We need to end tax exemption for “religious” institutions. Too much of that tax exemption subsidizes an anti-union, anti-democratic, anti-science domestic insurrection. I’m devoutly Christian and nothing divinely uplifted my life more than the blessing of two public employee union parents. That economic possibility did the work of Jesus! 🙏
@@ShardDesuThat’s self-contradictory for several reasons: 1. You’re imposing your religion’s values onto others, thereby violating your own rule. 2. Religions such as Christianity have evangelism as one of their core tenets. In fact, evangelism is the subject of over half the New Testament and it’s Jesus’ last command to believers before he ascends into heaven: “Go and make disciples of all nations.” This doesn’t mean forcing others to believe (which isn’t possible anyway), but rather going out and presenting the gospel to people and leaving it up to them to reject or receive it. To tell Christians to disobey Christ opposes the Christian faith entirely and would rightly be considered anti-Christian.
100 percent this. They want to privatize to control. They are trying to force their beliefs via or judicial system. And they are doing it quietly 🤫. Start making noise people. ❤
My husband has a job that is desirable across the globe. If the right has their way, Europe and Canada will start looking even better. If the right has their way, there will be a brain drain. Of this, I have no doubt.
It will be more like our University system I would think, where schools spend half there money attracting students with expensive sports programs that rely on the 'free' labor of athletes and students. Than pass that cost on parents, imagine student loan debt before the kid is even 18.
@@thinkharder9332In that case why are individuals without children paying taxes that go towards schools? You don’t normally get to pick and choose at such a low level what your taxes go towards. Literally the last thing we need is less money towards public schools.
Agreed. They should pay taxes. However, they are private education and should not get any government funding. Government funding is not to be used to indoctrinate children to one religion. That is the whole concept of private religious schools.
@thinkharder9332 But these high performers you are referring to are still benefiting from the public school system because they also benefit from the next generation even if they don't send their own children to public school. As you said, they still benefit from the next generation. I'm not advocating for throwing more money at the problem, but in this case we're talking about taking money away from the public school system. The point here is to try to burn down the current system, not somehow improve it by taking money away. There are a lot of problems in public schools. I have a family member who is a teacher in a public school and she cares very much about doing the best for her students. The school district on the other hand is wasting money on things like 'refreshing curriculum' (aka buying new books that are just the same book with the chapters rearranged). From my experience, funding cuts never actually cause the right things to be cut.
@@thinkharder9332That's a decision they have made. They don't get to choose where their tax money is going to. As a matter of fact, they can choose to believe that their money is going toward infrastructure or environment or what-have-you. Their money is not going specifically to government-sponsored education. Their kids can get a public education while going to Sunday school for their religious education. Religious schools should not get public funds whether or not parents are paying taxes. Those taxes are used for a lot more than just education, and the government should not have to separate out all the different possibilities for all the different citizens in the US. I'm certain that atheists don't want their taxes to be used in religious education which seek to indoctrinate.
Originally the government was supposed to look after defense, international trade, and basic law, and let the people create culture and commerce. That was the founding vision of a free country. But freedom to leftists means free money for me, taken from you at gunpoint. We should have the right to deny what is ours to people who hate us. You agree with that, when you're the one being robbed.
There's a big difference between "Freedom of Choice" and "Freedom From Choice." When your choices are made for you, that is NOT freedom. That is a dictatorship.
If school vouchers existe, private schools will cherry pick who they accept. So if your child needs special education or has an IEP they aren’t getting into those schools, and are forced to go to a now less funded public school.
More often, those private schools will take that student for just a few months, kick them out after refusing to honor their IEP, and then the family is *really* stuck due to the funding already being spent. It happens a lot in charter schools in my home state...organized grift.
if your child needs special education then Harvard might not be the best choice to begin with. Private schools of all levels are for more advanced students. Not the disabled. You may want to consider a montessory school if you have a special needs child. those kids tend to do better there than public schools.
Actually, most voucher proposals include enhanced vouchers for special needs and prohibit "cherry picking." The cherry picking argument has been made for years. That is exactly what happens when most of us can only choose public schools. Who goes to the expensive prep schools? The children of rich people. Opposing choice, as many do, just because they hate religion or hate the religion of others, is a poor argument. Many of the choices would not be religious in any event.
@@edarcuri182 First off, "opposing choice" is political terminology and I reject your dishonest framing. "Opposing choice" is what conservatives do when they won't allow women to get abortions even for non-viable fetuses. Liberals and progressives oppose taxpayer money being spent on private and religious schools because we want a good public education system that works for everyone, and the first step in that process is to not let our tax dollars get drained away funding the schools of the rich and evangelical.
I knew it. Every cornerstone of a civilized country is being commoditized and forced as a free market product. And this is all done by design. Teacher shortages, school budget cuts, fat administration salaries, ineffective testing policies, and more are ALL by design to kill public education. This is also happening to our jobs, where employers post phantom vacancies, giving perception there's an abundance of jobs, but the goal is to gradually erode all jobs (both blue and white collar), so people suffer, populations decline, and the 0.1% don't have to put up with humans anymore--they'll have AI service all their life comforts.
💯 I agree with you. Sam Altman CEO of OpenAI calls us "median humans" and wants AI "that you could hire as a co-worker." I feel like we are trapped in The Twilight Zone.
its also the reason that housing is becoming unaffordable, making "you will own nothing" a reality, and they wont stop even to the point where 99 percent of the population is homeless and millions of 1 ft by 1 ft smaller than a box vacant rental properties sitting at billions of dollars become ghost towns while the working class is still averaging 10 dollars an hour and inflation has skyrocketed to infinity.
as a european, it's mind boggling to imagine someone thinking privatization of the education system is actually a sane idea. just take a look how other privatized sectors (that aren't private in most countries) in the states have turned out - healthcare, incarceration, etc. I struggle to understand how such an outwardly mighty and virtuous country can be so irreparably broken.
It's about profit as well. It's the primary driver of why so much public sectors are slowly being privatized. Medicare, Medicaid, prisons, schools, infrastructure and utilities. just to name a few, are all slowly being taken over by for-profit interests. It's taking the democratic oversight of those sectors and putting them in the hands of a few.
@@thinkharder9332They are only considered better by people who went to private schools. They aren't better. People are attracted to money and if you go to a private school, your parents must have money. If you think that private schools are better, it just shows you've bought into this shallow scheme that if you have money you're better than everyone else. This is part of the way these people want to divide the people. The class war. People have been fighting this civil rights war. Now it's much different than the way it was 50 to 100 years ago. Now we have an upcoming class war. The people who create private school want to keep this class divide going. They want to minimize the middle and lower classes, to literally make money off the backs of these people. It isn't going to work. There are groups of robber barons who make money off the masses of people. They want to keep all the groups divided, so they fight against each other, while they take the money in the process. This is why there is a civil rights war and a class war. Private schools are not terrible, but it just goes to show you that when you have private interests meddling in things like education, it's just a bad idea. When you have private interests doing these things, they are not accountable to anyone. If they do wrong, they literally get away scott free. No one is saying private schools are terrible. But it's moving society in the wrong direction. Everyone should have the same education and it should be accountable by the government.
