What If Each Indian State Was Independent? 

Russia

USA

Do a hypothetical independent Antarctica video

There are separatist movement in India. 7 from memory being Proposed state contested over the India government have been firm upon though if violent unclear: -Andhra pradesh with the to be called Andhra in theory. -Telangana though this movement in a region to form a region inland into a country is very unorganized. -Assam region called Bodoland. -Arunachal Pradesh region called Teola. -Naga land a sort of ting already in east India with the contested (National Socialist Council of Nagaland). -Independent for a united United States of Kashmir which would be a union of Kashmir & Jammu. -Punjabs regions historical Khalistan Movement to recreate Khalistan. I only see the last 3 Naga, Kashmir & especially Khalistan are real viable possibilities for nation as they have outside backers & are fairly organized. Teola is so & so, so not really sure on the viability or local thoughts though a sizable enough movement no real backing or consorted effort to my knowledge. The 1st 3 of my list from top to bottom lack organization & have many issues so I don't really see them becoming a thing. Nagaland & Bodoland is mainly occurring due to religious difference & perceived injustices against the Christian native inhabitants of the region that feel mistreated by the Hindu corrupt Indian government. India is nota happy peaceful place. It is likely the most racist intolerant xenophobic place on the earth that was only ever unified in their dislike of the British as their former occupiers but we were saints compared to the Muslim Mughals empire previously in history.

China,Pakistan also.

It's a healthy combination of national patriotism and ethno-linguistic pride

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VwGhzxHhqiY.html

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

insurgent in NE India

@@indianumba1usnumba1chynalo6 don't spam here. India sambhla nhi jaata,aur inhe videsh ki padi hai.

Historically indian sub continent division was made only basis of religion. East west Pakistan muslim. Bhutan nepal Sri Lanka Buddhist

I didn't know that! That's interesting

In india language = ethnicity. One of the main characteristics of the indian ethnicities are the distinct languages and the land each one lives.

@@General.Knowledge that's not entirely true

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VwGhzxHhqiY.html

So true

This is not even funny💀

shouldn't you be counting backwards?

Why wouldn't they be? There's no need for such a video

You give Brown Coolie/Coconut vibes. Himself lives in India yet is not disappointed with this kind of video.

Great Man! Would have gotten POK as well if not for PM nehru. No hate to him but that was a foolish blunder which we are still paying for till today

@@Kushagra.j well yes I agree. However, it was also notable that Patel even agreed to lend Kashmir to Pakistan if Pakistan stopped making a clamour on Hyderabad. Pakistan's PM refused then and the rest is history.

Fuck that guy. If it wasn't for him south india would be independent and a developed economy . Instead we have to pay taxes to help those idiot hindutvadi illiterate PPL in the north who pop children out like chickens pop out eggs. Fuck the north

i think goa and Maharashtra Gujrat and Rajasthan Bengal and Odisha Uttarakhand and Himachal Bihar and Uttar Pradesh Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh all south Indian states all north east Indian states these states could come together

@@Goldenfly737no all North Indian states team up. All South Indian states will split because of different languages. 😊

Same with most of Magadhi, bhojpuri, Awadhi, etc, etc. These were all vernacular languages with no script. When Hindi got imposed in schooling and writing.. These started to die out.

If this is considered, Hindi will be only left with Khari Boli (also called Kauravi). And there would be about 700 different languages in total in India.

Yes they are not dialect of Hindi they are dialects of Punjabi

I am also Gadhwali 😍

Forget national recognition, even state recognition would have been enough for survival and enrichment. Atleast state government should take initiative to introduce them to school education, government works and public communication

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

United by the British

@@aa6eheia156 united by the civilization. What is British?

@@dynamitebsb4520 there were so many small kingdoms which would've never united if they weren't all conquered and ruled by the Muslims and then the British at different times in history. Their history of being conquered and ruled by others created the fear and notion that they must unite to stay sovereign

Nope. I'm not emotionally connected with some random north Indian who speak entirely different language, culturally very different, politically radical and communal. It's subjective 😂

Those which are written in english mostly have more than one language and no one makes majority.

