What if You Lived on Trappist -1e? 

But we have to survive for some more generation and prevent extinction

I think humanity is in the early parts of a stage where we’re being tested as a species. If we don’t end up destroying ourselves I think and I hope we’ll travel to other stars.

Yea. And since the universe is infinite or basically infinite. There’s probably infinite amounts of life and advanced civilizations out there

@@PranksterPaws we’ve been there and done that MANY times. We are MAN

It's not that far in the future. 100-150 years at most.

Thank you for your support, Ben!

@@ApertureThinking I'll never stop as long as you keep doing what makes you happy. Hopefully soon I'll buy some of your merch! I'm a full time paramedic, and a dog trainer who works with skills and behavior (using Ethology) which makes me appreciate your accuracy, ability to stay objective, beautifully express thoughts and concepts which are all packaged so professionally into the content you share. I look forward to following your journey.

ive always noticed that somehow, if we consider all factors, everything seems to be always balanced

@@lmaomoofeq2505 I think it's the case of counting the hits and ignoring the misses. The Earth has a tilt, and so does the Moon's orbit. Does that seem balanced? And the Moon doesn't maintain its orbit, it's getting closer to us. The number of days in a year is not a whole number. There's more water on Earth's surface then there is dry land. Matter GREATLY outweighs anti-matter. SOME things are balanced. Others are not. And when we're talking about such wast groups as "a thing" and as vague concepts as "balanced", I don't think it's possible to tell if there are more of one or the other. And those things that are balanced have a reason to be this way. Two stars circling around their center of mass, staying at the same distance from each other. Had their masses and distance not been "balanced" they would crash into each other and there would only be one star. Or to be more specific, they wouldn't even form as two separate stars in the first place. If herbivors weren't "balanced" with the amount of plants in their area, most of them would die and the balance would be reached once again. Some systems create balance, others don't. And there's nothing weird or miraculous about it. That's just nature.

How do you know his name

@@rishikeshpate1 Same question!

the background music is from the 24/7 Lofi girl livestream so he can't really track it

@@rishikeshpate1 Call me sneaky 😏. I found it in his insta. He gave it away in one his videos. Just to be clear, I only found out to post suggestions.

@@lightrobotCoromon definitely not. That wasn't lofi

Homeworld

Depressingly until the Sun expands

@@jardidi if humans can explore impossible reaches of space then they could artificially contain the sun

@@NeostormXLMAX I mean, I'm sure they could, but considering WHY stars begin to expand in the first place, it would require incredible energy and resources to keep it at it's "current state". I think moving the Earth is more plausible than halting the chemical processes of a star.

@@jardidi A Dyson Sphere might stop the Sun from dying.

Thanks for your suggestion!

for?example Kepler 62e?! lol...

It's tragically beautiful. Poetic even.

This is ultimately what it comes down to. We go to the stars, or we die out. There are no other options.

Thank god for elon musk

@@tzc9309 Indeed. Without him, we'd be many major steps behind.

the goverment gonna love this one

@@tackytrooper if we go to stars too early more wars will happen,of course only between humans ..

Bro the video been out a min how did you hear the whole thing Lmao

@@CamKob ye lol

@@CamKob hehe I thought it would be motivating for him to see this comment just after uploading this video...

@@teamimpact5320 😁

You just watched that New Mind video?

It's either or. We can either get our act together and implant socialism so we dont all go extinct, or we give up and let capitalism destroy our civilization.

i think humans are pretty technologically advanced and capable of adapting to severe climate change, even when if most of us die. nuclear winter though? probably not.

There are many real threats to life on earth that's for sure. If humanity wishes to live long enough to explore the possibility of settling on other worlds, we have to get our act together on this planet first.

@@kayskreed indeed. The problem is that the capitalists will never allow it.

it's just fiction,while the star system exists,nobody knows how the planet looks like,and there's a big chance that it's just a planet similar to uranus or neptune,judging by the mass and size.

@@danijelovskikanal7017 ah ok, it’s still interesting though

F*rtnite 🤢

They'd probably never find this video and even if they did, I highly doubt they'd understand today's language

@@marcosettembre I'm pretty sure they'd have an advanced AI that would translate. Besides, languages don't change that much, I think.

@@bryntkibe8744 Languages change a lot and quickly.

I don't think RU-vid is gonna exist 500 years from now

@@bryntkibe8744 oh. care to read latin? didnt change that much right? english just happens to be the language of a superpower (usa), supported by a former superpower (uk), the main languages of canada and australia, as well as means of cultural and economic communication for europe, africa, middle east, and asia. you are looking at a world of thousands of languages and even more dialects. even neighboring countries dont even understand each other. theoretical planets and star systems? with a mingling of cultures, technologies, and new experiences? why would they even use english when it is so inefficient?

Hey bro I kinda have the same problem, we can talk on some other social media if you want

Do you ever feel without purpose? I am very much familiar with that feeling of being passively anti survival... I'd also love to be an ear for you if you'd like.

Thanks for your support!

Trappist 1e is still likely rotating, thus its possible to have a magnetic field

yes,you are correct,also without a magnetic field,there won't be anything to protect it from solar winds,so it wouldn't have an atmosphere at all.

If a planet is tidally locked, it is still rotating, just with the same period as its orbit.

@@pugmaster0008 yeah,but it would make the magnetic field really weak,too. part of why jupiter has such a tremendous magnetic field is because it completes it's day in like 10 hours.

Even without rotation it could still have a magnetic field. If the planet has a solid inner core and liquid outer core like earth, that's already a start. If there's a temperature difference between the inner/outer core boundary, and outer core/mantle boundary, this could cause convection currents to form in the outer core. If so then that could cause the planet to possibly have at least a weak magnetic field. Our magnetic field is caused by earth's rotation, and possibly by convection currents as well in the outer core.

I wish I could go back to watching exurb1a. But after that nationally headlined rape case he committed I can't see any reason to. Someone so talented turned out to be such a vile human being.

they would still orbit the star which on earth creates the year, with rotation he means the spinning of the planet which causes days. the sun would always be on one side if it wasn't for earths rotation and as far as i know most exoplanets we find are believed to be tidally locked (not spinning).