What Happened to Boeing? 

Exactly

@@OfFiCiAl_CaRgO They "killed" that part of the script.

Why are you asking this? it is completely illogical as it will not help them make any money.

found dead during editing

They died.

and there's the heart of it...

what are you talking about all the major banks except lehmans got bailed out and bonuses in 08 and 09 with (TARP) so a company that is to big to fail cant fail especially with a central bank at the core of the structure.

@@adiintel1yeah they failed and was bailed out.

Boeing execs DO NOT f around. (Those stock buybacks cost $)

Can’t make buybacks without deleting some whistleblowers

It's actually been Engineer CEOs (starting with Jack Welsh) that have caused this.

Boeing CEOs were engineers. The problem is not that simple

Average engineer hating on business people. I hope you know the CEOs were engineers.

@@shaunsensei6948 sure he was an engineer by training, but he was much more profit and stockholder value focused than valuing safety and innovation. Those CEOs / COOs after the McDonald Dougless set the tone and changed the culture. Furthermore, many of the actual engineers working on the 737 Max complained about management and production pressures. Read the reports, and you will learn business people systematically caused these issues

Since when stonecipher, mcnurney, and muilenburg worked as an engineer?

sure is. ever see a 737-800 do a hard landing? notice how it always breaks up into 3 chunks. 1st section always breaks off behind the cockpit and the tail. usually the same frame numbers. then check out any other aircraft.

well it's kinda funny coz bloomberg as of this moment is completely sold on china , I would be completely unsurprised if there is something going on with Bloomberg and CCP after all the PR attacks on India and US & if you see their videos on china vs their videos on US or India , you can really see the tone behind those words , you really need a bias to be sensitive to and catch it (there are moments where it's not even that subtle) .

Maybe because we are at the point where CEOs and shareholders are making companies fail on purpose to fill their pockets. And not even some small company but strategic ones, to the point they are starting to represent a real treat to the political and economic stability of developed countries

Use the travel agent KAYAK it allows customers to cross out aircraft they do not want to travel on.

golden parachutes 🤩🤩

Although ain’t is not a word, I totally agree 😂

​@@cheese-powerOf course it's a word! What makes you think it's not?

Driving is way more dangerous though

DHC got bought out three decades ago, that said I'm really bummed out they didn't use more stock footage of the plastic princess instead.

I hope they get into the widebody market

Interesting, Boeing is pretty safe, many Airbuses crash too.

@@BilllBnow that’s quality cope

Airbus planes crash due to issues as well. American 587....faulty rudder design which killed 265 people.

Underrated comment.

Greed and stupidity

running the company like a "business" rather than a great engineering firm. Caring about stockholder value over safety and innovation. Prioritizing budgetary and schedule concerns over everything else. Terrible culture, pressuring Boeing ODAs, fear of retaliation, refusing to include new safety systems or anything that could risk increasing training requirements/budget/timeline, overworking manufacturing employees (production pressure was so high that some employees worked 9 consecutive weeks including weekends without break). Ed Pierson advocated for lowering and pausing the production line as he explicitly warned, “My first concern is that our workforce is exhausted. …My second concern is schedule pressure (combined with fatigue) is creating a culture where employees are either deliberately or unconsciously circumventing established processes”. Management and CEO decided to increase production, ignoring Pierson's concern. A few months later, the production line was in chaos and creating out-of-sequence work, with more than 38 partially completed aircraft left outside the factory waiting for parts. Many engineers advocated for a synthetic airspeed monitor, which would help eliminate erroneous air data readings (AoA) that could trigger continuous and uncorrectable auditory alerts, prevent stall warning speed alerts that lead to continuous stick shaker activation, and uniquely address the 737’s inability to replace erroneous air data on displays with correct information. Michael Teal, decided against the synthetic airspeed monitor in order to minimize costs and simplify pilot training protocols to avoid the necessity for simulator training. This safety enhancement was brought up 3 separate times and stuck down everytime. One frustrated engineering manager had claimed, "People have to die before Boeing will change things."

we aint going!

You’ll go BOING! BOING!

@@saijujiwara Keep spreading your fear mongering. It will only reduce the ticket prices for the rest of us who realize that driving is more dangerous.

@@steinarnielsen8954 keep defending your stocks. as we speak, another boeing 737 issues today with southwest airline. we need more competition. boeing is too cocky and greedy like USA. profit over safety. we need to boycott boeing to give them pressure for a change. people like you wont force them any change. if you values life you shoulnd let compagny like boeing do what they doing rn.

iTS where its always been, supporting the payer(Boeing pay outs) not the competition.

It takes a decade just to design one airframe. We’re talking about at least a generation of uneconomical and almost daredevil levels of flying before these new companies get their products refined enough for regular passenger service… only to begin consolidating again due to market pressures.

Yea. No.