@@thinkharder9332In my opinion its because of funding and networking. The public education system is for poor people, and private school is for rich people. This separates the socioeconomic classes so that poor kids have a slim chance of escaping poverty. because they are never exposed to intelligent discussion, business connections, etc. Private schools dont have 3 or 4 disruptive students per 30 student class (with only 1 stressed out teacher) One thing to consider - rich zip codes with good funding perform similarly to private schools. Also there are agendas in the learning material in public schools. They cant as easily indoctrinate kids at private school, and the private schools give each student way more attention and resources to learn real, helpful life and career knowledge.
as an American who's dad would tell him, all while growing up, that he's lucky that he was born as an American who is white and a man I will tell you that here a plurality of the white old men have been convinced, through the generations, that american exceptionalism is real and that white men built everything good in this country and everything that everyone holds dear is due to the white man. seriously that's the mentality of millions of white men here. it's fucking stupid
"I think we have to take our shot now" tells me they see the same thing I do. They've managed a narrow window through stretching the rules, and if we can defeat this push, they'll have to start all over. Keep voting (work in the system), keep protesting (build community outside the system). We can win.
Honestly I'm getting to a point where out of the system solutions are more appealing cause fuck these guys. They are dying and they know it and they don't want to fade into that quiet good night. Religion is on the way out. At least as we know it now.
At this point I think that separation of church and state legally wasn't enough. We need to tax religious institutions and actually start ruthlessly prosecuting their leaders for their crimes against country and children.
Wasn't enough for what? We don't have a state religion. Religiosity is at an all-time low if I'm not mistaken. I'd be willing to discuss eliminating tax-advantaged nonprofits as part of a revamping of the tax system.
It goes further. Imagine a child from an underfunded school system getting into college? Succeeding in college? It's a continuing attempt to segregate access to higher education by class.
They want to segregate by class so they can ultimately segregate by race and religion. Basically to go back to a pre Brown vs Board of Education world. Their parents and grandparents set this plan up for them to follow and execute once they saw rulings in the 50s through to 70s were not solely benefiting them.
What kills me is that so many people are okay with it. They’ve subsidized for-profit charter schools, gutted public school funding, and then blame poor education quality on public schools. How can people be so dense?
These people are Imperialists underneath everything else they are. Remember: the difference between Right and Left isn't about More/Less Government, it's about hierarchical vs. egalitarian systems. And ADF and their ilk represent sub-cultures and belief systems that hold hierarchy (along age, gender, race, religion, etc.) as the skeleton for society. Those hierarchies also allow them to gain at the expense of others, which reinforces their belief in the system's validity and importance.
Christianity in America has always primarily been an astroturf for letting entitled narcissists hold onto power they didn't earn. From it being the primary justification for the monarchy and nobility, to getting co-opted by the non nobility wealthy to justify slavery and colonialism. Where it has stayed ever since. Trying to convert the populace into willing slaves at the mercy of a new form of a wealth based nobility. Like Christianity cased the massive wealth inequalities we see now in America, and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
Religion. Money to be made from privatization. Class stratification. Myopic obsession about government. And some of the people behind this are old enough to still be angry about School Integration and the Civil Rights Act. It's a rich tapestry of rightwing greivances.
So i grew up in these circles: was homeschooled, my friends went to Patric Henry College in VA. It was when i attened a public university that my thinking started to shift. It wasnt just from the classes, but from seeing the experiences of the other students. Like i was raised no-sex-until-marriage. And felt like this was a serious think to do. Then i saw my classmates living with their girlfriends with no consequences, and while i didnt change my beliefs, the cracks started to form. Its these experiences i think the Right fears the most. Not learning theory or history, but sitting next to someone different than you. What are you gonna say to the classmate with two dads? You might feel he didnt come from a background you agree with, but you're not gonna say that. What about the girl who talks about her sexual assult and abortion? Suddenly all the crisp-clean ideas that thrive in a vaccuum have to face reality. This great equalizer is what they fear. The fact that their kids will experiences other people and change from their own reflections.
It's not fear. They want supremacy. They want everyone to follow the same rules. If they aren't allowed contraceptives, nobody is allowed contraceptives. If they believe in creationism, everybody needs to believe in creationism. If they're forbidden from dancing, then nobody is allowed to dance.
@@EyesWillRuleThey’ll still use contraceptives if it was a mistake for them, but gosh no for that low income black woman who lives on the other side of town. Of course she shouldn’t get it since she’s not like them and isn’t capable of thinking on their level. It is rules for thee and not for me.
@@EyesWillRule your idiot, every poll on the topic reveals that an overwhelming majority of republicans support Contraceptives being legal. maybe actually talk people on the other side. instead of Assuming their positions based what someone stereotypes them to believe.
Religions and religious people accusing anyone else of indoctrinating children is effing hypocritical. Teaching children about ALL religions and non-religions = education. Teaching children about only one religion and threatening Hell if they don't kneel to that one religion = indoctrination.
This is why I've always been against normalizing stuff like "One nation under god" in the pledge-- What happened to freedom of religion and freedom from religion?
Fun fact: the incorporation of that stanza into the PoA + “In God We Trust” insignia in U.S. dollar/minted currency were all hyper-nationalist propaganda borne by WWII. (Thank god I had a PUBLIC middle school teacher and 2 years of U. S. History educate me on this.)
I think I took issue with it briefly while in middle school and then I just stopped saying the pledge because well.. like I looked up the definition of pledge and saw that it meant that I was orally announcing my allegiance/fealty to god/America. Both have never created a hospitable environment for me and many more to live, thrive, and prosper. Both are empty promises and the zealotry surrounding both of these enormous collections of nationalist & faith-based institutions is also disheartening.
Welcome to Australia. We've had publicly funded private schools since the early 2000s. Coincidentally, our education ranking has fallen since... Let's see... The year 2000. (It's more complicated than one thing.. standardised testing is a part of it too) What this has lead to is segregation. 1 in 3 Aussie kids attend private schools now. This is the people with money and time to travel are entering the private system. These schools then use scholarships to skim the other good students from public schools. In short, we have concentrated disadvantage. We have some schools that used to be pretty good with now 50% disadantaged kids but who are underfunded. 90% of aussie public schools don't meet minimum funding requirements while 90% of private schools are overfunded. They say school choice. But it's school choice for some. My foster child was enrolled in 2 private schools when he was younger and he was driven out of both to protect the schools reputation. Luckily he came to live with me as I live in a good postcode which meant the school was able to provide a lot of resources to support him. If he had been in a disadvantaged postcode he couldn't have been supported.
That is exactly how it goes here in US. I feel education is intentionally underfunded and on top of that Rs have been chipping away at it for 4 decades that I know of. Now crazy Rs running for president are actually telling people they want to get rid of dept. of education all together as a campaign promise.🙄
Unfortunately, working against the interests, health, and education of the American public as a whole in favor of the few isn't political corruption, but it's definitely immoral. Start an interest group, create art, go out and vote, hell, infiltrate and/or conjure up new institutions like they do if it bothers you so much. Do all of these things, but not alone, if you really want to make an impact. You have the power to make a change, never forget that.
Buddy, that would mean there were times when they were not corrupt. But this is not the case. It's not called corruption when, the politicians are always corrupt crooks. The system is working exactly as designed since the US exists. Same as the healthcare system and public transport (Or better the lack of public transportation) The system is supposed to funnel money form the poor to the rich. Is this is what the good doing since 1776. So no corruption, that IS how the government is supposed to work in the US. It's no bug man, it's feature. 😂 The US is no country, it's just a very large corporation called a country which is run by the rich and you are the modern slave for the rich slave owners. And that's why you don't have a government but a board of directors instead. And It hasn't changed since 1776.
