This. This is what the internet has been missing for so long. A faithful Muslim historian who looks at the evidence honestly but charitably and covers all the bases with love and truth. Cheers Syawish
@@darkday8913 Intriguing. Actually not. But would love to hear your thoughts on why I came across that way, certainly hope to avoid seeming sarcastic in future comments 🙏
I am considering converting to Islam. It is my understanding that Muslims should live their lives as the Prophet did. That means to me that I should study the Hadith to find out how the Prophet lived his life and what he had to say.
@@BillGreenAZ yeah read lots of hadiths and don’t rush the decision. Muslims rushed me into converting and it wasn’t instant regret or anything but I wouldn’t have done it if I had really thought about it nd researched more before saying shahada and I wouldn’t do it again. I think it was part of Good Wizard’s plan for me to believe different religions before starting Tada-ism with the magic Word that Good Wizard sends me, his PropheTranslator. He revealed this verse in Spanish originally but here’s a verso of The Holy Text in English. “We have victory in Harry Potter, who defeated Voldemort once and for all and opened the gates of the magic world for everyone. Upon accepting this doctrine and protecting themselves in thier faith, G-d begins to educate them in the ways of their magic.” Proseletarians 4:20-21
9:56 For those unaware, the titles of "Sacellarius" is a Byzantine title which at the time meant something along the lines of "commander", but in later centuries it was more what people in the modern day would call a "finance minister."
Personally, I find it more amazing that so much biographical information about the life of Muhammad survived until today than the perfect (or near perfect) preservation of the Quran. All (or almost all) of it could have been lost in so many ways and at so many points early on...
What keeps me up sometimes is what Islamic/other historical pieces of literature were lost in the sack of Baghdad by the Mongols in 1258, the world can be cruel at times. Regardless, interesting to think about from time to time
Excellent video! Interesting topic, very well written and presented! I'm a historian, a medievalist, and it is so good to see such good material here on YT. Congratulations on your work! ❤
Thanks for tackling a tough topic. Although the early non-Muslim sources you mention are all used pretty extensively in Western academia on this subject, I had been completely unaware of Urwah Ibn az-Zubayr's letters on this subject. Always learn something new here.
as an agnostic, i respect your work and how u approach things fairly and with little apparent bias or emotion or personal opinion or hiding facts/aspects
16:50 also is similar to how the Norse kings collected what they had, mostly poetry, to reinforce their rule. we know very little about the Norse, because we have rather few and rather incomplete and contradictory information
@@beepboop204 It is an interesting observation you made about the Norse kings. If you read further, you might understand why that keeps repeating itself throughout history. All are cogs in the massive wheel that is counter to God's way. God is not for one nation or for one group of people. Even the Jews, when given the laws and ordinances to live rightly with God, were done so that they would be an example for those who saw God's ways as superior in hopes they would desire Him over false ideologies. However, they took it upon themselves to be the gatekeepers and created stumbling blocks that caused people to turn away from God. Hence, the advent of Jesus The Christ. Meanwhile, the Bedouins, being the carriers of goods along the Silk Road, were very connected to the known world. As the world got wealthy off of the trade, they continued to be marginalized. Islam was a political move to bring the desert peoples more wealth and dominate the trade route. A mix of religions in that general area was introduced to produce an ideology that was the catalyst to unify and launch a movement. It is told that to know the quran, it must be translated by an Arabic native tongue. Also, further understanding is only possible by their pre-approved scholars. This is the same error as the orthodox Jews made/make. We do not need a stumbling block to jump over to know God. These religions and the world who reject Him are all cogs in a giant wheel of deception. They had ample opportunity to have their supposed truth to be written, just as the Bible had been done before it. Their claim is that God had given the truth to the Jews. They wrote it down, but prevented it. Then God gave the truth to Jesus for the gentiles to write out and preserve it. However, they, too, prevented it. Then the muslim's god, who is also almighty and all-knowing, gave his final word to them. It suggests that God was too hasty with giving His truth to the Jews and, later, the Christians. But, He knew for sure that by sending one of His angels to squeeze muhammad, He would be sure that His truth would finally be preserved. Muhammad was not the first nor the last to make such claims. To anyone interested, His truth can be measured, and understood correctly, by no other means but by your own desire to know Him. If you respond, I can point you to a great starting position along the journey to His truth. To gain understanding and reach the finish line is up to each individual. It makes no difference to the language you speak. Nor, from what part of the world you live, you're standing in society, your skin color, or your gender. The only limitation is your lack of desire to be one with Him.
