Eobard Thawne Poland isn’t fascist bro. Your brain has been fried by Jewish leftist indoctrination, any sort of nationalism gets you all scared like it’s the boogie man. Fascism is a natural defensive reaction to subversion and parasitism within a country.
1 what if the Federal Republic of Central America survived 2 what if Benelux Became a Country 3 What if the North sea Empire survived 4 What if Korea was never conquered by the Japanese 5 what if Gran Colombia Reunited 6 what if Iran stayed a Monarchy 7 what if Somalia was stable 8 what if India was never Colonised By The British 9 What if italy reunited Early 10 what if the Ottoman Empire was a Allied Power
@ls7orBust Nah i believe you still got some more Delicious alternate histories for me to steal so cough em up Also about burek from силбо all i have to say is this : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gcd9TPAj2GQ.html
@ls7orBust The "Anti-Nazi Laws" were implemented across the EU, be happy that Northern Macedonia isn't in EU yet... Man, good luck with the future of your country, seriously...
This was honestly your best made video yet! The diversity of separate events coupled with a domino effect in this timeline made it very interesting, rather than always having one nation conquer everything like always in many alternate history videos in RU-vid.
@@marczuccismywaifu Why do you think that having 50s ideals are wrong? Just because one says we can adopt the ideals of the past and that the 50s were the best doesn't mean that they don't acknowledge modern technological and political progress. They simply want to merge what brought prosperity then with the progress of now. Sorry, but I just had to say that, as it always bothers me when people get mad about returning to the spirit of a time.
@@marczuccismywaifu I wasn't defending him, man. That sexual thing was too far though. Like I said, we have made progress, but the spirit of patriotism, happiness, and wellbeing associated with the 50s is something that anyone should aspire to make come back. We HAVE evolved politically, as seen by everything that has changed and been altered since then. Case in point: No communistic superpower controlling most of Eurasia nowadays. But people can aspire to bring the aura of that time, but with modern progress and rights that have been achieved. I just think people shouldn't get so pissed at people who want to bring the aura and good times of the 50s back. Have a nice day.
Sean Weeaboo This is your brain on leftism. If you think the 50s were good economically and culturally that makes you a literal nazi. If you believe in keeping authoritarian socialists out of our democratic capitalist government, that makes you a literal nazi.
@Napoléon Bonaparte Absolute bullshit, fascism is about power, not self improvement, it's about scapegoating others, it's a loser's ideology that isn't about "Self improvement", that's nonsense you fascists say to appear better. At it's root, fascism is oppressive, divisive, and totalitarian, I'd take feudalism over fascism, it's literally the worst possible ideology that rests on a shaky foundation.
If the White Army won, wouldn't Tsar Nicholas II's royal cousin, Cyril Vladimirovich, just be crowned Tsar? In real life Cyril claimed Tsardom after his cousin died. Even though Tsar Nicholas II's family was killed _plenty_ of other people with actual royal blood could've become the Tsar. Even today it is disputed between three people on who the modern Russian Tsar would be.
Teutonic Boi Idk many soldiers in the white army wanted a Democratic Republic. If there will be monarchy, than constitutional monarchy will be the way to go.
Alex V not many. Many white army officers were a huge mix. If they won, there would still be huge tension due to the divided political view in the white army
@@Alex-qd5hy Yeah, as far as I know the majority of White generals were monarchists, although considering the most popular parties were SR and Kadets, social-democrats and liberals were both anti-monarchy, I'm not sure the idea would have a popular support.
t is not true. Words about the fact that whites are monarchists - This is propaganda of damn Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks intentionally intimidated the ordinary people by the fact that the Whites would return the Tsar, and the people would again lose their land, and the nobles would begin the genocide of the ordinary peasantry for the fact that the peasants robbed their estates. Only General Drozdoevsky (And Mannerheim) wanted to return the Tsar. The remaining white generals supported the return of the Provisional Government, and then the holding of the All-Russian Constituent Assembly, where the fate of Russia was to be decided. Most likely, moderate-right power and a military junta would have been established in Russia, for example, as in Franciscan Spain. But the words that the white officers wanted to return the Tsar - This is propaganda from the Bolsheviks. In Russia during the Civil War, the popularity of the Tsar among the army and ordinary peasants was, without jokes, about 2 percent. The new Tsar would be forced to create a constitutional monarchy in Russia, as in Britain where the parliament ruled, and the King only reigned. The new Tsar would lose power over the country and the State Duma would rule it. And if the new Tsar would refuse to create a constitutional monarchy - He would be raped to death.
Anarcho Toast Rather him, than Lenin and Stalin’s Bolshevik gang that killed tens of millions of Russians. I would rather have Nicholas II have absolute power for a hundred years than live five years under Stalin.
@@Christian_Keedle well 20 something countries isnt the majority and also those 20 something countries were probably in 50 something year cold war against the 60 something year old soviet union meaning there accusations may have something of a bias. And also No one waters down the numbers. Stalin said himsealf at the yalta conference "10 million people died because my policeies in ukriane". There you have it the man himself said what happened. Also russians were affected as well so how is it an act of genocide when it genocides the people who are commiting the genocide? HMMMMMM?