I'm Asian American, in my culture education is highly valued is deemed to be the best way to become successful. Public schooling provides that opportunity, and it can cost little to nothing to a poor household. Now we all know it isn't the best it can be, but that isn't a reason to eliminate it, that's a reason to make it better. I can thank the public education system and the Federal Student Aid program for the success I live in today, if I had neither I'd be in a far worse economic situation. Public education should be viewed by everyone in this country in the same way Asian Americans do. You hear all this propaganda coming from right wing spaces about what the educational system is doing, how it's useless, teaches nothing, sets kids up to become failures, "grooms" kids, etc. Despite all of these nonsensical claims, the Asian American demographic's success has not declined. If the public education system was so bad, why does the Asian American demographic not economically falter? Asian American children go to the same public schools, they attend post secondary education, and they still end up succeeding in defiance of the right wing propaganda.
Upbringing/discipline to revere educational rigor is one factor, yet most Asian American families live in high income/de facto “segregated” neighborhoods where the public schools are oftentimes better equipped and funded than private institutions. These public schools are typically magnet program-structured, have less diversity or bussed-in students (especially outside of the Bay Area), and thus able to offer smaller class sizes, gifted/streamed classes, 100s of AP/IB courses and college partnerships, vocational training and have modern gymnasiums/sports training facilities, top music programs, auditoriums, science labs, etc. And with such infrastructure, K-12 schools in HICs (high-income communities) gradually become multi-year Blue Ribbon award schools. “Dream Hoarders” is a book that explores this concept extremely well. You may compare two Maryland schools, Bethesda Chevy-Chase High School (high SES/HIC) vs. Bladensburg High School (low SES/LIC). Despite being in the same state, Bladensburg is not a Blue Ribbon school and has lower graduation rates while BCC is a common feeder to Ivy League schools and UMD. Why? One is in Montgomery County (top 20% wealthiest counties in the USA) while the other is in Prince George’s County (lower percentile/poorest counties in the USA). Ultimately, Black American, Hispanic/Latine, and Native American students of low SES don’t put in less effort than high SES/advanced degree minority groups like East/South Asian Americans, Iranians, or Nigerians; the former communities are more likely to suffer from living in a community where lower property tax collections and budget deficits/mismanaged funding allocation occur and oppress at the local (county) level due to historical/systemic segregation that, by persistent legacy, still plagues these communities today.
@@RebeccaTurner-ny1xx I do not agree with this. As a second generation Korean immigrant, Asian racism is still rampant, where perhaps only in online circles do people think like this. In person, while being in a red state especially, there have been occurrences of white men telling me I should "Go back to your country" which for me, had luckily been the worse of it, but its said despite the fact I was born here, being a second gen, and at some point in their bloodline, they were immigrants too since they're not full native Americans, if having any native blood at all. But here's the real issue. Not all Asians are "light" like I, a Korean, am. You have the south east Asians, Muslim Asians, and such who are brown. Many of them are killed simply because they are associated with being Muslim, even if they had been born in America and have ever only known America living wise. Racism fueled murder does not take such into account. However, people seem to forget or not consider these people "Asian" because they don't look either Korean, Japanese, or Chinese. They still are.
That is why the American founding fathers deemed religions unfit for modern governance. The *1st Amendment's Establishment Clause* prohibits the government from making any law, _“respecting an establishment of religion.”_ This clause not only forbids the government from establishing an official religion, but also prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another. It also prohibits the government from unduly preferring religion over non-religion, or non-religion over religion. *Constitution Article VI Supreme Law - Clause 3 Oaths of Office* _"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; _*_but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."_* This means nobody is ever required to swear on the Bible, or any other religious book for an oath of office. They may choose a religious book, but none is required. _“...the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion."_ *-Treaty of Tripoli - June 7, 1797. Signed by President John Adams & Ratified UNANIMOUSLY, by the United States June 10, 1797* ....only a few times in history the Senate unanimously agreed on anything. _“This would be the best of all possible Worlds, if there were no Religion in it”_ *-Letter From John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 19 April 1817* _"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the Supreme Being as his father, in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter."_ *-Thomas Jefferson* _"I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world and do not find in our particular superstition [Christianity] one redeeming feature."_ *-Thomas Jefferson* _"The way to see by Faith is to shut the Eye of Reason."_ *-Benjamin Franklin* _“The study of theology, as it stands in Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authorities; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion....and as this is the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.”_ *― Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason (1794)* _"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."_ *-Susan B. Anthony*
@@AndNowIWrite You're welcome. It is more important than ever for people to understand that contrary to popular American folklore, the founding fathers DID NOT BELIEVE in the Bible, DID NOT IDENTIFY as Christian & DID NOT CREATE a government based on those values. In fact, most had an extremely obvious & palpable dislike of it. Just look at the laws they passed, treaties they ratified, the letters they exchanged & the books they published; written, edited & published by the Founding Fathers, themselves. Publications like, *Age of Reason* or *Reason: The Only Oracle of Man* or *The Jefferson Bible* are good introductions. They are all damning critiques of Christianity. _"I am no Christian, except mere infant baptism make me one."_ *-Ethan Allen - Reason the Only Oracle of Man* _"The story of the redemption will not stand examination. That man should redeem himself from the sin of eating an apple by committing a murder on Jesus Christ, is the strangest system of religion ever set up."_ *- Thomas Paine - Age of Reason (1794)* _“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.”_ *-Thomas Jefferson - in letter to Alexander von Humboldt, December 6, 1813* _"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life, I absenteed myself from Christian assemblies."_ *- Benjamin Franklin* (Poor Richard's Almanack) _“Take away from Genesis the belief that Moses was the author, on which only the strange belief that it is the word of God has stood, and there remains nothing of Genesis but an anonymous book of stories, fables, and traditionary or invented absurdities, or of downright lies.”_ *- Thomas Paine - Age of Reason (1794)* _“There is not one redeeming feature in our superstition of Christianity. It has made one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites.”_ *-Thomas Jefferson* (American statesman, diplomat, lawyer, architect, philosopher, Founding Father, 3rd president of the United States) _“Have you considered that system of holy lies and pious frauds that has raged and triumphed for 1,500 years?”_ *-Letter John Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 19 April 1817* _“Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.”_ *-James Madison - Letter to Wm. Bradford, April 1, 1774* _"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.”_ *-James Madison, Ibid, 1785* (American statesman, diplomat, Founding Father, 4th president of the United States) _"I beg you will be persuaded, that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution.”_ *-George Washington, letter to the United Baptist Chamber of Virginia, May 1789* _"In this enlightened Age and in this Land of equal liberty it is our boast, that a man’s religious tenets will not forfeit the protection of the Laws, nor deprive him of the right of attaining and holding the highest Offices that are known in the United States.”_ *-George Washington - letter to the members of the New Church in Baltimore, January 27, 17*
An "establishment of religion" means a specific church, like the Catholic church, or the Mormon church. There is no freedom FROM religion in the Constitution. The private opinions of the founding fathers in interesting but not relevant to discussions of law.
@@DJ_Force Incorrect. Our laws & secular democracy *REFLECT* the world-views of the American founding fathers. _“The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or Mohammedan Nation.”_ *- John Adams* (American statesman, attorney, diplomat, writer, Founding Father and 2nd president) Notice the 2nd president said, _"The [U.S.] is not a Christian nation."_ That encompasses Catholic, Protestant, Mormonism (Mormonism didn't exist at the time) & all other Christian eligious denominations. The U.S. is not Christian, not Jewish & not Islamic. Would you like to insert some other religion you believe they advocated for? A secular democracy was just one of the many, revolutionary & courageous, concepts these men established in their time. _"The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."_ *- Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man* (American Founding Father, philosopher, political theorist, and revolutionary) The founding fathers intentionally established a government with no religion, so the people living under that government have the freedom to choose any (or no) religion they would like, free from government influence.
