"What's 1x1?" Terrence Howard Interview | Chris Vernon Show 

Always said that empire and hustle and flow were a continuation 🔥

Terence Howard is one of a kind I believe he's a genius. And he made a lot of sense to me. People always say people who are different are crazy. People who are different see the light they are chosen. Thank you Terrence Howard For sharing your knowledge.

When your basics are faulty... You laugh at truth

Chris u the Man ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Great interview

Terrance is such a great guy. Loved Hustle and Flow, that movie changed my life

I love this podcast. The fundamentals to love of life.

They've coded our mind to only Remember and Repeat...if you wish to break free, you'll need to exit their code. Mr. Howard is speaking an ancient language.

Terrence's Mistake in a Mathematical Concept: Imagine you have a penny, which is just a single coin. If someone asks you how much one penny times another penny is, it might sound a bit strange because we usually don't multiply money this way. But let's explore this idea together! Multiplication: The Grouping Concept Multiplication is like making groups of things. For example, if you have 1 box and put 1 penny in it, you still have just 1 penny. It doesn't magically double! So, if you multiply 1 by 1 penny, you're not really making more pennies. You still have just that 1 penny, not 2. Note: we said 1 x 1 penny AND NOT 1 penny x 1 penny Understanding Units When we talk about multiplying things, we also have to think about what they are (their units). For example, if you multiply 1 inch by 1 inch, you get 1 square inch, which is a measure of area. This makes sense because inches measure length, and when you multiply them, you're finding out how much space something covers. But what about our pennies? Pennies are money, not lengths or areas. So, if you try to multiply a penny by a penny, you end up with something called "penny squared," which doesn't make sense in real life. There's no such thing as a "penny squared" in your piggy bank or wallet. Adding vs. Multiplying When you have two pennies, you simply add them together to know you have 2 pennies in total. This is adding, not multiplying. Adding is when you put things together to see how much you have in total. Bringing It All Together So, when we talk about 1 penny multiplied by 1 penny, it's likely a mistake to think about it in this way. When you're saying 1 penny x 1 penny, what you're talking about is having 1 group of 1 penny. It's important to remember that this still equals just 1 penny. It doesn't magically turn into 2 pennies just because we used multiplication. Multiplication helps us understand how many things we have in groups, but it doesn't change the amount when we're talking about... 1 group of 1. To clarify, the correct way to think about and write the concept of 1 penny x 1 penny is to see it as 1 group times 1 penny, or simply 1 x 1 penny. The real question multiplication helps answer is: How many groups of pennies do you have? This is what multiplication is truly about. Understanding multiplication in this way helps us see that it's a method for organizing and counting things in groups, rather than changing the nature or amount of what we have. This distinction is crucial in avoiding confusion and ensuring that we apply mathematical concepts correctly in real-world situations. Remember, in mathematics, clarity and precision in how we express and interpret concepts are key. By refining our understanding of multiplication and the units involved, we can avoid misconceptions and build a more accurate picture of the math at work in our daily lives. Money and Math When it comes to money, like pennies, we usually talk about adding them together to find out how much we have. If we have 10 boxes and each box has 10 pennies, that's 10 times 10 pennies, which means 100 pennies in total because we have 10 groups of 10. It's the same with just 1 penny; 1 group of 1 penny is still just 1 penny. Conclusion So, remember, multiplication is about groups and how many things are in those groups. We can't multiply pennies and get more pennies out of nowhere. And when we're talking about units like inches or pennies, we need to think about what those units mean and how they work in real life. I hope this helps clear things up! Multiplication and units can be tricky, but once you understand how they work, it makes a lot more sense. ------------------------------- ZERO: Understanding multiplication involves recognizing it as a method for combining multiple groups of the same size. The concepts of 1 and 0 play essential roles in this process, each serving a unique purpose that is integral to mathematical operations at all levels. The Role of 1 in Multiplication The number 1 is the identity element for multiplication. This means that when you multiply any number by 1, the result is the number itself. This property doesn't diminish the value of 1 in multiplication; instead, it provides a fundamental basis that ensures consistency across mathematical operations. When you multiply a number by 1, you're essentially saying you have one group of that number. Far from being irrelevant, this operation is crucial for maintaining the integrity of mathematical principles. The Role of 0 in Multiplication Similarly, 0 plays a critical role in multiplication. Multiplying any number by 0 gives a result of 0. This reflects the concept that if you have zero groups of something, you end up with nothing. This isn't a sign that 0 'doesn’t multiply' but rather that it applies the rule of having nothing in a consistent and predictable way across all numbers. The existence of this rule makes mathematical operations reliable and understandable, enabling us to build more complex equations and solve more intricate problems. Why "True Multiplication" Includes 1 and 0 The idea of "true multiplication" only starting at 2 disregards the foundational roles that 1 and 0 play in the broader framework of mathematics. Every number, including 1 and 0, has a place in multiplication because they help us understand and organize the world in a consistent manner. To exclude 1 and 0 from multiplication or to give their interactions with other numbers different terms would not only complicate mathematical education but also undermine the coherence and simplicity of mathematics itself. Conclusion In mathematics, clarity, consistency, and universality are key. The rules for 1 and 0 in multiplication provide us with a stable foundation from which we can explore and understand more complex concepts. These numbers allow us to express and solve problems accurately, whether we're dealing with the theoretical underpinnings of mathematics or applying math to real-world situations. Therefore, rather than being excluded or renamed, the roles of 1 and 0 should be embraced for the critical functions they serve within the realm of multiplication.

