Personally, I was always expecting not to get Gen 5 remakes until after we get Gen 10 DLC. Notice how we didn’t get OR/AS until Gen 6 inatead of Gen 5 and BD/SP in Gen 8 rather than 7? The pattern seems to be remaking games in the Gen that’s double their own
@@DDKoD I’m not entirely sold on that pattern cause FireRed/LeafGreen and LGPE don’t follow it. But who knows, hopefully you’re right cause I so desperately want a gen 5 remake!
@@jayjonesrgamingKanto is just the exception. Not only because of when FRLG and LGPE released, but also because of the fact that Kanto even got remade twice. That’s not gonna happen with any other region, even though many fans assumed it would with Johto.
@DDKoD For me, the pattern seems to be "a new console". Gen 1 got remade in GBA. Gen 2 wouldn't get a remake until the Nintendo DS released. Gen 3 would wait until the 3DS, skipping Gen 5 completely. Gen 4 and Let's Go only happened after the Switch, in the next Console jump. So it would mean we would only theoretically get remakes when the Switch 2 gets released.
BDSP ruined everything. ORAS excluded some content and Masada had the audacity to claim that very little would benefit from the Battle Fromtier, yet he failed to fully explain why Emerald content aren’t present. No remake surpassed HGSS, which honestly set the bar.
No Pokémon game period has surpassed HGSS nothing has even come close. The battle frontier missing and replaced with the lazy, copy-pasted battle maison was a giant slap to the face. The battle frontier was basically your endgame for all of Pokémon, it actually had a purpose and it was great fun for those in deep endgame with only pvp battles to look forward to.
no. BDSP was the best remake to this day. because remakes are meant to be faithful. Battle Frontier didn't need to be in Ruby and Sapphire remakes. HGSS were utter trash that didn't fix the issues from Gold and Silver.
@@JamieAlexander18 no. They are TRASH remakes. They included NOTHING NEW. If I wanted to, I can always play the ORIGINAL version called Pokémon Diamond. I didn’t need a faithful remake. Remake are meant to IMPROVE the original source. And yes, Battle Frontier should’ve been included in ORAS. And no, agree to disagree, HGSS are fan favorites FOR A REASON. They included EVERYTHING and for BDSP to bring nothing new to the table only ruined the reputation more. Have fun with your trash remasters then.
@@BillSchrader thank you. I played all remakes and I can tell you that I had FUN with HGSS. They hold up to this day because they improved the mistakes from the original source. And if the level curve was an issue, there’s this thing called a lucky egg. Use it. I know I did and that’s just a lame excuse to hate the remakes.
Fire Red came out in 2004. Gold and Silver remakes came out in 2009. Ruby and Sapphire remakes came out in 2014. BDSP came out in 2021. There are at least 5 years in between all of the remakes you guys need to chill
@@stathisconstantinou I'm thinking that Legends Arceus might have eaten into the sales of BDSP because of how it released only a few short months after BDSP did. And Legends Arceus wound up being what I consider one of the only few good pokemon games to release on the switch.
It tires me so much people keep calling bdsp remakes and not remasters when they're just a graphical overhaul as opposed to full on remakes like the other gens.....
@@megaman37456 no it wasn't. It didn't respected the originals. It made drastic changes which is not what remakes does. It added too much things which again is not what remakes does. ORAS is a bad remake. But believe what you want. I don't want to argue about what remake is better. It is subjective. glad you like ORAS but I don't.
All these RU-vidrs keep talking about how we're never going to get another remake because they skip them for the Legends game don't seem to be able to follow basic fucking patterns like seriously if you look at every remake we've ever gotten it's been on a different console that's because we get one remake per console generation we got fire red and leaf green on the GBA we got HeartGold and SoulSilver on the DS we got Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire on the 3DS and we got bdsp on the switch the Gen 5 remakes will not come until after generation 10 on the new system
@@coolcool5181 yes they have as a matter of fact about 13 years ago when I took my last class but also when you're driving and using text to speech Punctuation is probably the last thing on your mind
@@worthywill9294 the only time I care about Punctuation is what I'm actually writing something out professionally or if I'm writing something for a friend or family member I don't give a shit about it on social media
@@Whelp140 like any normal person should. The only time it MIGHT matter is for the sake of effectively conveying your message/point. Which you clearly did.
my wish: a pokemon game where you can travel between regions and choose your favourite. All pokemon would be available and you could visit all islands including the orange islands from the anime.