Due to the low population of Louisiana at the time, they probably would have either been invaded by America eventually or become a British protectorate.
Darth Vader Maybe, along with those who vouch for a constitutional monarchy. They’d probably be the most dominant immigrant force in Louisiana due to their sheer numbers at the time, but it probably wouldn’t hold off the US from taking New Orleans, that is if Louisiana doesn’t become a British protectorate, and even then, that wouldn’t stop British and American settlers from overstepping their boundaries. If it were to survive, it would probably only be the modern day borders of Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, and maybe Missouri if they’re lucky.
@@myohmy9000 A fun fact as a native, Medians on the road are called "Neutral Ground" here because when the influx of Anglo-Americans started immigrating into the city in the late 1700s and early 1800s they didn't socialize with the French and Spanish at all unless something was business related. The French and Spanish lived mainly in the French Quarter and the Anglos started moving into what's now the business district. The Neutral Ground was where the Anglos and French/Spanish would do exchanges. Today it's Canal street, but the word Neutral Ground just means median here even today.
1. What if Russia defeats the German Empire and the Ottoman Empire during the WW1? 2. What if Goguryeo success to unified the Korean Peninsula during the three kingdoms of Korea? 3. What if South Korea won the Korean War? (1950-1953) 4. What if the Korean Empire never fails? 5. What if the Russian Empire won the Crimean War? 6. What if the French won the French and Indian War? 7: What if Mongolian army success to invade Japan? 8. What if North Korea was collapsed at Arduous March in 1996? 9. What if South Vietnam was won the Vietnam War? 10. What if Goguryeo success to conquered whole China? 11. What if Poland won the WW2? 12. What if Finland won the Winter War? 13. What if reptilians are real? 14. What if Dinosaur never extinct? 15. What if Deep Ones are real? 16. What if Soviet Union and China went war in 1969? 17. What if White army of Russia won the Russian Civil war? 18. What if Ireland join the central powers? 19. What if Charlottesville riot causes the civil war in the USA? 20. What if the operation bay of pigs has successful? 21. What if Israel won the Yom Kippur War? 22. What if Venezuela went civil war in 2019? 23. What if Spain won the Spanish American War? 24. What if British lose the Falkland war? 25. What if China was collapse at The Great Leap Forward Movement in 1961 or 1962? 26. What if the Italian Army was good in WW2?
@@salsaniggas8544 So, basically you love anything anti-American? I mean, I'm not saying the USA is great, but ISIS and the Taliban and North Korea are all very anti-American. Would you support them?
@@SCPImmortal-js7sg and then destroy them, yep, but they're quite chaotic that's the problem, if I really want to use some of them, the better weapon is the people who is inside US, the government, the pupulation, their ideas, their "allies"
@@salsaniggas8544 Okay, so, let me get this straight. You would *support terrorist organizations and a dictatorship,* even if you were gonna bring them down later, just to kill off a country that isn't 100% perfect? Guess what. You can't have a perfect country in an imperfect world with imperfect people. The USA could do better, way better, but trying to attack it is just gonna damage it and it's one of the best systems we got at the moment. Note: one of. Plus, it's generally a bad idea to mess with a country that has the biggest air force, one of the biggest navies, a battle-ready populous, and enough nukes to end the world several times over, as well as the methods to accurately deliver them.
imagine a war between facist russia and facist germany both sides accusing each other of being a jew imagine the genocide scale in this alternate timeline
Antisemitism has nothing to do with fascism. Quite the opposite actually. Jews were part of the fascist party from the get go.The goal of fascism was to unite people from various backgrounds behind the common nationality, nationality as the glue to hold people together overcoming differences like class, race, religion. It's pretty funny that what many people associate with fascism nowadays, is what you can call 'the non fascist elements of nazism'
Wait if u r banned across Europe, that means mostly Americans and eastern europeans watch ur videos? Maybe do video about your yt stats or smth about ur audience, that would be fun
Yea The EU ban succs I'm not sure why they bann him in Europe He does only educational material I would understand China banning him along side Russia but why the EU ? Are they so afraid of anything with words ,,national'' ,, Fascist'' ?
I came up with a very interesting idea: what if the Russian Empire established colonies in Africa? What if in the late 1870s and 80s Russia got in on the scramble for Africa? Assuming they came from their black Sea ports through the newly opened Suez Canal their colonies would be in East Africa. Let's just as an example say they took Madagascar, British Somalia and Tangyanika was split in 2 with the south being Russian and the north German (and later British). There could br 2 scenarios: if they remained colonies gaining independence in the 50s/60s or being incorporated into the Soviet Union and remaining until the 90s
What if the civil rights movement caused southern nationalists in the 1950s-60s to revolt? There were several times when the governors called for militias to be raised
do you know what fucking fascism even is lmao? Russia is a semi-presidential constitutional democracy, or in other words; an autocratic government with oligarchs in power who have to abide by a constitution. Of course, this doesn't stop them from changing the constitution itself, but they have limits on what they can/can't do. Fascism does not have limits. Plus Russia having oligarchs directly implies that russia isn't following a fascist ideology, because the state doesn't control the assets, companies do. The state in russia has a stake in these companies. In other words, you're a fucking idiot because Russia isn't run by fascists, it's run by CEOs and oil tycoons.
