What Is At The Center Of The Universe? 

Tha F*ckery has to stop 😂

😂😅😂😅

Is that you Bubbles?

People --- including mankind's "best and brightest" --- who say "everything has a center except the universe" either aren't very serious, aren't very logical, or they think others are not serious or logical... Every time I watch, for example, a very serious person like Neil De Grass Tyson using the Earth to explain HOW the Universe doesn't have to have a center --- by skimming over the fact that a person floating on the earth's oceans is similar to what a person or a planet or a galaxy is like, IN THE UNIVERSE.... an existence with BOUNDARIES BUT NO CENTER TO IT ---- I started giggling... because I can't take him seriously. The earth DOES HAVE A CENTER! Just because you're floating on a raft --- and you could go around and around the world, without ever finding THE CENTER of the Earth ---- and you're in no position to know the CORE of the Earth.... doesn't make the Earth having no center to it! What Tyson and all these other scientists expect us to do ---- when we hear them use the earth's upper crust analogy (as to why the Cosmos also SHOULD have no center "and still be a perfect entity/existence..... supported on the back of a turtle that goes all the way down) --- is just to shut up and stop pestering them (because THAT, to them, show we are really educated, not "childish," the convoluted logic goes)... That is, they expect us to go: "Wow, I didn't think of it like that... yeah, you're so right... there is no way you gonna find a center to the Earth, 'cuz, as you said, you could walk or sail around the earth over and over and never find a center to that spherical object floating in the blackness of space..." But, Mr. Tyson.... there IS, IN FACT, A CENTER TO THE EARTH... Just because YOU or I or some wise man doesn't know it or doesn't have a way to getting to it... doesn't mean it doesn't exist. LIKEWISE, just because we don't know it, just because we CAN'T get to the center of the Universe ---- which was, according to these very people, supposed to have started from a singularity many, many trillions of times smaller than an atom, WHICH HAS A CENTER, by the way, a universe that started to GROW FROM WITHIN "not expanding into nothingness," etc ---- it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The "center" of something is nothing magical. It's just a place where MATHEMATICALLY --- or gravitationally or by means of some other space-time METRICS ---- it is in the "middle" of all other things... The reason we CAN'T know where we are, in the Universe, is because our cosmic horizon is only ~13.8B or so every which direction. The reason we can never know where the center of the Universe is... is NOT because we're completely stupid, like some Stone Age man floating on a raft, adrift in the open oceans! But by logic and by "cosmic law"/Hubble Constant.... at least currently, we know the diameter of the Universe is close to 100B light years. And by THAT VERY METRIC --- with that imaginary cosmic yardstick of 93B light years --- there indeed IS a center to the Cosmos... because all you have to do is just pivot, rotate, and angle that "93BLY" yard stick in every direction.... and there is a CENTER to the whole endeavor... Anyway, saying we know every major contours of the Universe, today, in 2024.... is like what Sir Eddington saying how HE & the best and brightest of HIS GENERATION, of he early 1900s, already knew every major aspect of earth and the Universe .... with nothing to do except for post docs to flush out the boring, tiny details. Eddington was IN NO POSITION to know any such nonsense. In 200, 500, or 3,000 years, humans will know much more about the Milky Way, the local group and its neighboring clusters, as well as the larger Universe, in terms of both its constituents and contours... Saying, in 2024, that "the Universe is made of 5% Baryonic matter, of which we and planets and stars are made.... 25% Dark Matter (Planet Vulcan stuff), and 70% Dark Energy, exotic Planet Vulcan stuff)...." is like saying, in Aristotle's time, "The world is made of Earth, Fire, Air, and Water..." Those are just pop culture beliefs & norms that every epoch's "best and brightest" like to engage in... to show the rest of the little people that WE NEED to give them money (via the government, via generous taxes).... so they (those few "best and brightest") could, with plenty of leisure time on their hand, come up with endless & deep sounding thoughts for everyone to hear... But REALITY ---- or the contours and/or constituents of what we describe as the Cosmos.... as some wise guy (science fiction writer?) once said ---- is stranger than fiction.

Everything is just a theory.

I was informed in another science video that it wasn't. I think if you can imagine a perfect expansion, this is unlikely. There is little discrepancy. I think it's safe to say it's not a perfect expansion but I'd like to think that it would be because it would make sense, like if you air up a ball the air distributed across the entire thing in equal amounts. There's probably some catch though as why it's not.

Center of the universe is wherever you happen to be standing

@@Speaker4theDead So true! I don't know why so many people have trouble grasping that.

The Universe has no center, knows no boundaries, and nears no edges. It's called the cosmological principle; the moment you pick a frame of reference, that point becomes the center of the universe.