Look oras was faithful, but it still had differences to the original game (the delta episode, wally's final fight, the rival getting closure in a final battle, the national dex being before the elite 4, legendary encounters after the national dex, elite 4 rematches that get mega evolution, latios and latias being gift pokemon, improvements from later gens at the cost of lowered difficulty and a so much more. I liked them, but i get why a lot of people didn't.
As someone who started out on Gen 1, and then missed out on the subsequent generations for one reason or another, I missed out on a lot of Pokemon. When Lets Go came to Switch, it was like revisiting an old friend, so I was willing to cut it a lot of slack. When BDSP came out, it was the closest thing to a new experience in a long time, and starting to catch the fun that I had missed out on, so again I cut the games some slack. Scarlet and Violet just felt like it was meant for a more powerful system than the Switch could give. I passed on the DLC, because the base game just didn't feel finished to begin with. I'm hoping that by the time that they are ready for Gen 10, they give that pair the time and care that it needs to really shine.
When being too much like the bad games, that makes the remakes bad. Crystal, Emerald, and Platinum are the best to be used as remakes, and have plenty of new stuff added.
@@Exodia_Misogynist BDSP is good and you need to stop with the troll comments. If you want to defend the mess that HGSS and ORAS was then by all means. Going to mute notifications from you
Ideally they should rotate new gen, legends and remake games so they all have longer development cycles. I think Hilda represents a problem for gen 5 remakes as well.
Lol Blue was not just a changed name. Blue was an updated version from red and green including updated sprites. Our red isnt even the same red that came out in Japan. Essentially, NA recieved the updated versions, and not the originals. Japan got Red and Green. Then the updated blue. Then the yellow version. NA skipped Red and Green. Got the updated Blue version as both Red and Blue. Then Yellow version.
@Real_Infinity95 He didn't actually watch pokemon growing up. It's like most of these youtubers now a days. Can't even pronounce ratatta's name correctly like how was pronounced in original gen 1 back in the late 90s.
@@nightowl7261 orrr, crazy concept, people just pronounce things differently. Plus gen3 was my least fav and I don’t particularly care for Kyogre, “Grewdon” or Rayquaza. 😂 Literally still have all my OG cartridges growing up, from Red & Blue up until USUM (minus Ruby cause I gave it away)
Your japanese Gen 1 info isn't correct. It started with Pocket Monsters Red/Aka and Green/Midori, then Game Freak made an updated version, that fixed many of the glitches and made completely new sprites, Pocket Monsters Blue/Ao The north american versions of red and blue are based on japanese blue. In other words, there is a third set of japanese only Gen 1 sprites. Some of them are more acurate to the original concept art, than the "updated" Blue sprites.
Genius thing is, game freak could also make multiple fully fleshed out legends games for one region, take alola for example, one game could be a more traditional new story while another could be a totally wild ultra space thing. For kalos, they have the lumiose city thing they’re doing now, and they could have one to flesh out team flare.
The reason we don’t have Gen 5 remakes is because they only do them with every even numbered generation, Gen 2: Remakes: Gen 4 Gen 3 Remakes: Gen 6 Gen 4 Remakes: Gen 8 Gen 1 is an exception cause it would be weird to immediately remake them. Gen 5 remakes are coming out with Gen 10
Someone else pointed it out and I think their theory fits better. each new "console" gets a remake. FR-LG - GBA HG-SS - NDS ORAS - 3DS BDSP - Switch Generational number thing is just coincidence imo. We may get BW remakes on the "Switch 2" but it won't be to align w Gen 10's number, it'll be cause Gen 10 is likely gonna be released on the new Nintendo console.
