What Happens to a Tesla Coil in a Vacuum Chamber? Will it Spark? 

You are back from RU-vid ghosting your comments?

If you got that information from an atom don't trust it. They make up everything.

lol

Yeah Vacuum chambers suck the air out. ...

@@appmicro Also don't trust girls with make up.

Well there are more components needed like tungsten plate and berylium window, as well perfect vacuum.

@@sauroman1 no you don't need a perfect vacuum or tungstan or beryllium.It even works with ac. It gets more efficient with dc and the tungstan plate but it works under very simple conditions.

No, you also need a heated filament.

bremsstrahlung radiation can be produced easily with a high enough voltage discharging through a vacuum. A vacuum tube for example. You're right, plenty of experiments on YT detailing this. Interesting stuff.

Skillshare

This sounds like very interesting experiment to do especially the part with magnets since magnets and electricity make funny things when they mix and move.

And why are the sparks more stable at about 3:30?

Alex Pannier you can get kits from China for like 20 USD dollars and they are pretty reliable and can play music

@@randomsomeguy156 thats what i want to do with the coil😂😂😂.

I want a car😅😛😛

But his melted

Tim Michaels cool idea

Ok so put something in the vacuum xhambwr that is meant to withstand it.... how would that be interesting

@@gordonramsey6115 Saw a video where an astronaut tested inside a vacuum chamber and the results didn't fair to well.

To prove to us that you can have a pressurized spacesuit in a near perfect vacuum. Lets seperate fact from fiction.

Grant Farrell FICTION?!?! O right those astronauts theyre all fake man, a yt video is the only evidence we have of SPACESUITS working... oh boy u got me there

Yeah

KOR: Boil something. The action lab: Vacuum chamber. They’ll just boil something in the vacuum chamber. 😂

Jan D lol

Gross, no. I don't want James to associate with KoR. Has the king sorted out his criminal explosive charges yet? Is he serving prison time yet? The dude is a total idiot; James is not.

mannys9130, I agree, KoR is just a show for 10 year olds to make them think they are smart.... What do you actually learn from it? It’s just the same boil/vacuum stuff.

It all has to do with the frame rate of our eyes: our eyes take several "photos" per second, which when put together in sequence by our brain, give us the effect of motion, very much like a conventional video camera. Now, imagine if you observe a single point on a spinning wheel. If it spins at such a speed, that between 2 consecutive "photos" your eyes take, it can make a little more than 1 revolution and appear a little further than the previous position, then you get the impression that the wheel indeed spins forward. But if the speed of revolution increases even further, so that the point we observe makes a little less than 2 revolutions in between 2 consecutive "photos" of our eyes take, then in the 2nd "photo" the point would appear a little behind the position in the 1st. This would give us the impression that the wheel spins backwards. And of course, if the wheel spins at the exact frame rate of our eyes (the point we observe makes exactly 1 revolution in between 2 consecutive "photos"), then it would appear stationary. I hope it makes sense to you. Visually it would be much easier to explain.

@@andreasgeorgilidakisawesome explanation! so if we know the exact frame rate of our personal eyeball, we could - in theory - determine the rpm of a speeding wheel based on how fast it appears to track in reverse??

@@HarlanHarvey76 that would be tricky, as we don't have all the information... We don't know how many revolutions the wheel makes between 2 consecutive "eye frames". For example, in the 2nd frame the point on the wheel that we observe, could appear 1 inch behind the spot that the point appeared in the 1st frame (and in the 3rd frame, 1 inch behind the spot of the 2nd frame and so on), BUT... we cannot know how many revolutions occurred in between the "eye frames"! Was it a little less than 1, or 2, or 3, or more revolutions? The point on the wheel could appear to be on the same spot in all these occasions.

@@andreasgeorgilidakis 🤔🤓😆

Nothing really exciting, it won't work, unless you use distilled water.

Water is conductive. It will simply electrify the water and you won't see any visible plasma.

Everything gets electricuted. Short circuit!!!!!!!!

Doesn't this require heat?

I have been researching this since I made this video and it is actually due to the Ponderomotive force. Not exactly an ion wind. This is a force in a non-linear oscillating electric field. I am editing my video to take cut out the part that I talk about heat, since I am now 99% sure this is not correct. It should

Ah, but you can do this same thing with a Van D'Graaff generator which is DC, direct voltage, not AC. Wimshurst machines do it too, which are also DC. redrok@redrok.com

Here is another view of it. Place diodes of sufficient rating to handle the high voltages so current flows only in one direction or another. a)When a tip is positive charged, electric field lines diverge from the tip electrons are striped from from neutral molecules. Now positively charge ions are pushed away from the tip along electric field lines, with those same positive ions also pushing against the positive charged tip. b)When a tip is negatively charged, electric field lines diverge from the tip. Electrons are either ejected and or charge neutrally charged gaseous molecules. Now negative charges are pushed away from the tip along electric field lines, with those same negative charges pushing against the negatively charged tip. Lesson learned is that thrust is generated when the tip is either negatively or positively charged from electrostatic pressure pushing on the ions and the direction of diverging field lines pushing ions away from the tip. The question is if the current is alternating, wouldn't the ions just reverse direction providing no net thrust. and given the fact that it does spin, does that really mean it is not due to electrostatic thrust, and must be caused by thermal expansion? No.... the ions are electrostaticly pushed in one direction away from the electrode. Since the ions are accelerated in mostly one direction and are slowed down through collisions with neutral molecules, and other ions with the same charge that have been slowed down, they tend to hang around a while little longer imparting more electrostatic force on the tip, as demonstrated with not as strong of a vacuum pressure. Then for a period of time the voltage drops below that which can ionize the air and the ions and tip travel further distance away from each other. In time the voltages reverses and eventually reaches a voltage that can ionize again with nothing but neutral gas molecules near by to be charged and repulsed. Distant ions of opposing charge are not as effected (do not change their momentum as much) because of their distance from the tip. The result is net thrust in one direction even with alternating currents. What is the source of thermal energy in a plasma discharge and does it have a direction? I am venturing a little beyond my sure understanding, but in a lightning strike, some thermal energy is caused by the acceleration of ions in a particular direction, they bump into neutral atoms exchanging momentum in the random collisions in front of them that in turn slowing down the ions down. Furthermore, as with all conductors, electric current causes a magnetic field. In a lighting strike, billions of amps are discharged in a fraction of second. Some energy from the discharge gets stored in a magnetic field and is released when the current stops. The ions' (unbalanced electrons) will be magnetically have fields aligned at a right angle to the direction of current flow. Those ions most strongly repel other ions in the plane at 90 degrees to the current flow. The magnetically constrained ions will jump in temperature with a magnetocaloric effect over neutral molecules. The newly aligned magnetocaloricly heated ions have a lot momentum to impart to neutral molecules and ions in the plane of their magnetic field 90 degrees from the flow of current.

Well... yeah, because actually what I described works only with DC. However the Ponderomotive force is basically a more complicated form of the same. I mean one might think that with AC ionized air molecules would be just wiggled back and forth near the electrode due to the alternating polarity of the electric field, however its nonuniformity with distance results in a net push away from the electrode.

The temperature in space is quite low and I think it has something to do with how the physics and space work along with the vacuum