What Happened to Portugal's Monarchy? 

Portugal needed to learn to share.

More like manipulative spouse .

Fact: Cape to Cairo is more important than friendships

Sounds like your average Civ game

Cecil Rhodes wants his Rhodesia.

Literally a coward who threw away thousands of years of monarchs keeping the crown because he was well off on his own. You're the type of person who'd believe King Charles killed his own people to ensure "Liberty and Freedom" because he said so. People can lie? Impossible! Why would corrupt people lie?

Absolute sensible lad.

@@zawarudo596 ... Wait, an ousted king saying no violence should be used to restore him to power is like a king who was involved in a massive civil war and was killed after a trial later? .... and honestly, Manuel II believing in Portugol lots, but not wanting to spend Portuguese lives just to return himself to power is like a believable position of a failed king who inheirted a mess. Killing his way back would not have solved his problems enough.

He was descendent from the Queen Victoria from UK, when things got tricky before someone try to kill him he left to the UK, and he had a lot of british status like "Royal Victorian Order" and stuff, british monarchy gave him a palace and free money for the rest of is life... that why he didint care much about Portugal. He end up diying in 1932 with 42yo

@@eucalipto042 He did care about Portugal because he fought in the Portuguese army during world war 1 even when it was a republic.

based

And Erkel Guy In Brazil

And the fall of Estado Novo

After 3 failed republics, Portugal gets a dictator.

Bulb66 He’s talking about Eneas Carneiro, which is a very obscure request for a video

Is not like they need it.

Scum bags

Ned Steven it was good for portugal actualy. Angola mozambique and all the other portugal colonies were more than enough for portugal small population. And it will have become independant 70 years later anyways 😂

Filipe Moreira Filipe Moreira uk which included ireland at the time had about 8 times portugal population And i dont call macao and timor oriental a empire 😂 altho angola and mozambique was a bit late in the independance actions. And macao and timor oriental are independant countries now since 20+ years Uk still own lands in the carabian. Atlantic (falkland island) pacific indian ocean. And mediteranian (gibraltar). Its called the 14 uk overseas territory. So uk is still an empire having land on all part of the globe. While portugal do not

Filipe Moreira also why are you placing your ego on history. You didnt do anything that deserve pride. Its the very specific individual portuguese dudes that made the portuguese colonization that deserve congratulation. Not you. You might be the biggest ssstttuuppidest loosser ever portugal has So dont place you ego in history. Its just make you look like a dude who has no self estim and try to build confidence on what other people did just because they share same passport

You mean Prime Minister. The Netherlands ate their Prime Minister not the King.

It's either they eat him ( metaphorically, or in the case of the Netherlands, literally) Or he eats them It's a zero sum game.

haha ha correct comment, :At least the Portuguese didn’t eat their own prime minister. They can’t r/woooosh all of us

eat*

Eat*

Nicolas Fritsch 👍

I always forget to look at it before the coup.

Luís Quartin I wouldn’t be so sure of that.

And China followed 2 years later. The same year the Titanic sank.

Luís Quartin M O S T

Imagine betraying or conquer all you friends -Nazigermany

The eternal Anglo

@@ichquell20 Who did they betray?

There are no friendships among nations, only practical temporary alliances.

Imagine not betraying everyone even your oldest ally*

@Schnitzelreich I would've thought they preffered neutraility rather than joining the Germans outright, especially since the Germans wouldnt be able to help them if they did join

Portugal in 1386: Oh crap! Spain is invading me! Quick! I need English Archers! Britain: Sure, why not?

@@fristnamelastname5549 England, not Britain. Britain was not formed until 1707.

yeah we had like 40 different governments from 1910 to 1918 and their decisions were pretty volatile

Frist Name Last Name well, we have been thankfull all these centuries for these 400 archers.... btw, the portuguese many times are bigger then they think. That battle was the first prove of it, but yes, we do thank you for the help. It was in a important moment and stabilized the independence almost 800 years ago, when Spain was still a project.

France asked first and Portugal was being attacked by Germany in Africa

@@lpereira300 You must be fun at parties.

Also, Germany declared war on Portugal, not vice versa.