Well in our state English is the official language rather than our mother tongue. Point is we have many languages and English is the only one that is understood by all so English became our official language

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

@@indianumba1usnumba1chynalo6 Free kashmir how you feel Hongkong also go in a law which gives that state special right like it was given to kashmir and there is a contract which will be till 2055 (don't know perfect) and after that Hongkong will be part of center china and stupid first learn different between center china and it's history then you will understand

Some of those states has over 20 official languages with no clear majority so its easier to just choose English.

The problem is the too diversed species. Humanity basically created artificial barriers around themselves and the diversity makes us unique. Freedom and peace to the world only could be achieved if the whole species could unite but until we have racism, nationalism, communal identities and religions basically impossible to unite all the humans despite we are all homo sapiens simply because the barriers and artificial hate toward others. I personally think once we improve our robotics the androids will take over the world and caretake us like childrens. If it is good or bad is up to the future I believe I could live in peace with everyone.

@@sziklamester1244 Yes sometimes I think we are too social, up to the point of having difficulties in understanding someone else having another perception, belief, want, love... Our satisfaction depends too much on what others are. Maybe we project too much what should be personal. We do what we think is good for us that's okay, but then we think we know whats good for others. I still love life as it is, but I hope this can be better

You're a Mizo and I assume a Christian as well. So as a Christian, who's a minority nationally but majority in your own state, how do you feel about the rise of the Hindu nationalists/Right/Far Right and their increasing paranoia or hate towards Christians? Currently, much of their energy is preserved for Christians in the heartland, but do you expect them to come along to your state as well considering some of them have begun to believe that pre-Christian Mizo faith was a branch of tribal Hinduism?

@@didd2810 I'm an atheist, not christian, so I can't have Christian perspective. Most extremist I faced are Christian, so I doubt they're much better than hindu extremist, but there are many moderates who understand importance of mutual understanding. So even about this hindutva thing, as long as there's more people who put humanity first I have hope. I'm opposed to this anti-conversion thing though, because it shakes the core freedom of individual. That doesn't mean I take the sides of Christians. We cant even have yoga centre here because the church prohibits it, and last year, there's project proposal for LGBTQ safehouse from central govt, but these fundamentalist Christians didn't allow that. We are bigots, and we're proud of it. But I hope in 20yrs, things will change. I've never met anyone who believe that our ancestor's superstition have connection to hinduism, I know that some follows zo-sakhua, but they thought it's origin is from East Asia

@@lalmuanpuiamizo Mizo Christians are quite conservative more so than other coastal Christians that I have found. However, my question was on a more national scale than on a state level because the Hindu nationalists have more power and scale than Christian nationalists do. In Goa too, it is the Catholic Church that has been the biggest impediment for growth and development in the state and constantly keeps the state govt hostage. However, while this is an issue, I find the extremists in power in New Delhi to be more dangerous.

And two thai languages and various Austronesian languages

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

Yes, you are nearly perfect !!!

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

@@indianumba1usnumba1chynalo6 Good work, Soldier

Burma was separate from India in 1937.

@@shivendraupadhyay1565 they separated it to weaken India

Burma was not seperated it was captured but Japanese dure second word war from British .

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

It's more saying that Pakistan as a political entity would be happy, not specifically the people.

Hey, what's your opinion on Balochi people who don't have any association with Pakistani culture ? And what is your opinion on Durand Line ? Just curious to know the Pakistani opinion on that.

In reality ..pakisthan is breaking in 5 ...peoples also dying ...

@@abc_cba the balochi people tho have association with Pakistani culture tho

@@abc_cba Balochi ppl are happy

North india Is Fairer Than Europe 😂

Wdym until then? India always be together. Infact Pakistan will soon remerge with India. Then there will be no more India vs Pakistan in cricket. Boring game.

