If you're not doing anything illegal never speak to the police, explaining yourself sounds like you're "respecting" their "authority" and sucking up to them, if they think you're doing something illegal, let them prove it, because whatever you say will be twisted and always used"against" you and never "for" you
The more you speak the more ammunition they have to fire at you to criminalise you. Notice that criminalising the public is the start of the interaction and this is what they are trained to do. The more you say the more they dig. Saying you may piss against a wall = pissing against the wall. The criminal damage is charged even if the act is not committed. Thought police. Feelings police. Out of control police.
Neither do we, badly written to give police wiggle room to arrest, detain then de-arrest and they get away with that daily They are no longer upholders of law they are feelings police a political branch of the government, and we all know where that leads. Police in the UK are broadly not trusted, so they cannot and do not "police by consent"
they have a past record that does not read well.. compared to the behavior of say countries in Europe on demo, s the british public are hardly a grave threat in most demos.... unless a super glued pensioner is on your list...
They happen all the time - keeping people in certain areas around football stadiums for example. In London they are pretty common due to royalty, politicians etc. or demos. They use S3 of the Criminal Law Act as the legal basis (prevention of crime)
Suspicion of what? Move the fences back if they want, approaching anyone without identifying themselves whilst wearing a costume and ordering them to move is utterly disgusting. Copsplaining like a world champion. “We don’t know that” she says. She has no right to know! I’m still waiting to hear exactly what crime is she suspicious of… Since when are the feelings of security guards of more concern than the rights of an individual on public land? Abusing the power of Constable is also a criminal offence carrying a life sentence. Maybe throw that back at them once in a while Reggie 👍🏻 Bunch of snowflake tyrants. All of them them…
Their main concern about photography is that it is likely to show them behaving badly, doing things they shouldn't and potentially breaking the law. Racism and corruption do not show up well on camera.
Well done to the Police for protecting the private security people from the Nasty Dangerous Cameras!! Good to see the UK citizens tax is being spent so well.
"Just trying to have a conversation" "We're not being argumentative"....All words programmed in to their tiny minds. The aggression that started it was by them. Yet another example of their stupidity and following feelings rather than law. Threats of detainment for taking photos in a public area. Disgusting! You are being funny , madam...ridiculous harrassment of photographers' legal rights. "We are the Police and because it's the Coronation, we can treat you like arseholes" Learn the law, no matter what the occasion is!
Oh you missed a HUGE one although I know there are very many. ....'You must appreciate'..... Actually no, I don't. Why must I?? Because you say so !!.... I think not. Stock phrase issued by those who are not very good at their job.
They bored silly, and needed to have something to do, so let us go and pick on some members of the public, and see if we can get something on them, whilst the pair of them used wrong, laugh, totally wrong law, and law, in the case of swearing in public, not existing.
Pretty much EVERYTHING they do or say is designed to manipulate you into doing what they want you to do rather than what you are entitled to do. One of the great things about auditing videos is that you can see these techniques in action and how to counter them. It's sad that the British public need this kind of knowledge but it is necessary when the Police cannot be trusted to act in their interest.
Telling the police "who think they know everything and what they say is gospel" that they are wrong when they are, will anger them, and when angered, will act unlawful and maliciously towards you 🤕🔨👮
Now that the UK is ruled by and for the rich and powerful, you guys should have tugged your forelock, apologised and obeyed the requests. 😉 Keep up the good work Reggie!
Our police (in the US} tend to protect the rich property owners over the citizens as well. Unfortunate. Reggie does a tremendous job. It's either laughs or great respectful audits. Cheers.
It has always been ruled by and for the rich and powerful. Fortunately for them there's little shortage of working class thugs who are prepared to protect them.
So that female police officer is admitting that the police are taking orders from the Hotel to move people away from a public place where they are doing nothing illegal. Just because the hotel has some so called high-profile guests, who have no more right to privacy then you or I staying at a Premier Inn.