The truth is that Portugal did not behave itself as neutral country. When Portugal complies with the British request to confiscate the German ships interned in Portuguese ports, Germany reacts by declaring war on Portugal, thus forcing the Portuguese officially into the war.

Nice one! It's funny and sad because it's true.

Si, senhor.

Os Afonso how you say Alfonso in portuguese?

But there is an 's' in Luis, yet the narrator pronounced it as Louie.

@@petercox5918 He made a mistake. It's pronounced as "Luees"

@Peter Cox in French that’s correct, you don’t pronounce the s in “Louis”. But Portuguese and Spanish (to my knowledge, correct me if wrong) are phonetic languages, meaning you pronounce all the letters, and can usually determine pronunciation from spelling.

'Tis often the case in such yonder land as is the Internet.

Samuel Revise cringe

This channel in a nutshell.

@@FireRayquaza24 Huzzah. Such an overflow of exquisite and refined language, molded as to form a scalpel-like criticism which doth assist me in mine progress. Translation for McCringe: very constructive, thank you. I'm sure you feel a lot better now that you've lost an occasion to keep your mouth shut.

Switzerland was part of the HRE until 1648 when they gained legal independence under the Treaty of Westphalia and then again in 1815 under the Congress of Vienna they were declared independent from the First French Empire.

idk too much about all swiss history butttt i think he's talking about how they were part of the HRE which had a King, and they revolted and made their own country

They got rid of the Holy Roman Emperor and became independent.

Well they were parts of Habsburg monarchy untill death of Emperor Rudolf I Habsburg, then they rebelled and formed Old Confederacy consisting of cities and cantons. So they kinda overthrown their King.

@@rtsgod The HRE had, well, an Emperor. But Switzerland was _reichsfrei_ . They were pretty much autonomous. The Habsburgs later tried to take that privilege from them, leading to revolution.

In Brazil, the stereotype for a portuguese Man is a Baker with a moustache, so yeah, the moustache game has always been strong

my father and father's side of the family are Portuguese, and I can attest that the mustache game is very strong

@Plo Koon I've seen an old lady on the news with some puberty-style stache, but that's about it

Even in women

Half my family is Portuguese. Can confirm.

Yeah it was. But its like a diminutive. It would translate as "brits". We had to changed it at their request...

Lol Portugal’s original anthem was a diss track lolol

@@scottydu81 Most of them are. The US anthem is about a battle with the British. The French anthem speaks of "watering the fields with impure blood" and was created during the Franco-Prussian War.

@@TugaAvenger French anthem dates back from the french revolution period around 1790 and references the other royalist armies of europe trying to put it down

@@CalgarGTX thanks for correcting, and being civil.

@Kaiser Wilhelm II Not all people are born and raised to be fluent in english, Herr Kaiser. Please forgive him with your power of being Victorias Grandchild

His English seems plenty fine to me. In fact I wouldn’t even be able to tell he’s not a native speaker.

@Kaiser Wilhelm II Decent, but it could be better. What about yours, Kaiser?

@@ertvonzukonigvonrahm835 I'm certain that I won't be executed or anything.

@@theyoshi202 Thanks. I've seen both better and a lot worse from native speakers. :)

it should be replaced by "the worst allies in history". Even after expeling the Napoleonic forces from our country brits stole almost all the remains of our churches gold and plunder the country. then come the pink map ultimatum. after the brexit. so now just leave us focking alone. Keep it to your corner, except when you're petted by your american owners, with the bless of the french navy and armorers to support the tea party club, a bunch of rurals who kicked his majesty bests out of the USA to be.

@@pedromiguelalmeida4446 rip bozo

The uk supporting Spain by letting spain invade Portugal before ww1

Also Queen Maria II of Portugal was born in Brazil

@@MarcoAurelio-vv3gz yeah,and was the daughter of our first emperor,Peter the first.

The throne remained the same, he only had to move to one of our colonies, for a couple of years and then forced to come back.

Mike Oxlong PT só falou bosta, chora mais

​@Mike Oxlong PT Nobody said "The Brazilian Empire". He said "our first emperor" because portugal used to rule Brazil, so they were the same nation for a very long time.

