Тёмный

Weighted Residual (1/5): Intro & Process 

Mike Foster
Подписаться 4,3 тыс.
Просмотров 40 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

29 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 20   
@danielbadel1226
@danielbadel1226 4 года назад
Maybe you do not have a lot of views because people do not know the power of this video. I'm coursing my master in Aeronautical engineering and i'm greatly thankful for this video, thank you! PVW is sooo clear now!
@mariajaen1795
@mariajaen1795 3 года назад
MASTER?! i am in my second year mech eng and my teacher decided it was an amazing idea to teach us this in mechanical vibrations course. I KNEW this was an advanced topic
@danielbadel1226
@danielbadel1226 3 года назад
@@mariajaen1795 yes, typically this is tought in mechanical vibrations. The principle of virtual work is basically a weak formulation of the static or dynamic equilibrium equations This meas that we are not finding the exact solution but a pretty close one. So using It you can obtain the same equations of motion for dynamic systems. So, why to learn it? Because is by default the method used to impose equilibrium in finite element models and solve structural problems. Try to study weak formulations of ODE is really useful
@mariajaen1795
@mariajaen1795 3 года назад
​@@danielbadel1226 I did study weak formulations of ODEs througt variational formulation and therefore i studied how to make them "strong", thank you for answering. Its interesting how the governing equation tends to change depending on what youre looking for, in my case, lowest mode shapes or natural frequencies. Sadly my governing equation changes so the formulation of a solution is more complex but your answer and this video ended up being extremely useful, thanks for answering
@amritkshetri5528
@amritkshetri5528 5 лет назад
what is the textbook you are refering to?
@jorgealejandroaguirrelara
@jorgealejandroaguirrelara 3 года назад
Hi, I have a big doubt. In this case, the solution equation was assumed easily as the bending moment of a beam is "easy" to predict. However, what if I can´t predict the system's behavior at all. How can I propose a solution equation for a problem of which I've got no idea how is it going to behave?
@Rashidiill
@Rashidiill 2 года назад
Leave it to computer.
@carbon273
@carbon273 3 года назад
how do you know what shape to assume? Thats where im stuck at. What about cases where its not obvious to predict the shape of the solution?
@DM-pm8hr
@DM-pm8hr 6 месяцев назад
This is so great! Thank you!
@william19155
@william19155 3 года назад
Hello. I have a specific problem in which I have to compute the integral of the residual, R, along the entire length of a beam example. I was wondering if you could walk me through it and answer any questions I have. I would be willing to compensate accordingly. Thanks
@yeisoncastellanos5816
@yeisoncastellanos5816 3 года назад
Hi, Mike. Thanks for this video. it is fantastic and powerful
@eamona708
@eamona708 4 года назад
Videos helping me out, cheers bro
@husnainhyder6713
@husnainhyder6713 3 года назад
Dear Mr Fosters Great Lecture no dought But there are some book in which they are choosing a trail function or supposed function regardless of the fact that they satisfy all the boundry conditions suppose heat diffusion equation (d^2 T)/(dx^2 )=T0 , and they say lets take trail function T(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d with BC’s that doesn’t satisfy the trail function such as T(0)=25 and q(x=L)=0 Please Explain Thanks
@danielbadel1226
@danielbadel1226 3 года назад
Hi Husnain, to propose a solution as you said always has to satisfy the essential boundary conditions (this are the conditions with not derivatives as you have), but not necessarily the natural one. Even is the final answer is to find the the coefficients a-d the in the proposed solution you can know the values of some coefficients before starting, for example d=25, otherwise the first homogeneous boundary condition is not satisfied. The solution you are proposing is general and need to be adapted to your specific problem to find the coefficients that satisfy the BC. Was that helpful?
@Rashidiill
@Rashidiill 2 года назад
You saved my 2 hours.
@AryaArald
@AryaArald 3 года назад
Very helpful.
@AryaArald
@AryaArald 3 года назад
My question is, why do we assume a solution, when we already have the exact one (Bending equation)?
@danielbadel1226
@danielbadel1226 3 года назад
Hi, because you do not only use this method for structural problems when you already know the solution, also for thermal of any other physical problem. Bon the other hand, you can use it to solve any ODE and not only in 1 dimension as the beam case but also for 3D systems of ODE as for solid elements. This is basically what the computer inside a FE simulation requires
@徐捷耀
@徐捷耀 2 года назад
so, I still do not understand why do we assume the form of the solution like "Y=Asin(pi*x / L)". Would you tell me why if you know the answer ? thanks
@Torq123
@Torq123 7 лет назад
Great.
Далее
Weighted Residual (2/5): Collocation
3:39
Просмотров 17 тыс.
Катаю тележки  🛒
08:48
Просмотров 567 тыс.
Weighted Residual (5/5): Example #2
18:57
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Approximate Solutions - The Galerkin Method
34:57
Просмотров 45 тыс.
Solid Mechanics | Theory | Point Collocation Method
8:43
the COOLEST limit on YouTube!
9:50
Просмотров 26 тыс.
Weighted Residual (4/5): Galerkin
5:18
Просмотров 57 тыс.
Deriving the Dirac Equation
16:34
Просмотров 101 тыс.
Researchers thought this was a bug (Borwein integrals)
17:26
Understanding the Finite Element Method
18:36
Просмотров 1,7 млн
Weighted Residual Method - Finite Element Analysis
13:40
Катаю тележки  🛒
08:48
Просмотров 567 тыс.