him his 5th federally if they cannot give him federal immunity!
@@angelaboone0430 my question was when not if cause she doesn’t have a choice she has to make a ruling no matter what the ruling is she has to make it, i dont even know why you attached your thoughts to my comment when it doesn’t apply, so if your not gonna answer the question just make your own original comment instead of an uneducated response to my simple question 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
@@jucobangggs If you don't think your question was answered what stops you from being polite and simply either a) not reply or b) say something along the lines of "thank you but that doesn't answer my question"? Calling people you don't even know "uneducated" is not good manners.
@@surrenderxe dont be in the comments if you gonna be all sensitive and play victim when someone challenges your comment, how about you grow a pare instead of crying about someone being rude I can respond how I want deal with it
Woody would not look at thug when he walked out of that court room . He is the reason Ysl” is on trial! Let’s not 4 get that my people. !!! This Kat” started the whole investigation;act like you don’t (know) remember!!!!!
I never forgot and it baffles me how much love he’s getting even on social media like you some type of hero when he’s literally the biggest rat. I don’t care how hard he tries to act. He’s a snitch and like you said this entire came down because of his days, years worth of snitching that he did.
Exactly!! Like what do they want her to do walk in to court one day and say OK this trial is over, dismissed. It just don’t work like that. She has too much to lose to dismissing this trial this fast. Trust the process. 🙏🏼
Well, changing your opinion ist perfectly fine - don't you do that too sometimes? Or do you form exactly one opinion about a certain topic and stick to it no matter what?
There was nothing wrong with the ex parte meeting because Woody was not a defender in the case, so the defense had no burden to be present. It was a meeting to purge him from his immunity violation. In that meeting, he had a substitute attorney in lawyer Kayla Bumpus who was sitting for lawyer Melnick. This case will not be a mistrial. The jury will decide if they want a city ruled by gangs or a city ruled by law and order.