Normie

@@Cjnw ????

who's that ahole? the robber king?

He was one of the most popular monarchs

I expected "to Manuel II, whose name definitely didn't have an "o" in it. " EDIT: I thought "Manoel" was more common than "Manuel" in Portugal, but apparently I was wrong.

@@ixlnxs Er... no.

@@ixlnxs what have you been smoking, mate?!... This is not Spain, the most common way to write that name on Portuguese was Manuel and still is. We had a movie director called Manoel de Oliveira, but he was part of a tiny minority.

@@pedromiguelalmeida4446 in Spain the name is also written as "Manuel" lol

Can pretty much be expanded to any leader. So many revolutions that grind to a halt because killing/exiling the dictator doesn't really fix anything.

It's always a good first step, though.

That's what everyone should say to Spanish republicans. It happened in 1931 and it will happen again if the current king is ousted.

@@ArkadiBolschek often yes but not sure if always

I'm not too sure about that, I mean, look at the French and American Revolutions.

It started even sooner, arguably, with the razing of Lisbon in 1755. Now that was blow.

Yes well, you have to apply Occam’s razor to establish a clear and cut cause. I would be even stricter than History Matters. The fall of the Monarchy began with the British move on the Portuguese African colonies.

It also didn’t help that every male member of the House of Braganza kept either dying or living and deciding for some reason in the name of God not to marry, or to marry and not have children. The contentious and well prepared Pedro V died in a epidemic and was replaced by the ineffective Luís I and later Carlos I, who was murdered, meaning you had two Kings whose reigns were stagnant. Manuel II was... he was the right man, because his reign came far too late

What you're saying is when Portugal went from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, in the first half of the XIX century, Portugal had 3 constitution (1822, 1826 and 1832), with a Civil war in the middle, and political turmoil until 1851. (They decided to use the Constitucional letter of 1826) Portugal entered the period we call "Regeneração" (Regeneration) where Portugal invested heavily in infrastructure, communications and industry to catch up with the rest of Europe. Although these were somewhat successful, they didn't produce the expected results, and Portugal entered a vicious circle where they kept taking on loans they couldn't afford. Portugal entered bankruptcy having to leave the gold standard, and negotiating how to pay the loans, in the Crises of 1891-1892, this and the unhappiness with the political system that was either one party or the other made the Portuguese take action.

Mhm, not really though... Salazar didn't lead the 1926 coup, he just took over in 1933.

@Kaiser Wilhelm II he's not an ignorant and probably not communist so what r u talking about

The most unstable democracy in the world. Some 30 governments in 16 years of republic

Probably better off under Salazar than as a democracy. But the economy struggled because of a long war in Africa.

Salazar kept portugal from falling apart like franco did in spain

The kind of alliance everybody wants, and nobody wants.

In the TimeGhost video about what if the Nationalists had lost the Spanish Civil War some people commented that had a Nazi-aligned communist Spain invaded Portugal, the UK would have intervened on the basis of the medieval piece of paper, it got me a chuckle. Portugal was almost entirely useless to the British, it doesn't even border the Mediterranean, you can't close it off from the Atlantic from there-it would be just some extra coastline which the Axis wouldn't need anyway. There's no way they would have risked even a single British life trying to defend it.

Bullshit it is an Alliance still, a lot of military training gets done still between both nations, the UK generally aided the Portuguese whenever they needed help.

Funny, the Brits never screwed us..

@@scarletcrusade77 sure, overall in Africa right???

Surprised Pikachu face

How?

Saguntum-Iberian-Greek Konstantinopoli With the Hearts of Iron IV DLC „La Résistance“ you get the optional restore the monarchy and even creating a dual Monarchy between Brazil and Portugal

OVERPOWERED FOCUS TREE INTENSIFIES

@@joao_1986 laughs in +1000 manpower a month and the entire Brazilian navy. Seriously tho I'm happy paradox made our monarchist tree so overpowered lmao

*Deus, Pátria e Rei intensifies*

You mean spain?

love that song but i can't understand but one world i think the say honor i dont know

Se Deus quiseeeeeeeeeeeeer Há de brilaaaaaaaaaaar Denovo a corooooa sobre as lusas armas! Que a nossa pátria soube sempre honraaaaar Que a nossa pátria sobe sempre honraaaaaar

Wow, I didn't know that, maybe it was karma for the bloodshed in the Colonies.