Let's get a new Pokemon game with the original graphics just adding all the updated features like the special physical typing, abilities, mega evolutions, ect. And either adding in all the previous gens of pokemon or maybe create an new generation separate from the main games of pokemon. You could also make the new generation of pokemon look like or be spinoffs of the original pokemon. Idk just throwing out some ideas
i think remakes might still be possible if gamefreak thinks ahead, such as making the scarlet violet textures at a higher res and downscaling them for the switch.
Kinda wish I can look into the multiverse and see what diffrence it would of made, if they just based the D/P Remakes of off Platnium but everything else was basically equal.
@@JamieAlexander18 "that wouldn't make them DP remakes if they based them on Platinum." Can you please show me where all the Crystal content from HGSS is in G/S, or where the Sevii Islands are in the original R/G or R/B?
There are a slew of BDSP ROM hacks that modify or change quite a bit. I'm sure there's a hack that doesn't do any rebalancing or add anything besides the Platinum content at this point.
@Unregistered.HyperCam.2 That's why those aren't true remakes like BDSP. BDSP are true faithful remakes of the originals. That's why it's hilarious when fanboys keeps crying over BDSP for not having Platinum contents. Duh, it's Brilliant *Diamond* and Shining *Pearl* , not Dusty Platinum.
@@nightowl7261 ...I don't even have words. This is the stupidest response I've gotten in quite a long time, and that's even including bad faith arguments. I'm not bothering with this.
What killed remakes? Multiple things. 1. Accessibility of older pokemon in newer games. 2. The battle system being mastered in gen 4. 3. Reduced development leeway.
@@nightowl7261 true but its not sold like that. its not even called pokemon yellow, its called LETS GO. which if they wanted couldve been its own piece of the franchise like the Legends games are.
A flaw of this Video's conclusion is BDSP remakes were not made by Gamefreek, they were made by a 3rd party studio. So little to no resources were drawn away from the main games. I suspect the remakes will continue because while they sell less, they are relatively cheap to make due to shorter production times and still sell ridiculous amounts, only slightly less then Legends Arceus. With longer mainline production times, the remakes will be perfect ways to fill in gaps in releases, especially if they outsource them to 3rd party studios to work on. Remakes are here to stay, even if they are less frequent. I just hope they take the best version of the past games (platinum, Emerald etc) and base the remake on those and add some new features and post game content to them.
Yeah. Saw the title and was thinking what are they talking about? Nintendo has still been doing remakes they just have a side game next and a new console coming up
This may be a hot take, but NO, BDSP did NOT improve the graphics from the original game This is a problem I see with the gaming community where they think 3D is automatically better than 2D What makes a game good graphically is the artistic style and how well implemented it is into the game The original Diamond & Pearl, with all their technical problems, had a cohesive art style, the 2d elements combined pretty smoothly with the 3D elements, it was COHESIVE. And that chibi style worked for 2D characters BDSP, not only does it have average 3D graphics, but the artstyle is awful. A bunch of trees that look exactly the same worked for Diamond and Pearl, but it looks god awful in BDSP. Also you have toy trees but realistic water? That has no cohesion whatsoever. Also following Pokemon look awful too But hey, lets say BDSP is better than Diamond & Pearl graphically, in a literal sense. Even then, Diamond & Pearl at least looked like games from the year they were released, BDSP looks like a game that woulda been released for mobile 4 years before. The only important improvement BDSP had over Diamond & Pearl is that at least they dont have performance issues, everything else is either worse (although not necessarily less enjoyable) or the same
*Definitely* wouldn't call LGP/LGE "good" sometimes I wonder which is worst between that and BD/SP. While I don't hate the idea of remakes being a thing.... as it stands I'm not complaining if the legends series just replaced them. Especially with gen 5, I don't think they can effectively remake it *(tho not for the reasons most likely think)* Conversely, I'm not sure if kanto is the best for a legends if I'm remembering the lore correctly *(not that I'm in any hurry to have ANY revisit to kanto)*
@@jayjonesrgaming I'm not sure if you were on RU-vid enough. Almost every poketuber gave the games grief and I don't recall it being popular unless MAYBE we're referring to the pokemon go crowd... *(still felt hit or miss there as well)* Granted, the games are/were beautiful but considering that there was only one "high point" I can't imagine enjoying them myself. I'll acknowledge that the concept of the "spirit of pokemon" does at least shine there. But not enough to make for/overlook the short comings
@@worthywill9294 The LGPE games were popular for the Pokemon Go crowd and for children, the demographics they were marketing toward. Not disagreeing with your opinion on the games, but I haven't been a child legally in 14 years(a child of the target demo for the game even longer) and I've never once played Pokemon Go, so take my agreement for what it's worth.
