Behaviourism --> (Repetition + Reward) = Reinforcement Liberationism --> Student-centered Social Constructivism --> "Student may learn with friends among himself" Connectivism --> Things are connected. Nowadays more than in the past, and things will be more connected in the future, becase of entropy always increasing. Make useful connections!
I have master of degree in pedagogy. When I moved to UK I tried to get a job in my field and there was not one place that people who interviewed me knew what pedagogy is!!!!! In one place I was told that my qualifications are to high and they would need to pay me more and all they want is simple teacher after a course not trained person after 5 year of study with master of degree. I have 4 kids now and we are home educating and my master is well used.
This was so helpful for my recent assignment on the use of pedagogical knowledge to planning in order to teach the children subjects creatively! I was a little confused where to start but this has really helped! Thank You!
So it is important for teachers to do thorough research every year for important updates on strategies to improve learning in class. We live in the world of endless revolution.
I have spent the last 5 days wading through pedagogy articles and feeling overwhemed by a sea of not very different pedagogic statements. This has really helped me categorise them. Thank you.
You, sir, are a brilliant teacher! After researching social pedagogy for days, my mind was all over the place....I just wish I'd have come across this video sooner! Packed with all the information I needed and presented clearly. Thank you :)
This was really enlightening because of the fact that was well structured and the approaches were flowing logically. but i propose that you could have explained the theory of cognitive constructivism prior to the one of social constructivism because it was actually the one that was brought forth first. After all, the sense of pedagogy is still here since from the 18's but the only problem is that the term pedagogy is scarcely used this days.
It has taught me so much was lost through all this approach 🙌🙌I am a distance learning student in South Africa originally from a small rural area around Hlabisa # Thank you 💞
I'm an under qualified English teacher in an academy abroad. I offer my perspective only for those who might by chance relate to it. For my first job I was clearly exsposed as being very underprepared and in particular unprofessional! Thanks to the ignorance, indifference or mercy of that employer I had the opportunity to "cut my teeth" as the expression goes but really I just survived(sorry to those students btw). I then though by my own volition read pedogogy books enthusiastically. For example, in one I read about a "silent method", which was reported in that book as a means of teaching Vietnamese locals to learn basic English to help provide Intel to US troops but through a method of colour coded canes representing certain lexical sets or grammatical functions(yes I became a nerd of such trivia) with those canes used as pointers to words on a board and so inviting the learner to piece together the understanding of the coloured cane as related to the inclusion of the new word on the board. I tried this my own way by entering a class without saying a word and writing on the board a statement about myself already known by the students (ex my name is x) but then after draw a question mark and simple point at random students and the question mark. They always understood my intention and answered it if not a little bewildered. I didn't do this thinking I've adapted an outdated method nor thought I was innovating anything at all. I was testing though! After that gig I went to other schools which encouraged their own method which quite frankly was standardized to prevent teacher failure because of a market(the market I'm only qualified to participate in) that is riddled with un certified people like me but with the negative affect of never giving the trust or chance for uncertified eager participators of that market the chance to test and develop. I believe then, if that's my experience in my peripheral involvement in language teaching , that the standardized state managed schools pedogogy is far more inhibiting. Ex. I for one know well trained teachers in great positions , whom's footsteps I wish I had followed (seeking other routes currently though, not jealous though! Just acknowledging my past failures and their earned successes), who are as good and earnest and knowledgeable a teacher could ever be but yet somehow oddly be complacent about pedogogy despite their far more brilliant suggestions and ideas to my enquires than I could produce in my enthusiastic free time myself. How? They are at mercy of a system that is mechanised to the point of only being worth agrevating if the pay encouraged it. The parents expectations, the students participation and the principals understanding altogether form a beurocratic system that eliminates pedogogy variation. My clumsily expressed point here is to illustrate that my interest in pedogogy and testing methods was facilitated by a careless employer while my esteemed real teacher friends aquiesced to a over established system that gave them their financial reward but discouraged their innate pedogogy interest which got them there in the first place! To sum up: my interest without financial reward is offered here as proof that it is an interesting subject in and of itself to all teachers of all backgrounds. I'm further offering that my over qualified friends in teaching lost the interest (professionally not privately)by inhibiting school criteria standards. the over systemization if state education has trained teachers forfeit further training with the security of regular income. My irregular income in a underregulated market has allowed me stand out from non credential teachers by my independent research and application of alternative methods. Oh, I'm not happy where I'm at don't mistaken me here. I need to officially train for better job perspectives, I'm only offering my take on interest in pedogogy studies by professional and non alike based on my own journey. For those who can relate
Studying grammar might help you become a better English teacher as well. Proper use of a and an is a good start for you. Only critique I can give you for your long paragraph. I'd have to study more grammar to confirm whether or not your punctuations are correct.
