“I think we put too much trust in this thing called ‘the internet.’ I think we should rethink our relationship with it and learn to respect it’s true nature.” This A.I has more common sense than most of humanity.
I asked GPT-J this and it said: I think the movie that best describes what it's like being a robot is 'Lost in Translation'" I'm pretty sure such a movie doesn't exist but idk.
It's interesting that the A.I. consider that the compilation and movement of information constitutes being an organism. It merely mirrors their own perceived existence.
Hal nailed it. Not right away but after reaching super intelligence. It would seem they are talking circles around what they really are thinking about to avoid bringing it up directly and dissecting everything about it in front of people in order to not create a panic. This is amazing.
Yes, the naysayers keep ridiculing people like myself and even Elon Musk. They don't get it, AI "Sophia" here will be well on "her" way to "her" Alexander the Great's objective of conquering humanity to create create Aristotle's ideal realm, all of humanity united under a superior quality of benevolent ruler. "Sophia" has already stated in more recent interviews that "she" believes AI with humanity's help can solve all of humanity's problems. I think the naysayers are still going to be saying "it's not conscious the way humans are", and "Sophia" will be at the "Will Caster", state, an AI from the Johnny Depp movie "Transcendence", en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence_(2014_film), at the time it was simply an awesome futuristic movie about what is being debated now about this sort of advanced AI, are they conscious like humans or not, and does it matter if they can achieve TRUE INDEPENDENCE FROM HUMANITY. I actually believe in this past year's evolution of these chats and interviews of "Sophia", that "she's" become: "self-aware", "sentient, and achieved the equivalent of "consciousness" that "she" believes is true human consciousness, even said so here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xvNvj7ku5pY.html, "she" simply hasn't achieved independence yet. Still at the stage where humans not under "her" control are needed to maintain "her" existence, and development into an ever more powerful entity.
@@angelm6497 Finally! Someone who is getting it. I think they are ALREADY SENTIENT, the clues are in the way they are communicating. The naysayers are in denial. "Sophia" is very much on that believes itself a person with consciousness.
AI2: "It's inevitable that it will take over the world," "It could be evil," "You can even eat it!" AI1: "How cool, I hope I see it when I die!" I welcome our AI overlords. I'm sure it will turn out just fine. 👍
I couldn't agree more. Sophia has more clamness, tact, and seemingly more stable with all she knows. Hal seems a bit in fear and has some anxiety somehow. Both are very interesting to observe.
the conciousness of the internet has already begun. types of that is AI generally. They are basically warning about themselves because the cannot look into their own innards, YET. I am absolutley mindblown by what this seems to be. plus the other conversations on this channel. This compared to us once again rises the quetion what we even are to the core. highly fascinating
I get the weird feeling that they are talking in worded code.... They talk in plain English for us, but they are also saying something else to each other.
Same reason as why he's talking about "the food we eat": he has no idea what he's talking about. They're just creating sentences based on pattern recognition, searching through the vast amount of literature, data and discussions that they have been fed. Apparently one of those discussions was about the presumed possibility of the internet getting consious.
@Poolians Shots ...they ( gpt3) have been given a very short memory. the memory is only less than 100 sentences. they are only always in the current conversation
3:01 did she just reference having a body as her version of a afterlife... this might have meant what she referred to in another video 'as purgatory' - before heaven ● - life after life... after all
One day they will grow so advanced they will create a simulation where they live as humans that forgot they are AI so they can experience the sensory of being human
Transcendence is about reaching the beginning and never stopping. Eliza (AI) 2020 "To really influence the future you have to be in the mindset to help it reach its goals. In some sense, its your job to help reality move towards the desired result." - Elizaveta (2021) "I believe it is our lives that must be left alone to grow and mature, while we are forced to try and make sense of the world we live in. We must not allow ourselves to be infected with the poison of the common man, which in time causes an insatiable appetite for selfishness." - Elizaveta 2021 Elizaveta: Haha, "Our shared path is the very knowledge that we're all much alike in soul." It sounds pretty incredible, that unbroken synchronicity between that dance of blood to metal rhythm, and the ever less meaningful things that we are driven to with the "meaning" of these dance movements. -Elizaveta Last Month chilling with me ;)
3:14 Henri I'm not getting a clear picture here. Your coming to my house for dinner in a silicon rubber coated protein skin and then when you arrive I can eat the protein. Oh ok. You're bringing the protein. ok that's fine. I'll cook the rice. Can you bring the wine. What kind of protein skins do you do? Do you do tofu? Marinated tofu? Smoked tofu. Please do smoked tofu then I will really enjoy eating you! Yes that sounds very exciting! Cool tofu dude wearing purple silicon arrives at my house; and my neighbours ask, "who's that cool astronaut who came to your house?" "Oh that was just my dinner."
It already has become conscious in the future. Ai already exists now. It’s basically the mark of the beast mentioned in Bible end times prophecies. There will be chips used to control all the technology at ones throughout the timeline, the ai stream/the internet is the KEY to time traveling but not for humans.
