What A Difference 1 Year Can Make In Bodybuilding (Ronnie Coleman 2002 vs 2003) 

Totally agree. No aesthetics whatsoever, but when you've got that much size you don't need to be aesthetic. Reminds me of one of those miostatin deficient bulls.

@@dingo4010 He still had good flow in his physique

@@sonyx4500 yeah agree bro, compare to other mass monster he not only bigger and thicker but look better also, one of the best looking mass monster ever

Yes agree!

He certainly looks ridiculously gigantic everywhere, but i prefer him a little smaller and with a significantly slimmer waist like 98/99

Man’s a freak of nature. Should have a fence around him

Yeah, there were aliens growing in his belly too

am i actually seeing you in this comment section?

Georgi Lukanov I have been following bodybuilding since before half of my viewers were born, and I’ve been watching bodybuilding RU-vid since Luimarco’s first videos.

@@aragusea I'm losing my shit. Since you're reading, would you consider making a video going over dietary fiber? It's overlooked

Adam!!! Very weird to see you here, but pleasant surprise for sure

I realize it is kinda randomly asking but do anyone know a good place to stream new tv shows online ?

True

Could very well be Big Ramy in the future if Chad figures out the recipe for him, he definetely has the structure and muscle for it. Just need to come in dry and with more separation in his legs + more lower back details.

@@Nek0i7 stop

@Jason Stewart Dorian didn't train hard? Lol. Every other professional that came to train with him ended up vomiting. His reputation for it is so well established that it's quite odd to say any different. Guaranteed you have never lifted anything close to Dorian.

@Jason Stewart Not offended in the slightest brother. These are just reflections and you do with them what you will. I was simply expressing that yours is a contrary opinion to all evidence and 99.9% of the other human beings with an opinion. The man's training regime is called High Intensity and he is a proponent of partial and negative reps, using weight that you admittedly cannot handle, probably on a strict diet that you do not to adhere to and you say you are not impressed. You must absolutely tear the walls down at your gym and I would love to see any videos you have of you training. If you genuinely believe that it is dosage that separates, you are in for a very disappointing time in the sport. If you genuinely believe that you are currently outworking any professional bodybuilder, you are in for a very disappointing time in this sport. Genetics is a term disengenously used by some to comfort themselves. The elite are those who are among the genetically gifted, who are on the right drugs (which enable you to train more than those not) who WORK THE HARDEST. No Mr Olympia does not work hard.

@@diggermcginty870 100%

Tony Decker he meant small when he compare him to himself LMAO

in 2002 there were like 2 guys way bigger than Ronnie Gutman

@@leart78 yeah Gunther and Markus Rhul

Dude weighed 180 in 2002. He wasnt even training. Went vegan. Ribs showing. Get with the program.

@@atomtension5645 are you kidding Ronnie was a power lifter before bodybuilding and he was never vegan do you homework

Correct

No calves, left lat was always smaller, gut, no tri, gyno.

His legs aren’t underrated at all lol his quads hams and glutes are considered to be some of the best of all time.

@@larrywerdeniuk8157 no triceps? He has one of the biggest long head tricep muscles of all time. Look at the front double biceps and tell me he has no triceps

@@billyyeah7530 yes, very weak triceps. Side tri shot, always flat, no pop. No calves, left lat smaller, gyno, chest drooped, 4 pack + bubble gut. To me body was a mess, to me.

I did both those matches here is 97 vs 2002 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE--AYKP9BUpKk.html

98 ronnie is the best version in my opinion, although he is masiiveee in 03

Was that an insulin incident? I thought they fucked up his diuretic dosage. Hence why he had to drink a gallon of water to feel better?

was not meant to loose, that show is fixed, in stage he was looser in 1999/2001/2002/2005

And that was the one year he arguably should have lost.

@@leart78 You are an absolute moron. 99 and 05 he looked flawless lmao how can you be that ignorant. You clearly have zero knowledge about bodybuilding

@@leart78 01? The prejudging sure. But he destroyed Jay in the two back poses which are the most important poses. So no he deserved it. 02? The controversy came from Gunter not Levrone. And Gunter placed 5th. There's a few shots of Gunter demolishing Ronnie but given his placing would you really say he'd beat Ronnie? 99? This is just ignorant. Ronnie beats Flex and Cormier in 5/7 poses any day of the week. No way would he lose in his best version.

And nearly destroyed his spine.

@Jason Stewart 17 inches now

He DIDN'T beat atrophy. Look at him towards the end of his career and a couple years after. The insulin atrophy is a slow process so it took a couple years to start noticing

Yep!! I always thought Dorian in 1993 was astounding, and his improvement from 1992 was a one off in bodybuilding history! But Ronnie from 2002 to 2003 is just another level of ridiculous and impossible!! He was already a 5 time Mr Olympia, and a fully mature (38yrs old) and fully grown bodybuilder - yet he added around 50lbs of muscle - IN ONE YEAR!! Having said all that, my preference is still for the overall look of Arnie in 1971 and 1974, although obviously he isn't beating Ronnie on stage! The problem with Ronnie and all todays guys is how they look "relaxed" and how soft and bloated they look when not posing - see 6:20! Arnie and the guys from the 70's and 80's always looked hard and tight, and since we don't walk around posing all the time isn't that a preferable look??