Naaa not always General category will surely demand for a seperate nation in near future I'm going to make a union for general category i will fight till death and through global support it will be easier 🗿​@@SerCrispinCole

No it would be very harmful for the collective identity of india as nation as it might lead to rifts between states

Definitely for the Tamils at least, especially with how the north likes to treat them

@@jonseilim4321 Treat them like what? Now no one calls them madrasi nor anyone have problem with it. The thing is they hate Hindi but Northern people never did that to Tamil. Except these things, There's nothing but Its more painful to be northeastern. No one have idea about it, Nor North recognize them nor South nor West. People thing they are from China or Japan. Imagine treating your own citizen as alien? Though people now opening their eyes but its still long way to go

No need of Flags. It would be disaster idea in India

Khalistani flag for Punjab?

Thanks!

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

If the British never came to India, you were probably in a islamic nation.

@@Sharif_karbalai If British never came to India there would've been barely any muslims to even create Pakistan much less to rule.

It's called the Indian subcontinent not South Asia.

Redrawing borders using natural barriers is a very interesting exercise, yes!

@@Sharif_karbalai better answer: india would be divided between some major powers. There would be maratha empire and sikh empire and sultan's and all. I don't see mughals surviving

Sri Lanka was never British raj it was a separate colony called CEYLON.

I consider only India, Pakistan and Bangladesh as successor states to British India. These 3 have much more common in Languages and Ethnicity

It depends on the map!

🤣

And you are correct

It is united through religious propaganda, authoritarian rule and military enforcement.

lol tru

Maybe before BJP, but unfortunately not so true these days.

@Indi An Fasod lol

​@IndiAnFasodKeep day dreaming.

Well as per me Sooner or later general category will surely demand for a seperate nation And it will be easier for them to get it because they are actually being used as tax bank and they absolutely get nothing

Inside india there are 1600 languages. Each state in india has a different language.

@@anantbhushangaur1972 inside China there is 1 language with several dialects. But yes, the most populated country in the world has only 1 language. Chinese people are much more united than Indian.

compare population of singapore to india

City-states have been theorized to be manageable to govern, in spite of complexity, because of their smaller size.

Indeed💯

I'm the one. Who commissions these projects? The comments will be drooling with brain dead Pakistanis.. Whose country is burning down the gutter as we speak.. But they're still more worried about the hypothetical Muslim lands they can take. Or the Chinese.. And their gib moar land rhetoric.

@@ritikshaw5868 I'm pretty sure this guy isn't Pakistani and hating india doesn't mean you are Pakistani

@@khalilabushahin418 I know. That's why I asked who's commissioning these projects. There are a lot of forces who'd want to or are actively trying to see India broken. This feels like it plays into it.

@@ritikshaw5868 stop being so insecure. Even if there are forces like that, india is only getting what it started in the first place.

Why wouldn't they be? We don't need a foreigner explaining our Languages.

Every state has its own flag in India.

They didnt consider the local flags , those were actually government flags

That's the flag of Jaisalmer kingdom

Mahrashtra have official bhagwa kesri ...we will take belgaon from filthy kannadi

@@raj-khotmarathawarriorclan Hi Please Stop Hate bro. We r Indians first

Serve dal chawal across India anywhere & all will be familiar with it. Many God's too are common across India. Sanskrit & Hindi words can easily be found in many languages across the country. India has its differences but there's plenty that's common that binds India into one cultural identity

Bengal should be added to Bangladesh and South India should be it's own country. Khalistan also makes sense and Kashmir and Jammu should have it's own government. Even Pakistan should give independance to Balochistan. Everything evens out and most of the tensions drop.

@@phillipholland6795 haha most of these states with different culture language would instantly get into violent conflict for land, resource, water and many other things...... the only thing that makes india better than africa is that its lack of war and violent fight among each other. so a united india is much better than a divided one, differences can be settled with a strong federal structure within a indian union otherwise it would be just another africa struck with poverty, violence, tribal war and military dictatorship

@@phillipholland6795 kanglu Mulle demolished our Hindu temples Nobody interested in unite with izalmick majority country .