If you are interested in arguments for sunni hadith preservation and refutation of orientalists check out my youtube channel ru-vid.com/group/PLiokPpD98QeJLe3inswhv8DHTXJo6rz3t
It fascinates me a lot but I'm not really educated on architecture. I might invite a guest for a podcast-type episode to talk about things I'm not very educated on.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Yeah it really fascinates me to see how much they borrowed from byzantine styles for example the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qusayr_%27Amra has a byzantine like portrait of al Walid the II.
7:04. A material interpretation makes perfect sense. Muhammad was an orphan. He was lost in the sense of having no family protection or life prospects, but found eventually found protection in his uncle Abu Talib, made a life as a merchant and happily married. God found him lost and guided him.
From the context it seems to be addressing the prophet not the community because Dhoha and Inshirah list out problems before the prophet with the solutions Dhall can mean lost valuable thing, meaning the people weren’t aware of him and Allah guided them to his message.
If you are interested in arguments for sunni hadith preservation and refutation of orientalists check out my youtube channel ru-vid.com/group/PLiokPpD98QeJLe3inswhv8DHTXJo6rz3t
This is a great content, and what stood out the most is that a Muslim can put his belief aside in the name of knowledge. I'm a Muslim my self and had to put my belief aside and look at a picture of the Prophet. Although, seemingly it's a triggering topic for most Muslims.
Question: I remembered that there are some people who can definitely read and write during the time of Prophet Muhammad. So why did they not record his biography? Sure, writing down the Words of God is important and there were wars. But were they really that busy? I am pretty sure places like Mecca and Medina will be the perfect places to sit down and write the biography of the Prophet since the wars were nowhere near them.
at the time of the prophet no, since why write a biography about him while he is still there, but after the story of the prophet was transfered bits and pieceses through hadith (his marriages, moving, house, look, speeches) these were then compiled through multiple books and multiple authers. the saying or hadith were forbidden to be written so they wont be added to the quran but still they would be recited and taught verbally.
also its not about being busy, the material for writing were limited as it is and most people were iliterate so reciting rather than writing down made sense to them. it wasnt until expantion and the limited number of memorizers that they began writing it down
Arabs didn't have much of a writing culture. They did write down bits and pieces here and there but not completely. These sayings were passed down orally and only when the Caliphate was big enough and came into contact with the cultures that had a big emphasis on writing did the Muslims begin writing.
God is not for one nation or for one group of people. Even the Jews, when given the laws and ordinances to live rightly with God, were done so that they would be an example for those who saw God's ways as superior in hopes they would desire Him over false ideologies. However, they took it upon themselves to be the gatekeepers and created stumbling blocks that caused people to turn away from God. Hence, the advent of Jesus The Christ. Meanwhile, the Bedouins, being the carriers of goods along the Silk Road, were very connected to the known world. As the world got wealthy off of the trade, they continued to be marginalized. Islam was a political move to bring the desert peoples more wealth and dominate the trade route. A mix of religions in that general area was introduced to produce an ideology that was the catalyst to unify and launch a movement. It is told that to know the quran, it must be translated by an Arabic native tongue. Also, further understanding is only possible by their pre-approved scholars. This is the same error as the orthodox Jews made/make. We do not need a stumbling block to jump over to know God. These religions and the world who reject Him are all cogs in a giant wheel of deception. They had ample opportunity to have their supposed truth to be written, just as the Bible had been done before it. Their claim is that God had given the truth to the Jews. They wrote it down, but prevented it. Then God gave the truth to Jesus for the gentiles to write out and preserve it. However, they, too, prevented it. Then the muslim's god, who is also almighty and all-knowing, gave his final word to them. It suggests that God was too hasty with giving His truth to the Jews and, later, the Christians. But, He knew for sure that by sending one of His angels to squeeze muhammad, He would be sure that His truth would finally be preserved. Muhammad was not the first nor the last to make such claims. To anyone interested, His truth can be measured, and understood correctly, by no other means but by your own desire to know Him. If you respond, I can point you to a great starting position along the journey to His truth. To gain understanding and reach the finish line is up to each individual. It makes no difference to the language you speak. Nor, from what part of the world you live, you're standing in society, your skin color, or your gender. The only limitation is your lack of desire to be one with Him.