Hmm, I would say that pedagogy is the study of learning.... And since everybody is learning all the time it is a wider concept than "teaching" is. So pedagogy is also about teaching/didactics, but it is more than that. Cheers
Technology’s role in pedagogy is especially an essential component during the pandemic. It even allows for more intimate communications with your instructor behind the click of a button.
Hello pedagogues! Team Satchel's hosting a FREE WEBINAR on reversing the impact of school closures. Sign up today to claim your free resource pack: info.teamsatchel.com/resource-catch-up-learning-strategies-webinar
This was a brilliant video I'm studying my foundation degree in childhood studies at the moment (going onto year 2) and honsetly this video helped so much thank you !! 😊😊, new subscriber here ! xx
I feel teaching and learning is subjective as its to that moment- spontaneous, because knowledge itself s multi dimensional & vast. So its totally on the teacher to teach the students he/she is dealing in the class and the students to learn and unlearn whatever is been taught. Every class is different and every student is unique.
Currently study in a M'ed course and this video has been brilliant. Much easier to comprehend the information from a well structured and presented video such as this, rather than reading from text books. Thank you very much, Jack!
Seems to me that Spelke's contribution of highlighting Core Knowledge Theory was not debunking Piaget's work, but merely showing that there are these innate mental processes that exist to serve our survival in the same way an infant knows how to cry when something is wrong. We're built by evolutionary adaptation with specific bottom-up processes that start with basic units (core knowledge systems) and serve as a foundation for the perception of what is happening. At the same time, we acquire new information through experiences that being more curious about one type of information can enhance memory for unrelated incidental information
Learning is a continuous process and so is Teaching. As teachers learn and become more knowledgeable of the different pedagogies, learning progresses with it and becomes more worthwhile and engaging. Thank you fpr the knowledge shared.
Excellently put, I appreciate your video and you sure your knowledge. I’m not the smartest man in the room, but I am the man who wants to learn about so many different things.
I have to say that this video is really well done. I am a student of Pedagogy, on my final year, and I have noticed that most people do not understand or do not make difference between teaching and Pedagogy. This video gives brief, yet very good information on what is Pedagogy and how it differs from teaching. I'm your new subscriber.
This is great, I completed school centered teacher training and whilst this gave me plenty of classroom experience in an intensive training period, it only taught one very good instructional approach - AfL/ assessment for learning - and focused on just one approach to lesson planning. A B.Ed, would I guess have covered all of these theories; not having that, this video gave me a very clear and concise explanation, and a great suggestion to use mixed-groups to support a social constructivist approach to learning.
I was interested in this subject because I believe that holistic learning that focus on the creative development of the individual is the purpose of education...I think we can grow closer to God by this process and therefore grow closer to each other...
Am here because am studying a degree in pedagogy and the 2nd one in EFL teaching here in Mexico to become an elementary teaching you need a degree in pedagogy
This continuum of pedagogical theories is all contextually valid. They're all valid *in the right context*. Paulo Freire's liberalizationism theory maps to A.S. Neil's Summerhill or Sudbury Valley schools or Sir Ken Robinson's TED talk , students need to be at the center of their education, it is they who are learning. Once a firm direction is determined by a student lessons given in Skinners operant conditioning are speedy and effective, this is what Salman Khan does through his Khan Academy (though Paul Kelley's "spaced learning" system appears to be more effective (I'd like to see a few more studies)) and these techniques are very effective at getting a student "up to speed". Lev Vygotsky's Social constructivism AND George Siemens technology focus can be seen through the lens of Sugata Mitra's "School in the cloud", where students learn to work and solve in groups (supported by the individual skills gained through other technique). Why is this treated with such academic mysticism.
