Тёмный

Weighted Residual (4/5): Galerkin 

Mike Foster
Подписаться 4,3 тыс.
Просмотров 58 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

29 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 31   
@wiktormorela4907
@wiktormorela4907 3 года назад
You are the guy who knows how to explain maths topic in engineering way, thank you!!
@akshaychandandey3551
@akshaychandandey3551 8 месяцев назад
This is amazing videos series. You saved me from scrambling through numerous FEM books, and still not getting anything. Thank you.
@quentinfitzgerald3305
@quentinfitzgerald3305 6 лет назад
I've been trying to understand the Galerkin method for weeks now and finally it makes sense.
@pegatrisedmice
@pegatrisedmice 7 лет назад
So it is possible to understand it without being bogged down and frustrated by unnecesarry maths. Very simple and concise. This is something that everyone should understand before trying to understand the numerical approach. Thanks a lot ;)
@DrMikeFoster
@DrMikeFoster 7 лет назад
Thank you for your encouraging words!
@leecypherr8782
@leecypherr8782 5 лет назад
so true
@JHL0L
@JHL0L 5 лет назад
After reading multiple books by, e.g., Belytschko and Zienkiewicz, I finally understood the problem thanks to your video. Thank you VERY much. PhD thesis, here I come.
@ziaurraman3237
@ziaurraman3237 4 года назад
I need supportive material foor this topic plz syedziaqau1@gmail.com
@jcs-bm2rb
@jcs-bm2rb 6 лет назад
I've reviewed so many explanations of Galerkin's method, and this might be the clearest and most concise, Thank you for posting.
@ANJA-mj1to
@ANJA-mj1to 11 месяцев назад
Very well that you chose the right weighted function! I am looking - researching topic of Isogemetric and how Galerkin as localized function has an optimal convergence rate for head and velocity. If give meassure of the head = (x+1) than velocity will be only x. We also apply Fup or B-splines. However, Galerkin in isogemetric has the most expensive isogomeric concept due to numerial integration what we have seen in yours presentation especially if we put the conducte matrix. Applying yours IGA framework with classicl Galerkin what you explained briefly and clearly and add the collocation in same Galerkin we can get formulation of groundwater structure and flow! Thans how you contribute to isogomeric topic to the groundwater flow with applying anylitic approach. We have point how to exact did it in geometry with resolution level and spline based methods of hydraulic flow. Good look with your work!
@Torq123
@Torq123 7 лет назад
Too good..How nicely the Galerkin method is explained without citing any intricate mathematical expressions. Waiting for some more lectures on these FEA topics.
@ajaybhattu2516
@ajaybhattu2516 4 года назад
Extremely useful sir Dr. A.P. Bhattu, Associate Professor, Mechanical Dept, Pune India
@Mulkek
@Mulkek 3 года назад
Thanks, it's so simple & great explination!
@albajasadur2694
@albajasadur2694 Год назад
I have two questions about the Galerkin method: 1. What is the reason for forcing the integral of the "weighting function" x "R" to zero such that it yields an optimisation of the residue R in the domain? 2. Why is the chosen weighting function the "same" form? Does it relate to the derivative of the trial function w.r.t. the coefficient, say "A" in this video?
@kingjames061000
@kingjames061000 5 лет назад
Thank you so so so much for posting this!
@kyl4436
@kyl4436 4 года назад
Thank you! I understand now.
@Kill-qj6ng
@Kill-qj6ng 3 года назад
very clear tuition
@william19155
@william19155 3 года назад
Hello. I have a specific problem in which I have to compute the integral of the residual, R, along the entire length of a beam example. I was wondering if you could walk me through it and answer any questions I have. I would be willing to compensate accordingly. Thanks
@tabassumaktertrishna0923
@tabassumaktertrishna0923 Год назад
Can anyone suggest me book name of galerkin method which mention in this video.
@ofiradi4775
@ofiradi4775 3 года назад
excellent !! thank you !
@eng.renatocarvalho
@eng.renatocarvalho 4 года назад
I understand intuitively why you do the integral of the residual to be zero… you are summing all of the residuals in the domain and making it zero. Now, when you multiply it by the weighing function, I just don’t understand how it will improve the accuracy of the function representing the approximate solution.
@attiabachiri3666
@attiabachiri3666 6 лет назад
thank you very much it is helpful, and wonderful explanation
@AryaArald
@AryaArald 3 года назад
Thanks for the video, its very helpful. Could you also show how to solve the elasticity problem with 2 or 3 quadratic elements and shape functions as weight functions?
@anaslahrichi
@anaslahrichi 4 года назад
Thank you sir !
@matthewjames7513
@matthewjames7513 6 лет назад
Thank you for your video! This really helped me understand the method :) Can you please explain why we need phi and why we should assume phi has the form of the solution? It seems intuitive to me that all we need to solve for is \int R dx = 0 instead.
@mmp434
@mmp434 Год назад
great
@adelnoppert370
@adelnoppert370 4 года назад
legend
@andreluisal
@andreluisal 6 лет назад
Excellent
@oukozamzu8627
@oukozamzu8627 6 лет назад
Thank you
Далее
Approximate Solutions - The Galerkin Method
34:57
Просмотров 46 тыс.
Understanding the Finite Element Method
18:36
Просмотров 1,7 млн
Always Help the Needy
00:28
Просмотров 15 млн
Когда Долго В Рейсе)))
00:16
Просмотров 127 тыс.
Weighted Residual (5/5): Example #2
18:57
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Mod-01 Lec-03 Introduction to Finite Element Method
50:43
The Most Terrifying IQ Statistics | Jordan Peterson
10:54
The Finite Element Method (FEM) - A Beginner's Guide
20:46
You don't really understand physics
11:03
Просмотров 186 тыс.
How Math Becomes Difficult
39:19
Просмотров 179 тыс.
Finite Element Method
32:19
Просмотров 89 тыс.
Richard Feynman: Can Machines Think?
18:27
Просмотров 1,5 млн