What on Earth Happened to the Huns? 

Monty python reference?

@@miguelcamacho4595 no

Miguel Camacho I made it up myself

Did the Romans terrorize any body? Right.

And the other barbarians lol

"Ladies and Gentlemen! The Turul is an ancient image the ancient image of the Hungarians. The Turul is belong to our blood and to our soil. The Turul is the symbol of the Hungarians living today, the Hungarians who have already died and the Hungarians just to be born. The Turulbird tells us that there is only one Homeland, that can unite all the Hungarians within the Trianonborders and beyond. From the time we are born as Hungarians, our seven tribes form a blood alliance, our Saint István king establishes a state, our armies lose the battle at Mohács. The Hungarian is a worldnation. The Nationborders and the Trianonborders do not coincide, consequently millions were scattered outside of our thousand years old accommodation. We come together, we usually erect a Turul to ourselves, to find answers to questions such as who we Hungarians are, what we can do separately, and what we must do together Ladies and Gentlemen! Today is St. Mihály's Day! This is what Scripture gives us today. There was a battle in heaven: Mihály and his angels attacked the dragon. The dragon and his angels were defending, but they could not resist and there was no room for them in heaven. Mihály and his angels overthrew the great dragon, the prodigal who is the devil himself, the Satan, who seduces the whole world. His angels were pushed back to the ground and crashed together with him. We do not know the means of the fight, we do not know the circumstances of the fight, we only know the result of the fight. There was no place for Satan, because Mihály, who is love, service, and serenity, did not leave him any. I mean, any place." Orbán Viktor Mihály hungarianspectrum.wordpress.com/2012/09/30/fighting-the-devil-viktor-orbans-speech-on-st-michaels-day/ de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blut-und-Boden-Ideologie 2010-2014.kormany.hu/hu/miniszterelnokseg/miniszterelnok/beszedek-publikaciok-interjuk/az-eros-nemzetek-tagjai-osszefognak

@@orbanfurer-bg6me Delirium tremens!!!

Collin Buckman They’re hellenized and then Turkified I guess, but video about that topic would be awesome!

Ancient Anatolians could refer to a large variety of groups. Hittites however were Aryan (White) people from Europe (Danube region) who carved an empire for themselves in Anatolia.

@Ricardo Milos Aryans broadly refers to bronze age Indo-europeans, and also refers to Proto-Iranics. Both of these groups were ethnically White/European.

Hittites are Turkified in Anatolia...

They Hitt-ite and quit-ite that''s what happened.

Hippity hoppity you're Atilla's property.

Huns were the typical incel Hapas of today. Kind of like Elliot Rodgers.

@@KD--kj6zs how do you figure? They were amazing warriors and actually spent time outside lol

@abhishek roy False. India and China both benefitted greatly from contact with Europeans. Europeans uplifted the world out of savagery. India wouldn't even be industrialized without European colonization. Also, India and China had nothing, and still have nothing to be jealous of.

@@KD--kj6zs white powa ✊

*Masaman

This kid is very Pseudoscientific

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NgFlN6DmFyo.html

@Indian Streetshietters Mulan may not be east asian but turkic people. Because it happens in the era when northen China are occupied by turkic and mongol people.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-js7mx3EgiDU.html

MUSIC KA ENDGAME last time I was this early atilla wasn’t even a hun yet

@@sebziez Attila was the first king of the Hungarians .. 100% Attila is a Hungarian. take your research!!

Janos Nemeth I know? Maybe this will make it better: last time I was this early Attila wasn’t born yey

Janos Nemeth no he was a Turk and before you say look at the name the Europeans said that they were huns as a slur but the Magyars started calling them selves as huns

@@janosnemeth4793 a what garian? A HUNgarian? 😂

just like Mongols

just like Napoleon and Alexander the Great

@@xXxSkyViperxXx The empires that didn't fell quickly were the ottoman empire , the romans and the colonial empires I think . Anyone else ?

Dont have sons lol they all think theyre the best

@@stormbringer2840 Egypt...