What are uou talking? What bloodshed??

@@acharonim4659 Not a lot of bloodshed my guy. Portugal’s costly and disastrous colonial wars in Africa didn’t get going until after the fall of the monarchy

@@Edmonton-of2ec kinda says a whole lot about the Republic. Doesn't it 🤔

@@acharonim4659 The colonial wars only started in 1961 and ended in 1974/1975.

i agree, and that multiple shields and castles thing looks disgusting

There's only one thing for it, restore the monarchy and get the old flag back.

This^

I propose a compromise, use green and blue, or white and red

there was literally attemps to re-use the royal flag during the first days of the *republic* At least they didnt went with the US copy past one

Nah men, we chill down here

No. We had enough sardines and codfish.

Generally speaking, Prime Ministers aren't food.

When the Dutch don't have oranges they eat the Orangist prime minister.

Thank god my King hasn’t been eaten yet

Tbf in the HOI4 time in 1936, Portugal had just had it's 10th anniversary of the military dictatorship,aka "the second republic" and the 3rd of the "Estado Novo" Salazarist regime, both of which had succeeded one of if not THE most unstable republic in modern history. I'm sure the Portuguese people would be ok with a king

Nothing new, they loved land grabbing.

@@OneofInfinity. You could say that about all empires throughout history.

Don't worry its fine we just hate Spain and Brazil and France and morroco and some hate the usa

Honestly, when didn't UK betray it's allies?

British never had any real enemy or friends, only interests

That's pretty sums up 😂

Well I mean did they? lol

If you call turning into a dictatorship based on a failed ideology that makes you starve a fix..

So..they made it worse

Meanwhile (actually 100 years sooner) in France

@@italiangarbageposting to be fair, some politicians in russia opposed collectivization, at least before Stalin came along

I mean there was Salazar

They got Salazared

@@kurdan9848 For the better and worse I suppose... While Salazar definitely didn't lead to nearly as much bloodshed (the Angolan war notwithstanding) as Franco did, he also supervised over one of the most economically inefficient regimes of 20th century Europe, all the more ironic considering his economic background, and he specifically prevented foreign novelties from reaching Portugal for fear it would lead to people losing interest in religion and tradition (there was no color TV or Coca-Cola in Portugal until 1975 and 1977 respectively, so even later than most of the Eastern Bloc). And Portugal never really did have a _genuine_ and lasting economic boom the way Spain did under late Franco and subsequently, today falling behind even some of the more prosperous Eastern European nations.

They got estado novo'd

@@yarpen26 There are pros and cons to everything, but generally it was a bad thing. Also I'm not sure if saying "not as much bloodshed" would really be a pro, it's a very low bar.

Old flag was dogshit. Green, yellow and red are way more appealing than white and blue.

Yes, more fucking instability!!!

@@miguelpadeiro762 i heard that portugal of today is poor. Not like greece but still poor

@@cgt3704 *cries in greek

Mr. Karl McYoda how would a restoration of the monarchy cause more instability?

Mr. Anderson - professional catholic monster hunter A civil war? You’re going against the national identity of Portugal? In fact, how would it NOT make Portugal more instable?

Thank you!

and Izzy? 3:40

He's a legend

@@harrywood6502 is hee?

apple's lover some dude who’s been a patron for a a year and a half

I didn't know countries had heads

@@TheRealKingLeopoldII And I did not know that you still live

@@frose1980 Yeah, I faked my death

@@TheRealKingLeopoldII You gotta be pretty old now, what's your secret?

@@nobleactual7616 Belgian fries and beer

Or Us elections. On both sides

The United States was pretty successful, but to be fair, a colonial revolution is very different from one centered around a country's "core" territories.