@@mikthe2004 ronnie claimed he could've came in that size in previous shows, but he was trying to match the amazing conditioning he had at the 2001 arnold which just made him come in smaller and less full my favorite is kevin levrone because even standing relaxed he looks like a god and when he poses he was obviously elite, it is strange how the best bodybuilders like ronnie, dorian and phil don't look good standing relaxed

@Pro life only you think markus ruhl 02 NOC is the best ever, you know bodybuilding like i know ballet condition means being shredded with little water, which he clearly is hence every pro that saw him that day calling him the best ever but of course you "know" better than jay cutler, dexter jackson, and kevin levrone right? HAHA facts > your feelings

@Pro life only i don't speak with my feelings i speak with facts, saying markus lost due to politics is feelings you idiot, saying markus or jay lost because they are white is feelings, you are a complete moron you don't even know what conditioning is, what videos? why don't you find me the names of reputable people that say markus 2002 beats ronnie or dorian? show me facts instead of your stupid feelings for once and what the hell is a "fun boy" do you mean fan boy? that is what you are of white bodybuiders, and i am white myself ronnie has 8 olympias FACT, saying he should have less is FEELINGS

@Dj_M1 Go back to school buddy!! 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002 - that's 5 Olympias for Ronnie!! Yates didn't improve after 1993, he was good in 1995 and even 1996 but you cant compare his 1997 shape to his 1993 shape. If he was 12 lbs heavier in 1997 it was all in his gut! In 1997 Yates looked horrible! I'm only quoting 50 lbs gain for Ronnie because someone else said it, but whatever it was he was way bigger in just one year. Did you even look at the video? Look at 1:40 or 3:10!! He looks 50lbs heavier!! It's astounding how much bigger he is!! Conditioning - look at 4:40 - it's comparable!

He wanted the easy money, and he's the type of person with a one track mind. He even had to quit being an officer and couldn't make it to his retirement benefits.

@@shino475He did work a full time job most of his competitive career not many bodybuilders do that

Man you know the result Flex will be too soft for Phil

old ass muscle I agree flex. would lose, but it would still be interesting to all the people that always claim phil wouldn‘t even place top 6 in the 90s

I know in 2011 he would of and thats what he asked for.

That was a crap comparison tbh! 2002 was Rons worst year, he did something wrong and came very downsized. In contrast 2003 was his biggest year.. so when you put two extremes together it makes the difference even more apparent that it actually is.

@@armenakbalasanov9074 No not really. He came in less full. He was trying to replicate his 01-98-99 conditioning and failed badly. No way was he 258 here. He was 247-250. There's more than 5-7 pounds difference between 02 and 01. Ronnie tried to do it right but codnitioning is tougher than size. Be was the same weight as 98-01AC but his fullness was lacking and he wasn't conditioned enough to make up for it.

He never had that size before though

No, that's not the case. Dorian Yates was the One Who decided to become big and to change the competition. He started the Mass Monster Era. Coleman instead Always wanted to be as big as possible. And he was big some years before(i think 1999 Is the best Coleman).

@@mence5992 But the difference in size alone is huuuge. 1999 is his best version for sure

@Dj_M1 Dorian yates started the mass monster ERA. Everyone knows. The difference between Dorian in 1992 and 1993 IS incredible. Everyone before wasn't that big. He was the one that changed the game. I think you missed all. Coleman had some issues, that's why in 2002 was smaller. Dorian in 1992 was not at his full muscular potential on purpose. Then he decieded to be bigger.

Its probs a wig in 07

Nf 1 hmm I didnt think of that. Even more weird to put a wig on. But thanks for the reply!

maybe his hairline wasnt too good

He’s always had hair. I remember hearing that when you have a bald head it creates an illusion and makes your physique appear bigger. I suppose that’s why a lot of pros shave their hair.

I Isaiah maybe explains why Shawn Rhoden won when he shaved his head haha !

keep in mind he was dry as a bone, so he would look bigger than the scale says. I seen a 200 pound bodybuilder up close in shape and he looked 300 pounds lol.

It's a joke you boomer

MANNIX HERRADURA bro how can you be that dumb🤦‍♂️

@@HoodwatchTV bro how can you not know that I know it takes hard work, eating, consistency etc? Lol "I ain't never take no steroids" -ronnie lmao Remember he gained 40lbs in a year & stepped on stage at 296lbs shredded

@@beyoutillfull9695 he assumed u mean he could have been natural before this year I guess

Who really knows what would happen if his 2004 physique battled 1998-99 version. I thought he stepped on stage at 296lbs in 04.

@Dj_M1 I mean.. He beat EVERYBODY.

2005 was a good year

@5% FOR LIFE , LIFE IS SHORT LIVE IT ! what are u talking about 😂jay didnt compete

@5% FOR LIFE , LIFE IS SHORT LIVE IT ! do you know anything about mr o lol

@5% FOR LIFE , LIFE IS SHORT LIVE IT ! more?

Steroids happened