To learn more about velomobiles and place an order click here: www.velomobileworld.com/ambas... To contact me for more information email: sales.usa@velomobileworld.com
@@Spinnie1 to the wooden one? I did add assist to that one. It helped with speed, but only up to the legal cutoff. However, the steering on the wooden bike has never been quite right. It eats through tires very quickly and has a dangerous wobble above 20mph. I may someday fix those problems, but I don’t really trust that bike anymore and I frankly enjoy riding my Bülk a lot more. I can go just as fast without assist in the Bülk and it’s lighter and easier to maneuver.
I'm building an extremely unconventional velomobile. It is a 40% scaled version of the Tesla Cybertruck. I expect to have it mobile at the end of June this year. Where it will shine (everywhere because of the stainless steel appearance) will be off-road. It has a dual drive system, one is 2WD, pedal assist 250w, limited to 25kph or 15mph (chain to both rear wheels). The other is 4x4 8kw with an estimated top speed of maybe 40kph or 25mph. 20x4 fat tyres, all independent suspension, side mounting 20mm axles. Front brakes are 180mm hydrolic, rear brakes are 160mm cables with a park brake. It has a powered reverse, cruise control 12v road class lighting (headlights, 2x 20inch light bars, indicators, rear stop/tail light bar, car horn, bike horn, +bike bell. Full steel chassis with polycarbonate windscreen, tinted roof, and side windows, full sheet aluminium floor, polycarbonate panel (that looks like stainless, sorta) skin. Adjustable coil-over hydrolic shock absorbers all round. On board inverter for mains like power, ample usb ports, the same kind of features we saw on the Cybertruck prototype with the rear tailgate becoming a ramp, the Vault cover, large 1500lb load limit on the rear shocks. Standard car tow bar and ball with 12v trailer plug port. Yes, probably going to be heaps of weight, close to 160lbs for the batteries, wheels, motors, brakes, suspension, and tyres alone. Then, the framework is 120lbs, the windows and skin I have no idea, maybe 50lbs. That's 330 lbs or 150kg without myself and my Pomeranians. Overall costs are high when you factor in the time involved, but the costs have been spread out in a kinda pay as I build fashion. Everything should total almost $8k AUD which is a little over $5k USD. This DOES NOT account for the almost 4 hours of time (sorry, I meant 4 years!) invested planning, researching, designing, reverse engineering, ordering, and building it.
No question. The level of refinement in the design and build quality blows my mind. The ones from velomobile world usually come in around 24kg or less, are stiff, and the new models are all impressively fast. So much better airflow through the cockpit, better maintenance access. Really impressive.
In the Netherlands I get the expences for my commute compensated. This is €0,21 per km. So over the 12 years I had my previous Quest that costed €6000 and was sold again at €1500 I even made a profit, because I've commuted some 8000 km/year totalling the compensation on roughly €20000. Not expensive at all!
Similar in Germany, @ArjenHaayman , although I don't know the exact figures. But even without that compensation, just the amount of fuel I don't have to buy for the car will amortise the VM in just a few years. And some VM riders even put paid advertisements on their VM, which help amortise it even faster.
I'm waiting on my Quatrevelo, might be the first in the country (NZ). I previously commuted via single speed, but hate the seat. We are a 1 car family, just 1 Suzuki Alto, I'm hoping have the Quatrevelo will mean I don't ever need the car when I'm going somewhere by myself.
Cool! I used to travel NZ with a bike in 2004. The most people riding bike there were tourists. And the local people told me to be cautious because they car drivers are not used to bike riders. I’m wondering if this has changed a little bit. I believe there are only some view velomobils beside your Quatrovelo. Probably you’ll need a electric motor to get up the hills. I remember one hill was so steep that I had push my mountain bike.
There is a guy posting in the German velomobile forum about his plans to build a velomobile. He is also from New Zealand. I think at one point there might have been a DF velomobile there as well.
Deve ser muito bom ter um velomobile....a sensação de liberdade deve ser incrível e se ele tiver uma boa velocidade deve ser melhor ainda...eu farei o meu...e apresentarei aqui , mas o meu terá volante .😊
Godbless you for making this so I didn't go through the experience myself. To my surprise, I also had ideas to use the corrugated-plastic-cardboard style material (I see it used in politician voting lawn posters) in your red-yellow-black design. It looks like I'm headed to the online store to customize away!
Learn from my expensive mistakes. I like to be cheap and I swear every time I end up regretting it. I do not regret my Bülk. Not one bit. If you have any questions about the online store, feel free to contact me sales.usa@velomobileworld.com
Trice T was what the Borealis was based on. I did put some serious thought into replacing my frame but unfortunately, recumbent trikes on the west coast of canada are horrendously expensive. I visited our only 2 shops, and the cheapest basic model available was $2,500-and it quickly ramped up to $12,000. By time I factored in my want of e-assist, the price difference locally for me was even between an open trike and a luxury velomobile
Ha. I always thought my first one looked utterly ridiculous. Terrible to ride. The wooden one looks cool, but the heavy weight was no much fun. Trust me, the new ones from velomobile world are an amazing riding experience in comparison.
@@mnveloguy well the first one looks a bit goofy but for a self constructed I find the geometry pretty neat. The second one is like a luxurious road vessel. Something to please the audience haha! I dream of trying out a velomobile, so I'm still looking for someone who could lend me his/hers for a little ride here in Upper Austria
Thanks for watching. Open wheel wells disturb the smooth flow of air around the body. That causes drag. I’m the case of the velomobiel I built, my wheel wells were quite large and left the top Of the wheel exposed to the air. This made the aerodynamics even worse. There is a video on my channel from about two years ago testing the aerodynamics. I taped some panels over the wheel wells and was able to ride much faster.
