What Fallout 4 Did Better Than Skyrim 

I think it was a huge opportunity wasted by Bethesda to not have a Minutemen quest to retake Quincy and turn it into a sttlement. There is a Creation Club item that makes you go back there and battle the Gunners for control of the ruins, yes. But once you have done that... Nothing. No opportunity to turn the ruins into a settlement. And worse still, the Gunners simply re-spawn at regular intrevals so you have to continually clean them out. After all the talk about the fall of and the "Massacre af" Quincy it seems so disappointing that there is no chance to go back there and right past wrongs so to speak.

I really think PReston should have been encountered later (after diamond City.). Codsworth should have taught us how to build beds/the basic settlement stuff. We find Dogmeat and some random settlers in Concord. We save the settlers and can let them move in with us or send them on their way. The power armor on the roof is the set Sturges was working on not some 200 year old easy salvage. He teaches you how to make turrets if you let them move to Sanctuary (if you don't, they settle at red rocket and become a settlement, unless you kill them). Get the radio signal about the Minutemen needing help when you get to Boston downtown. Preston is holding out in Quincy and needs you to save the town.

@@kyleellis1825 That really would have made so much more sense than the "storyline" Bethesda cobbled together. 🤔

Any person that knows Ivy is a man of culture held in high regards. Congrats !

Sadly it turned out to be completeley pointless :(

Fallout 4 definitely plays amazing with the gunplay but honestly I started a new new Vegas play through as a strong sharpshooter moron and I was impressed withh hhh how well it has held up compared to fallout 3’s gameplay. The one thing I don’t like about fallout 4’s combat is it makes it makes vats almost always unnecessary to deal with enemies effectively

Thank you :)

Much appreciated!

Glad you enjoyed it. Thank you!

Have you played fallout new Vegas? Because the companions there are top-notch, significantly better in my opinion than fall out force. With that being said, I agree with you, companions were absolutely lame in Skyrim. Some of them had some unique dialogue, but realistically, there are only three or four voices, and they all have the same voice back. It’s sucked. I always Played as like a summoner or something so I could have back up without having to have some fucking loser tag around with me and make the same three or four comments. Except Serano, I love Serano we all love Serano. And Lydia, at first anyway.

@@maxminton3693fallout new Vegas probably had better writing for companions but fallout 4 had a better system for companions, affinity

@@REALPEDROGAMEPLAYS I didn’t HATE the affinity system, but they were a few things that were incredibly frustrating. There are certain things that just didn’t make sense to me. Paladin dance getting pissed off that I shot myself full of morphine during a fire fight because I got my dick shot off doesn’t really make sense to me. He’s a soldier, soldiers use morphine during battle when they get wounded. They’ve been doing it for over 100 years in real life, which means I’ve been doing it for quite a bit longer, and fall out. I know that they call it medics, but it’s still morphine, it’s still a battle ready painkiller. And there are other things too, there was a similar system in fallout new Vegas, but it was kind of a bitch to work. You only got points with companions under certain circumstances, and some of them were very difficult to trigger and we’re buggy as shit like everything else in fallout new Vegas. in general, though, I was really disappointed with fallout four is riding. I think the only companion that I really liked was Nick Valentine. Everybody else annoyed me. I did like that sailor guy from far harbor, but I rarely use them since it was more nicks story in far harbor anyway. He had a personal connection to the other robot guy that was in charge of shit. It’s been a while since I played, I went blind five years ago and I can’t play video games anymore pisses me off. I miss fall out more than I miss any other game franchise. Particularly fallout new Vegas, it’s Ridings is top notch. Fallout four did have good gameplay though. And I agree with you that the infinity system, well, not perfect, it was probably better than the system in for new Vegas. Mainly because in fallout new Vegas, I always just ended up gaming the system, looking up on Wikipedia, where the triggers were, and then going there with my companions. Fallout four was the same way, I remember, stripping myself down in front of Kate, and that druggie ghoul to get them to like me. That felt dirty.

@@maxminton3693 hence the speech to text, I understand. Okay, well yes I agree with you about that and it’s unfortunate you went blind. I can’t even fathom that, I’m sorry.

Yeah, sorry about that. I didn’t mean to ramble in that comment, and speech to text gets shittier the longer you talk. Listening to it again, I made more mistakes than I realized. What I meant to say at the end was that I thought one of the weirder things about the affinity system was how you got points for getting naked in front of Kate and Hancock. I didn’t remember Hancock‘s name, so I called him that Ghul character, and I have absolutely no idea what speech to text thought I said. Anyway, being blind sucks, but there is one bit of hope. It takes such an ungodly, long amount of time to make video games now, then, by the time Bethesda makes fallout five I might’ve already had my vision restored. When I went blind, the doctors told me to be optimistic, and that in about five years they would have stem cell therapy to cure me. That was five years ago, so either the doctors were wrong, full of shit, or I’m about to get my vision back. I don’t know, but when I do get my vision back, I am going to play so many fucking video games. I miss them so fucking much.

Glad you like them!

Thanks mate!

Glad you like it!

thanks mate, appreciate you sticking around my channel all this time :)

What, you mean your friends aren’t practically bulletproof demigods?

I meant as in you can place furniture wherever in the settlement you like, instead of it being locked to certain places.

You're right that Skyrim's map is bigger, but: in Skyrim you have lots of mountains where there is nothing else. While in Fallout 4, you can go into a lot of large buildings with multiple floors, there's massive verticality. So IMO Fallout 4 has the by far more 'entertaining' map🙂

I personally dislike sim settlements as it removes the creative freedom with the settlement system