Website Which Compares Eco Credentials From Brands | SEASON 18 | Dragons' Den

Подписаться 614 тыс.

Просмотров 46 тыс.

50% 1

Abbie Morris and James Omisakin's company, Compare Ethics is all about combining sustainability with technology. Their website is designed to verify eco-friendly claims made by companies in order to gain the trust of consumers from their insight. Abbie and James are seeking a £70,000 investment for 2.4% of their business.
Season 18, Episode 5.
An international sensation, Dragon's Den features entrepreneurs pitching for investment in the Den from our Dragons, five venture capitalists willing to invest their own money in exchange for equity.
#DragonsDen #BusinessPitch #EcoFriendly

Опубликовано:

30 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 112

@FilmMakerJose Год назад

Plot twist Touker owns all the factories

@kevintwine2315 Год назад

They don’t call him sweatshop Suleyman for nothing

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

And they all have a score minus 1 million coz they're based in chyna....

@IAmTheJayster Год назад

A niche for an niche with a ridiculous valuation, sounds about right

@davicool4284 Год назад

Toukers brand along with H+M and Nike is on the biggest polluter list. Not just in the factory but the rate in which "cheap" clothing is disposed after wear

@susisiebert5942 Год назад

Hand M and Nike are horrible!!!

@MissSwordfish Год назад

What’s toukers brand?

@teresawallace1130 Год назад

No the second hand clothes are cheaper

@Joeyyy28 Год назад

@@MissSwordfishHawes & Curtis

@kevintwine2315 Год назад

They don’t call him sweatshop Suleyman for nothing

@GhandiPVR Год назад

Cant believe they went for this. Theyre trying to become the official ethical brand, would take a lot of capital. Also their “credentials” was just them having decent jobs in the past ahaha

@originalunoriginal4055 Год назад

" I feel like I'm talking to a politician!" The way she tried to dodge Peter's question, then he called her out immediately! 😅😅😅

@edwoodsnowden Год назад

Touker could smell the bullshit from miles away! Love the way he destroyed their pitch and crazy claims!

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

Probably because this idea if successful would greatly expose and damage his investments😂 so it is by his casual greed and self-interest rather than his ingenuity and any care for humanity.

@demonmech Год назад

Takes one to know one

@Hutchyy Год назад

Why would big brands pay £100,000 if small brands only pay £1000?

@techtitanuk5609 9 месяцев назад

Hate all this eco ethical videos argh

@HistoryonYouTube Год назад

I can't understand either the beginning valuation, nor the one at the end.

@geofreyr Год назад

"this is a global opportunity", "we are the platform to get this right", blah, blah, blah. Everyone says the same old crap.

@00Kuja00 Год назад

Don't forget the "revolution". But yes I agree, just a bunch of smelly old hot air.

@louisescaife8304 Год назад

I must be thick. I don't understand any of it

@00Kuja00 Год назад

In short: they think they have the moral high ground to judge what others should buy, so (1) they can make money and (2) impose their set of values on a global scale.

@greatsoldier 6 дней назад

same

@barnabusdoyle4930 Год назад

The value of this company wouldn’t come from their ability to verify the info from a brand or company, it’s how much foot traffic their site would get from consumers and how much consumers would be swayed by their recommendations. That’s the value they would bring to their clients and without that their company is pointless

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

Indeed, except it's actually pointless irrespective of how many people would fall for it. Profitable maybe, but definitely not useful.

@barnabusdoyle4930 Год назад

@@scienceevolves4417 It’s marketing. Marketing is effective in some forms and a complete waste of money in other forms. The entire concept of marketing is an illusion.

@1jackal1 6 месяцев назад

Ex World economic forum employee social credit ranking system. No thanks. I won't eat ze bugs.

@Erickhetfield Год назад

A lot of entrepreneurs and companies concerned about "ethics" and the environment, now that it's a highly profitable endeavor.

@barnabusdoyle4930 Год назад

Is it highly profitable? I feel like a lot of these younger people on Twitter who care about this stuff will still end up going to Walmart to buy the factory tee-shirt made in China because the price is too good. I want to say this is more of a fad then anything else.

@johnchapmonkey8933 Год назад

@@barnabusdoyle4930yep most of time when it comes down to it people talk a lot about it but in reality don't do it.

@incidentlyaniguana2193 Год назад

@@barnabusdoyle4930that's the point. It's profitable because you can over price your "ethical" products.

@TheManInBlueFlames Год назад

ANOTHER eco product...ANOTHER from the app and rating category. I dont really understand how they can claim to be the arbiters of virtue here. Like what enables them to verify the businesses? Their backgrounds even if they line up STILL dont give them that definitive edge.

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

From my understanding of it, all value is in that magic formula of the internet of things big data computer modelling a i generated algorithm😅😅😅

@infjmale91 Год назад

Touker looks more like Harry Hill's Dad every year.

@randomchannel5686 Год назад

Touker never ceases to amuse me. The king of hypocrisy

@techdesigner9741 Год назад

She worked at the World economicforum ? 😱☠🤢

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

And apparently oh do proud of it 😅😅😅 Instant red flag innit!!

@RougeOX49Unknown Год назад

What’s bad about the world economic forum? I’m confused

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

@@RougeOX49Unknown Let's start counterarguments shall we. What's good about it in your opinion?

@bvds2007 Год назад

Sorry, those are not credentials. Yet another pseudo sustainability scheme. The very fact they are being paid by brands makes it not credible. A consumer subscription model, would be more credible and potentially more scalable if done right.