They are called white huns

Separate of hunnu kingdom is start of the 2 huns one invaded europe and one stayed in central asia Huns were actually mongolians

@@platobear4488 It's a little unfair to say they were mongolians though? Even if ruled by Turkic-Mongol dynasties a majority of the nomadic peoples present in the borders were actually caucasoid

@@kareemnj6248 there proof of it in ancient digs , but the majority were mongoloid people admixed like today eastern europe is more mongolian than europeans except from black sea in a straight line to the Atlantic France , up from that line just Mongolian related people Mediterraneans the pure Aryan European

​@@robertolang9684 Europeans are not Aryans at all.stop spreading bulshit.yes they carry R1A1 heplogroup but it doesn't mean they are Aaryan.

hahaha

Good one 😆

Regina Redding source or gtfo.

M'yagar!

@@kknives36 There are none. Gentically they have no proofs at all usually and linguisticly they usually have two arguments. First they will claim that Summerian and Turcic languages are both agglutinative. This of course does not proof any relation as agglutinative features evolve and devolve independently all around the world. The second argument is often that there are thousands of words of similar meaning with similar sounding. But usually they can only provida a dozen examples which are often not even real. Source: I had far to many discussions with people like him. They are not worth your time, unless you are locked up in a room and have no other activity.

LOL!

Sicambria Arpad dynasty had hunnic origin

@@papazataklaattiranimam yes and Avars also melted into HUNgarians. The name Magyar comes from one of the tribes (Megyer or Magyar) that arrived to the Carpathian basin in the late 9th century. So the descendants of the Huns today live in HUNgary and the Caucasus.

Sicambria sorry but the huns were defeated hundreds of years before Hungarians came to Hungary. After the huns came the avars. They were deafeted as well. Then the arpads? Don’t know the name. when the Hungarians arrived there were still descendants of avars a life. But no huns

@@stolzerpfalzer768 Hungarians/Magyars weren't (isn't) a unified nation. The 7 tribes that arrived to the Carpathian basin had closer-further kinship with each other as well as the Hungarians-Avars-Huns. Like another example of the Transsilvanian Saxons. They originally came from today's Netherlands. They weren't exactly Saxons not entirely Germans but they were close related to Germans so over the centuries they became Germans. If a tribe is defeated and/or their state/empire collapses that doesn not mean that they simply disappear. When Árpád's united tribes moved in to the Carpathian basin they were like "welcomed" by the Avars and they together began to build up the principality.

Cossack == Kazakh (Kazakhstan)

The Cossacks originally were a military class from the Ruthenian part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, mostly dominated by the Ruthenian Orthodox (aka Ukrainian) people and organized by the Orthodox Ruthenian nobility. There's some speculation as to how they started, with the most probable possibilities being either that they were remnants of the Orthodox Cuman resistance(which was quite fierce, but not well-documented in English) against the Golden Horde or simply the border guard against the Tatar raids, during the colonization of the depopulated by the Mongol invasion Central and Eastern Rus lands, which was organized by the Ruthenian Orthodox nobility from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The first official organization of the Cossacks - the Zaporozian Sich, was established by a Ruthenian magnate Dmytro Vyshnevetsky. Also, the Russian Cossacks, originating from Don, are famous as the cavalarymen. The Ukrainian Cossacks were mostly seafarers and infantrymen.

Abane Reizei this is a wonderful writeup, thank you! My Great-great-grandfather was a Cossack cavalryman who moved to US in the late 1800s - apparently on vacation, and he just never left 😂 I’ve looked up a good bit but it’s been difficult to tell whether they’re a separate people group or not. Many thanks brother

@@brandonfisher2350 No problem, bro. But honestly, it's best to just read up some articles(maybe watch vids) or books (with good historical sources or good researches linked and not some made up bs) about such stuff than to ask someone on the RU-vid, as you'll quite often get quite a biased/nationalistic opinion on topic. Alas, the best I can recommend to you for info in English language about the Cossacks is to read Wikipedia, as I'm not big on sources.

Abane Reizei right - understood and agreed. I’ve read a few actual Russian govt sources and all sorts of other things. I’d just still like to see a breakdown from someone who knows how to research better than me. Especially when dealing with genetics.

The Huns were Monglians. Please tell the Turkish people to stop claiming them.