Is there a way to see if a local school board candidate is being funded by this group(s) - we're seeing more and more School Board Candidates use "we're your conservative candidate" to win in deep red districts, and since it's so cheap to run a school board campaign it's hard to tell if they are tied to these larger groups.
they already literally have their own schools where they're allowed to indoctrinate the hell out of students and teach straight up fake science. so why do they need to attack everyone elses schools as well?
They don't. They want the politics of the Bronze Age where the wealthy are seen as godlike figures above the rabble of the common person while enjoying the luxuries of the modern age. We need to stand up to them to show this kind of attitude isn't tolerated anymore.
They do not want the Bronze age they want the Dark Age where everyone who was not X in that Kingdom was killed or enslaved similar to peasant farms but for factories.
Kind of rich for people insisting on a religious education accusing public schools of indoctrination. Isn’t accepting something as fact solely because you’re told with an insistence of suspending reason the definition of indoctrination?
You are not correct. At all. Religious education does not accuse anyone of anything, first of all. Secondly, in religious private schools, it is more inclusive in that one doesn't have to believe in God to attend there, but God can be included in discussions. Not so in the public school sector, so who has more rights? Religion is free-will. As for suspending reason for belief in God, on the contrary. Look up Thomas Aquinas's 5 Proofs on the Existence of God. It's too bad, by the way, you'd never see that in a public school library but all sorts of LGBT material. This is why we are having this discussion.
@@sstritmatter2158 *//"You are not correct. At all. Religious education does not accuse anyone of anything, first of all."//* Firstly, you Completely Failed to support your original point(s) that they were "not correct [at all]". As all you did was simply state "Religious education does not accuse...", even though NewBloomWon NEVER Claimed or Implied that 'Religious Education accuses', they Specified " *people* [who INSIST on a religious education]...". There's a big difference there. *//"in religious private schools, it is more inclusive in that one doesn't have to believe in God to attend there, but God can be included in discussions."//* Secondly, you're playing fast-and-loose here to a point of dishonest representations. One needn't Necessarily believe in a God to attend many [though not even remotely Every] religious private school, sure, but even in the cases where it isn't a Hard Requirement (and no telling how long that will last either)... the students who Don't Believe (or Believe Differently) will nevertheless still invariably be shunned, marginalized, and/or outcast merely for their differences in belief. All the School itself needs to do for that to happen is just NOT Even lift a finger or say a word, the Religious Students and Religious Parents will MAKE it Happen. Further, "including God in discussion", by Your [Religious] Private-School Standard, means making reference or mention of A SPECIFIC Religious 'God' (and mere Unfounded and/or Unprovable BELIEFS of a Specific Type) as much as possible even when or where there is NO Feasible or Realistic Relevance to the subject or topic at-hand. That makes for a Hindrance to proper education, especially since it's Ideological BIASES that can (and often Will) be used to deliberately seek to Control or Manipulate the Information Available to those they're "educating". Meanwhile Public Schools don't (and Can't) condone or support Shunning or Marginalization of believers of ANY Religious Ideology, including those that believe theirs to Be "Superior" or "Absolute Truth". And while Religious Beliefs can't merely JUST be 'discussed' Willy-Nilly as though they were Actually Objective Facts, they CAN Be Referenced when & where genuinely relevant to a topic or subject, and NOTHING Prevents students of Public School from Believing their own personal Religious Ideologies (regardless of what those are). So, the very Idea of Religious Private Schools run starkly COUNTER to the concept of Religious Freedom. If they Didn't, then they wouldn't be Called "Religious" & "Private" in the First Place. *//"As for suspending reason for belief in God, on the contrary. Look up Thomas Aquinas's 5 Proofs on the Existence of God."//* Oh, you mean Aquinas's THREE [supposed] "Proofs on the Existence of God" (apparently Aquinas, for all his [relative] intelligence in his time, Couldn't Count properly; see 'Equivocation' and pay attention to how his "Argument from First Cause" is just being [dishonestly] Phrased 3 Different Ways and arbitrarily being called "3 Different Arguments"). Every single argument of his has long-since been rebutted, countless times. *//"It's too bad, by the way, you'd never see that in a public school library but all sorts of LGBT material."//* Sounds an awful lot more like you've Never been in a public school library outside of literally the most basic of Elementary-School Libraries. But sure, let's just PRETEND that 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders (or Younger) can Magically just FULLY Understand & Comprehend Complex Philosophical ramblings & jargon (and particularly from the Renaissance, Middle-Ages, or Medieval Period; I'm SURE they could all just Perfectly Read That NO Problem [/s]). *//"This is why we are having this discussion."//* No. We're having this discussion because You (and/or many folks much like yourself) WANT Your Personal Religious Beliefs to be held as a Privileged & 'Superior' Position Over Other Religious (and Non-Religious) Beliefs within our current modern Societies. WANT them to Dominate. And the Money-Hungry Religious Leaders & Apologetics Mouthpieces, just blanketly tell you what IS or ISN'T to be believed, and you swallow those pills without question (most of the time), even when they're the ones making the biggest personal investments (and Profiting the Most) out of things like those Religious Private Schools & 'Voucher' Systems (among other Geopolitical issues). Simply because they phrase it in an appealing & religiously self-confirming manner that caters to your personal beliefs and makes you FEEL morally-justified in further helping them to continue lining their pockets while ultimately Taking from the poor more than anyone (exactly like Jesus wanted... Oh wait... ).
These people should be in prison, but instead we have them allowed to corrupt our educational system to such an extreme degree under the guise of “religion”, because our government is too spineless to stop them.
Our government is too spineless to stop them because these people are paying them. We need to go French Revolution on these people and force them out of power.
Check out *PROJECT 2025* This is why we must call for Direct Digital Democracy with neither Parties nor Politicians. Citizen initiated referendums with thresholds and a social contract means Communities can vote their own laws. As well as a Public Authority to audit police and prosecute bad actors in our own courts. With the appropriate checks and balances, you could have a national digital forum where qualified professionals can debate the issues in a public setting without all the disinformation and bad faith antics, hatespeech etc. Any vote would need to pass the 70% threshold, with a veto or _rewrite_ vote needing 30%. The issues would be debated, the public educated, and then a vote taken. Votes that fail will have to wait a year before trying again. Any new proposal (Citizen Initiated Referendum) would have to reach a threshold of support before it made it onto the register. This would all be subject to a Social Contract (New Constitution) that forbids human rights abuses and discrimination, that can be written in the same manner based on the core principles we all share. Councils and Boards could operate in a similar fashion at Scale. It works in a way that obligates people to better educate themselves ( that is to use logic and evidence in their reasoning ) for a better understanding of the issues, and then take collective responsibility for the outcomes. As opposed to the divisive US v them scapegoating and bi-partisan finger pointing the current Capitalist Pyramid Scheme runs on. This can be achieved through a General Strike or Velvet Revolution, much like the Occupy movement, peacefully occupying State Buildings until a People's Mandate can be implemented. Alternatively candidates could run with the directive to install a Direct Democracy, and therefore wouldn't need to have any policies of their own, they could even be Mascots! If you agree with these ideas please copy and paste this post, the only ones that can stop them is US, all of us, on the same page, with the goal of a Direct Democracy without Parties or Politicians, for a safer sustainable future for our kids.