8:41 "While none of the sources state this, that event is usually considered to be the migration" It is recorded in Tarīkh Al-Ya'qūbī which is one of the earliest Shi‘ite historiographies. I think it should be mentioned in Tarīkh Al-Ṭabarī as well. Love the video, keep up the good work.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT I noticed right after posting my reply, hahah. May Allah reward you for your knowledge and your efforts in teaching us. May you be amongst those for whom the Angels spread their wings and supplicate. Do you have some sources you would recommend to learn more about Islamic history, or even the methodology behind our sciences?
Salam brother not trying to be rude but why don't you put your sources in the description of the video so the views can also read and do their own research
Walikumaslam. I am trying to find a way to do so because I read a bunch of books for a video and often things are too mixed up. I've made a website and I'll start putting my sources there and add a link to it in the description. My apologies.
Your interpretation of verse number 7 "we found you lost" is a very simple translation. The translation is more like "we found you at a lost". Meaning, while he (PBUH) was an orphan and he lost everyone in his life, God protected him and gave him a sense of "direction" even though he was an orphan. Lost does not necessarily mean "lost in sin". The verse is infact refering to the Prophet (PBUH). You should consider using more than one source for your work. You should try reading books from different types of scholars and you should take all their opinions into consideration before exposing your ideas to the world. It is the responsible thing to do. You should conduct yourself as if your are in academia especially of you are going to call this a history Channel.
That was just an example. Sorry if you don't feel like it's not adequate to prove my point. I didn't say that it necessarily meant "lost in sin". I did say that that's just one of the possible interpretations. If you look solely at Qur'an, you don't know which of the many interpretations of the word to choose. You also don't know what it means for the Prophet's biography. If you go only by the Qur'an, you can't really explain many of the verses. Only be looking at Tafsir, which was written more than a century later, do you find answers to many questions.
@@AlMuqaddimahYTyou make a valid point. Thanks 🙏. Your are correct, I didn't find the example to be a very good one. However, I think understand what you were trying to say. I would like to hear your opinion on the sciences of Hadith and it's authenticity. Perhaps you can entertain us with your thoughts in a future video. Thanks again.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT tafsir schools existed from the time of the sahabah, there were three main ones (makkah, madenah and iraq) and the sahabah would teach quran, hadith and tafsir. During this period the tafseer was taught by narration. That is, the sahaabah who headed schools of tafseer would quote the sayings of the Prophet which explained the meanings of verses, or explain the historical context in which the verses were revealed, or they would quote verses of pre-Islaamic poetry which explained the meaning of some words that were no longer in common use. Mujaahid ibn Jabr , a student of Ibn ‘Abbaa was the earliest compiler of tafsir but his works didnt survive. a point which you keep repeating is as if the compliation just poped into existance and was'nt there before. hadith, tafisr, fiqh were all used by the early caliphs in their ruling and taught by multiple generations. who also were there when compilation started and would stand against rulers if they try to change anything in the religion like the incident of the claim of creation of quran
I mean, the Aeneid might be a good comparison. It was commissioned as a way to legitimize Roman power, the dignity of Augustus, and as an answer to Greek epics.
Can you make a video on how much of the knowledge of his life was lost after his death. How the Hadith came to be and why some are saahi and others are not.
No. The more accurate interpretations are: 1) He found you lacking awareness of what lies in the unseen and bestowed upon you the knowledge of all that was and all that will be. 2) He found you deeply engrossed is His love and gave you a way towards the acquisition of His closeness. 3) He found you unaware of your mastery over all of creation and granted you cognisance of your majesty.
I was really disappointed to see that you have ignored ( deliberately or not) so many verses in Quran which are related to the story of prophet Muhammad including: events before his birth (Qureesh and Al Feel verses) , the receiving of the message ( first encounter with Jebreel ) ( Alqalm verse) , the reaction to facing jebreel and the order to start the message ( Almudather verse) , the dispute with his uncle ( who rejected and attacked him following the announcement of his message( Almassad verse) his vision/ visit to Al Aqsa mosque a and heavens ( Alesra and meraj) in Altaqweer verse. In addition, most of the battles against non-believers during the life of the prophet were referenced in the Quran ( Bader , Ohod, Haneen, and Alfateh) in different verses (Alemran, Alfateh, Anfal ..) . These are some examples and there are more covering some events with his companions and his wives…. So, if you accept to deal with Quran as a historical book, you should at least do your homework properly.