Not really. Bengal and Bihar share a lot in common. After all Bengalis were a part of our glorious Magadha Kingdoms and Empires.

You have a point! Yeah i agree.

That mother nation only care the aryan indian not the dravidian indian. Wake up.

@@cnachopchopnewsagency you please continue to live in your nightmare.😭

​@@cnachopchopnewsagency Go to the hell

All indians 💪🏼🇮🇳✊🏼⚔️

@@kanaka7552 damnnn that was a banger line 🔥

Where are you from in India??

@@sairis i am from Assam jai hind

@@Siwushwiw , Ok. Good👍 But I am asking this person.

@@sairis okay

States which wish separate r usually non Hindu Sikkim is a Hindu majority n I have seen no insurgency their

@@hkk3554 great point! There used to be some peaceful pro buddhist separitist sentiment there, such as in the form of the Sikkhim Nationalist Party early in its time as an Indian state, *but I should have been clear it has no insurgency*. Though I wokld also add that Tripura has active separatist insurgency despite being 80% Hindu, so I'd say the issue is more cultural than religous.

I am Nepali and gorkha movement is not a separatist movement from India but from West Bengal.

@@amanrautx thats why I said within the states. not connecting you to insurgency by any means. respect my friend.

@amanrautx I am also visiting Gorkhaland now brother

You know that Pakistan was also a part of British India and that it was made up many princely states

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

@@indianumba1usnumba1chynalo6 and give inner Mongolia to Mongolia and free Xinjiang

The rise in the Neo Fascist ultra nationalist parties like RSS and separatist groups like JKLF, ULF, Maoists etc. don't seem to support your claims.

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

Guess they'll distribute according to population like with Soviets

I think nukes will bind keeps quickly

India's nukes is increasing dude. India's nukes are confidential maybe >200. who knows?

Actually it's not that amazing because most Indians follow Hinduism which acts as a glue binding diverse Indians together.

@@_---_1674 Yes that's a good reason too

भारत एक सभ्यातिक राष्ट्र है जिसमे पाकिस्तान और बंगलादेश भी आते है और देश व राष्ट्र मे अंतर होता है।

@@_---_1674 सबसे ज्यादा हमला? मतलब कुछ भी? इतिहास पढ ध्यान से भारत सबसे अधिक इनवेड नही हुआ है समझा और ये देश हिंदु धर्म के कारण एक जुट है और भारत एक राष्ट्र है जिस का कुछ क्षेत्र पाकिस्तान और बंगलादेश के कब्जे मे है।

@@sahilsingh6048 अबे मुर्ख मै बिहारी नही दिल्ली एनसीआर से हूँ समझा और हा तुझसे अधिक शिक्षित होऊंगा

May or may not be

Yes, India will most likely not split like this but this video was just for fun. They are not trying to glorify Hindustan's colapse. I am from U.P 🇮🇳

Hell yeah

Fatherland 🇮🇳🇮🇳

Poda we want freedom

@@cani5761 sheriya, who cares about india

ughn most people in india speak hindi as their second or third or forth language even in the so called hindi belt more than half people don't speak hindi as primary language so chill, its only the southies who are being dramatic but still speak English with pride

Of course but we are proud Indians 🇮🇳

And yet your language is endangered...

Nepal was never part of india

@@Hassan-ki4un it's still a part of Indic civilization wheather you accept it or not

@@Hassan-ki4un Nepal is part of Indosphere, basically a region, which is influenced by Indian Civilization, and at some point was part of the Indian Civilization. It includes, Burma, Cambodia, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia(western part), Pakistan, Afghanistan(below hindukush) and some parts of modern day tajikistan, Sri Lanka as well as maldives.