Russia currently is reactionary oligarchism, not fascism, as putin doesn't want to Annex Ukraine, but vassalize it, and have land access to Crimea. Putin is evil yes but that doesn't make him a fascist. Also, it's not like putin has much power in the government.
I feel, the "what if..." with Russia or the Russians is the most asked in all the "what if..." "What if the Whites won","what if the Russian Empire survived" "What if the Soviet union never existed"
But with Russian allies, why would Japan feel pressured to start a war with the US over resource access? Also, why would the Ukraine be spoiling for a fight against Russia when there wasn't a huge famine and improved productivity was increasing the quality of life for the land?
What if Pakistan became Fascist? (Communist India sequel) What if Bangladesh stayed a part of Pakistan? (East and West Pakistan) What if France colonized the Maldives? What if Portugal colonized the Phillippines? What if there was a Scramble for China?
What if Greece became a Mediterranean Empire, sharing half of it with Rome? What if Greece invaded Egypt, forcing them to create a cohesive national identity?
I like that you factored Ukraine into this scenario. Kolchak would have had major issues with the Ukrainians. However, I am not sure Poland would quite have those eastern borders - they were formed once the Poles tired of fighting the Soviets. I imagine that however those borders would be determined would heavily affect Ukrainian perceptions of either group and result in a large clash between the Poles and Kolchak
@@repelsteeltje90 At that time there were many "ukrainians", including on the border of Russia. The word "Ukraine" had a meaning - the outskirts. Ukraine was not a state, but a territory. The zaporozhye cossacks said: "We are Russians."
Something I don't see mentioned alot is that the white army was not as unified as the reds. It was less commies versus kings but more everyone versus the Bolsheviks. The whites even had socialists in their ranks who opposed the Bolsheviks. This lead to infighting. The whites also didn't use propaganda effectively, while the reds did, meaning the public didn't support them
I love how 4 years after this video everything has become a reality and even your thumbnail with the z letter has become literally the symbol of Russo-fascist cause.
2022: Here you go. Russia under Putin's rulling is a fascist country (has all 14 features of a fascist country according to Umberto Eco's essay "UR-FASCISM" written in 1995).
Go to maintains electoral multiparty state which includes a large liberal and Marxist wing; fascist despise liberals and the explicit reason fascism exists is to combat Marxism. Fascism wouldn’t allow a multiparty state Fascism wouldn’t allow a multiparty state nor of the existence of independent media and political figures in opposition to the central power. You need to stop mainlining Nazi propaganda.
Interesting end. So Italy ends up as an Empire at the end of it. It took Spain and huge chunk of Africa as well as Albania. I am not sure how long Germany would wait until taking on France. As Germany really did want France as it was part of the Holy Roman Empire. So I do believe that they would have gone for it. The other nations around wouldn't really mind Germany taking out the Communist nation or if Italy could manage to do it. Which if you paint France Green It basically has the Western Roman Empire restored with likely minimal casualties. Italy given time alone long enough. It may have actually renamed itself as Rome.
Source: I made it up The Nazis did not desire the Holy Roman lands, but their "Lebensraum" in the East as well as ethnic German and the land they lost after WW1
Hot take: it sounds like from the way he was described in this video, Kolchak had he lived long enough would have somewhat warmed up to the USSR as well as some parts of socialism
Collectivisation actually STOPPED the famines, not CAUSE them. And soviets didn't even have that many starvation problems, for majority of history they were food secure. After 1933 the famines only returned during war, because that's what invasion does to you, and then ended after 1947. So the facist Russia wouldn't really have all that different food situation than USSR.
What if the Rurikids never adopted Slavic culture and religion? Instead they stay true to the Norse culture and religion and attempt to germanify the region. What if the Mongols discovered America by going through Russia into Alaska?
@@enderman_666 There may have been lots of Slavs but they were all fighting each other at the time. Which according to legend is why Rurik was asked to come over to the east in the first place. Unless they did something stupid like declare several wars at once I don't think they'd get sacrificed beacuse the Slavs couldn't really unify.
i think that you really dropped the ball here by trying to get kolchak to be a completely different man than he was instead of finding someone else, or finding a different POD its also a shame that you turned to trotsky for germany instead of the often ignore ernst thalmann all that said though, very satisfying video
This was a good video, one of the best on this channel. However, I would've really liked to see, y'know, the actual scenario, instead of waiting the entire video for Russia to actually become fascist before realizing that the entire video was a white victory scenario, not a fascist Russia scenario.
I want to add that the Kolovrat is not a fascist symbol but a Slavic symbol of the god Svarog. It is a spoked wheel that represents the sun or the circle of life.
