I think it's more complicated than this, since lower intensity often tends to make you less hungry overall, and also doesn't affect NEAT as much, plus you can go for longer. I agree that both types of cardio are important for heart health though!
Hunger levels have nothing to do with it. You are you are assuming that, if you are more hungry, then you will have no other option other than eating more calories. There are many ways to avoid that. That’s not something that you should put on high intensity.
So if you're doing a low zone 2 fat burn at 70% HR, you'll need to do a longer workout to burn the same amount of calories than you would at a HIIT. Which supports the theory that you burn more fat calories in a lesser amount of time doing a HIIT than say riding a bike in HR zone 2. But let's talk about the metabolic effect on lowering insulin resistance, on stimulating human growth factors, increased metabolic rate. Would love more perspective and compare and contrast with these factors.
@onepeloton Question on this, how does body behaves for HIIT when you some hours fasting, cause in theory you wouldnt have so much extra carbs for usage, so are you using more fat, or maybe muscle...
Protein, unfortunately. The body more readily uses protein when it doesn't have access to carbs bc it's easier to convert into ATP. It's better to passively fast and fuel up before exercise; reduces stress and allows you to go longer/harder. That and walking after eating helps digestion. Fasting is good while you sleep and the body is focused on repair.
So many questions... so If I eat 5 hamburguers extremely fast, diggestion will be the same as eating them at a normal peace? I mea, what's the impact of high intensity on metabolism and fat oxidation? Whats the footprint of max intensity on a chemical response? Or is just about kcal?
Except I have personally proven that the low intensity has melted off my midsection. I have abs showing! 😁 So it causes me to wonder if there is some missing information in this presentation.
Yeah, it's in his assumption for total calories burned in a 30 minute interval. 500 kcal/30 minutes is VERY high. Humans are designed to walk for hours without even noticing, but even just dancing hard for 10 minutes feels fatiguing because we can't take in oxygen quickly enough. I also have noticed low-intensity exercise and weight training (I'm just at 25lbs now or body weight for planks and push-ups, nothing crazy) has been more effective for me. As a woman, stress and hormones plays a huge part in weight loss for us too, so these cut and dry formulas don't account for the body revolting
High intensity, burning 200kcal of fat, then rest for 3 days, 4 days total, exercise & rest. Low intensity, burn 60kcal fat, can be do everyday. In 4 days, there would be much more calories burn from low intensity, 4 x 60 =240 kcal..
im going to realistically estimate the percent of your awesome machine's use after 6 months, 3% and thats being generous - good cloths rack though - 😂😅🤣😂🤣😅 lolololololololololololololololololololololololol
