I am currently in the middle of reading Dirk's new book for the third time. I thoroughly recommend this book. It is very accessible and packed with great information.
it's a pity the approach of only looking at your blunders means that your after-match analysis doesn't discuss the times when you made the correct move, despite being unsure. For example at 7m mark you were wondering if you should stay on the 18pt with your 55. You were behind in the race, and thought it might have been a mistake not to stay back. It never came up again in the analysis, which leaves me wondering, was it the correct move? or was it such a small error that it didn't get discussed? It surprises me that it wasn't a blunder because you were still 15pts behind after you moved your 55, but I guess with the opponent on your bar point, and with your timing advantage, it was not necessary to stay back.,
In long match there are many interesting spots. I don't want to spend too much time on the analysis so I focus on blunders and cube actions. Of course this means that I miss some spots. You can look up everything that interests you in the XG file.
this thinfs calls mindflips. we need to analyse also our mindflips (if you choose right but was not sure and your alternative decision was a blunder, which is means you make 50% of times maybe this mistakes, or lower or maybe higher tat 50% but in thhis particular moment you make right move)