@@jamiljama3904 How so? Just by saying this you don't prove a point. Asian Huns were a confederation of many nomadic tribes in the area while European Huns started as Turkic and eventually mixed with Uralic and Germanic people. Just by the name of the European Hun Khans you can see they spoke a Turkic language, Atilla being Etilli in todays Turkish and Monjuk (Atilla's Father) means "Bead" and still the same meaning in Turkmen/Azeri/Kazakh or any other Turkic language (Turkish form is Bonjuk). European Hun's origin story is also similiar to the Grey Wolf mythology of the Turkic people were they seek refugee in the Altai mountains as they are surrounded by enemies on 4 sides, and goes on.

@@atillayilmaz8411 it's really unlikely two races of people called themselves the Exact same name

@@karllsonberglund8161 Hun is not a race, its an empire. Just like how Holy Roman Empire inherited it's name from the Roman Empire, European Huns inherited their names from the Great Asian Huns. Mongolians are really few people even to this day, they had 1 great empire that ruled the word for less than a century but thats it. After that some of them either become Chinese in the East or Turkic in the West due to Turks always being more populated in the steppes. Also that statement is wrong in another way too. Today when you say Albania you probably refer to the Balkan country that is called Albania in English, but hundreds of years before a completely unrelated people group called Albanians lived in the Caucasus.

@@atillayilmaz8411 do you know the Xiongnu? Yeah in Mongolian they are called "HUNNU ULUS" which means Hunnic Empire In the 1st to 10th Century Mongolian really blows the Cover And Hunnu Means Multiple Man or A lot of people in Mongolian Which is what the Huns are Many different ethnicities of People in a Confederation So that means the Huns have origins in Mongolia or they use Mongolian or something Similar or their Nobles are Mongols

"….the first saint in the world whose identity has been confirmed by archaeogenetic research." The full article titled :' Saint László is more Asian than most of our kings' can be found on the Institute of Hungarian Research's website. If you want to stay on the science site not following only theories, read the article titled: 'The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians' Might as well forget the Habsburg created Finno-ugric origin bullshit. :)

jokegajr 5 Medes closest descendands as of today are Kurds and Azeris. Idk exactly about the Sumerians but I think todays Iraqi Arab Population are genetically close 👍🏽

@@user1596 Sumerians are gone. They asimilated by babils,arabs and etc.

Let me tell you as turkish civilian *Sumerian = Turks*

because pannonian basin is the place where almost all of nomadic tribes who came to europe settled, at first sarmatians and scythians, then avars and bulgars, then eventually magyars, ancestors of modern hungarians

@@libriosquare Ummm..... Magyar is the name of the modern Hungarians in Hungarian. I hope you know that.

@tovarishcheleonora8542 which is also name used for Hungarian nomadic tribes before the establishment of Feudal Kingdom of Hungary

@@libriosquare My point is that was that you said it as if Magyar and Hungarian were two different group of people when it's just the translation of each other. And it was just one of the 7 tribes, where the tribe you refering to was actually called Megyer. And these are the names of all the 7: Nyék, Megyer, Kürtgyarmat, Tarján, Jenő, Kér, Keszi. (Yes, we Hungarians learn the names of the 7 tribes in history class when we learn about how our country were created.)

Attila, Csaba and Zsolt are still very common male surnames in Hungarian cultural areas in the Carpathian basin.

My mother was half Szekely and half Magyar.

True.

Because the huns were a mixture of Hungarian Turkey and Kazakh people

People of Hungary are not ethnically Hun. You're white and that's ok man. Nothing wrong with being of white European ancestry.

@@Shinobi33 nothing wrong with having Siberian ancestory either.

@@sara_s_ no of course not. Beautiful peoples with a rich cultures and histories. I just feel today many white people try and pass off as another race or try to accentuate a possible distant exotic ancestry because they feel guilty of who they are. There is nothing wrong with being who you really and where your people came from. Which includes those white European ancestry

@Benjamin Mellin I get what you're saying. But the language came from the Huns not the race. Be proud of being white. Nothing wrong with that. I'm proud of my Spanish and African heritage

OMG you should learn more about the huns. They were not barbaric people going against civilization. They had very high knowledge, were more civilized than most people around them . Sadly there is so many wrong information out there. Like in this video. The magyars did NOT come from the north and they WERE hunic related . In the carpatian base there was always a core population related to huns. This population was pulsing between the west and east. You can call them Avars, Magyars , European Huns, Asian Huns or Santa Cause, they were the same people, same family if you like. During the time and during the long distances they may have mixed with others or had some changes but still they were carrying the same ancient gene, culture. And magyars are NOT finno-ugoric origin.

