The other top ten players said they were most afraid of Federer and Nadal out of the big three, because Federer just takes the racquet out of your hands, and Nadal runs you into the ground. They said, “at least Djokovic lets you play”.
nah most ruthless was nadal on clay handing out bagels to top 5/10 players. Monte Carlo 2010 is an example (fewest games dropped on a masters 1000 title)
@@TennisAddict99 it’s Roger in Basel. This was everyone that faced him with an exception of a handful of players. Again, this was not a match that needed this much of a hype title.
I wouldnt say this is ruthless, some of fed backhand is not deep enough plus he play quite safely compared to when he played nadal in miami and indian wells or wawrinka in one of these final.
@@MikeAG333 6-1 6-3 is most ruthless? and did i talk about score? or did i say "play quite safely" and "backhand not deep"? which one did you not comprehend?
@@haikalizzuddin4033 Obviously English isn't your first language. And obviously manners are a weakness of yours too.........along with punctuation. "Ruthlessnes" does not imply perfection.
@@MikeAG333 getting personal are we? Talking about manners from someone who dont have manners themselves. Haha. Get a life. Stick to the topic, fed have won at least 30% with score 63 63 or lower. So which one is "most" you so called 'english 1st language speaker'?
Fedsqaush had lots of success with b players and b tournaments where he won 50% of his titles on the 250/500 circuit..When it came to nadal/djoki over is career he only won 33% of their GS matches which includes GS finals!! 33% is complete failure!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed on his supposed best surface grass 3 times in a row to djoki Wimbledon finals.. Fed has a weak backhand, was weak mentally and didn't have tennis smarts. But FEDsqaush did sell lot so running shoes!!