@@dundid1t4LL I found there's a direct link between Scientology, Trump, and the techniques used by the right wing echosphere, who also tie to NXIVM (Elon promoted it) Epstein (Trump's bff for20+ years) and Saville, (who Brand idolised) and the Monarchy who (Shapiro and Piers Morgan defends). Tate dated Peterson's daughter and Elon went to the same Jesuit University as Trump, and Epstein hooked up Elon's brother, just like he did for Trump. Trump's lawyer Alan Dershowitz said he was introduced to Epstein by Lynn de Forrester Rosschild. Scientology is training these people in the tactics of brainwashing, basically what MK Ultra became, and probably run by the CIA, and Opus Dei, which is basically the same thing. Their principle strategy is Gaslighting. Gaslighting, aka Grooming. Accusation in a mirror (AiM), mirror politics, mirror propaganda, mirror image propaganda, is a hate-speech incitement technique where one falsely attributes to one's adversaries the intentions that one has for oneself and/or the actions that one is in the process of enacting. It was used in Rwanda, Guatemala, Brazil, and Burma, each having ties to Mossad. Trump, Barr, Bannon, Cippolone, Gore, Guiliani, Leo, Alito, Thomas, and Barrett are all Opus Dei. Trump trained alongside Epstein and Roger Stone under Roy Cohn, who used kids to blackmail politicians on behalf of Mossad. Cohn trained under Meyer Lansky, who trained under Hoover. Robert Mercer and Rupert Murdoch are both Knights of Malta. Saville, Bezos, Gates, Koch, Rogan, Walsh, Crowder, Kirk, Fuentes, Dore, Knowles, Kulinksi, Ball, Iverson, Icke, Woods, Watson, Cernovich, Abbott, Jones, Robinson, Woods, Pool, Rubin, Peterson, Posobeic, Duke, Molyneux, Yilanopouse, Gionet, Richardson, Tillerson, Greene, Manaforte, Flynn, Ducey, Acosta, Attwood, Stone, Pence, Desantis, Meadows, Trump, Eastman, Black, Kerik, Melania, Barr, Bannon, Hawley, Gingrich, Abrams, Comey, Cuomo, Kerry, Abrams, Gore, Spencer, Blassio, Pompeo, Bolton, McCarthy, Nugent, Cruz, Rubio, Gaetz, Santos, Tucker, Gutfield, O'Reilly, Beck, Scarborough, Devos, Kasich, Mercer, Murdoch, Rosschild, Ingram, Kelly, Lake, Conway, Coulter, Huckabee, McEnany, Hannity, Spicer, Christie, Prager, Maher, Colbert, Corbett, Hayes, Biden, Harris, Fauci, Pelosi, Menendez, Pirro, Manchin, Cooper, Maddow, AOC, Newsom, Uyger, Dawkins, Hitchens, Hancock, Sitchin, Ventura, Morgan, Cowell, Farage, Johnson, May, Merkel, Blair, Cameron, Brown, Blair, Mogg, Benjamin, Trudeau, Putin, Bolsanaro, Stalin, Lenin, Tito, Trotsky, Hitler. All Roman Catholic. Special mentions (adjucants): Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, Miller, Watters, Greenwad, Blumenthal, Maté, Camp, Brand, Loomer, Shapiro, Thatcher, Bush, Obama, Merkel, Greer, Summers, Silverstein, Adelson. Greenblatt. Wexner. Also Hindu Nationalists Ramaswamy, Tulsi, Haley, Hirsi, DeSouza, Modi etc. Edward Snowden worked for Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakheim and was bought to us by Glen Greenwald, who now rubs shoulders with Jesuit Agent Provocateurs Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, whose mutual friend with Steven Crowder Brian Callen is the founder of Diligence, a spook Contractor to the CIA. Julian Assange helped Roger Stone and the Trump Campaign in 2016, being the first to suggest challenging the outcome if he lost, and asking to be made the Australian ambassador to the US. Margeret Sunbyrne, the head of the Sun Worship Cult he was raised in was also protected by the CIA in the Australian Supreme Court, on grounds of "National Security" Trump paints himself Orange to represent Apollo. Aleister Crowley inspired NXIvM and Manson, and was a master of mind control, his Protege L Ron Hubbard was the founder of Scientology, which uses the same mind control tactics displayed in right wing media. They were also instrumental in Trump's conception as the Moon Child, born on a Super Wolf Blood Moon on June 14 700 days before the founding of Israel, who he gave sovereignty over the Golan heights on its 70th anniversary, and was inaugurated aged 70 years 7 months and 7 days old. June 14 is the birthday of Osiris, Known as the Day of the Pharoah. Scientology uses the same tricks as Religion and Freemasonry, including isolation through strange acts (rituals/hazing) Gaslighting and intimadation, these can also be seen in right wing propaganda. Peterson's hero's journey comes from the transit of the moon through the zodiac, which is why they're called months. Blame the victim: The strategy is to make the aggressor's feelings the goalposts, everything is oriented around their needs and approval; a war of attrition using subjective language and logical fallacies such as incredulity, which amounts to disbelief, and acting as if this belief is something the victim is responsible for. "Look what you made me do" *In the context of child sexual abuse (CSA) the **_gaslighting_** is often used to convince the victim all the abusive behaviours are fine, normal and an expression of “love” (for eg Patriotism, Christianity, Service). It is used to ensure the victim doesn’t speak out about it and doesn’t fight back. It can also be used in concert with other **_grooming_** tactics like fear and isolation. Ultimately the aim is to legitimise a worldview that is detached from reality, and therefore arbitrary. Now they can call evil good and good evil* *>>Trivializing:* *The victim’s feelings are made to feel like they don’t matter, are **_unfounded_** or they are weak for thinking so.* (woke/ lib/ groomer/ unamerican etc) *>>Countering: This is quintessential gaslighting.* *They **_directly counter the memories and perceptions of the victim._* *>>Repetitive Questions: The abusive partner makes the victim doubt what they think or feel by asking the same question multiple times.* by doing so they preemptively assume the role of an authority by virtue of being rude. The shock value is the whole point, it's the politics of Terrorism. *>>Diverting: The abuser diverts the subject and puts the blame into outside circumstances.* *>>No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity* is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to *protect their generalized statement from a falsifying counterexample* by trying to _exclude the counterexample_ improperly. This is the Core of White Supremacist ideology. *"What Others Say" (Appeal to Populism)* The abuser tells the victim what other people "think" about the victim, the abuser and/or the situation on whole. Also known as an appeal to populism, the basis of Authoritarian Communism, and Cults, "if many believe it then it must be true" (whether people actually agree with the position and whether it is true or not). Bolshevism itself means "the Majority" and is no different to Fascist appeals to a "Moral Majority" Patriotism is a form of Authoritarian Communism. Other than direct contradiction and disbelief other strategies for Gaslighting include Begging the Question, and the use of Strawman arguments; refuting a reframed argument *different from the one actually under discussion* while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. Through the exercise of overwhelming a subject with countless contradicting premises and subjective terms a game of Pigeon Chess is played to deter criticism and break down a person's defences, until they no longer trust their own feelings, and rely solely on an outside source for direction. This is clearly demonstrated in the Maga cult, and is repeated in the convoluted dogma and magical thinking of Evangelism, New Age Spirituality, Ancient Aliens, and Graham Hancock. Always alluding to a secret to be revealed, but always in vague nebulous terms and undefined benefits of a far away place with no means to verify one way or the other. "Trust me bro" Effectively they all play the same role of an Enlightened Guru with deep understanding of life matters who can solve all your problems. It's likely no coincidence Reagan emptied the mental health services in the US, over half of those in Jail and living on the streets have undiagnosed ADHD. Auyawasca and Psychotropics are also a staple in brainwashing, as is telling the target they've been brainwashed and that the Guru has the cure, right wing propaganda uses this language heavily by flipping the script and arguing they are the victims, that they're the ones being silenced and cancelled, that they oppose child abuse while also defending it, that the deep State is out to get them, when they're the Deep State and always have been. Aleister Crowley was a big advocate of using Psychotropics to brainwash, just like the CIA, Opus Dei and MK Ultra. Brand and Trump both use hand waving and holding them outspread in a "settle" gesture called pacing. They can also stare at an opponent, "asserting dominance" to put the target on the back foot and unsure how to respond. Peterson does this a lot, along with rapid fire speech, and using an insulting or demanding tone. By using these tactics as well as loaded language (Newspeak) and inference (plausible deniability) only to move the goalposts and reframe when challenged. Trump's Mentor Roy Cohn admitted to using kids to blackmail politicians on behalf of israel, and trained under him alongside Epstein and Roger Stone. Trump's Jesuit mentor was Norman Vincent Peale, a 33rd degree Master Freemason. He was born June 14 during a Super Wolf Blood Moon to Fred Christ and Mary McKleod, he keeps a book of Hitler's speeches called _My New Order_ and uses it verbatim at his rallies. The Von Drumph family come from the same place as Hitler, Vienna Bavaria, Capital of the Holy Roman Empire. He paints himself Orange to represent Apollo; the Dawnbringer of Aleister Crowley's Golden Dawn. Jamal Kashoggi's Mossad brother Adnan sold Trump a Superyacht for Russian Roman Abromavich, who was also paying Boris and Farage for Brexit. Most of israel's govt are non religious Russians.
