What Really is the Heart of Christianity? 

Don't forget about regeneration because it's integral to the Gospel. Anyone who hasn't experienced and/or doesn't believe in regeneration is someone who doesn't believe in the resurrection and what it means (1 Corinthians 15, 2 Corinthians 5:17, Titus 3:5, 1 Peter 1:23, Ephesians 2:1-2 etc). ROMANS 6, 1 JOHN 3, ACTS 26:18!!

Wow this is a massive return! How did you do it please. Can you explain, I’m in dire need of solutions to my problems my rent is almost due and we’ve been living off loans and nothing moves exactly the way we planned. I’ll be glad if you respond thanks.

Well *Ms Maria Luisa Abrams* has been guiding me through the digital sphere. I’ve been able to pay off my car loan and give back to the community with her help honestly it’s been a game changer

I know her! She is an expert and a licensed broker, she is accountable and has all the skills needed to ensure that your investments yield positive results. Her name really rings a bell guys, I saw the first comment and I just knew there could be no other person than her

YES!!! That's exactly her name so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her from Brisbane Australia 🇦🇺

I'm surprised that this name is being mentioned here, I stumbled upon one of his clients testimony on news last week.

They're just repeating tradition and what famous preachers say. Acts 26:18 is essentially the Gospel. Someone saved FROM sin (Matthew 1:21) and truly born anew/born of the Spirit (born of God: John 1:12-13) is a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17) in a new spiritual kingdom although still on earth. Remaining in your sin while having a head belief in facts is not a "gospel". I believed in all the facts as a lost RC and was still in darkness.

What are you talking about? What are they adding or taking away?

@@alienschmaliens Watch the video. The very beginning of the video starts with the concept of "The creed" (scriptures) is the least of what the bible is, but there is more to the bible/scriptures than that. Both Alicia and that guy agreed on that point. The implication of there "being more" to the scriptures, which is not yet there, means that "more has to be added". This goes against what the scriptures say and it goes against the FINISHED work of Jesus on the cross. There is nothing to add and there is nothing to take away. There are no more prophesies to make (adding to), because all prophecies have already been made during the Old and New Testaments. There have also been no more nature defying miracles (eg raising people from the dead) since the Apostolic times. Today, we have God's providence, but no nature defying miracles like Jesus performed, which He did for the very specific purpose of showing the Jews and Gentiles that He was the Son of God. Today we are to believe in FAITH, not charletons performing false miracles. If we still needed miracles to be performed to believe, then FAITH would not be required. So, Jesus's crucifixion, resurrection and ascendance is a FINISHED work. There is nothing to add or take away. Hence, the warning in Revelations against adding to and taking away from scriptures. Revelations also articulates the consequences if anyone does this, which is what Alicia and this other bloke is suggesting is okay. It's not. This is a slippery slope, because as I said, it deifies humans (they become their own little god's by adding whatever they want to the scriptures) and it humanises God, (bringing Him down to our sinful level). It's blatant blasphemy. It is self idolatry, the only unforgiveable sin. "You shall have no other gods, but me". The video opens with this very suggestion and later in the video Alicia says "yes, I have also thought that there is more to the bible (creed), but not less ~ paraphrasing Alicia. This means she is against taking away from scriptures, but she is okay with adding to the scriptures. This implies that God never did a good enough job, so we as humans need to give God some help to make up for His deficiencies. How arrogant.

The Bible is Satan's book.

@@alienschmaliensall of you are taking an allegory ( gal 4.24) as literal and so deceive yourself! The name of God forever is I AM ( exodus 3.14).. name in scripture means nature, character! So to take away or add to the name I AM is to take it in vain! To say I AM sick .. is to say God is sick which is not reality! But you will experience what you believe about I AM ( you)

@@terrypaul7706 "The Father loves the Son and has given everything into His hand. He who trusts in the Son has eternal life." "yet you have neglected the weightier matters of Torah--justice and mercy and faithfulness." "To the pure all things are pure; but to those who are defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure. Both their mind and conscience are defiled. They claim to know God but their deeds deny Him."

do you have sources that say it's made up? because we *do* have sources that say Jesus was a real historical figure who claimed to be God, we *do* have sources that say he was put to death and buried, and we *do* have sources that say dozens or even hundreds of people claimed to ha e seen him in person, alive and well, *after* he had been put to death. soooo it seems pretty historically implausible that people just made it up.