@@miaemblem8072 haha no, not Italian or speak it. Just used that clip cause I didn’t have any of my own and their’s was one of the only clips I could find that didn’t have an overlay
WTF? Why should he speak Italian even if he's Italian??? Let me explain this as simple as I can Karen. United States of America is RU-vid's main demographic. So most RU-vidrs who want to reach that audience speak American/English even if it's not their native language.
@@johndawn6951 I think you're overreacting. OP never said or suggested he "should speak Italian". He just asked if jayjonesgaming did or was Italian because he used footage from an Italian RU-vidr. Calm down.
Here's my take on it- Pokemon games were always these little indie-style pixel games on small little handhelds with not much grand scale nor complexity, to be enjoyed by all ages. However, as soon as the Switch era came about, and both home and handheld consoles merged, Pokemon, more specifically GameFreak, was suddenly expected to pump out massive, vast, AAA titles far outclassing their usual area of expertise. Which is why, since the Switch era of Pokemon started, things have not been following the usual patterns and trends as they have previously. Firstly, Let's Go Pikachu And Eevee released, which was very clearly meant to be a cash grab due to its nostalgia factor, being set in the Kanto, and its interconnectivity with Pokemon Go, which was raking in cash like nothing at the time. Excusing Pokemon Let's Go, the next mainline games to be released were Pokemon Sword and Shield, which did sell amazingly well, but were hated on by almost the entirety of the Pokemon fandom, and critics alike, for being lazy, unoriginal and boring. However, Pokemon SwSh were the first mainline games to include paid DLC, namely the Crown Tundra and Isle Of Armor. These two DLCs were actually pretty good, and GameFreak tested the waters with them, seeing if a more open style of gameplay would work well with traditional players. They then produced BDSP and Legends: Arceus, and even though both sold well, one of those games went down as among the greats, which the other was known to be particularly lazy and a carbon copy of the original. After testing the waters even further by creating fully open zones in Pokemon Legends: Arceus, GameFreak was confident enough to put out a fully open world game which was Scarlet and Violet. After Scarlet and Violet got paid DLC too, GaneFreak announced that a new game, set in past Kalos, called Pokemon Legends: Z will be released after a year of no Pokemon mainline release. This decision stood out for multiple reasons, like how they broke their pattern of releasing remakes in the order the generations were introduced, and how they always worked toward releasing 1 game a year atleast. Cont'd in comments.
My way of seeing this is that GameFreak is slowly and steadily undergoing a metamorphosis, by recruiting multiple new employees, slowly making their games more open and grander in scale, and taking large enough gaps between game releases. The break in patterns is due to them taking risks, risks which are long overdue for a franchise as big as Pokemon. To ensure quality control after the disastrous launch of Pokemon Scarlet and Violet(which are some of my favourite Pokemon games of all time, but buggy as hell), while also trying to figure out a new remake formula, much of which is talked about in the video. I frankly don't think traditional remakes are going anywhere, and it's better that they stay, but expecting more 'faithful' remakes should be something the fans must expect, as GameFreak also wants to put out games that are fresh and innovative. They had ILCA make BDSP because they wanted to give fans their traditional remakes, but also wanted to focus on a new take on those old games. I disagree with the video creator on that I do think there will be remakes that come out for Black And White, Black And White 2 and X And Y, but GameFreak might sit on those for a while until the divisive graphical fidelity of Nintendo consoles allows them to make those games. I also feel like we will revisit Johto eventually, be it a Legends game or some other way. I feel that the Legends title is more for GameFreak having new takes on older generations, focusing more on world building, but not a replacement for traditional remakes, as they can't really have newer generations missing out on classics such as those older games. Sure, they might be tricky to figure out, but knowing GameFreak, they'll find a way for sure.