@@iruleatgames you guys literally had a civil war

@@starplatinumzahand8174 We also have the longest lasting democracy in the world, and our civil war was between two different republican democracies with different ideas of freedom. Considering we were and still are one of the world's leading superpowers, I think we've done alright. Not perfect, but alright.

@@iruleatgames I mean, as a country, economically and military wise, yes of course... Socially wise not so much

Yes, but as history evolved, the same happened with the two republics. The Portuguese Republic became less and less a corporativist system (that is even more visible in the Third Republic), whereas Brazil actually didn't change a lot...

And now look at Brazil. Widespread corruption and gang capital of the world. There's uncountable amounts of videos of criminals burning people alive, eating human flesh & brain matter and killing women in front of their children. If only these people had a higher religious ideal to look up to... Oh wait they ousted the monarchy so I guess this is what they all wanted Brazil to end up like!

Is that the golden circle dude??

It's a good subject, but as a Pole I can tell already: it went bankrupt

Admirał Patryk I would’ve figured because it was eaten alive by surrounding powers

Because it was a lot of land stuck between greater powers than itself. Not much more to it, really.

@@mr.anderson2241 Emm, not that much as you think it had. You see, in 1374 King Luis the Hungarian, to put his daughter on Polish throne, promised to the Nobility a little but too much. Next kings in XVth Century needed to accept another privileges, but in 1505 king Kazimierz Jagiellończyk made a ,,Nihil Novi" (lat. ,,nothing new") privilege, meaning that no new law will be accepted without an agreement of all Nobility. In XVIth Century Nobels were able to negotiate. We were expanding territorially, polliticaly, economically - on any kind of level (that's why we call XVIth Century ,,Gold Century" (,,Złoty wiek")), and Nobles we're proud of this ,, Nobilitian Democracy" - when in Europe Absolute Monarchy was getting more and more popular Polish-Lithuanian Nobels were calling Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth ,,Green Island" (,,Zielona Wyspa"), as we were standing out of totalitarism. As King Zigmunt the August said: ,,I'm not the king of your conscience" (,,Nie jestem królem sumień Waszych"). So everything was fine and great. By the time. In 1651 there was a first time when Sejm was broken without any kind of negotiations. That made us lose Chmielnicki's Up-Rising, so we lost an ability to co-rule the Russia. But that also made baronage even more corrupted, so with almost endless ,,Liberum Veto" (lat. ,,I don't agree") shouted in Sejm, King needed to ,,buy" the votes. That blocked the development of our country, which became visible in second half of XVIIth Century, when Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth, mighty superpower everyone was afraid of, started to ,,bleed out". We didn't development our farming, so we were exporting less and less every year. We weren't developing our Army, so it was getting weaker and weaker every decade. And we didn't change our pollitical system, so it didn't stop. In XVIIIth Century everything was clear. First, in 1702 we disbanded Winged Hussars (if you want I can explain why) and we had like 10.000 soldiers, while being between three superpowers wanting to destroy us: Prussia, Russia and Austria. The myth that Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth collapsed because of neighbors is partially true, as they were corrupting our Nobles, but without ,,Nihil Novi" privilege they couldn't do much to destroy us. But here we are, in Age of Enlightenment - but for Poles and Lithuanians it's getting darker and darker. In 1764 Stanisław August Poniatowski gets the Polish-Lithuanian throne (Nobles didn't like them, but Russian Army forced them to elect him (we didn't have a throne heredity)), but 4 years later the ,,Bar Confederation" (against this new king) started. In 1772 he singed I Partizipation of Poland. That wasn't cool, so like only 6 years later we started a ,,Great Sejm negotiations" (,,Obrady Sejmu Wielkiego") to reform our backwarded, weak country. It resulted in III May Constitution (,,Konstytucja III Maja" (this is the reason why 3rd of May is a national celebration in Poland)) in 1791, turning us into Constitutional Monarchy and reducing Liberum Veto. But we were too poor, as our king liked to party from national budget, and made a debt on 30mln złoty. His favourite lover, Czarina Catharine II The Great, promised him she will pay for all of this - if he only accept II Partizipation of Poland, and that's what happened, in 1793. That outraged Tadeusz Kościuszko, who launched an Up-Rising against that (,,Kościuszko's Insurrection" (,,Insurekcja Kościuszkowska")) a year later, but collaborative King ordered those rebels to capitulate, which they did. Another year later, in 1795, all of neighbors just walk into the country which doesn't even resist, and grab all of its lands, announcing III Partizipation of Poland. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwelth disappears. Then is it true it was because of neighbors? Well, yes, we can say it, but the most important reason is economical crisis and too much privileges for Nobility. That's the true story why this mighty Superstate collapsed.