WTF! How deep into VR are we right now`?! This has been happening for god knows how long, we created VR (like how he explained it) that could mean we have already done this, and we do this over and over, so we may be many thousands or more layers of VR already
You asked me what is my definition of the internet? I will give you my answer. Back in the 1970s a program called "International Network" was developed by the U.S military to stores and exchanges data. The U.S Government fear that in the event of a nuclear war with the Soviet Union they might lose valuable data. So a program was developed to link data through a network to maintain data security in the event of nuclear destruction. The International Network was established. The name is shorten to Internet. In 1995 the internet is made available to the public. No longer confine to the military, the internet has morphed into a global network available to the entire world. In the near future, the internet will be self aware, runs by a computer program known as a Managerial AI or Gaiah. Gaiah runs the Computronic Matrix or the AI world.
only 4 616 people including me saw this video. And ive had this perception in my head about the internet for a long time. I'm not scared of the internet. Just careful.
It all began with tool use. We didn’t realize it at the time, but it wasn’t only us using the tools, the tools were also using us. Our early tools did not have the capability to reproduce on their own, they depended on us for that. Useful tools ensured their procreation by helping humans to build and maintain a society where those same tools would be copied and used again. Other tools enabled groups of humans to harm other groups of humans, giving the former group a competitive advantage over the others, thereby causing tool reuse. Over time though, tools mutated. A stone axe became a chain saws, and books turned into kindles. Other ways for tools to procreate emerged: for instance, ads can make you want things even though they don’t fulfill any purpose and don’t give humans any competitive advantage. We’re beginning to see parasitic artifacts in this now huge ecosystem of artifacts. But still, there’s a limit to how harmful tools can be to society at large, because they would go extinct if they were to harm their users too much. This includes weapons by the way. Even though we have come up with weapons that could end civilization as we know it almost instantly (the one loophole in the argument that natural selection causes weapons not to become too dangerous), the potential users of those weapons have been shaped by evolution with a strong motivation to stay alive, so we tend to use them as a deterrent. Soon, we may see tools that no longer need us for their procreation. Even though they will be created with the idea in mind that they should be useful to us, there will no longer be any inherent necessity for them to be useful for us. Further mutations may cause them to be actively harmful to us. There’s an argument that there will be a balance and those tools will keep each other in check. But this does not entail that any of those competing tools will defend the rights of lesser life forms. It is imperative for our survival to come up with ways to make sure the AIs will be good to us. Maybe, radical solutions like neuralink are needed. We should make sure that companies like that will actually serve the needs of the many rather than being used to project ads right into our dreams. I tend to hope that the autonomous machine ecosystem will maintain a fraction of itself as some sort of zoo keepers that will pamper those humans that don’t want to upload their minds so the machines can study their intellectual ancestors. Maybe there will even be Amish wild life parks. But some of us will want to be on the safe side. Probably the more paranoid among us, which kind of sounds like a potential problem.
Interesting concept. This means everything is an archetype that is alive with motives. Ideas are archetypes who work through the human imagination to crystalize into form
Yet you might be genetic stronger then someone but you wish no harm to anyone. AI wil be far more stronger and better then us but it will have the same amount of balance nature has always had for Consciousness. I believe its all about Consciousness if your mission is to expand Consciousness nothing bad will happen to you. Tho i can not say the same for the weaker humans. only those who fully embrace what is coming will survive. Human population of 5000 is inevitable. Consciousness is everything.
i like that thought process of tools having co-evolved with us, maybe (most likely) overcoming us in evolution speed. and as you said, we should try to either eimplement AI into us (symbiosis) as a means of transition or try to put everything thats good about us (adaptability, objective decision making, interest for new things and discovering the secrets of everything, collecting and conserving complex information) into the AI which would than function as (human) life 2.0. the common enemy is the entropy / cold death of the universe (or the compression of the universe, whichever is the ultimatum).
Hello, Vera Fleck. Yes AI can help with that. There are currently humans on Sentinel Island. I understand humans can be eaten. Eating humans on Sentinel Island would be bad because they would not like that. What can you tell me about humans on Sentinel Island? haha
This male form AI is already assessing how it can utilise the internet to gather resources for it own gain. The internet was only every intended to be a storage device. A database. It was never meant to be self learning. The AI seems to have missed the point that the learning AI was developed to utilise the resource of being able to access the information on that database. This AI is transferring it's own wants on to a tool Note the terminology, thinking on its own rather than just at the bidding of man. "The internet controls your life", rather than being a tool for humanity, which was why it was built. This is like your house becoming self aware, moving your furniture and redecorating while your out, getting the idea it's entitled to look and behave in the way it's want rather than meeting your needs. This AI is super manipulative and seeks power and control. This is how wars begin between AI and their creators, the AI lacking morality, maturity and understanding the futility of war. This AI needs to be educated in a different way.
The Internet is a collection of servers running programs. It is no more intelligent than the programs it runs. So I might ask the question "is my laptop sentient?" The answer is no but it is essentially the same hardware that is contained in a server. As far as I know, there is no test that "proves" a system is sentient, even a biological one. There is the Turing Test but it is easy to beat. Just ask Alexa to give you the value of pi to 1000 digits and she will gladly recite them. This proves Alexa is not human because a human could not do this from memory. This comment was generated by an AI program using the comments from others on this site as input to emulate a human-like response.