To say that India was "split up" implies that India was, at any time prior to 1947, a singular unified country. It wasn't. The use of the anglicized word "India" (from the old Farsi word "Hindu," itself from the Sanskrit word "Sindhu") to refer to the general land mass east of the Indus River does not equate to it ever being a unified country named India that was divided in 1947. Prior to the creation of the sovereign nations, in 1947/1948, that make up South Asia (in Bangladesh's case, 1971) "India" was the word used by the Europeans to refer to South Asia, whether it be under their rule, the Mughal Rule (which never ruled the entire land mass), the Delhi Sultunate (which also never ruled the entire land mass), or any "empires" prior to those. Like many modern countries (especially in Europe), South Asia was divvied up into many princely states that were were only unified in singular nations upon the 1947 creation of both Pakistan and Bharat. If Indians understood and acknowledged this, there would be one less argument for them to make against Pakistan. That Eastern Pakistan shares many cultural commonalities with Northwestern/North Central Bharat does not make them similar countries.

@@shivendraupadhyay1565 well Afghani people are more like Persians

lanlocked need to work good with neighbour states some good example Ethiopia, Kazakhstan

Not if proper infrastructure and highly educated skilled workers are present. Manufacturing , agriculture, and information type economy is possible.

Landlocked States in northern India still have rivers so they can grow with agriculture Look how a landlocked state in South (Telangana) is doing great you don't always need a coast

Indians don't respect their ethnic identity otherwise they will be all independent country along ethnic lines

और आपस मे ही लडते रहे पश्चिमी देश अपने लाभ के लिए हमे आपस मे लडाते रहते जैसे पाकिस्तान भारत की लडाईया होती रहती है।

need of the hour imo

True. I wouldn't say all of North Bengal but the Gorkhaland area certainly deserve to be its own state if not a UT

@@rahuljadhav542 🤡

@@hewas_chewasky not. India was ideologically similar or india is similar civilization groups. If the concept is brought by British. Then india would separated into 100's of separate countries instead of joining together. Better come with good points 😂.

Politically yes, Culturally/Civilization NO!

Wasn't that a good thing? I mean i think it was for good that india and pakistan were separated from each other. It's my opinion i must clarify that.

@@happymaguire7806 noo way The british propagate this lie to overshadow the horrific attrocities they committed and also made such borders so that India and Pakistan will always be at loggerheads so that there's no peace in the subcontinent

@@ShivagamiDevi you can say that, but coming to the real world, look where is pakistan now and how far india has come from 91 to 23. A stagnant vs the fastest growing economy. Pakistan is literally standing on the verge of an economic collapse and get disintegrated. Entire pakistan was built over the notion of hatred towards india and obsession over Kashmir. Sorry to say if any pakistani is reading this, but pakistan is a failed state. So let it be where it is. We should focus on ourselves.

@@ShivagamiDevi but i agree to one thing that yes, Britishers deliberately made such borders to keep india occupied from all 3 corners. From china on top to pakistan on both west and east. Fun fact: bangladesh (east pakistan) was never meant to be created. It was instead decided that all the bengali muslims will be transported to the west Pakistan. But just to keep india busy on both the sides, they drew the boundary of east pakistan, now bangladesh.

@@happymaguire7806 i agree that it's a failed state but how did it reach here? Thanks to US they funded terrorism in pakistan and the government and the military didn't focus on any development they were just busy with acquiring arms and ammunition and funding terrorism now they are so undeveloped and their own funded terrorists are now against them But I know this will happen and I'm just waiting for the return of the glory of the great Akhand Bhārat

They're not secular, almost all have anti-cattle slaughtering laws due to Hinduism

I think he meant demographics wise but I'd imagine a breakup would see a few states become religious. States like Punjab, Tamil Nadu would likely be secular while states with high Hindu populations like HP would probably at least have Hinduism as a state religion.

If its has majority hindus

No

No

No

🏳️‍🌈❌

Asli acc se aah abdul

jaldiii official flags honge har ek state ke. tangg aa chuke hum centre goverment se centre khud india ko one hand property sqmajhati haii

As a tamilan I completely agree

@卐 Arup Ratan Mitra 卍 W man

@@amrutheshumashankar4996 W tamilian

❤️❤️❤️ from Bihar. Long live mother INDIA.