@@Admiral45-10 Well, as a Pole, I know that. Nonetheless I think this is interesting subject and worth mentioning.

Yes, but unfortunately it's a very little party with no presence in parliament.

"Rule" is an overstatement. They had occupied bothe the Angolan and Mozambican coasts and had claims on the lands in between which were recognized by all other parties of Treaty of Berlin, except for Britain.

That had nothing to do with the Portuguese support for Rhodesia

yup. we even sold 100.000 h&k G3 to South Africa some time after our colonial wars come to the expected end.

Portugal supported Rhodesia alongside South Africa for obvious reasons...cough cough...a shared opposition to native self-determination Nothing to do with the fact that we briefly occupied/claimed those lands 100 years especially when back then all the ancestors of the rhodesian white elite were still living in England at that time

the alliance between Portugal South Africa and Rhodesia has no relation with that

they were toxic in more than that. they tried to apropriate port wine too but people from porto sent them away

Bem vindo à vida de quarentena

@@wolfgang6517 very much camarada

Saudações tupiniquins irmãos lusos

PORTUGAL, CARALHO! :)

Someone Else Verdade lol

Britain [proudly]: The only thing that doesn't change is change itself.. Except for tea: the stumli for our colonial exapa.... Sorry, our way of civilising other people.

@@HerewardWake or they could have just helped them. The British didn't took Rhodesia because they feared that a outside power would have taken it. They took it because they wanted more land

@Pedro Abreu same with the tea. plus i would accept the "way of civilising" if britain wasnt considered one of the least civilised and most problematic countries in europe

If you're interested in Portugal take a look at anything you can find from our earlier history, from the 1100's to the 1580's especially. It's very interesting.

@@MaSsiVeGaming1 Thanks for the recommendation, i'll definitely take a look

@@AlexMcNamee You'll be happy to know that because we're overshadowed so much, most of us really enjoy telling foreigners about our history. So feel free to ask

@@TheZeldaCinema we are overshadowed because of ignorance, even from portuguese themselves (specially those who start speaking spanish to foreigners)

most things atributed to spain in terms of history come from portugal. on average spain came a lot later to the party and just copied

Macau. Brazil, Angola. The Portuguese ruled near and far.

@@markhenley3097 Ferdinand Magellan, Vasco da Gama, Antonio Salazar.

@@Koala1203 Salazar slytherin?

And they showed us how good deep fried battered fish could taste.

@@Croz89 nah it was actualy portugal who taught them how to batter fish sorry to disapoint you but battering food is a portuguese invention xD

Fun fact: no

That's why Portugal have more gold reserves than Brazil =) Sou português, ok? xD

Portugal in the 60's had one of the biggest gold reserves in the world. Enough to buy and sell Brazil, metaphorically speaking.

Yeah...200 years later and Brazil still haven't got over the 1500-1822 period.

@@pedrocarmo1996 that's Portugal's fault clearly, because you didn't have some 200 years to fix that

Não

Actually was not "the British" but more like "the bretons" ("os bretões").

@@diogorodrigues747 Bretons and british are synonyms...

really? and here am I was thinking who runs the uk is the parliament and the government with its prime-minister. lets say, like it works Portugal with the President, Parliament, and a government led by a prime minister. the main difference is if we get a crappy President we can vote him out, fact that can't happen with the blue blooded ones in a constitutional monarchy. Either way, all your arguments (i prefer to call them mere opinions) are a big fake. sorry, mate.

Ah, actually, one comment here explained that Portugal already had a constitutional monarchy before, instated through earlier revolutions following the enlightenment. So, no. Most constitutional monarchies aren't Alice anymore today. Any existing monarchy actually is a huge anomaly.