TBH, I just want an anthology collection that ports the entire franchise to one console, with trading between generations EASY and straightforward. I don’t need graphical updates, half of the charm of the older games was the creativity in the sprites. IMO, Pokemon as a franchise benefits from the legacy of its catalog more than any other franchise. I love playing through different points in the franchise to see how mechanics have changed as well as endured from earlier entries. I agree with this video’s take that remakes will struggle on the grounds that Pokémon’s underlying battle mechanics have largely stabilized, meaning that there isn’t really much to “remaster”. As for BDSP, my disappointment stems from deeper than the fact that it was a 1:1 remake from a story perspective. It was also a 1:1 remake from a BUG perspective. There were numerous bugs present in BDSP from DP that were originally patched out for the release of Platinum. That’s when I knew it was actually an incredibly lazy, uninspired remake without soul, pride, or passion for craft.
Pokemon Brilliant Diamond & Shining Pearl were great remakes and i enjoyed them way more than the gen 3 remakes because they were faithful rather than being like the gen 3 remakes which were more or less like playing X & Y with a hoenn skin on it and i'm glad the gen 4 remakes didn't make me feel like i was playing Sword & Shield but in the sinnoh region......i don't plan of getting Legends Z-A because i really disliked Legends Arceus and if Z-A is anything like Arceus then i won't enjoy it either (if Legend games end up replacing faithful remakes or remakes in general then i think i'll just keep getting the new gen games only until they become as uninteresting as the anime has become since the end of gen 5's anime which doesn't seem too far off since gen 9 sucked so bad with the exception of a few things that made it just barely enjoyable enough to warrant me not selling my scarlet copy to Gamestop) as of right now my biggest hope is that gen 10 will be the next gen 4 or the next gen 5 or the next gen 6 in terms of greatness
I completely agree with you the BDSP remakes were better than the ORAS remakes because BDSP really felt like gen 4 brought to the Nintendo Switch rather than a gen 4 add-on to gen 8 and i'm glad to see that i'm not the only fan who dislikes the Pokemon Legends games in fact i still consider buying Legends Arceus to be one of the biggest wastes of money in my gaming career right next to buying the Lets Go games
@@averagebear7960 oh yeah i regrated buying Lets Go Pikachu only a few hours after starting it up FireRed & LeafGreen were way better than Lets Go Pikachu & Lets Go Eevee but even the Lets Go games weren't as bad as the majority of gen 9
15:00 Locations should get bigger in the remakes, making "each remake a larger and harder project", but GameFreak seems to be following the LoZ recipe: the new games look more and more realistic, while the 2D games & their remakes are made in the Chibi style. We might see a chibi Unova if it's ever remade.
No, the reason we got Blue is because Green was a very buggy game with ugly sprites. Blue was the 3rd version that was magazine exclusive in Japan. They just gave us that version instead of the inferior Green game.
I think there might be more…… just not at the moment. It does seem that GAMEFREAK learned their lesson and decided to slow down a bit and take their time with their projects and such.
The reason why I like Hoenn it's because it's the most "adventure" feeling Pokemon game, it's atmosphere is just so unique and it's music is so charming with it's Trumpets and French Horns mixed with some NES sounds
I think Pokemon Scarlet and Violet where poorly done because of remakes being made around the same time, if they stopped with remakes they can put more work into their next gens of Pokemon. With newer Pokemon games getting into the 3D range and being more complexes means you have to put more work into the game which takes years to do, so if they get rid of remakes they can put more work into the next gens so they don’t end up bad like Scarlet and Violet. Also I am sick and tire of the Kanto region which has been done 4 or 6 times already.