Quran is the word of God speaking to a human mind through Gibreel RA. It has never been altered. The oldest Quran which is few hundred years after the death of prophet is in Birmingham Library and you can compare word by word to see if Quran has been altered.
Almuqadima, Why do you keep on saying that the Holy Quranuran contains very little information about the prophet's life? There are vast amounts of quranic information about the prophet's battles and engagements with the meccans, about his expulsion from mecca, his family disputes, his prophethood, his pre-revelation life history etc. These can be compared with sira materials to give further insights.
@Danny Al he could simply be a non muslim interested in the religion. as he has not declared his faith publicly he is not to be considered an enemy within imo..Just a poorly informed non muslim Pakistani
First of all, this is a very fair video. Congrats on creating something that is thoughtful and not mere propaganda. Question: the letters of Zubayr - do we have extant early manuscripts of them (I can’t find them), or, like most else, do we only know of them though Ibn Ishaq/Ibn Hisham’s attribution?
could someone explain why some things that are considered haram aren't in the quran, but are in the sunnah? Wouldn't that make the Quran incomplete? Edit: Provide reliable sources if you're going to answer. (no wikipedia) Thanks
Sunnah are the actions of holy prophet and the companions (who followed prophet) and latter generations (who followed the companions) written down. It's mainly oral and written tradition and actual tradition of people who lived at certain times. Like for example imam Malik lived in madinah in 150 AH and considers the tradition of madinah as a key source in derivation of law.
its not that the quran is incomplete but the quran is giving the main rulings and major stuff that were needed and then the prophet would calrify. the prophet was sent as a judge too and his rulings were of divine nature so following ayahs like this Al Nisa 65(But no! By your Lord, they will never be ˹true˺ believers until they accept you ˹O Prophet˺ as the judge in their disputes, and find no resistance within themselves against your decision and submit wholeheartedly.) the people followed what the prophet decreed and would make narration rings to memories it like they did the quran.
I'm curious, what happened in Arabia (Mecca/Medina) after the Prophet died until the era of the Caliphate which moved outside of Arabia. Because many hadith sources were written/completed by non-Arabs. Expansion outside of Arabia (Mecca/Medina) are very significant, but I don't know what happened in Arabia after he died. Thanks
Scrutiny of historical works has happened and will continue to happen. A little thing I wish you pointed out was that Muslims also disregarded alot of the things said in the sirah of ibn ishaq. Most notably the contemporary of ibn ishaq, imam Malik. This really gives impression that Muslims made stuff up and went on with it, which isn't the case.
Actually scholars hv a science of authenticating the narration... If any narration isnt considered as authentic its not regarded as Sahih one... Some rules for that are The narration provided should be linked back continuously in a chain of disciples upto the time of sahaba and prophet Everyone in the chain of transmission should be a God fearing person with a good memory and not be famous for making up stuff by community There should be more people narrating the same thing in different regions.. So like its a well known thing if it was a public action or teaching.. These are some criteria and every narration is judged based on these
Robert Spencer said in his book that the name "Muhammad" in early coins and inscriptions can simply be a title because Muhammad means "praised one", or that the Arabs were actually referring to Jesus. Can we say this 9:52 is a good example to suggest that Arabs were not referring to Jesus
There's no proof that Arabs were referring to Jesus, tho, that's just an implication. A lot of names have meanings that are praising the person can be interpreted as titles but we can't just do that.
The Quranic verse does not say he found you lost. For native Arab speakers the structure of the sentence means unguided therefore unguided meaning before he received the revelation. This is only an issue for western people and non native Arab speakers following a translation. Also you are quoting from a western man who has little understanding in the arabic language like many we see anti Muslim preachers make these mistakes.