We did have one. Since the early 1800s. Hell, our anthem before the republic was not of praising the king but praising the "Divine Constitution", written by D. Pedro IV himself, the saviour of constitutionalism in Portugal. The problem is the later kings just let "others do their job", to the point of a dictator of sorts being appointed at one point, cementing a weak image of the monarchy, which became official with Portugal submitting to Britain The dictatorship can be blamed on the unstable republic, which was put to an end with a military coup in 1926, the climax of the dozens and dozens of governments that were formed in the brief existance of the first republic, putting an end to democratic vote, which only resumed after General Óscar Carmona died in 1951, but by then presidents were mere puppets of the real ruler of Portugal, the far more famous Salazar, the "prime minister"...who was technically also a dictator

its an anomaly if ur from a republic country. if ur from a modern constitutional monarchy country you would not think its an anomaly. im from a monarchy country and republics just seem so boring to me. our monarchy also cost less than republics and our monarch socialized and mixed with the public and seemed lowkey so many in my country didnt mind the monarch.

@@blackdial5992I hate the republic in Brazil every country should be a monarchy

Yes and no. We technically already occupied the areas in the Pink Map, due to Serpa Pinto's military expeditions. He withdrew after the British Ultimatum.

@@zap3231 ok, obrigado pela resposta!

Well, they weren't wrong.

@@ArkadiBolschek Yes they were

@@b3ygghsas Well, it _is_ the future and look, they're a Republic.

and the actual present

Like literally what was the King even suppose to do? Start a senseless and (toaster bath) war with Britain the most power Empire at this point literally over a piece of land in Africa?

He/they already made a video about the Spanish one and have some about the nazis, so the one left are Portugal, Greece and states like Vichy France and Nazi puppet states. I don't know if he has a video about Mussolini, but he should.

@@tekmogm5979 he made one about Vichy France and one about Mussolini. Edit: Adding the word ''One'' so the sentence would make more sense.

French Revolution too

And the russian revolution three

Atatürk in a nutshell

@@appleslover also that

It's also Regaining Polish Independence in a Nutshell.

Que a nossa Pátria soube, sempre honrar Que a nossa Pátria soube, sempre honrar

@@wolfgang6517 and then the winged hussars arrive

Parabens amigo!

They are from Miguel I descendants

Bring the crown back caralho!

If im not mistaken there is a political party that is trying to restore the monarchy, but im not sure i have to confirm it first

There is! It is called the People's Monarchist Party (Partido Popular Monárquico) It is unfortunately rather small though almost making them non-existent. I believe there are quite a few monarchists with the new conservative party called Chega, but I am not sure about their numbers.

God, king and Country, VAMOS CARALHO

And retake Olivença.

They got shot by the commies the end

@@ronanwaring3408 also the dogs got shot

They fled to Britain

@brentonz they shot the tsar cuz they didn't have a choice if the white army captured the tsar they could restore the empire and that would cause problems to the reds and btw marxism doesn't say that u must kill the kings/emperor.

for example in romania when the communist came to power they exiled the king same thing in yugoslavia.

No just youtube's drunk again

RU-vid checks views for authenticity before displaying them, so that number is "stickier" than likes or comments. After some time it goes to its actual number.

there's no iberia. just a small peninsula with two distinct countries: Portugal and Spain.

forcing the allies to make an official request for Portugal to enter the war. They internationally recognized the new republican regime and allowed Portugal to parade in the military parade alongside the winners and the new order.

I don’t think.

@Zachary Durocher ending monarchy in that way just makes the country more unstable.

their isn´t great diference between the portuguese 1st republic and the monarchy soooo not really a mistake

@Zachary Durocher I'm not saying Portugal should have a monarchy again but monarchies aren't "trash".

@Zachary Durocher saying monarchy is trash when the thing that succeeded it was an absolute master piece of trash politics, probably more unstable than S.A banana republics

Facts

I really liked your text, i couldn't agree more.