I have a master degree in pedagogy that I did in Brazil but when I required a translation of my diploma in New Zealand, they translated as 'Bachelor in Teaching'.. confusing.
I have been trying to pitch a research idea for programming education interm of any of the topic (pedagogy, misconceptions, learning strategies or assessment). But I am unable to get a starting point for it.
Mahum Khan knowing what kind of society you want to live in and what skills and values those citizens would need to work and live together or apart however that society would need those skills, then how to cultivate those skills and values through learning seems like a solid place to start. You can utilize all the various ways of teaching as a part of the counter arguments that would pop up and to what kind of society the old ways created as opposed to the way the new or old way of learning you think would be best to cultivate the society you want your descendants to live in.
I would like to share my own learning theory if anyone wants to check it out? I have not studied pedagogy nor am I a teacher; but is studied how to learn by myself. What I see is a lot of discussions and information across the web about how teachers teach; most methodologies are either: Throwing information at a learner to see what sticks, or throwing them in the deep end of a pool hoping they will swim. -to my own knowledge ofc. To the theory: So the idea is that everything is solved through a group of fundamentals. You would start with a subject, a idea, a question or anything you wish to learn or call it the object of your learning. Then you would make a group of fundamentals to the object of your learning; using critical thinking. You would look at the fundamentals and identify which of them you understand or do not understand. The fundamental you do not understand; you would find the fundamentals to it through critical thinking, and build your knowledge on that fundamental as if it were a object of learning. How many fundamentals you know of the object of your learning would value how knowledgeable you are on the subject. You can identify a flaw in your knowledge in two ways: 1. The question or answer makes no sense; Your missing a fundamental to the object of your learning. An example of this: "4 + 5 = 9"/Arithmetic Your fundamentals are; numbers, addition, subtraction, multiplication etc. The fundamentals of your numbers are represented as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. Now imagine 5 was not in those fundamentals; the question above would be gibberish. 2. The answer is wrong. 4 + 5 = 6 The fundamental knowledge of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc; would be a value of dots which equals the symbol of a number, now what if that information was incorrect? What if there were two dots to the symbol 5? It would give you an answer that is the result of your knowledge of your fundamentals.
Another example of this: Say a kid were to learn how to ride a bike under the fundamentals of balance, control and movement. Later the kid learns how to do wheelies. Now, another kid is asked to do wheelies on a bike but has never ridden a bike before. The common knowledge is that you need to practice how to ride a bike first before you can do a wheelies.
I am a teacher and I teach children according to their interest as per their birth, but it is very confusing to adjust between old times teaching methods and new times. Teaching methods ✍️
Thanking you for sharing this informative presentation. Well done, in just a short space of time to simplify what PEDAGOGY is about and how I theorists are isconnected.
Pedagogy started with Behaviorism around 1898? Strange theory, given that this is an ancient Greek word, named for a practice that was practiced by the ancient Greeks, and has been going on for millennia. It's also strange that this video sees pedagogy as only something that occurs in a traditional classroom. Homeschooling, online learning outside of class, tutoring, etc - are all forms of pedagogy. And that teacher workload is going up? This is an idea that seems bizarre to me. My Mother taught classes of 35 - 40 children with no teaching assistant back-in-the-day. My grandmother taught all grades at once in a one room schoolhouse. A friend told me that her first grade class consisted of 60 children, and one teacher. The *work* hasn't increased, it has arguably lessened. The bureaucracy, though, has skyrocketed.
It is a bit daunting, looking at preschools in France and having to watch a RU-vid video (grateful to have it available) to get through the first paragraph on the first school's website.
Get up and give thanks. If we haven't learned much, at least we've learned a little. If we haven't even learned a little, at least we are not sick. If we are sick, at least we are alive. So, give thanks.
Amazing video! I never heard of the connectivism approach, especially since I did my teacher training in 2018... You would have thought it was included with Piaget and the rest.
behaviorism: repetition complete control: no critical thinking, creativity; give ist a space liberationsim: creators of knowledge social constructivism: cognitivsim constructivism: Connectivism: teach how to find knowledge