To be fair to the tradition, you should acknowledge and do a video on the isnad system and how Muslims claim to verify hadith's authenticity. You've quoted Dr Sean Anthony a lot. It this interview he acknowledges the general credibility of the isnad system and acknowledges the possibility that Caedman's story plaigarises the Iqra narrative, not the other way around, for example. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GdaxAXEdx04.html
The Doctrina of Jacob is wrong to say that the prophet is false simply because he has a sword when in truth the unbelievers waged war with him and in order to defend himself he formed a state. The compilation of hadiths made by Hazrat Imam Bukhari in the 9th century was a compilation with a chain of narratives, he didnt made the hadiths himself. Also in 11:34 the picture is wrong, since we muslims are told to noy bow to any person when meeting him.
You really need to stop using that picture. I'm not one of those lunatics that insists death on anyone that shares pictures of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. But I am quite firm that there needs to be discipline and respect with this.
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl so muslims drinking wine or commiting adultery make it right? drawing in of itself is haram (drawings of things like plants or rocks are the exception)
@@codexana4411 it tells you about how your modern day conception of islamic rules wasn't shared by much of. Muslims historically. Same with matter of homosexuality I told you about before. And no I am not claiming these things are right. I am saying that they were common and denying that has no purpose
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl so in the first centery of pure islam thought and rulership violently rejected these thoughts and had regulations and rules for their existance and then yu will go and measure the addition of forign rulers to measure the response of muslims is really inaccurate. the spoiled upper class by no way reflected the lower classes who at many times reported and even revolted for such violations. these things also doesnt represent the muslim world accuretly as for example they werent present in arabian pen. if one would go by oriantliest writing then all you would get of the rulership at the time is everything unislamic which clearly breaks when you read about the scholars who emerged at the time and their veiws on the subject.
@@codexana4411 the first century of 'pure' islamic rule that produced serval fitnas? {the first one just happened 30 after death of the phropet} the so called pure period of islamic rule is less than even America! Which had one Civil War in two centuries. The 'pure' first century of islamic rule had serval Civil wars.
Actually from what i know theres not a single hadith which tells you how to pray from beginning to end ? If im correct you cant even get passed takbeer never mind the full prayer ?
Man we are less free today as we did 1000 years a go thank you for making a video about this tabo subject next made video about how Othman Ben Afan chose the write Quran
Muhammad Mustafa Al Azami’s following books are refuting your claim that Ahadith were not written until Zuhri: - Studies in Early Hadith Literature - On Schacht’s Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence Zuhri’s statement is clearly taken here out of context. Other than that: The Life of the Messenger and His Statements and Actions were literally alive in that society in which no Law Books existed. The Law was what the Messenger said and did. To learn that you had to go to the Companions or to the students of the Companions. It was a personal learning instead of scriptural learning. But that doesn’t mean that scriptures weren’t used as means of memorization or supportive tools for the memory. The authority was still with the teachers who were known and respected figures and who were teaching the sayings of the Messenger and His Life in Corroboration to each other.
Claim your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/almuqaddimah. Start your free trial TODAY so you can watch Oman: The Treasure of Mudhmar: www.magellantv.com/video/oman-the-treasure-of-mudhmar
Where are the originals? The gadiths were written in 9th century. The first biography of moe was in 813 in Cairo Egypt. Mecca did not appear on any map until 641 AD. The current Hufs Quran was compiled in Cairo in 1924. 15,000 differences from older fragments. Where are the 5 Uthman manuscripts? The Quran contains many stories that were in Syrian documents that predate islam.
What's your opinion on medieval Islamic depictions of the Prophet Muhammed? And the recent news about the Professor in Minnesota who was fired for showing such medieval artwork?
The only problem that I have with it is that it was made according to the way people used to dress and look in the 8th and 9th centuries not 7th and 6th centuries. And it's also show you how liberal the Muslim used to be.
Using only western scholarship in your videos really limits the information For example we now have to books that are pre ibn ishaq Like the book of Qasim bin Salam
The Quran is also the same as was during the prophets time. They had "suhuf" Abu bakir who compiled them during the lifetime of the prophet. Suhuf meaning sheets made from leather and papirious as paper didn't exist then. During uthman ibn afan time there where different accents and way of speaking and that is when uthman ordered a standard Arabic Quran in the qurayish tongue which was the accent of the people of Makkah and the prophet. So yes the Quran was the same and has been proved
ROYAL HOUSE OF DAVID, The Everlasting Covenant: according to DNA geneticists studied the Northern Arab tribes to which Muhammad belonged to. The tests suggested most of them were descendants of the same man that 50% of the Y-haplotype Cohen match descended from. In other words, the prophet Mohammed is a patrilineal descendant of a Cohen and has Israelite blood.