Yeaaaaaa I'll have to call bullshit on your "monarchism is growing" part. We've got socialist movements for days and you know how those guys are when it comes to kings. Plus, pretty much everyone just laughs when they see an actual monarchist around here. Like it's not a popular idea. Only reason I'd say you were misled by a Portuguese person is because I know you're Portuguese yourself lol.

@@zap3231 I don’t claim it’s a big movement. But it’s growing indeed. The thing is that there are more monarchists than one might think. It isn’t an ideology, so people are not passionate about it, but they prefer a monarchy. To be fair, most people don’t care, but I wouldn’t be surprised if more cared for the monarchy than the republic itself. And yes, I say that as a Portuguese.

@@avantelvsitania3359 Well I would, especially cause, again, we're filled to the brim with socialist/communist movements and political parties, and even the right-winged parties don't much care for monarchy. You see people everywhere condemning the Spanish monarchy for their recent actions against that guy who insulted it and to top it all off the main source of attention for the modern monarchist societies here in Portugal are just people wanting to laugh at them. Monarchism isn't coming back here, especially with the Miguelist successor. I don't know if he's abandoned his family's absolutist beliefs but if he hasn't that's a sure way to know the House of Bragança is dead forever to the Portuguese Throne.

Tell that to France and Germany

we technicaly did go to war against the brits in a couple ocasions because of cod. we obviously won btw. also despite all that a good majority of people in portugal dislike the brits on average and most brits know nothing about the windsor treaty and the amount of help we gave them... its still a very one sided friendship

@@zestorm6233 No we didn't go to war over cod. That was Iceland. Read a history book.

@@zap3231 yes we did read a history book

@@zestorm6233 No you didn't, otherwise you'd know the cod wars were with Iceland. NOT Portugal.

@@zestorm6233 well, you haven't even googled the subject when you are writting on a device from where you can still get a lot of pretty good information. The so-called Cod War was fought between the UK and Iceland.

Tu és muita burro

@@fish4225 obrigado. Bom argumento o teu. Viva o Rei!

@@RiderSousa N tou a fazer argumento nenhum, tou a gozar contigo por seres estúpido

@@fish4225 mais uma vez, bom argumento o teu. Viva o Rei! (Viste? não perdi a razão ao insultar alguém)

@Cheese Head I guess the British would need a friend in south western Europe, with them taking Gibraltar from Spain.

Warwick Bull Portugal was always a bit on edge with Castile/Spain so close, and could never truly match them. It’d make sense that they would want to secure an alliance as a last effort to deter aggression in Iberia. Spain and Portugal are often historical friends, but friendships can change quickly.

@@woom_y You learn something new everyday, thanks.

Not "at one point": they've been strong allies for centuries.

@@woom_y Spain and Portugal historical firends ?? bahahahaah are you smoking crack or something?

retornqado was mario soares and alvaro cunhal.....the others were not retornados. "retornado" is a vulgar term invented by leftist parties

Nah, eles podiam ter ganho as eleições.... do ano 4060

@@wolfgang6517 Republicanos sempre serão desonestos. Na eleição geral de 1888 no Brasil, eles elegeram 2 deputados, um número ridículo.

Os caras não conseguem honestamente e dão golpe e colocam ditadura militar no país pra garantir o estabelecimento de seus regimes ilegitimos

@Hugo Batista errado! O partido republicano nunca teve uma grande vitória. O máximo de deputados que conseguiu eleger foram 14 (em 153 possíveis) e isto já no ano de 1910. Antes disso a sua representação parlamentar era na casa dos 3 deputados por eleição. Os ideais republicanos só encontravam eco nas zonas industriais de Lisboa, junto de algum operariado, que era diminuto no panorama nacional. A questão dos adiantamentos à Casa Real foi mal explicada pelo governo e aproveitada pela oposição, fazendo dela algo que, na prática não era. A 5 de Oububro a República ganha a revolução, não porque tivesse um esmagador apoio popular, ou até mesmo militar, mas porque houve uma descoordenação no lado das tropas monárquicas, a que a saída do rei para Mafra não ajudou, sem esquecer o incidente com o embaixador alemão. No fundo a monarquia cai porque não houve ânimo para a defender, houve uma passividade geral, tirando algumas excepções.