@@DMC888. What an utterly ridiculous analogy!! And you call my comment a " Bad example" !?? Firstly it's not an example, it's a statement of fact about what was going on at that hotel. Secondly the only 'protecting' (your word not mine), the police were doing was 'protecting' the people in the hotel from being photographed from a public place. They weren't 'protecting' them so any criminal acts they may be doing in their private life wouldn't be found out, which is what you are insinuating with your ridiculous Jimmy savile analogy! Jimmy savile was photographed all the time and even if the police stopped you photographing him, everyone still knew who he was, and it would have had no bearing on his criminal activities.
Statements like, "When you're compliant with us" and "If they (security) tell you to move on, you should move on" should make everyones blood boil. The arrogance of that woman is unbelievable. Reggie, I have no idea how you could stand and listen to that contemptuous diatribe, you clearly have more patience than me. And the male constable ... what was he going to do if you didn't move on? Words fail me.
A simple ,polite" no",should suffice, they would have to manufacture a crime to get you away from there, and few cops will take that risk, many will threaten, few will risk it.
Yet again the police working and acting on behalf of a private corporation namely a private hotel, I hope the hotel are paying the wages of this private security and not the tax payers.
As far as I’m aware there is no legislation forcing you to “have a conversation” with a police officer. And certainly no legislation to not be rude to them.
As long as rude doesn't( in their minds) tip into threatening / abusive behaviour, they'll likely pull that stunt, it's up to you to politely imply they're full of shite.😊
Ive looked everywhere on the gov website for a law that says weeing up a wall is criminal damage and I cant find that law anywhere, I can find 1.Outraging Public Decency (Criminal Justice Act 2003) 2. Indecent Exposure (Sexual Offences Act 2003) 3.Penalty Notice for Disorder - PND (Section 5 of Public Order Act 1986) 4.by-laws of individual local authorities under Section 235 of the Local Government Act 1972. That doesnt mean there isnt a law but I cant find it
Stop calling them "Sir". Call them "mate" or "fella" until they learn some respect for the public. What section of law creates a "sterile area" in a public place and allows private security staff to move the public on from it, eh? And since when do the Police enforce the wishes of hotel staff in preference to actually upholding the LAW (which she is clueless on)? They are an absolute disgrace.
Absolutely appalling. Your rights get trashed because some posh fekkers might be unhappy about you being there? 🤬🤬🤬🤬 I'd have ended up getting arrested. Jeez, that really boils my piss!
6:40 Harassment - Means to subject someone to constant and repeated physical and/or verbal persecution. Alarm - Means a frightened anticipation of danger. Distress - Means to cause trouble, pain, anguish, or hardship. I seriously doubt the people who called the police felt any of that. They were just annoyed that they couldn't assert their perceived authoritah and so had to call on someone who they thought had more authoritah.
The way you go about your conversations is so polite and genuine, Mark on the other hand is absolutely desperate to get into a shouting match at any possible second, he constantly spouts the same shite like a broken record. Keep up the good work and don’t be too influenced by his awful approach 👍
Any public urination is illegal, this goes for young children and dogs. Private security need to be told bluntly to go back into their domain on control and not give orders to the public on public land !
Just putting a stick in a hornets nest and poking it. “We’ve been told”. That is not the basis for a consensual conversation. The police support aggressive security and it’s unacceptable Telling people to “move on” is not acceptable in a normal society but Britain has become a police state.
This is pathetic. Completely mishandled. No-one should ever engage in street conversation with the police in any circumstances whatsoever. But these attention-seekers just can't stop themselves. They just love to hear the sound of their own voice gobbing away. It's what the police rely on in these encounters - it serves to muddy the waters and provide hooks with which they can enforce their will on members of the public irrespective of the actual law.
It always seems so bizarre to me that they feel so entitled to just go and start trouble with the public over nothing to justify their pay. They are useless or at best useful idiots. They look for trouble where it doesn't exist just to "earn chicken feathers" (an internal insult within departments in reference to 🐔 💩 🐖).