I hate gen 5, most of the designs of gen 5 where terrible I only liked 5 Pokemon out of that 150 designs, gen 5 was the worst gen in my opinion. I only liked Serperior, Galvantula, Elektross, Scolipede and Liepard the rest where bad designs. Gen 9 despite being glitchy had the best Pokemon designs, a hundred good designs, so many good designs while Gen 5 has over a hundred bad designs, a garbage bag, a chandelier, a pile of gears and a ice cream cone such bad designs for the 5th generation I did not like one bit.
Every pokemon remake was just bringing a old game into the current gen art style, maybe changing a few things then adding content. Gen 1 to 3, gen 2 to 4, gen 3 to 6. And then bdsp ruined it granted adapting that to sword and shield style probably would of been even worse. Its jsut so sad becuase the remakes are considered some of the best games ORAS and HGSS espeically
If Nintendo hired me to remake pokémon games the first thing I would do is add Steelix to the game. I would also add something similar to the mystery dungeon games as trading to evolve pokémon can sometimes go wrong like the tradee running away with your prized pokemon
I agree. The best example is that Alpha Sapphire which doesn't contain Steelix unless traded hence why I despise that game however I traded with myself to get Steelix. The part where you trade evolve pokémon is also the part where they run afterwards
Yup. While I'm not COMPLETELY convinced we won't see remakes anymore I'm not complaining if we don't and the legends series replaces them.... barring kanto *(since I'm not convinced a legends game would work if I recall the lore correctly)* Granted, in gen 5's case I'm not seeing the typical remakes for them. So either "B/W 3" (soft title) or hyper focus on a legends game
By well recieved do u mean sales or actual critics? Cuz if we being real HGSS were better recieved than ORAS A lot of people complaned bojt ORAS baceuse they didnt include the Battle Frontier and made the game way easier, they also didnt include some Emerald changes for gym leaders and didnt give them Megas
We need 1:1 remakes like BDSP because Diamond and Pearl aren't available for any current consoles. They're not made for fans of the originals, they're made for people who have never got a chance to play them and want to play them on the Switch. Also, GameFreak didn't even make BDSP themselves, they outsourced it to another game dev company. None of GameFreak's own employees worked on it.
@@cleverman383 think a good solution is to release all the old games on virtual console like how they did w R/B/Y and Crystal then keep remakes as a bit of new mixed w the old. I enjoyed BDSP, cause I love Gen 4, but I also was a little let down it didn’t get the same love Ruby and Sapphire got.
@haroldnecmann7040 It's a better execuse than the ones constantly crying over BDSP being faithful remakes. It's a diamond and pearl remakes. Not a platinum remake. So people should stop crying over it about it not having platinum contents.
Idk but having diamond and pearl have a forced run in a game, that was insanely too fast, designed for linear straight line movements killed any hope i had for that shit. Let people walk if they want to and not woth some bs where you have to barely... Barely tippy tap the stick forward to walk and if you go just a millimeter too much youre sprinting in a game that wasnt designed for it.
I disagree with your remakes don't need to be made because there is nothing to modernize take. BDSP should have used eitherSword & Shields or Lets Go Pikachu/Eevee models and style to remake the game instead of the chibi art style. However I think remakes and/or resisting old regions will always needed because they're will always be people who didn't get to experience those regions and stories when they were originally released. Like I would genuinely enjoy a Sun & Moon game in the Gen 8 or Gen 9 style for the sole purpose of playing them with my wife who didn't lile Pokémon back when the 3DS was a thing.