When you say that some people think the Qur’an is incomplete are you referring to the unbelievers because no Muslim believer can come with such claim? Also, why do you always involve Europeans in the history of Islam when we know that they were living in dark ages and barely had any knowledge at that time and since they were also islamophobic (as they are today) and wrote many lies on Islam and Muslims?
Thanks for listening to the masses man. You are doing a fantastic job, but be careful how you narrate things, this is a very sensitive topic. There are fanatics in your home country who may take it out of context.
Therefore I will give Him a portion with the great, and He will divide the spoil with the mighty- because He poured out His soul to death, and was counted with transgressors. [This is Tree ] To be considered a transgressor required him to be a transgressor as YhWh cannot judge illiterately. If the Law is written it cannot be given over to another . Yeshua the [Sing] Son in Hell did transgress. Truth Law of G-d doesn't consider/ isnt partial to fiction] He is in a cavernous hell suffering the gnashing of tribunery teeth. El is the Power to control all deficits. For He bore the sin of many, and interceded for the transgressors. Interceding is a requirement of the Defender of the defendants. Arguing their intricacies required knowledge of good and evil, (understatement) understanding complete and utter disapproval of the Sin. The Son of Man isnt YhWh as he did consider the lie foretold by the devil and prayed for the reliving of the Denial. Continue....He broke the Scripture. El is in denial of the tree. How can he be if in twain/ tresses? Every day that a Christian turns on his head. Consortium. John 15:1 “I am the true vine, and My Father is the gardener. The Spirit of the Father Dwelling within the Sin/Flesh. The Son of Man means a Professor of Sin as with Ezekiel qualified for judgement. The Son of the Father a spear headed vagrant. Yahoshua or Yeshua translates to English Our Lord and/in Saviour not Jesus. The man behind the Sin is never named. YHWH within the mere male is in control speaking and in coherence, the Prophet/Rabbi in obedience and total annihilation of self, the Father unable to be put to death. The male tells all his followers he has the anointing and none other. He will transgress and be crucified. The twelve apostles given His anointing before death. To afflict the Sin on to another. There will be a Sanctuary who will be an offering unto the Law. He will caste down and approve. [Call] To heal is to propensity configuration (disposition). It is never a construct of mind. that is omnipresent. A judicator in derailment / the Sly/ slivering contritely. or composed (ill). The fear of the fake prophet adonai-zed and belligerent, capable of usurping the Tree/Conifer. The words skewered by the evil intricacies within the doctrine vile and true for it had been with us for the prolific denial in the cloven foot. Saul of the gospel is waiting for his disciples. They truly are despicable. Their pretense is philandric/ phalanstery. The monster they have created is obtuse. Gentiles must be circumcised into the doctrine of the Law, to be ben Israel without is a Sin of the Commandment and Jew will never believe this unless confused or disenfranchised by the opponent. From the first born of Moses sinner of a gentile mother to Will of YHWH he was never given salvation until circumfixed to the Word. You can be all you want to be and never be anything. Corruption is a slave. 6 Yeshua said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life! No one comes to the Father except through Me. 7 If you have come to know Me, you will know My Father also. From now on, you do know Him and have seen Him.” 8 Philip said to Him, “Master, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” 9 Yeshua said to him, “Have I been with you for so long a time, and you haven’t come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10 Don’t you believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me? The words I say to you, I do not speak on My own; but the Father dwelling in Me does His works. 11 Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me-or at least believe because of the works themselves. (Coniferinae (or group Coniferales), including the pine, fir, spruce, and other cone-bearing trees and shrubs, and also the yews and their allies that bear drupelike seeds. a plant producing naked seeds in cones, or single naked seeds as in yews, but with pollen always borne in cones.) Most Christians believe in Yeshua but do not realize their faith is concluded. Songs of a Gentile.
Because, its meaning is ambiguous. The word Daalan can have many different meanings. If we take one meaning, it came apply to the Prophet but another way can not. In any case, the interpretation problem makes it difficult to draw any bit of biography from it.
