Thank you! What joy to watch, his strokes, creativity and ballet of movement, even ignoring results of who won. Roger’s game and greatness will never be duplicated. He gives more joy to watch above everyone. We all, given the choice, would choose to play like him over anyone else. LOL some of us actually do try. But to make a living or win majors everyone with lesser mortal skills and talent must use two hands, a western grip, and large lightweight powerful more forgiving racquets with polyester strings. Grand slam records will be broken again and again as careers get longer, but nobody will ever play like Roger while dominating. Long live the king, who will always hold and own the court, the entire court (not just the baseline 😀).
Ce mec est une catastrophe. Il fait qq bons trucs les 6 premiers jeux, du coup il se voit faire jeu égal et se frustre dès que les 1 ères fautes arrivent. Il se croit meilleur qu’il n’est, de là vient sa frustration.
Fedsqaush had lot of success with B players and B tournamnets where he won 50% of his titles!! His GS record agaisnt his 2 biggest rivals nadal/djoki is only 33% winning rate!! That is complete failure and he only won 33% of their GS final meetings too!! Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed 3 times in a row at wimbledon finals to djoki on his supposed best surface grass !! Fed was over marketed to all the armchair tennis players who gobbled it up but popularity is not a sport that is for the pageantry section on youtube
@@canski5646so its Federer fault that he is more marketable? More charismatic?more screen presence?attracts audience more?more loved by the audience? Did anybody stopped other two from being that?? Why are you getting jealous if Federer is people's champion and more popular?
i do appreciate the commentators saying " Oh, come on ! " as a true expression of disbelief. Federer - greatest athlete of the 21st century. it is not just tennis ...
Roger seemed, to have some curse put on him, he had this choking problem, for years, but Wimbledon 2019, was the most tragic of all, this is why, his GOAT status will always be questioned, Sampras never would have lost from that position, God obviously was angry with something Federer did, to reward Novak with the victory.
Federer won multiple slams without losing a set. Novak failed to do it. Everyone got toyed against Roger’s peak. Roger would have toyed with even the grass dominated wood racquets era with his classic and timeless style game and grips. Novak and Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Novak and Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90😂 yes ofc 😍 I love Federer hé is à god not human . I have poster in my room you know and even if hé kill my familly i Will always love him ❤❤
Nadal TOYED with Fed at Roland Garros. He made Fed look like dummy, and denied him GOAT status by blocking him, in his prime, from achieving a calendar-year Grand Slam.. Then again, clay was Fed's Achilles heel: He won only 5 of 38 red-clay Masters tournaments entered.
Roger toyed and bagelled Nadal 6-0 frequently, including 2007 to end Nads 81 match clay streak. Any era would have been weak against Roger’s peak, even grass dominated wood racquets era with his classic and timeless style game and grips. Federer could take his game and beat the best even in this era. Novak and Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Novak and Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90 Nadal overall dominated Fed on red clay. While Fed once won a match at the minor tournament Hamburg was (known for freak winners due to the effect of North Sea salt on the playing surface), it doesn't take away from the fact that Nadal beat Fed regularly at the tournament that matters: Roland Garros. Particularly humiliating was Nadal's beating of Fed in the 2008 Roland Garros final: 6-1, 6-3, 6-0. That was followed by Nadal beating Fed in the 2008 Wimbledon final, thus beating Fed on his best surface during Fed's prime. That amounted to dethroning Fed as Nadal became #1 ranked. Finally, in 2009 Nadal beat Fed on hardcourt in the AO final, reducing Fed to a crying wimp at the awards ceremony.😂 With that AO triumph Nadal 'de facto' ended Fed's prime.
@@danbotez1307 Nadal is lucky girls and women like Chris Everett and Monica Seles showed him to grunt hard and use two hands. And weak juniors showed him to use a western grip. And racquet and string technology to make Tennis playable for Nadal’s lesser skills. Federer could take his classic game, grips, strokes and all court skills and beat the best in any era, even the distant past which has to be included in the phrase “greatest of ALL Time”. Nadal would not have been able to make a living playing with western grips, mediocre serves and volley using heavy wood racquets, gut strings on predominantly fast grass and fast hard courts surfaces. Nadal’s lesser mortal skills require two hands, extra grunting, western grip, the lighter, bigger, more forgiving more powerful racquets, polyester strings, and slower courts.
@@Prostaff90 An H2H wining record of 24-15 of Nadal vs. Fed, including 8-6 on outdoor hardcourt, is not due to luck, but to overall domination. I know it hurts Fed's groupies that Nadal denied Fed GOAT status, but that is the unvarnished truth.
