Тёмный

We the People with Judge Luren Lake Altered Heirloom & Daycare Debt 

Justice Central
Подписаться 42 тыс.
Просмотров 24 тыс.
50% 1

A man sues his future son-in-law for making drastic changes to a family heirloom; Daycare owner sues parent for unpaid field trip fees
In 2021, Byron Allen's Entertainment Studios announced a revival of the We the People in the fall of 2022, with family lawyer and legal analyst Lauren Lake as presiding judge. Lake hosted the Daytime Emmy Award winning court show Lauren Lake's Paternity Court for 7 seasons. We the People with Judge Lauren Lake premiered in 2022.

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 33   
@queencharles3527
@queencharles3527 5 месяцев назад
1st case: It was a matter of principle for the old man. He felt offended & that's understandable. His gesture to help pay for the wedding shows that he wasn't trying to be malicious. Respect the old ppl..lol. They just want to feel appreciated and respected.
@twilderlm2559
@twilderlm2559 5 месяцев назад
Every1 knows a family heirloom is not 2b changed. If she's cool w the ring being changed... she shld've declined / told her dude 2 buy another 1.
@RedRose-lb3xf
@RedRose-lb3xf 2 месяца назад
Just buy NEW WEDDING RING DAAA?!!! Instead of entirely refigured!!
@US1151
@US1151 4 месяца назад
It was the principle. Old man had to teach the young man “order.”
@G-PAT
@G-PAT 3 месяца назад
First one: I don't think he should have changed the heirloom I think that takes away from the value, it wasn't his to change anyway
@On3Lov3ly
@On3Lov3ly 7 месяцев назад
That 12,000 case warmed my heart at the end.
@Buildyourinheritance
@Buildyourinheritance 6 месяцев назад
Fiancé is airhead
@albertaowusu3536
@albertaowusu3536 5 месяцев назад
It is not a family heirloom anymore. The fiancé should have it back if they break up.😊
@fashionforwardmom
@fashionforwardmom 4 месяца назад
So you pay for a weeks worth of child care yet there is no prorate the week of the field trip and you have to pay extra for the field trip that makes zero sense if I have to pay for the trip or pay someone else to watch my child then i better be getting a pro rated refund that week
@HopeAndrea_HFG
@HopeAndrea_HFG 2 месяца назад
💯
@Yuditeu
@Yuditeu 2 месяца назад
Facts!!❤
@lillianwilliams5510
@lillianwilliams5510 7 месяцев назад
The defendant probably cant afford to pay the fine and perhaps will have to take her child out in order to pay. She would have done better by getting someone to keep her daughter. Also the trips should be planned a year in advance or at least included estimates in the weekly or monthly fees. The terrible thing is the child who doesn't get to go. Where was she taking the children for $225
@Alwaystaykind
@Alwaystaykind 3 месяца назад
Dont send your child to that daycare 😂 ,they sucks parents 💰 money
@lillianwilliams5510
@lillianwilliams5510 7 месяцев назад
So they still have the ring plus have to pay the $12k. Family should stipulate conditions under heirlooms being passed on. Clearly have a WILL WITH SPECIFIC REQUESTS
@sandrawestley4193
@sandrawestley4193 6 месяцев назад
You do not alter a ring that is so old, really it’s not rocket science, even so I would not sue my child for the money at all, how can a young couple find that sort of money when they are getting married, I would just put it down to experience that I had not made it clear about it should stay exactly as is. But I don’t think in the UK that they would change the ring, often our jewellers will not even enlarge a size of the ring in case it’s ruined. I’ve got rings that are from my great grandmother and I’m 80 years old now, so it’s very old.
@albertaowusu3536
@albertaowusu3536 5 месяцев назад
He bought the ring at market value he can get it back if they break up.
@mommolette3607
@mommolette3607 7 месяцев назад
Judge lake is fair
@gwendolynosler3930
@gwendolynosler3930 6 месяцев назад
I think so too fair
@DWBTommyStrikes-e6s
@DWBTommyStrikes-e6s 5 месяцев назад
Way Too Fair
@albertaowusu3536
@albertaowusu3536 5 месяцев назад
This is now his family heirloom😊
@SavicksterTheTrixter
@SavicksterTheTrixter 7 месяцев назад
Father has a good attitude with the money.
@SavicksterTheTrixter
@SavicksterTheTrixter 7 месяцев назад
2nd case ending - no it's NOT fair- plaintiff is going to have to give 50% refunds to EVERY other child when their parents start complaining that defendant only got to pay half. WHAT IS FAIRS is that the plaintiff needs to sue THE FATHER for the other half. Since the child is a minor, this shouldn't be a problem. These procedures really need to be changed in order to avoid this hassle for the plaintiff. Either: 1. BOTH PARENTS are brought in and pay for half each or 2. Plaintiff gets everything and DEFENDANT can sue the father for half since the father's relationship is with HER. This is so disgusting for the plaintiff who tried to help a child.
@twilderlm2559
@twilderlm2559 5 месяцев назад
And I'm disappointed n the daughter 💯
@prettybossy510
@prettybossy510 День назад
It's still the GM ring and now it can be an heirloom passes to their children... isn't that the point
@Wanshkl
@Wanshkl 2 месяца назад
1rst case: I dont know what it is called but he couldve had 2 separate detacha le rings made to stand as frame of the original ring.
@monicaswavel6074
@monicaswavel6074 7 дней назад
Sad that the Father cares more about the tradition than his daughter. Very sad.
@albertaowusu3536
@albertaowusu3536 5 месяцев назад
Is he still going to marry her. Dad basically sold the ring to him.
@lillianwilliams5510
@lillianwilliams5510 7 месяцев назад
Most field trips are included in the regular fees or they tell the parents in advance that is additional costs and how much each trip will costs. This day care was ripping off the parents.
@ericstewart517
@ericstewart517 7 месяцев назад
Actually, obviously, it was discussed "in advance" ....they BOTH clearly said they had discussions prior about the Permission Forms/etc and the mother said NO, can't afford it. And the owner said, "Don't worry about it" And THAT was the problem....one person's "Don't worry about it" meant "NEVER worry about it," to the D....and "Don't worry about it....until later" to the P Honestly, I absolutely can understand how the D may have thought the Daycare was just "scholarshiping" her daughter....it does happen "Oh, we can't afford it..... Oh, don't worry, we want little Linda to come ....don't worry about it" She should have added ...Don't worry about it RIGHT NOW, you can pay over time/later
@Cattleya1998
@Cattleya1998 4 месяца назад
Fair enough
Далее
Как открыть багажник?
00:36
Просмотров 14 тыс.
JUDGE MATHIS FOX 66 WSMH-DT (FLINT)
1:37
Просмотров 23 тыс.