@@dundid1t4LLmy guy... private schooling is a privilege have you ever thought about that? Like you have to be rich enough to afford it. You are so mired in privilege that you can't see it can you?
No wonder this happens, education is the best bet for poor people to lift themselves up, so if all schools are private - no more education for the poors. Which makes people more desperate, a cheap labor force, and the private schools funnel government money in. What's not to like if you are a filthy rich asshole who owns a school? Writing the words "owns a school" made me dizzy, honestly...
Exactly. The 13th, 14th, & 15th amendments made it illegal to Own other human beings as Chattle Property but it does not prevent bonded servitude which is the direction this is leading.
Ah, the middle class liberal mantra: "education is the best bet for poor people to lift themselves up". Sadly, in most capitalist economies, it is completely untrue for virtually all working class people. The USA could have the best public schooling, and still there'd be massive inequality. That's how capitalism works. Socialism is the solution, not self-help.
There should be no private schools. Multi-tier school systems mean that the upper class will have real education while the lower don't. That's what they want.
Why wouldn't a public school be able to provide the same level of education as a private school? It should. And if it doesn't, that's part of the problem that needs to be fixed.
This is part of the class divide. They farther they separate themselves from the middle and lower classes, the more they can achieve and the more kids they can indoctrinate.
@@jacobmecrob5185A public school can offer as much if not more than private schools. Private schools want to be private, so they can teach their own agenda. Usually non science based agenda.
@@anitaoconnell2799 You already have school choice, it's called using your money to send your children to a private school. Can't afford it? That's too bad. I can't afford to have a McLaren F1 but you don't see me crying to congress to give me "car choice" at the taxpayer's expense.
While not solely responsible, people can thank Trump for packing the Supreme Court with jurists supporting this kind of gross malfeasance to our public education system.
Actually, reach back one tier, to the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society, both of which are funded by hard-right monied interests. They make recommendations, right-wing presidents appoint them.
@@krejados1 Ding ding ding. While the right always complains about the "deep state", it's because they actually have a competent deep state which is working in lockstep to create the dystopian hellscape we're living in, and to make it that much worse.
People want to make the “both parties bad argument” and then don’t vote but really should vote for the lesser of two evils and keep doing that over and over so that the evil is lesser and lesser. But understanding incremental change like that would also involve understanding things like evolution, which is beyond these dummies.
It is not private religious schools who are lobbying for vouchers, it is people tired of Woke Marxism infecting the public school system and very poor education standards.
What I find crazy about this is that even the founding founders wanted public education so that fact they want to destroy it is just nuts. They love to act patriotic and think they are supporting America, but they seem to do everything the founding fathers didn’t want( they wanted separation of church state, public education, etc)
You still think it's 1880. Have you slept through the technological revolution. Just because a system was great 150 years ago doesn't mean it's still suitable
@@dennykeaton9701 Yes, and private schools are so much better. Get a grip. Our public schools need the funding for better teaching methods, materials and technology. Privatization will only turn it into a business, and therefor a vehicle for profit above all else.
@@meriscorditan2799 It's like two guys in 1910 debating on how to handle the horse manure in the city. You are hopelessly stuck in the past arguing about public vs private ECT.
@@meriscorditan2799I’ve read this over and over again and I can’t, for the life of me find the part where he says that they’re a benefit. Sort of sounds like he’s saying both public and private schooling are a negative.
Their position is patently absurd. If I don't like what my local police are doing with POC in my neighborhood, should I sue to get a police voucher? If I don't like my local roads, can I sue to get a road voucher? Just because you don't like the state offering doesn't mean you should be able to just take your tax money back and essentially force every other taxpayer to fund your pet project.
They aren't the same thing, but nice try. The closer logic is if there is a public works project, it should be put out to bid and the best contractor given the bid. Hence, welcome the voucher system.
And what some Beyond Republican people can do and force kids to the schools that only teach the kids how to be same Beyond Republican Politician not even teaching about the internet or having internet even TV to keep the kids from learning and scaring them into not wanting to go off this path for fear of death. Yeah, really crazy cult stuff to groom politicians from birth.
About time people noticed. The Conservative mantra states that only the wealthy need education while the workers only need enough to "do the job". This has ALWAYS been the working of religious based governing. Knowledge is a power that Conservatives do NOT want you to have.
Where I grew up in Montana there were amazing public schools and the private schools were always subpar religious schools that didn't want to teach evolution. The Espinoza decision is a tragedy.
Why is everyone so concerned about teaching Evolution? No one cares about Relativity, or Quantum Mechanics, or even basic math. A population that understands statistics but not evolution will be much better served.
They have plenty of financial support from all the religious bigots and top 1%. They are pushing for one thing but those who stand to benefit the most are the slick, rich dudes who couldn’t care less about education.
I thought America was the land of the free and of the brave! Jokes aside it's really sad and disgusting how big the american conversative (fascist) movement is.
The US government was designed from the beginning to serve the interests of the wealthy elites. We can easily deduce that these far-right religious organizations are funded by these elites to mold the US into whatever society they wish to have and only certain people will have more rights than others.
I do not know a single conservative who's a fascist... That would be the democrats. Keep your hands off our children and keep sexual harassment out. Boys are boys and girls are girls.
Honestly, the Satanic temple might just do it. They have a health clinic for women currently, and one of there on going goals is to get rid of capital punishment on school children. You know how in the 80s you could spank children in school? That sh*t still happens and the satanic temple does activism against it. Not the church of Satan they are the crazy ones.