​@@letsspeakhungarian6626 Some pretty strong revisionist folktale history there. The Huns were documented by Romans and Goths alike to be unspeakably savage and irreligious. The Mongols gained a similar reputation 700 years later, along with their notable administrative, cultural, and legal accomplishments that stand out in history. You missed the part in the video where they addressed this with DNA evidence. The Franks and Romans annihilated most of the Avar successor presence in the Balkans. Magyar DNA is not the same; Hunnic does present as a Turkic language or at least some type of Altaic, with Germanic names in some leaders. Not saying that steppe or any neighboring peoples don't mix. But the Slavs, Goths/Cumans, Iranic Bulgars (that we know were not originally Turkic from DNA testing) all joined the Greeks, Dacians, Illyrians in the Balkans for hundreds of years before the Magyars, with a distinct language and Uralic DNA, began making incursions into the area. The Magyars did not have the same reputation as the Huns and I don't know why you would want them to. They were seen as highly effective lightning horse nomad raiders that kept much of Eastern and Southern Europe guessing for decades. The movements of the hybrid Gepids are much better documented as are the latter movements of the eastern White Huns leading up to the Magyar invasions as well.

Very good analogy Flynn.All eastern invaders were a conglomerate of different ethnicities from their empire.

By the way, onogur does not mean ten arrows, on = ten, in turn our ogur no Turkish language into.

@@attila3231 he said ancient turkic not turkish. Btw on means ten in turkic languages including the turkish

Arrows are OK. From beginning. Ogur or Oguz...r/z

@@merketarif126 The six arrows in Turkish (Altı Ok)

:D

Ripping this from a dude on Masman's reddit- Basically the Huns weren't Xiongnu. Nor were they Uralic Magyar. It's kind of like how the Mongols conquered the Tartars, and the Europeans confused the Mongols for Tartars because there were several Tartar levies in the Genghis Khan's armies. Only in this case the Europeans confused the Huns for Magyars and the Chinese confused them for Xiongnu. The Huns were an Avesto-Tokharian people, who conquered the Steppe Xiongnu and later several of the proto-Magyar Uralic peoples, and incorporated members of both groups into their armies. Unlike the Magyars however, the Xiongnu lost their homelands before the Hunnic Empire collapsed, and once it did they were unable to find a new homeland. This resulted them in being assimilated by groups such as the various Tunguskics, Mongols, Manchu, Mandarins, Hui, Uralics and so on. They disappeared swiftly as an independent peoplegroup after Attila died. Conversely, we know for a fact that the Bulgars subsumed the Western Huns and there were several hybrid Hunno-Bulgar kingdoms for a while, the Khuni/Chuni Huns were eventually intermarried with Turkic peoples to birth the Kumyks in the kingdom of Djidan about 300 years later, and the rest were subsumed by the Khazar Kaghanate. Basically,the main way you can distinguish between the three groups is that the Magyar still exist as an unadultured culture and peoplegroup in the modern era, Hunnic culture still exists but only as part of hybrid traditions amongst the Bulgarians and Kumyks, while the Xiongnu only exist as genetic predecessors, with their culture being almost entirely wiped out.

@P Ciprian Unlawful claim = establishin a 1000 year old country, before the first "lawful" vlach set foot in the region in the 12th century. Magyars denying Hun relationship = more than 800 years of tradition of brotherhood with an extinct ethnicity, that is still alive today.

@@raguelelnaqum Xiongnu was a tribal confederation. Lots of its tribes like "Tujue"(Turks) stayed there and lived under either Chinese or Xianbei domination.