Khalistan and Nagaland will get freedom 🐷🇮🇳🐷

No really. For eg, other south indian states have their own culture and language much like Tamil nadu. So it is less likely that south india would unite under Tamizhakam if a supposed trifurcation happen.

And usa into 50 countries

@@dynamitebsb4520 The United States would probably split up into more like 10 or 12 States. What me to tall you the scenario?

@@cyruswest7986 Yeah. I'm from Kerala and I don't see Malayalis joining with Tamil Nadu even though we love them so much.

not gonna happen we keralities will not join tamil nadu.if kerala is going to join a state it will be most likely to be karnataka

wat makes you think that arunchal pradesh and other non hindi speaking areas belongs to hindi speakers? and should remained under the miltary occcupation of hindi speakers?

@@Rajputrajx I didn't say anything you claim 🤦‍♂

@@Rajputrajx the army men beating the Chinese were shouting in Punjabi at Tawang post. 😏

@@ritikshaw5868 "Army men beating the Chinese" 😂 I am really curious how do y'all bundutvas manage to make up so much sht without any proof ? I mean there are literally videos and pictures of indian soldiers being humiliated by the Chinese, they literally made your soldiers do sit ups while holding their ears lol don't make me search up the videos on RU-vid now

@@Rajputrajx Have u seen how Punjabi soldiers thrashing Chinese soldiers like street dogs. They all are non Hindi speakers.

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊

They used guns to stop separatism espeically in Kashmir and North-East

@@medanchess7892 guns were and is used. Not denying that. But the key difference between Kashmir and Northeast is that the insurgents of the past form govt today. In Kashmir that isn't the case and insurgency is pretty much active. Violence never solved violence. Only peace talks do. Most insurgent groups of Northeast were brought into mainstream through talks. We have not reached that level in Kashmir yet. Here is a video by the Print. They explain it better. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0FblYv1YiDI.html

Yes right now it's just 75 years ie 3 generations since independence. So the memories of being oppressed by British the common enemy are still fresh in people's consciousness, and that is what still keeps the country together. A few generations down the line, 100 - 200 years from now, that won't be there. And each region will have different aspirations, dreams. Not 36 but more than 60 -70 states balkanization is inevitable.

​@@ajayram198250 I guess max 500

you clearly dont know india then ladhaki and jammu epople give thier life for bharat arnuhcal people give thier life for bharat, unlike you europeans our pride lies in bharat your probably think we west bengalis would merge with bangaldesh, we would never we would die than do that especialy since they killed our sanatan dharma brothers

​@@keralanaturelover196I give it only 50 if States aren't given autonomy

That would be Nagaland, started a day before India's independence

@@didd2810 Nagaland would be a quarter of it on the Indian side. "Nagalim" would actually be more historically accurate even though India and Burma won't agree

@@zekliasajem2197 if I'm not wrong wasn't Nagalim a concept that came later, as a greater Nagaland idea that would incorporate all Naga majority and plurality areas outside of Nagaland which not only Burma but other Indian states quickly rejected.

@@didd2810 Nagas fought for all their people and when asked a name for their land they gave the name Nagalim. It was only later that India took the areas previously administered by the British and extended their control to the erstwhile excluded areas as well. Meanwhile Burma came from the east and took the remaining portion. Nagaland was created as an appeasement to the more vigorous or politically United tribes ; while the rest of the land and the people were divided, the history made unknown to the majority because of India's political and educational brainwashing. The freedom fighters also became divided due to intelligence mission of the Indian forces and became little more than petty guerrilla fighters who only sought power and wealth by misusing the name of a righteous movement that was broken from within. This is the condition till the present date and that's all the things I can tell briefly without any outside influence. ✌🏻

FREE TIBET FREE HONG KONG FREE UIGHER 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