Mike Farris is 72, his expiration date is coming up in the next nine or ten years. Homeschooled kids know that they didn't get a good education. When they reach their late twenties and mid thirties and have children, they will send their children to public schools.
It should also note that they keep using the term "Marxist" to mean "empathetic". Funnily enough being called a Marxist lead me to read Marx and discover that I am one, but I'm not Marxist because of my education at school.
I think that is just their ruse to control people. Look at mass conversions and religious boarding schools of the past. Very few of the perpetrators genuinely believe their own drivel, but want to control others with it.
People are so indoctrinated, they don't even understand what religion is. Whether it's any of the 3 Abrahamic Doctrines, Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. They "act" as though they are "progressive/law-abiding". But in really they are "Old Testament" regressive! Don't matter the Doctrine, if you're a Heathen, Infidel, Apostate, undesirable, you're not wanted! And, there is nothing you can say that will change their minds. But, they will use you for "the greater good"... The fundamental structure of religion is Power & Control! What happens with Power & Control? Corruption! What else in this World will give you the Power & Control to have a person do your bidding, willingly, and with zeal!... For "God", of course... Have a great day! 🙂✌🏽
@@dennykeaton9701We get it, you're a troll. I guess this channel has gotten popular enough for you people to try and sow dissent. But all you're doing is alienating everyone normal against you, and that's the vast majority.
Leading up to and after BLM; things like the 1619 project having the general public realize the clear connection between slavery race and class disparities from then to now seemed to anger these people. They saw an awareness growing and are quickly acting to dahs it out by pulling the country HARD to the right even if they have to go full fascist to do so.
Nah, this has been one of the long term goals of the fundamentalists for decades. Things like the 1619 project are just convenient opportunities for them, but they'll always find something to clutch pearls about. There's no bar they won't stoop below to get their way.
That New York Times 1619 project is a very poor example. As many socialists pointed out at the time, that was deeply ahistorical and aimed more at getting its author a great career in the anti-racist-but-pro-capitalism sector. She succeeded.
What really needs to be done is to nationalise education. Finland has ONLY public schools. Private school just isn't an option there. And, would you look at that: they top the global education rankings!
I think the racial origins of this cannot be understated, "school choice" was a phrase that was popular with segregationists when school segregation was outlawed... to me "school choice" just means white parents' choice to not have their kids around non-white kids
Correct 🎯 “WhY mUsT eVeRyThInG bE aBoUt RaCe?!?” Because it’s the biggest motivator of fear in the U.S. So much so, for example, when the Black Panthers showed up fully armed at a California Statehouse exercising their second amendment rights, then-Governor Ronald Reagan moved to implement gun control.
I told a friend of mine this a few years ago and she got really, really mad at me, like I was some sort of conspiracy nut. I'm so temped to send this to her.
She's a very good friend, @@jasons8479, this incident was unusual and surprising. I think she assumed I was too biased by my left-leaning politics and was overblowing things. But I knew it was entirely real I just didn't remember any sources I could point to at the time.
The freedom to pursue your own spiritual development meets the spirit of freedom. The pursuit of control of others does not. It is what the Taliban does. This is about zealots bent on power over others. Expressing fear, that others are wielding power over them, out of the absolutist perspective. But, they are unable to notice that it is the determination, that their religious institution must prevail, that creates this perception.
That anyone would say that public education is trying to replace parents is laughable. Parents consistently say that they don't know what to do when their children don't want to get out of bed, bathe, do assignments, stay off the phone when they do show up. Most people wouldn't let their pets misbehave but let their offspring run wild then say educators aren't doing their job. It's exhausting.
I think there should be a public debate on what the proper role of religious institutions is. I'll start. I am fine with religious institutions giving religious instruction to those who are willing to accept it. I don't think they should force their religious beliefs on others by trying to put them into secular law. If you are opposed to abortion because of your religion, don't have one. But don't tell others what to do. I am fine with religions helping to care for and feed the needy. I am fine with the social aspects of religious institutions serving as a kind of dating site/matchmaking service for those who want that. I am NOT fine with religious institutions financing candidates, or involving themselves in politics. If they want to do that, they should register as lobbyists or PACs, and be taxed accordingly. I also believe religious institutions should pay some amount of tax to city, county, state, and federal governments for the services that they use and benefit from. Such as streets leading up the their churches, fire, law enforcement, and emergency medical services. They could not long exist without these services and should share in the burden of paying for them like the rest of us. I'd suggest 10% because I think that is funny. Churches invented tithing. By definition, A tithe is a portion (10%) of your income given as an offering to your local church. I see no reason why that should be a one-way street. Feel free to offer your opinions. I would suggest that name-calling shows you have no intellectual opinion to contribute and are emotionally troubled. Try to make astute and cogent arguments.
I think all religious institutions should be taxed, particularly the megachurches and large institutions. The only things that should count toward tax breaks are providing housing and food for all who need it, or similar services that the government can't seem to manage at the present, but that give back to the broader community
This has always been happening. The way to make this nonprofitable is to raise teachers wages. They can't afford professionals with the minority of students they get if the wages of teachers don't allow them to compete.
I keep telling my husband that this is happening, but it's not registering. I want my child to go to public schools... but he wants to catholic school. I can't 🤦♀️ Separation of church and state in public education is the biggest threat to these religious extremists and fascists. That is why they are buying supreme court justices, and they aren't even hiding it. And if we want to talk about unions... if this happens... goodbye teacher unions.
Divorce him for custody of the kid 100%, then if in NY state where this is impossible to gain custody 100%, remarry and have the person adopt the kid. This had to happen to a cousin in very Western NY where she was raped by a person she was tutoring who was way stronger then her and kept the kid herself becuse adoption rules would have let the other father have custody of the kid and had to marry her then current boyfriend when kid was under age of 6. The kid is now 17--18 getting ready to graduate, she does know who the father is and his last name despite her not having that last name, but her mom's last name instead and any kid with that last name even if in a different part of the USA or those other 7--8 kids who were created by him but a few 2--3 with a different last name, mother/daughter are keeping tabs on the names of the kids and there kids so they do not end up even dating romantically. I say this as one kid can't be counted for after age 12, might have committed suicide at age 12 or is dead due to the father having some custody looking like an accident of leaving the kid at the last local high school football game of the regular season without her jacket. The family of the Rapist they only have lots of kids in the hopes one of them in school sports ends up a star who can then save the family out of poverty seeing that since the late 1960's to early 1970's when at the time the better endorsement deals helped athletes make more $$$ to live like a millionaire off all the endorsements.
@@caseysmith544 Absolutely nutter. Are you actually advising this person who otherwise has a happy family to wreck her life by dissolving her marriage over school choice? And you wonder why people say that the Left is insane and hostile to family values. This is disgusting. #LeftistLogic
Funny thing…I went to a public school. Once in college, I ended up tutoring a lot students who went to these private Christian schools because they were failing.
The goal for these people is to get the country to follow their views exclusively. Those kids will no longer be failing because they come from the right background. Also, you likely have a selection bias. Usually people call on tutors if their kids are not doing well or if they have someone who they want to become advanced.
It has been exceedingly clear that these dangerous groups have the resources, and sheer determination to win. What's frustrating is that Progressive groups, even ones like "Patriotic Millionaires" are not nearly as organized with a defense, while the attackers chisel away what legal protections we have using clever strategy.
Network with people. Get a strategy. We need to organize. In little ways at first maybe but it's definitely time to do something, even if it's only calling and emailing. It's going to get worse.