@@RandomGuy-df1oy Yeah, but many such groups were both tribal confederations and ethnic identities. See the Wampanoag, which started out as a cofederated polity of disparate tribes but eventually became a term for a unified ethnic identity as well

Genetic studies also show that Hungarians are descendants of the Huns. Among the ancestors of the Hungarians are Sarmatians, Onogurs, Sabers ... Scythians

@Revi Revi SIMP

NATIVE BALLKAN PEOPLE, OR TODAY ALBANIANS

They were black and middle eastern people who later became Italians

@@bigsouth010 THEY HAVE SOME TIES WITH THE ITALIANS BUT THEY WARE NOT BLACK OF middle eastern,THEY ARE WHITE PEOPLE,

Art Channel Albanians aren’t Illyrian

An Albanian lie

Well, technically, Indo-European people came from around the Caucasus (in theory) which can give a lot of chance for Asian influence. But if you talk about modern germans that's a whole different thing and means nothing.

Atilla was KYRGYZ. Atilla from Altay Siberia (in old day Enesey Kyrgyz land) and we are now live in central Asia Kyrgyz Republic. Our kyrgyz language in 99% similar with Altay language, we are one nation

thus many independent Germanic and Slavic countries today besides Germany and Russia

"….the first saint in the world whose identity has been confirmed by archaeogenetic research." The full article titled :' Saint László is more Asian than most of our kings' can be found on the Institute of Hungarian Research's website. If you want to stay on the science site not following only theories, read the article titled: 'The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians' Might as well forget the Habsburg created Finno-ugric origin bullshit. :)

Hello there. Hungarian here. Admiteddly I am no Székely expert but perhaps I can answer a few of your questions. What would you like to know?

@P Ciprian Wow, ever thing you said today is totál gibberish. Nice job. Székely appear is sources only in the 11-12th century (centuries after the Magyars were already settled down, an farming). They were either Avars, Kabars, Magyars all of the above or nőne of them. Hungarian = Magyar + Székely.

Maybe a late but, most of the mongols converted to islam and got turkified

@@mehmetomer8614 loved how this comment came out from a Türk

@@abdulazizbature2615 Mongol or Türk, It doesn't matter. Your race is not gonna be asked in the Judgement day 👍

@@mehmetomer8614 I know, may Allah have mercy on us all

@@abdulazizbature2615 Amin Brother.

To defeat! The huns!!

@@alex-fs9yt Did they send me daughters, when I asked for sons?

@@spongebobsquarepants4137 You're the saddest bunch I've ever met.

🎼🎶🎵But you can bet before we're through.... Mister, I'll make a man out of you🎶🎵

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-js7mx3EgiDU.html

In what language is Onogur in 10 arrow? On-ogur on-10 in Turkish, ogur has no interpretation in Turkish. Josephus Flavius azt is írja: „Magóg és Hunor népei az áradás óta itt vannak. Területük Spanyolországtól a Tanais (Don) folyóig húzódott. Magog megalapította az ő nevű magarjait, amelyeket a görögök szkítáknak neveznek. ”Ennek az ősi rokonságnak a tényét hangsúlyozza az a tény is, hogy az etruszkok, mielőtt a mai Közép-Olaszország területére (Umbria, Toszkána) költöztek volna, a Kárpát-medencében, a Duna-Balkánon éltek.

@@attila3231 as far as I know, ogur means tribe/people or arrow as a metaphor for a tribe

Yea, there's zero proof that the Arpad dynasty is descended from Attila.

@@maximus3160 Hungarian is a Uralic language though? Huns we’re Uralic?

@@maximus3160 and Bulger-Magyar tribes spoke the same language it was only when the bulgars were enslaved by Slavic tribes Bulgarians aren’t even Slavs hungarians and Bulgarians share 95% of dna

Hopefully they get sent to the middle east. The chinese know how to deal with muslims.

@Gerd Wiesler they preserve it. Try visit them

本田盾子 I’m happy China got affected by the Corona virus

@Class Consciousness fuck the west more like it

@@ulverup sorry we will spread if we want to fucktard

"….the first saint in the world whose identity has been confirmed by archaeogenetic research." The full article titled :' Saint László is more Asian than most of our kings' can be found on the Institute of Hungarian Research's website. If you want to stay on the science site not following only theories, read the article titled: 'The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians' Might as well forget the Habsburg created Finno-ugric origin bullshit. :)

🤣🤣🤠🤠🤣🤣..gurjar are pure huns..rajput gurjaro ke olad hai..words by rajput ithehaskar thakur yaspal singh rajput

Ah thanks for the info. I thought they were just synonyms.