The expansion isn’t the speed of light locally. Just like to throw that in there lol

Just because you cant reach it does not mean it doesn't exist

The only thing spacetime doesn't curve around is massless particles

Always try to give your basic understanding of the universe.!!!

@@joeydavis7455 you mean like z bosons w+ and w- bosons .. Photons electrons muons tau.. Ya the fields curve around them

@@ric101657 that would take some times

@@Z-Boson yeah I suppose if Newton's law of universal gravitation proposes that mass (and energy) can curve the fabric of spacetime itself. My bad, I should straighten that out.

This universe is in the « You Tube » ! 😂

The universe seems to already be in this « you tube »… 😂

Bug bang sounds disgusting

The center of this universe wouldnt be detected but there was once a center. The expansion of space may render it imperceptible but there's a center. In the universe's expansion, dark energy caught up with the slowing expansion of the universe 5 billion years after this big bang event. Dark energy is mostly responsible for the expansion of the universe. Picture a balloon being stretched from the air filling it. Space might continuously expand at every point because of this dark energy but there is still a universal center, an unfixed point.

@@joeydavis7455 Incorrect, there was never a centre as you characterise. There is no centre today. It doesn't even make sesne to say there was once a centre. What happened to it?! 😂 Either the universe is infinite, in which case there obviously can't be a centre. Or it's finite and curves back on itself. You might even say picture a balloon being blown 😉up and then point out where the "centre" of the surface it. There is none. That the universe is thought to have sprung from a singularity should also not be confused with there being a centre. A singularity has no proportions and has no centre, because having a centre implies another part of the singularity which is not the centre, and a singularity doesn't have any parts at at all, let alone a centre and other parts that are not the centre. "Centreness" has no meaning in the context of a singularity. As soon as universe sprang out of the singularity, it was immediately either infinite or finite, but again in both cases as I have already explained, it had no centre. It didn't before. It doesn't now. It's that simple.

Put your blanket around your neck hero to scientists everywhere. Your argument doesn't even make sense. The universe is not the surface of a balloon in respect to the balloon. It's all the balloon, the air in the balloon and the balloon itself. You're trying to break it down to certain components. The universe is a defined object. It has to have a center. Like the magnetic poles it's always changing so it's unfixed. You're also trying to say a singularity is non-existent which is also not the case. You're just wrong and should admit it. You might be fooled but I'm not.

@@joeydavis7455 No, in the balloon analogy, the universe is just surface of the balloon - the whole point is that it's a 2D analogy of the 3D reality. All the balloon and the air inside is not an analogy for the expanding universe. You've totally misunderstood the balloon analogy and why it's used. Also, "the universe is a defined object" means nothing. Again, if it's infinite, it can't have a centre. If it's finite, it's curved and still has no centre. If the universe is finite, if you keep moving in a straight line, you'll eventually end up back where you started. There is no centre. You're imagining the universe and a large, finite ball hanging in space. That's not what it is. There is no space outside of the universe and there is no cente. Literally everything you're saying is hopelessly simplistic grade-school gibberish. you;'re so far off understanding any of this that I suspect there's no chance you'll grasp it.

​​​@@flat6croc50:07 it doesn't have a center point from which the expansion proceeds. In its entirety there is a center. You're just overcomplicating it. You can take the 93 billion light years we know of and say there isn't a center because it's expanding and that relativity suggests it's irrelevant but of all that can be seen. There is a center. We would be the center. If you could take all of the universe into your hand looking at it from the outside in, the universe has a center. It's natural for objects to have a center. It's just too simple for one theorist to accept so they have to elaborate on hypothetics.

Because they were struggling to explain a lot of information about the early universe, the scientists whose turn it is to get to use the telescope decided to study the solar system.. a waste of a valuable resource if you ask me.

When people use it in past tense 😤

No one cares

@@TheFos88 Certainly, millions of people have become Muslims in recent times, and most of them were Christians. The reason for this is that the Qur'an has made known hundreds of scientific facts. Believe me, too much cares 😉😎 AlhamdiliLaah

@@BrainPower-MC I worship Old Gregg. He makes water colors and drinks bailey's from a shoe. So he's pretty cool. Even with his down stairs mix up. Alas, tis just an indicator of his god status.

@@TheFos88 You can worship whoever you want, but after death they will not be able to help you. This concerns the Eternal Hell or Eternal Paradise. Know Who you worship. The Qur'an gives you at least hundreds of scientific facts for its authenticity. Type in RU-vid, miracle of the Qur'an, and you'll see what I meant.

Nope .. no it doesn't. Give your religion credit and call it what it is. Faith... there are NO scientific " proofs " in any holy book.