Dude the exemple you made in the 7th minute is utterly stupid ضلا means lost ,and yeah the prophet was lost during his early life and did not know who to worship
well todays world believe the Herodotus writing about Crosus and Astyages madness ..... But reluctant to believe Muslim scholars biography of Prophet..... even they were better. Muslims made whole elm of Rijal , people who are they narrating......
The thing is, most scholars don’t really take Herodotus serious as much as you think they do, a lot of scholars are doubtful of the sirah because it was written about 130+ years after muhammad died, and it was written right after a new dynasty was established. So fabrications could have happened in the sirah, besides, the original sirah which was written by ibn ishaq is lost to history, the oldest copy of the sirah that we have today is a manuscript that was transmitted by one of ibn hishams students. And it’s currently in the Austrian national library in Vienna.
It is incomplete. Only the story of Joseph is narrated. The rest of the stories are incomplete. It is not true. The "sun does not set in a boiling muddy spring." Its a filthy book of violence towarda the "infidels" & Muhammad's evil deeds.
Fkin hate it when people know that it offends Muslim when u depict The Prophet albeit hiding the face. Please edit the thumbnail brother, just keep the name and the calligraphy.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT so muslims drinking wine or commiting adultery make it right? drawing in of itself is haram (drawings of things like plants or rocks are the exception)
Careful you're walking on a thin line brother. Your line "let's assume for now that quran is indeed the same as it was 1400 years ago" is problematic. There is nothing to assume there.
Quran is preserved , because every year in ramadan it is recited every day for whole month . from first to last . thats called taraweeh . about western scholar when they deny preservation they didnt consider oral tradition , they so skeptical of hard copy of quran
wow the amount of western worshiping in this video is amazing. who in this world still debats the preservation of quran? we literally have maniuscripts from the time of sahabah, and the recitation chains. you use western sources and none of the people of arabia themselves. like you said hadith wasn't written down and so it wasn't compiled until later (some books were written in the times of sahaba) and from these hadith we draw most of the seerah. the quran mentioning the prophet is just a weakness of arabic from you or your source (who you choose over tafsir books talking about the ayah clearly explaining who it was addressed to the prophet like many other ayahs) and you dont mention the specific ayahs which were given to his wives or how many details of his life were mentioned and just went across it with the "we dont know if it was addressed to the prophet of not" yeah sure because when i read the ayahs about zayid wife i think its directed to me too. and the political stuff you keep mentioning is so stupid tbh like how can a sultan or caliph change sources and memorizations of hadith? there was school and scholars debating and compling and purifing stuff across the ages and if something slip at an era it will be caught on by the next. brother you think you are a true historian by copying the western methods and sources, its like saying they would know us better than we do. dont you see the amount of false narrtives they start everywhere, same with the homosexuality video you did.
Okay, I am very much willing to talk about it but I don't find online debates to be very productive. So, I'll just explain myself here. This video is an attempt to look at the Prophet through sources written before 800CE. Tafsirs were written later on. Hadiths were compiled later on. How do you know what Ayahs were given to his wives without later sources? Not all of the Ayahs are ambiguous in their intended addressee, of course. The Ayah about Zayd's wife is actually a good example of what I was trying to say. The event is mentioned but not narrated. How much do you learn about the event by just reading the Qur'an? What manuscripts do we have from Sahaba's time? I didn't try to debate Qur'an's authenticity here. I did talk about that in my Sana'a Manuscript video. Finally, this point is an interesting one that you raised: there was school and scholars debating and compling and purifing stuff across the ages and if something slip at an era it will be caught on by the next How will one correct something that was incorrectly written by al-Zuhri? A lot of scholars, including ibn Ishaq were students of al-Zuhri, they learned from him.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT 1- the first book of hadith was written in the life of the prophet called "The Truthful Script"/"الصحيفة الصادقة" and from it the hadith are compiled into different books and like the quran to ask for the physical written copy is to ask for things after the expantion since the main source of knowledge was recitation rings and then compliation which are then purified through imams like bukhari and muslim and many others before them. (the purification is through learning the narrators and their credibility and puting these works for the western method which was built for something different is a big diservice) 2- the Sana'a Manuscript is from the time of sahabah and the Birmingham Quran manuscript and again following the oral tradition of the quran and how these pages match puts the whole debate to the grave. and through the compiling process a written copy of the quran was present at the time of the prophet's death 3- because al zuhri wasnt the only scholar, you are talking about an empire built on a religion, for just a one imam to exist is impossiable and no one just gets information out of thin air, if he mentioned something and its not recored or heard before the scholars would question its legitimacy.