Tans...

taigs for Roman Catholic

So the Hungarians are huns.

@@panzerofthelake506 polish are poles.

@@VenturaIT thanks

The Xiongnu is a political power, Hu is the best name for him

@@tbh15241ss Your point being.....?

@Ron Lewenberg Khazars could be discussed even when their group is ambiguous.

Ostrobothnian 99 Long live Oghur tribes

The Bulgars (also Bulghars, Bulgari, Bolgars, Bolghars, Bolgari,[1] Proto-Bulgarians[2]) were Turkic semi-nomadic warrior tribes that flourished in the Pontic-Caspian steppe and the Volga region during the 7th century. Emerging as nomadic equestrians in the Volga-Ural region, according to some researchers their roots can be traced to Central Asia.[3] During their westward migration across the Eurasian steppe the Bulgars absorbed other ethnic groups and cultural influences, including Hunnic and Indo-European peoples.[4][5][6][7][8][9] Modern genetic research on Central Asian Turkic people and ethnic groups related to the Bulgars points to an affiliation with Western Eurasian populations.[9][10][11] The Bulgars spoke a Turkic language, i.e. Bulgar language of Oghuric branch.[12] They preserved the military titles, organization and customs of Eurasian steppes,[13] as well as pagan shamanism and belief in the sky deity Tangra.[14] The Bulgars became semi-sedentary during the 7th century in the Pontic-Caspian steppe, establishing the polity of Old Great Bulgaria c. 635, which was absorbed by the Khazar Empire in 668 AD. In c. 679, Khan Asparukh conquered Scythia Minor, opening access to Moesia, and established the First Bulgarian Empire, where the Bulgars became a political and military elite. They merged subsequently with established Byzantine populations,[15][16] as well as with previously settled Slavic tribes, and were eventually Slavicized, thus forming the ancestors of modern Bulgarians.[17] The remaining Pontic Bulgars migrated in the 7th century to the Volga River, where they founded the Volga Bulgaria; they preserved their identity well into the 13th century.[12] The Volga Tatars and Chuvash people claim to be originated from the Volga Bulgars.

The Bulgarians think the Bulgars were a Balkan people who spoke a slavic language.

Well thanks to the ottomans we may never know how wrong you are. As in this video there are some deeds given to the slavs that either did not happen or are largely misinterpreted. Their conquest at the hands of the Huns adding to their ranks are largely exaggerated where as the Bulgarians who actually warred alongside them are almost always never mentioned. The youngest of Atila's sons Irnik/Ermak actually inherited the Bulgarians to rule over. This opens the way to few misconceptions. The slavs and the Bulgarians just to humor the most popular theory aren't one and the same but slavs are credited as coming to the Balkans earlier despite some Bulgarian feats. The Romans themselves mention Bulgarians in the IIc. A certain individual speaks about losing the land and that Moesia(northen Bulgaria) belongs to the Bulgarians. Misionis rex Vulgares. However Paisii Hilendarski father of modern Bulgaria wrote a book and used references from other books and texts that the otomans had yet to burn when he calls out the Bulgarian people originally Slavonic who fathered and left the slavic branch in their pursuit to the ancestral land. The second misconception is the title of Khan. In St. Parkersburg there is an original copy from the 8-th c. of the Bulgarian Rulers and it begins with Kanas Avitohol who ruled from about 145 AD. and continues with Atila's son Irnik from the Dulos clan in the mid 5-th c. That same clan is attributed with creating Bulgaria in 681. but in that treaty the Romans recognize the enlargement of Asparuh's Bulgaria not it's creation. Every name that ruled over in Bulgaria has had the title kanas (Княз) no khans (Ханове) or anything of the like. almost all of the names in that list are iranic Kubrat his son Asparuh and his whole lineage including. Also in what world would you believe that Asparuh and his tribe numbering around 10 000 women, children and old folk included would beet a profesional Roman army numbering between 40 and 60 000 men a battle ready fleet and a very determined emperor? Obvously the local slavonic farmers further aded to his ranks and the romanized Thracians helped him but why would they do that? A large portion of our DNA can be traced to the Pontic steps that is correct. Paisii Hilendarski wrote that in the mid 18c that among the many ethnicities that formed Bulgaria was from the Cimerian tribes aka modern Crimea. those Bulgarians who claim to be decendent from Volga Bulgaria are from at least three oblasti (areas/states) with Tatarstan and Chuvashia the most vocal among them. Unfortunately they are a minority there and can not over rule the majority that are Tatars who themselves want a free tatar state in which they can rule themselves in.

