This Changes The Rules Of Physics! Gravity Is NOT a Force! 

No that's not happening so you can just relax. Nothing travels through time. Time is a mental construct of mans mind. Time is not a physical thing that can be manipulated nor can it be a medium. It is understood that conceptually we are simply allowing time to pass but nothing actually ever moves through time. Nothing can move through a mental construct of a mans imagination especially one that is based on a light in the sky.

Gravity behaves “strangely” in that it's powerful enough for the Earth to attract a massive object like our Moon but is so weak that we can easily counteract the gravity of an entire planet by jumping.

Well that that's not what keeps things in orbit around our planet. What keeps them in orbit is that we have gotten them to a height and speed, whereas the acceleration of gravity from the Earth is not able to overcome their velocity around the planet. Because the farther you go away from the center of mass of an object. The smaller it's gravitational force on that object. It's the same reason why we have to ensure that clocks in the GPS satellites in orbit are properly adjusted to take into account the lower pool of gravity and hence the very slightly slower speed of time

No No No. Time does not, Cannot Ever flow. Time is a mental construct of mans mind. Time is not a physical thing that can be manipulated nor can it be a medium. Just like the phrase "Travels through time" the idea of time flowing is Only meant to be conceptual never physical. You cannot slow or stop a mental construct of a mans mind with physical mass. Impossible.

Incorrect. Gauss's flux theorem (what you call Gauss's Law) deals with electromagnetism not gravity. Your own scientists will tell you. Stanford Solar Center f or instance will tell you, "Electromagnetism - the force we know best - is 10 to the 36th power stronger than Gravity."

Earth does not spin. Show me repeatable testable evidence Earth spins.

@@DivergentDroid you got me there sorry Einstein woah 🤯 wasn’t expecting that smart sophisticated answer I’ll think about it all night

@@areuokay4984 My point is you only believe Earth is spinning because someone told you it was. You have never seen it spin with your own eyes. You have never felt it spin. The claim is it spins at 1040 mph at the equator and something like 700 mph in the USA. It is claimed to spin west to east. We see the sun "rise" in the east therefore and "set" in the west. Landing on a north south runway while Earth is traveling 700 mph perpendicular to your runway would be impossible. Your craft would be instantly destroyed and of yes, those forces would not only have to be felt they would be measured. We experience none of that.

@@DivergentDroid do you not believe in gravity ?

@@areuokay4984We observe most physical matter falling down to the ground if they are released above the ground. This act of falling is what most people deem gravity. So we have an observation that most things but not all as in physical gas particles seem to obey but this tells us Nothing about the cause of the observed phenomena. Who's gravity would I believe in? Newton never claimed mass attracting mass (which is claimed to be a force) but others have taken his thought experiments he expressed in the language of math to mean that is what Newton suggested. So on one hand we have mass attracting mass which can never work. Physical gas shows us mass does not attract mass. On the other hand we have an Einsteinian spacetime effect called gravitational accretion (which is Not a force). This was never observed ever, it was only a mathematical construct Einstein proposed because Newtons mass attracting mass went against Einstein's general relativity ideas. But of course Einstein's form of gravity only being a thought experiment and never observed in reality cannot be the cause of the downward observation. That would be silly. Neither of those ideas Newtons or Einstein's has been nor can ever be validated by the systematic cause and effect experimentation of the scientific method - therefore there is No Proof for those ideas. None, Zero, Nada. Those ideas are fairytales. What does work and can be tested and validated via the scientific method for cause and effect relationship? Archimedes Principle. It's that simple. It works always in any medium. It's testable, repeatable. When we speak of fluids like water we call it Archimedes Principle. When we speak of the relationship between mass/weight buoyancy and density, we call it Relative Density Disequilibrium. That's what gravity really is. No need to make up silly notions that are never able to be validated, we already had the answer for thousands of years. Newton was an alchemist and not a very good one. He was kinda a dummy as was his pal Einstein. They didn't bother to do actual research or they did know about Archimedes Principle and kept quiet about it to push their own agendas.

There's gotta be more to it. Certain gases, those heavier than air (argon) do sink and collect in low areas.

@@christopherprisco8690 It's a gas. All gases bar none, even heavy gasses like sulfur hexafluoride or argon can be 'poured' out and will pool but only for a short time. They too in time will expand to fill the available volume. Entropy is defined as a rate of change over time. "Gravity" cannot hold any gas to the Earth. That's Never Ever been demonstrated and it would violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

@@DivergentDroid agreed. Entropy rate is, though variable, legit. Due to our atmosphere being dynamic it (any gas) will dissipate.

Ugg. That's way worse than Newton or Einstein.. and just as Wrong. He claims, "What is gravity? New theory of what gravity really is. It is caused by graviton radiation, Black Energy, created in Black Holes!" All he has is a begging the question fallacy. He doesn't even have an observation of a naturally occurring phenomena.