It is possible Velomobile World would be willing to sell one like that. You would need the right axles with whatever wheels you chose instead and those wheels would need to be equipped with drum brakes to work with the struts we use. The rear wheels use a proprietary hub and you would need whatever rear wheel you use to be compatible with the rear swingarm. SRAM eTap May or May not fit. The space around the rear derailleur mount is quite small. I don’t know of anyone that has installed eTap so I would suggest asking in online forums if anyone has successfully installed one. I know it is possible to squeeze an Archer system into a Bülk.
I did ask a few people about the Red eTap. Consensus is that there is not sufficient room and it would be very difficult to access the charging port. Normally kn e a traditional derailleur is dialed in, it will stay dialed in for a good long time. The area where the derailleur is mounted is fully enclosed and protected from anything that could knock the derailleur out of alignment. Much more reliable than on a trike where the cage is close to the ground and can be struck by road debris and damaged.
@@mnveloguy I mainly went with it as no cables to be replaced when not run as smoothly and you just detach battery to charge away from bike Okay thanks for your help, in time if I get more space I might get one as they are to enjoy
@@mnveloguy I meant rather producing these in an industrial level (economy of scales) but then again, there is simply not enough demand. However, thank you for the insight you share. I can only imagine the effort and other troubles that go into building these velomobiles!
@@manoman0 the intention of the 4 More is to generate substantial interest to allow more mass production, but even then, there is a limit to how cheaply they can be built. It’s a limit the 4 More is pushing hard against. Cost of labor, materials, profit margin for factory and dealers (needed to support the product at delivery and during use, especially for repair), and shipping all add up. Serial production doesn’t magically reduce the cost of labor. You still have to pay employees a fair wage, especially if you want them to do the manufacturing well. Shoddy work means a shoddy product, and at the speed Velomobiles are capable of, failure of parts can be catastrophic. €5499 for the N American market puts the new 4 More in the range of a lot of e-bikes and well below the range of quality road bikes. I’ve seen used Velomobiles for as low as $2500 recently too.
I disagree with your statement that used velomobiles sell for 75% of new. That may have been true in some years but currently the used market seems to have more supply than demand and nothing is selling (based on the listings on U.S forums and marketplace). Or perhaps the demand has shifted to brand new and shiny since velomobile maintenance seemed to be a major concern to potential buyers when I sold a used velomobile earlier this year. What have you experienced selling your used W9?
My W9 has not sold yet, but I've had several interested people. I had a guy here today that would have been happy to take it home, but his legs were too long to fit. He and his wife ended up ordering two new Buelks from me while they were here. It does appear demand currently is for new models. Some of the used ones have been posted at close to new price and I think that is influencing resale. I may need to adjust the price on mine, but we'll see.
I mean, there are bikes that cost 8-10k. A velomobile is vastly superior to a bike in (almost) every way. I get that its a steep price, I find it hard to justify the expense myself, but its not a huge overhead from the manufacturer's side, its simply costs this much to build a decent velomobile.
You're still better off than I am… I "bought" an FAW+ kit for $7k from Texas that will never show up and I have zero expectation that David will refund me-if he's even still alive. Just buy one that's already fully built.
@@mnveloguy What's really sad is the he'd had a 20 year reputation of being an honest, if occasionally slow, vendor. That's the only reason I was willing to buy from him (other than needing the rest of my cash for other purposes). So yeah, just buy a finished one.
5:07 But I didn´t know anything about Rotovelo being slow cause it was heavy...! I always thought, that it was slow cause of not-being earodynamic... Its form was flawed, and that can be easilly corrected, if Rotovelo had designed the correct molds in the first playce... So, that argument of yours doesn´t cound in this case, I think... The shell-construction-method wasn´t THAT flawed at all, it was just the shell-form, that was flawed... If they had simply copied the form of a successfull race-velombile, it would have been pretty fast. I think the Rotovelo simply wasn´t long enough in order to be aerodynamic. Simply too short and too thick. Moral of the story: building industrial-grade-quality velomobiles at home, isn´t reachable yet, if you cannot work with carbonfiber. My bet is on 3D-printed-foaming materials, in big 3D-printers (beyond 1000$). The shell is very thick-walled, and thus very sturdy... But its weight is ultralow. If then a single layer of carbonfiber is applied on top, it protects the surface against some eating or the weather. Also an easier getting-on/off the velo would then become important, one with more comfort, and less contact-points with the shell. Cause when built like that, it wouldn´t be strong enough, to support the driver´s weight when getting-on/ff (like at 6:38)...
I think you misunderstood my comments about the rotovelo. I said it was slow AND heavy, not slow because it was heavy. It is slow because the tail is too short and the nose is not an ideal aerodynamic shape. It is also quite wide and has too much frontal area. It was designed to be durable rather than to be a race bike. But even with a more aerodynamic design it still will not accelerate or climb as well as a well-designed lightweight carbon fiber velomobile. The rotovelo also lacks a fully enclosed drivetrain so parts wear out faster. I have heard from people before who wanted to design a foam shell. The thickness you are thinking about will add more weight than you think. A single layer of carbon fiber will also be very easy to damage if you run over something or accidentally bump something sharp against it. Of course this also will have to be a shell around a trike instead of a monocoque carbon fiber velomobile. In the end you will be surprised to find it will likely weigh more than the commercial carbon fiber Velomobiles. This i can tell you from many people who have had these ideas and my own experience. If you want a lightweight shell on a trike, it is better and cheaper to use Coroplast.