I think the concerns are super valid too but I’m with you. I wish we had so many more people working on Pokemon because it’s such a huge franchise and it’s so loved by so many, we should have huge teams developing and working on these remakes so they can bring the magic back
I think it really would just make far more sense to bring FRLG, HGSS, ORAS, Emerald, Platinum, BW, B2W2, XY and USUM to the current system as moreso remasters that are mechanically and visually the same games with some additional animations, a bump in resolution, better loading times, better framerate and overall small quality of life improvements generally involving making the menus easier to navigate on the current platform. Aside from that, updating the battles themselves to the current graphics as an option would also be neat. FRLG, HGSS, Emerald and Platinum having the Pokemon share many of their animations with Colosseum and Battle Revolution would also be a nice touch, I'm not sure how possible it would be to match those animations with the current models. However, the big change would be full integration of HOME so you could move your Pokemon out and IN to these games like you can the Switch games. Like obviously this would only be for Pokemon already available in these games but it would be a fantastic way to help with Pokedex completion which was really hard in Gens 3-5. The ability to move Pokemon to and from the remakes has always been the big draw to me and it would make games like FRLG or HGSS so much more replayable since you could bring in Gen 3 pokemon in early game Kanto or Gen 3 and 4 in early game Johto. Could also just add in an extra 200 per game like the DLC expansions. Pokemon has made a lot of questionable decisions over the past few years but the fact that we can move Pokemon out of Scarlet and Voilet and back into Sword and Sheild like the memory capsule feature in GSC is one of my favorite additions and I would gladly take that anyday over a national dex. With each Pokemon game trying to develop its own identity it would be just so so cool to bring over say a Buizel caught in Scarlet and use it in Black. The graphics of the GBA and DS pokemon games are timeless. The 3DS ones I think could also be upgraded to near modern visuals while still being just faithful remasters. Being able to see these regions reimagined in 3D is something that should be saved for the legends games.
Why can't we just get a Pokémon game where (in comparison to Elder Scrolls Online) you could travel to any of the known regions and catch any and all Pokémon in the planet. All while playing it online. I'd call it Pokémon World Online. Yet we never get to see this idea brought to life despite me being the only one talking about it. So far, lots of people have challenged this and say that this is bad idea. But what do you think?
Gen 5 fan had rioted at game freak for skipping unova revisit game which also could have been legends game as well. So the gen 5 fans are leaving pokemon for palworld.
@@Daemon1233the Pokémon community can be just as toxic as the Sonic and Genshin community depending on the subject if not more so at times they’re just impatient waiting for a Gen 5 remake that may or may never come me personally I don’t care for a Gen 5 remake I’ve been wanting to see Kalos again for years and the legends gameplay intrigues me far more than the main series does now especially after the mess SV was
I think you’re getting a little bit a head of yourself since Legends ZA is not a remake it’s still entirely possible that Unova remakes could come in gen 10 BDSP still sold the best of any remake so I very much think remakes are on the cards, they may go back to full on remakes rather than faithful ones but BDSP’s (undeserved) reputation isn’t stopping them alone
@@jayjonesrgaming unpopular opinion but for Black and White the “faithful remake” approach would work fine BdSp is disliked because they used the weaker version had they used Platinum as a base most people would love it, Black And White is a better game than Diamond And Pearl and doesn’t have a Grey to avoid using
It's like people forget we only get one set of remakes per console generation the next one won't be until the switch is successor and after generation 10
@@Whelp140 well I thought after BW2 there would be a RSE remake on DS in gen 5 (gen 3 and 4 had 3 sets of games so I thought 5 would to) and remember when everyone thought after Sun And Moon the next games were Diamond And Pearl remakes
Hot take but I try to think that legends Arceus is the enhanced story that goes along withBDSP. And both games are the gen 4 remakes as a hoe. I also agree that the remakes moving forward won’t look that much different from the original versions because the one moving forward are already 3-D
There will be remakes lol GF wants that cash. It's impossible to predict patterns though as noone saw AZ coming. I'm most curious if AZ will be the last game on the switch 1 until the switch 2 comes out hopefully with an open world gen 10 with no performance issues.