I’ve been talking about this for years. It may be too late - they’re already so deep into their plan - but I’m glad it’s finally getting some attention.
It was interesting to here the guy say that Christianity and politics aren't separate...because Jesus clearly stated and showed that his followers would have nothing to do with politics, governments, because they recognize God's government, his kingdom. So, are they really Christians if they are looking to politics, to men, to solve problems? Because Jesus showed that we should look to God's kingdom and his direction. The Bible foretells that governments will turn on religions...considering how powerful and motivated religions organizations are becoming, you can start to see how governments could get to the point where they will have had enough of them.
We all know these 'Christians' don't actually *believe* the words of the dude Jesus they claim to worship, let alone want to take action to live how he preached they should
This is why Christianity is a much less practical religion than Islam. Because they always put themselves in the position to be a victim. Shia Islam actually achieved things in history. That is why I am Shia.
Michael Farris was a family friend for years and years before the family finally separated from him entirely and I assure you whatever your opinion of him after this video, he was worse in person.
I will say that I wish there were alternatives to the standardized education system without having to send kids to a private school in the first place. Personally I'd rather send my children to a public Montessori school that allowed them to learn at their own pace, whether that be faster or slower than average, rather than the regimented education that I largely slept through.
It’s interesting how this group sees privatization as a tool of their influence. The thinking for the push for privatization of public services since at least the 90s is a lot clearer now.
I graduated from a public high school in 2021, and none of what these conservative idiots say about public schools is true. If anything, everybody I went to school with is either Republican or Libertarian. I am the only Communist from my graduating class, but that's because of my family telling me about their life in the 1970's and 1980's Soviet Union, what is Marxist Theory, etc. As well as my own experiences. And in my opinion, public schools do a pretty good job of indoctrination for preserving the status quo. When I was in elementary school, all I heard about the Founding Fathers and Lincoln boiled down to how great they were. When I was in 3rd grade, we were told that all immigrants come to the US for freedom and economic opportunities. And that they are grateful to have the privilege to live in such a great nation. And the only stories about children with an immigrant background that I was exposed to at school had characters that were having some problems but became American. Which didn't align with my life. I, a child of Russian immigrants, was bullied at school, including physical. I didn't really have friends. I never even really identified as American, and speak with a slight Russian accent. I had very strong negative feelings as a kid. I hated the US, for the bullies, for lying about the country my parents grew up in, for isolation, for forcing me to erase my Russian identity because I was born in Indiana. I have mellowed out, but my feelings about the US are mixed. I still hate the people who made my life hell in school. I hate the hundreds of psychopaths who care only about their own pockets, even at the expense of other's well-being. I love my friends. I love the beautiful nature of the land. I love going to college in California. I love the American far left, for just being there and telling me that I am not alone.
Some states already subsidize private schools by requiring transportation for all private school students. Seems reasonable until you realize that it costs a lot more to bus 5 kids to a school 20 miles away that it does to bus around 50 kids to the local public school 4 miles away.
Public education has already failed and no one wants to acknowledge it. Your average public school student is traumatized by poverty, absentee parents, and a sick culture of consumerism and greed. We need charters and home schools options for the vast majority of students. For students that cannot function in a charter or home school setting we need well funded early intervention programs that can give troubled and struggling children the help they need early. Making teenage children sit 30 to a room for the majority of the day is an absurd practice left over from the Industrial revolution. America will never be a monoculture like China and trying to enforce one via a public school system is a giant waste of money, time, and the future of our children.
Also, the history of racism and slavery need to be taught. It also needs to be made clear that Protestant Christians and Catholics were complicit in slavery and racism.
Sorry you cant force our kids to all be christians. If you want your kids to go to a Christian school pay for private school. Yoy do not have the right to force your beleifs on everyone else. Authoritarianism is why people dont want anything to do with religion. The more Authoritarian you get and trying to force how people live. The more people will reject any religion. I like my freedom you cant tell me what to beleive.
Though many of my fellow Christians might oppose me on this, I agree that religious tax exemptions do need to be ended or at least altered. The very foundation of Christianity is about living a simpler life in the first place. This tax exemption made sense in eras where the church and the communities surrounding it provided many of the services that the government or other communities could not provide. However, in this day and age, many Christian communities and churches have disconnected themselves from the wider public for one reason or another. These churches no longer provide any service to the public and thus should also not have the tax exemption that the exemption was based upon: to become a pillar of the communities they were in and surrounded by. However, this also means I am supportive of tax exemptions for churches and their communities that do provide service to the public. When the church opens its doors to host anything and everything from voting polls, meeting places for non-Christian organizations, and gather their people to pick up trash, provide help to the needy and poor from their own coffers, and more. I am also a supporter of public education but also acknowledge that many of the teachers tend to inject their own biases into their teaching strategies. My personal example was a English Teacher in my 10th grade. Our assignment was greek myth and I was given a choice of multiple greek myths. Wanting to do my best, I went to more obscure/direct translation than what we could find in our textbook. I found mentions of rape, so I reported that. My teacher did not like that I mentioned that and began to ARGUE with me despite my having just reported what I found with sources to back it up. Essentially, she wanted to sanitize it. On the other hand, my history teacher from my 11th grade was very open to details about history that the books did not mention (intentionally or not) like the devastation Genghis Khan left in the wake of his conquests; the textbooks like to talk more about the connections and cultural aspects than the devastation. So public schools have their ups and downs, but just because I don't like one side of it doesn't mean I'm going to defund it!
Boys are boys and girls are girls. Keep trans out of our girls bathrooms. And keep your sexual motives and grooming out of the classroom. Right? Right?
@@maxfastest keep molesters hands off the children and have separate locker rooms for boys who think they are girls. Keep the smut and filth books out of the library and the U.N. WEF approved global sex degenerate education out of the schools. It's not the 80's anymore.
So I have no real bone in this fight, but why are vouchers bad? I grew up in an area where literally ALL of the public schools were terrible and everyone knew it. But no one could move out because of how poor they were. And funding wasn’t the issue because each year the city increased the funds but nothing changed. It was the terrible teachers who couldn’t get fired. If we could have voluntarily pulled out of these schools and gone into private schools (religious or not) to redirect the funds to the schools that actually worked, wouldn’t that make the schools in the area want to hire better teachers in order to keep us? I don’t know if that’s how a voucher system works, but that’s what it sounded like to me
I would rather be awake "woke" than asleep. I can't back teaching kids to hate others due to their beliefs. Whether it be religion, LGBT, separation of church and state, or anything of one's own beliefs. This country was born from people escaping to this country for religious freedom or have the opportunity to own their own land and prosper. This country was built on that. Now certain individuals want to take that away.
Cultists weren't escaping anything, those zealots brought the persecution with them and inflicted it on the native population 'manifest destiny' style. Seperatipn of church and state isn't a belief, it's a tenet of an orderly secular political system that excludes faith based decisions because they aren't based on reality, equality or tolerance. Organized religion is a dogmatic method of propaganda to control populations and teaches people a codified set of rules intolerant of differentiation or disobedience.
In brief, some specific complaints about the public education system include overcrowded classrooms, outdated curriculum, inadequate support for students with special needs, limited access to extracurricular activities, insufficient teacher salaries and benefits, inadequate infrastructure and facilities, and disparities in resources in low-income areas. These issues impact the quality of education and can hinder student learning and teacher satisfaction.
You know what, sure, vouchers, but only for nonprofit run schools. No for-profit schools. That’s my line in the sand. No shareholder or profit motives in education.