@johnchapmonkey8933 Год назад

You know dragons won't be happy with validation if they offer 2.4 %

@bw7228 Год назад

That look touker gave to Debra and Peter at the end asif to say , your fked 😂😂

@hamza361 Год назад

Touker always acts so arrogant and rude when anything clothing related comes to the den.

@BenjaminGoose Год назад

His companies score very low on sustainability, that's why he's so aggressive here.

@RealRushinRussian Год назад

tbh so does Peter when it's anything tech related. I also think in both cases it's more about strategy and less about their actual personality.

@bw7228 Год назад

Anything with drones it’s peters baby 😂

@fearghal10 6 месяцев назад

Incredible to see Touker openly state that the premise is BS, he knows full well that guys like him have built the supply chain to be impossible to follow - but then bids anyway cause he sers the clout it could buy him if it takes off

@jamesmurray1138 Год назад

Touker isn’t getting any of the fashion deals these days because he is always asking for such a high amount of equity

@jasonm4332 Год назад

she worked at developing sustainability policy at the WEF...................

@Krakanakis Год назад

Of course that this was WEF related

@salemkid1979 Год назад

yup, IM OUT!!!!!!!!!!!

@BenjaminGoose Год назад

*insert WEF conspiracy nonsense here*

@Krakanakis Год назад

@@BenjaminGoose cool and edgy reply dude

@BenjaminGoose Год назад

Lemme guess, you're gullible and think the WEF wants to force us to eat bugs? 🤣🤣🤣@@Krakanakis

@theofficialstig Год назад

scam

@ChintanCG 11 месяцев назад

Wow I didn't think they would get a single offer

@shadaba.qureshi4367 Год назад

bottom line, cheaper you are the more polluter you are....

@davesmith3075 Год назад

This is the sort of technology that’s going to digitally imprison us in the future 😢

@rossgoodchild1852 Год назад

Don't let it then don't use apps or bank online only deal in cash and you will be fine

@will-i-am-not 19 дней назад

Touker is a massive hypocrite

@willowwren7752 Год назад

So tired of Peter and Debra getting the deals 🤢

@debyaka Год назад

Dont let them hug or shake hands!!!! Its too dangerous!!!!

@kaliou6645 Год назад

Brands? Ec🌍 Friendly?🌸 and Tech 🖥️ Must be a well suited pitch for Brand Lalvani, Deborah and Peter 🍕

@JV-qh7ix 7 месяцев назад

Absolute garbage "company". This must be the worst investment ever on DD.

@mohammednaser-q3e 4 месяца назад

BIg mistake

@2323-s2b Год назад

First!!!

@originalrenigade Год назад

Worked for the WHO? Yeah those guys are legit 😅

@theofficialstig Год назад

african presidential campaigner = aka corruption

@scienceevolves4417 Год назад

Yeahhhh because they "care" oh so much about humanity!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@SpencerLeCroix-qi6lz Год назад

I rather listen to my grandad eating a peach for 30 min, keep in mind my grandad have no teeth, rather than listen to these fake people specially the girl for like 30 seconds

@TwiceBorn369 Год назад

Good business if they become the trusted brand verification platform. Other brands will worry about their eco-friendly rep.

@ellenkarlsson9490 10 месяцев назад

Aren't there free, non-profit websites that do the same thing?

@soundproductionandadvice Год назад

WEF... Sigh.

@salemkid1979 Год назад

eat ze bugs!? IM OUT!!!!

@ryankeane8656 Год назад

I'll own nothing and be happy and for that reason I'm out

@dodihoza7859 Год назад

Touker 😂😂😂

@sadikmeah4057 Год назад

Another reggae reggae sauce

@theofficialstig Год назад

so true, except that one actually made millions and this one went bankrupt

@AnnAnn-xx4uf 7 месяцев назад

Why because the guys black?

@sadikmeah4057 7 месяцев назад

@@AnnAnn-xx4uf Yes

@salemkid1979 Год назад

wait, is he snaking her?

@salemkid1979 Год назад

btw, i had steak and potatoes for lunch!

@edward9643 Год назад

Unfortunately nz now receives these clips within hours of going to air so I'll have to wait about a year to see if the deal actually went through

@originalunoriginal4055 Год назад

Who is nz ?

@jaysing9766 Год назад

U really think these big brands give a toss to ethics

@2dradon2 Год назад

Customers do, and thats the point

@itszenbaby Год назад

But its the brands paying them, not the customers if I understood correctly

@ryankeane8656 Год назад

They like to appear that they do

@00Kuja00 Год назад

And one must ask to themselves "whos ethics?".

@ryankeane8656 Год назад

@@00Kuja00 very complicated I suppose. A set of rules imposed by "someone"

@ianoliver7271 Год назад

Well, the company is still going strong!

@mauharley Год назад

Based on what? Their last set of accounts state that they're 145k in the red.

@billyjesus5442 Год назад

another great investment. @@mauharley

@JonasHamill Год назад

@@mauharley That is in line with their numbers though. This is a pretty recent episode so it's possible they're still forecasting greater profits this year

@SpencerLeCroix-qi6lz Год назад

Mate they are not strong at all, I have no idea where your Indy come from, however based on last year financial index they are in debt

@magusxxx Год назад

Touker: "When was the last time you were in a proper factory of 500 people?" Me: "Are you implying smaller London factories aren't proper? How many smallest people....I'm sorry, I meant people...who are in the smallest factory which makes your goods?" Touker: ......