@@codexana4411 1- What's your source on this hadith book? 2- Sana'a Manuscript has an alternate version of the Qur'an, doesn't it? There's minor differences, no? Birmingham Manuscript is only a few tens of ayaahs of the Qur'an, doesn't really put any debates "to the grave". 3- Give me an example of someone questioning a Taba'i or a Taba-Taba'i? The system you're mentioning was developed after al-Zuhri, during the Abbasid era.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT 1- my source on that hadith book are majorly arabic but a simple search مخطوطة صحيفة همام بن منبه would show the surviving copies of the manuscript and the hadith in the book were later mentioned in mosnad ahmed. 2- sana'a manuscript doesn't have an alternate version.. the differences were either because either the uthmanic standard was not yet completely established and the writings on the manuscripts show the learning process. plus nothing of these readings exist outside of the readings known. these manuscripts with things like Samarkand Kufic Qur'an and the daily use and recitation of the quran prove its preservation. 3- that will be so long for me to translate but check how they debate the tabai's about the shiaism in them or how they questioned there narrations, there are so many books about tabaien and i am not an expert enough to go through all of them. but as narrators they were questioned. the method was developed after the verbal narrations chains became longer and diverse but before that there was no need since the tabaien literally learned from sahanah and the generation after them and al zuhari was not the first to be commanded to compile but he was the one who did collect the biggest bulk of knowledge and after him compliling began by other scholars so he wasnt the only source of hadith and other chains of narration were written down. 4- there were other sources of serah before ibn ishac: موسى بن عقبة المدني:141هـ، وألف كتاب المغازي, أبو المعتمر سليمان بن طرخان البصري: 143هـ، وألف كتاب السيرة الصحيحة 5- while ibn ishaks book was the most refered too it wasn't all sahih and most seraa today are given from the compiled sahih hadith which include the daily life,how the prophet looked like, house and such.
@@AlMuqaddimahYTif you are a Muslim then intentionally or unintentionally you've become a kaafir, and this for other Muslims is like a sword put through his chest, as a Muslim is the brother of a Muslim... But if you are non-Muslim then it's your wish how you present your videos, it doesn't bother Muslims even a bit...
Mmmmm no, you can lie to this guys who are as ignorant as you but not to me. The part where YOU say it says "In the name of allah, Munammad is the meenger of allah", actually says "In the name of Allah". The word Allah as you should know is the generic word for god, any god. You probably don't know or you want to hide the real "moon and the crescent" roots, it's Roman and Zoroastrian, not Islamic at all. The figure of the person in the middle of the coin is the ruler who minted that coin, the name is right on the upper right, but in the left side the lettering says "make his kingship increase" all in Pahlavi not Arab. And in the back of the coin is the Zoroastrian eternal fire and two Zoroastrian attendants. Not Islamic at all. My research says that probably Islam started in Iran. And these are some of the real guys in history. Abu Bakr from 632/634 and Hormizad VI from 630 to 632, Abu Bakr to be a title from Diyar Bakr. Farouksad was the ruler from 651 to 665 and Uthman was from 644 to 656 Farooq Hormizad could be Umar Ibn al Khattab. The Sunnies = Parthians The Shi’a = Sassanids I don't know about you, but your lies are as stupid as Islam's.
@@AlMuqaddimahYT Yep, love to play with Muslims who have no idea why they are Muslims. Do you care to dare to tell me that my idea of Iran is the birth place Islam is absurd? And to explain to me and you followers how in the the heck Muhammad had elephants in Arabia and camels and horses together in battles when we know or we should know they hate each other, not to mention that the quantity of water needed is something to think about? We are not as stupid as you guys think we are, there are things that don't make sense and we are going to point them out.
@cascarrabias397 repent for your sins or you will pay for it later Allah is the most forgiving there is nobody worthy of worship but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah
@@viroshanargiri4641 The bodies of the prophets do not decompose, and worms do not eat them, as well as his own. Do you understand that Muhammad is the Messenger of God in bliss, there is no one like him, all people die, but the Hereafter is the abode of eternity.