Thank you sir for saying it finally someones dares to say it outloud damn. If someone killed it, it's gamefreak themselves since they have reached a level where they are unable to remake using new games assets, which led them to create the legends sub series to carry on laziness path
It’s more of a question of quality really SV is the biggest selling game in the franchise but damn sure is not the best experience the series has to offer they succeeded in sales no doubt but is the lowest reviewed and heavily criticized main series game in the franchise’s history so much so for me when Gen 10 inevitably comes I won’t buy it and keep my eyes out for some spin-offs that offer something new from different developers like Pokken or another mystery dungeon game or Legends
Pokemon remakes are a way for newer fans to see older regions with fresh eyes and modern mechanics. BDSP are the latest remakes and due to me never playing Kanto Johto Hoeen or Sinnoh untill they fot remakes in 3d i still haven't played Johto but i have played the others and BDSP was fine as a fresh experience. Oh and we are most likely getting b/w remakes in gen 10 due to the whole remake the game in even numbered gen alao know as the remake a game the same gen a new one comes out that matchs that gens number. E.g. gen 2 remakes came out in gen four and gen 4 remakes came out in gen 8 that is a pattern we can follow to determine that it is too early for a new one wait a few more years for gen 10 then we shall see if I was right or wrong but i feel like irs going to be right. That being said have a good day.
What killed remakes of Pokémon games nothing because we don’t know anything about what’s happening internally we also kind of assuming that they only have one team that does things even though it’s been widely reported that they actually have several teams again we don’t know also apparently they can’t do remix, but they can do Entirely different type of games I still don’t know which is easier or harder considering they tried both. Also, this is just giving more unnecessary hype for AZ so that people will be disappointed that we don’t actually know what looks like and we only really just know by a name also, it’s kind of funny because technically the remake still basically sold more than legends and again nothing really killed remakes. If anything we still haven’t gotten a confirmation we haven’t got any interviews. They’ve never said anything about it.
BDSP have a lot of issues but the chibi art style is something I actually like. I prefer the chibi characters from Gens 1-6 over the tall, realistically proportioned overworld characters we have now. I worry the games' bad reception will stop Pokemon from ever returning to chibi characters again.
We honestly don't need remakes anymore. Gen 5 got a soft remake in the DLC, that was all we needed. No need to remake gen 7, 8, or 9. The stories are finished.
*looks at prices of the older games* We do need the old game rereleased in SOME fasion properly thou... weather it's remakes or emulation. Doubly so if they really want us all subbing to Home... oh wait using our old pokemon as ransom wear right... espcially after bank is finally closed... all those pokemon that won't be obtainalbe in there current forms in Home anymore.
@@Left4Cake I think a Pokemon Stadium 3 on the Switch 2 would be the perfect non main series Pokemon game for gen 10. Gym leader/Elite 4/Champion castle for all regions including 10, a ton of mini games, GBA and DS ports so all the old games can be played and pokemon transfered, transfer pak attachment for the switch so old cartridge games can be played to get back older Pokemon, a battle simulator to make showdown obsolete, competitive team rentals, compatible with Pokemon home, ribbons and marks earned through playing features. I may be missing some things but that would help a lot.
@@martonyomchale342 With how massively barebones Battle Revolution on Wii was, not just in comparison to Colosseum and XD(which Battle Rev is still using the majority of the models for, just with chromatic aberration and a lighting filter), but even in comparison to Stadium/2, I think the ship on a new "Stadium"-like game set sail about 15 years ago.
Nintendo is saying you folks are too entitled. BDSP did really good in Japan. But the American wanted a giant cheese burgers instead of the sushi that was given to you. Now nintendo says they will make a remake when they feel like it instead of making it for ungrateful mofos.
@@nightowl7261 being ungrateful for jew slop is how people should be. Spending full price for worthless crap. The only good thing about is that people modded it so it wouldn’t be as shit.
I don't think they skipped Gen 5. I thin Z to A is just for Lore purposes. Not really a remake. Out of all the regions, Sinnoh and Kalos has the most lore. Unova has some lore but it's nowhere near the grand scale as the other 2. Also I believe they know people are still heated about the lack of pokemon Z.