Kazakh also a Kipchak/Cuman nation

@@tasbykekerey1203 I know

​@@tasbykekerey1203kipchaks and cumans are Turks

Yup turkic

Atilla was KYRGYZ. Atilla from Altay Siberia (in old days Enesey Kyrgyz land) and we are now live in central Asia Kyrgyz Republic. Our kyrgyz language in 99% similar with Altay language, we are one nation

Could be. The whole world mixed itself. That's why racism is stupid.

@@brianticas7671 , there is no pure race on the world , every nation is mixed with an other in some way.

it is hungary

My ex boyfriend who was Romanian was convinced that the romany gypsies could have been descendants from the Huns, but ye never know. It would be interesting tho' to see a video about the origins of the romany gypsies ...🤔

@@mcgarrtirishgal3903 …Ye never know indeed!!! The Romany are a fascinating people and culture for sure! And if one day it were possible to compile genetic data them, see if there is in fact any remnants of Eur-Asian DNA among them.✌️🤘👍🔥😎

Сашкó long live Iranic peoples and Iranic nomads

Attila the Hun 😂🤣😂🤣 F** off kiddo

Atilla was KYRGYZ. Atilla from Altay Siberia (in old days Enesey Kyrgyz land) and we are now live in central Asia Kyrgyz Republic. Our kyrgyz language in 99% similar with Altay language, we are one nation

Longback some where I read that Rajputs are their descendants?

@@muzeebhussain5707 yes they are.

@@muzeebhussain5707 no they are probably jats

Jats, gujjar and rajputs

​@@Raghucr7not rajputs most probably huns and scithians are jats and gujjars.

ı am from turkey central anatolia north cappadokia and I am related to the Ottoman dynasty.but if you look at my type i'm central asian.we Turks have a large DNA

@@yargocebeturkmen3633 That's pretty cool. The area of/around Turkey, the Turkic(ish) people and their history, culture and genetics definitely fascinate me. I'm just regular old vanilla European American with a few teaspoons of Native American lol. Have you been to Gobekli Tepe? That has definitely been an interesting development.

@@Blalack77 I couldn't go because of the pandemic I was going to go with friends in 2020.We want you to come and see.you stay with us

Do you mean most Europeans descend partially of Huns?

I don’t think I referred to any kind of conclusion of change of demographics.

@@anonymous_a Because you talked about Herritage

I meant Huns being a cultural heritage to Turks

Baghatur Tarkhan Hungarians are not turks and was never. Don’t claim everything to the turks, or you are not better than a nationalist. And btw, if we hungarians had ever something to do with you guys, its over, since the Ottoman Empire wanted conquer all of Hungary, but couldn’t handle the “magyar faszagyerekek” ;)

Baghatur Tarkhan We would have made them kneel down, if basically the whole world was not against us. Search Matthias Corvinus, in Europe at the time Hungary had the biggest and most modern army. And show much more respect to us like 2. Mehmed did to the hungarian King Matthias:” Amongst the worlds princes, only me and him are worthy for the regal name.”

@@idiebeforeiquit not much point to get angry - the world is uneducated.

Atilla was KYRGYZ. Atilla from Altay Siberia (in old days Enesey Kyrgyz land) and we are now live in central Asia Kyrgyz Republic. Our kyrgyz language in 99% similar with Altay language, we are one nation

@@idiebeforeiquit What about Stephan the Big of Moldavia.He destroid Matthias army.