I've read this a few times in an attempt to ascertain the direction of the comments. It is however pretty much irrelevant. Did you know that 'Lyme' is a nasty tick borne disease that is prevalent in the USA and parts of Continental Europe and ever spreading in the UK. Is that something you're assisting in??
Reggie, keep away from meet the tyrants- he is just 100% confrontation- thr joy of your channel is your humour and how you always keep the moral high ground. Upto you mate but we love your humour and how you talk to people, even when they get verbally aggressive. Edit to say - that police woman was sexy❤❤
So when members of other states are around ( foreign visitors ) a perfectly legal activity is now deminished to the point that a British citizen taking part in it requires investigation by the police ? do we have lawful rights in this country or just a list of temporary privileges ?
Police: they told us they don't want you taking photos. Photographer: but we're in public and it's legal for me to do so. Police: yes but they told us they don't want you taking photos. Wtf 😐
Hey steady on old chap, I was going to ask her to come to my 3 million £ broom cupboard in Mayfair to see if she wants to Stand up with me for tea and biscuits. To celebrate the crowning of our wonderful head of 'what a state' 😂😂😂😂😂
I forgot that on public holidays that the law also goes on holiday and the police can just make up whatever suits their agenda 👍also urine is sterile so technically if UKMTT did take a piss he would be making the scene more sterile so I've no clue why that constable is complaining.
If their goal is to stop people taking pictures, how, in the first place, can they tell who is taking them? A person with nefarious intent would be using one of the many undetectable means of obtaining images. (hidden cameras in glasses, etc., etc.)
It's about time the police remembered that they work for us not the elite staying in some hotel no laws were broken they serve us we pay there wages I think they need a little reminder there is no crime being out in public filming training recommend
THE MET and this sh*t mentality they have is the reason myself and my partner have decided to never go to the UK for a holiday. I'd hate to walk around as a tourist there and have to be constantly explaining why I'm taking photos.
Is it worth pointing out that the Met only Police London so you are free to visit the "UK" in all its glory as London only occupies one small area of it?
And the police in your country are better? It's a human nature thing. Put a uniform on someone and put them in a gang and you get the them and us mentality. As well as the mentality where tyranny is supported.
They need to stop saying they have the right to challenge ,they can ask what I'm doing . So some snobbery is in town, peasants now bow down now .......
Hi Reggie, Sterile area No Riff Raff, Guilty Guilty cos the hotel has feelings and Your rights don't count any more. @14:28 "We don't work for them " really? They want you to move on , so we are going to move you on. @16:37 you called the Office Miss , Remember Brighton. What about the golf cart for the toffs with no number plate? Thanks for the video.
The hotel instructed the police to remove members of the public from public space near their front doors. This police complied. Remind me who the police work for because I didn’t know they just worked for private businesses.
Criminal damage can include actions that simply impair the value or usefulness of the property of the owner. It doesn't have to be actual damage or destruction. Morphitis v. Salmon [1990] Crim.L.R. 48. That said, Criminal Damage would unlikely to be the charge for peeing up against a wall.
If they don't tell you they're recording it's classed as covert recording, a big no- no. And is a breach of GDPR. You can request a copy of the recording ------ but how can you get it if you didn't know you were recorded?
YO! Reggie!! I bet she calls her other half 'Sir', she is as cold as ice. 😆 Oh when UKMT squeaked his squeaker, my sleeping dog stirred and went and got his ball, haha. Peace and love baby!
Yes but .... Criminal Damage Act 1971: To constitute criminal damage, one has to unlawfully destroy or damage property belonging to another. It woukd seem a bit of a stretch to apply this to urinating unless the act somehow damages the property (e.g., if it causes staining or corrosion). I think this behaviour is normally dealt with as a fixed penalty notice rather than prosecution.
I think that I recognize your side kicks dulcet tones, and to be fair he can be on the provocative side.....also I worked at the MOD in that area for 17 years, and when they went out for drinks, they often went to the Corinthian Hotel, and back then the cocktails were a minimum of £18 a go (goodness only know what they are now) - PS I never went....
