I am so grateful that you guys figured out a unique system to measure glasses fitting. Have wasted money on sunglasses that doesn't fit well. Thank you!
This is a great idea, but unfortunately it's difficult for people who don't have reading glasses or any kind of regular pairs.. All i have is a pair of sunglasses that fit decent.
I love your videos, they have really helped me understand finding the right size glasses for myself, while shopping online. and I love all your review videos too!
I hate how almost no stores include the most important measurement which is frame width, and should be the inside measurement. All other measurements you can see visually and are much less important than frame width. Just ridiculous.
I wish oakley eyeglasses had width measurements. I need something slightly larger than the metalink 55. I like the mnp family but I don't want to end up with the same undersized look
This video has been out for over a year. I emailed Customer Service about being a difficult fit and they suggested watching this video to point me in the right direction. Still, every pair I looked at does not have a Frame Width listed on the product page. How is this helpful???
How do you measure your face for frames when you DON'T currently have any glasses? I'm having a really hard time trying to measure on my own. Can you please make a new video in response to my question? Thanks!
That is a very good question! We are having a tough time coming up with a reliable and consistent method of measuring this. We are still working on how to make that translate. Stay tuned for when it comes out!
Hey Orca! Check out the link below to view Oakley's XL styles... www.sportrx.com/shopby/brand-oakley/frame_fit2-xl/product_type-sunglasses.html?is_eligible=1&show_full_attribute=1&side_wide_product_type=rx
This guy has commented on his alleged large head/face but here we see him in 139mm frames that fit pretty great. Achieving an also good fit look with 145mm in the aviators video. It feels like measurements have no effect on looks, or am i missing something?
Most likely! A 2mm difference in SFW would likely fit without much issue. You can also take advantage of our Test Run program that let's you try the frame on before purchasing Rx lenses. 👉www.sportrx.com/test-run
Most likely! A 2mm difference in SFW would likely fit without much issue. You can also take advantage of our Test Run program that let's you try the frame on before purchasing Rx lenses. 👉www.sportrx.com/test-run
@@sportrxeyewear Thanks I called in for advice and the optician was very helpful. I put up with Smith Directors being a bit too tight. Hopefully Oakley Shocktubes fit better :)
It's is a measurement that may not be done identically for every frame. I can say, for certain, that it is more than just doubling the eyesize and adding the dbl. Doing that is a decent starting point, but there can be other design details that affect the SFW measurement. Rob goes into that a bit to try to explain how that works, but it's definitely one of those things that blends extensive optical experience and science with art/understanding frame design and functionality. We're racking our brains to figure out how to come up with a foolproof way to explain it for all to duplicate! Thanks for watching!
That is a great question! It will help with the large/wide head element, for sure. As for the cheeks bit, that is a bit tougher to discern by the frame alone. The bridge fit plays a large roll in that as well, so there may not be a perfect way to figure that out aside from physically trying them on. We'll wrack out brains, though! Stay tuned!