Im so annoyed right now because I got click baited into this Terrance Howard video sometime earlier this week, and now I am stuck in a section of youtube with 0x1 people that know how multiplication works.

Terrence 100%

Much Respect to you Mr. HOWARD. I proposed this same idea to a mayoral candidate years ago. HE said he was extremely interested in my idea, and he would call me, but never called. I was even willing to donate my own personal equipment for the children's development. I've since moved out of that city. Most inner city legislation is not interested in truly helping out troubled youth. SMH

I would love to watch a Terrence Howard show full of educational content.

Thank You Terence , Greeting from Poland :)

Wow! Howard is very patient! 😂 Not surprised he ran away!

This is absolutely awesome I have been watching his work. The work is so locked in convention revolutionary ideas that can alter the very fabric of reality are shit down. This guy is a genius.

Why be afraid to challenge your own thinking/reasoning? I welcome this type of dialog, whether I understand it or not. I would keep digging and searching, and learning.

Terrence unironically seems like a fun guy to be around

i hope he has the strength to get through his inner demons empaths have it hard man

Absolutely on point brother

Mang, great to be here mang

Hustle and flow is my favorite movie

I've always known that Cardi is smarter than what ppl have been giving her credit for..Cardi will be doing fine I do believe 2024 will be her year..everybody gotta go thru their pain first before they get back up..this pain will bring out the best of her later

He was good in Electric Dreams TOO!

That's so funny, 1x1, i used to look at that when learning math, and over the years, my gut was like, what?! Lol

I love hero 6 that's one of me and favorite Disney movies❤❤❤

Those that KNOW you don’t have to TELL.. Those you have to TELL won’t LISTEN 💯

I’m here in Memphis Tennessee as well. Thank you very much Terrence for sharing your perception in knowledge I am very like-minded And agree with your theories, and also have a few things I could possibly add or enlighten on with you.. thank you very much

You're so smart Pal . 👏👏👏👏

I wouldnt even attempt to debunk 1 X 1 = 2. Terrence wants and needs this attention. I was a math tutor and still am. I have many kids passing around these weird math trivia. One was, " So 3/3 = 1, 2/2 = 1, 1/1 = 1; so hence 0/0 =1? to create a world of conflict. Some people love to have others scratch their heads. This is case with Terence in my opinion watching him perform, He is a performer!

Terrence Howard 🙌🏼🔥 keep unveiling the True Nature of existence

A honest man need to be honest like the sun needs to sine the dishes man will trustly sell but honor he has none tarrence Howard thanks for speaking the truth the wold need more people like you I alsow know about the tree of life lots of Knowles

Pure Genius...

You rock.. I'm learning so much

Howard is much more interesting than the characters he's had to play. A true intellectual.

So 1 line multiplied by 1 line gets you the square, the plan. If you divide 1:1=1 to the power 0. That is a point, you can also reduce the line to a point. Any number at the power 0 is one, so you can reduce any number to 1 point.

If someone would have told me this in second grade, I may have liked Math more instead of history; AND the Kaleidoscope obsession as a kid!!! This was on point!!! Nice.

When he said “I can fix it” i really pictured a solution being created or rebirthed.

There is only one equation being demonstrated in this interview: narcissism x vast ignorance = psychosis

Salute🏆 Peace ✨ Power⚡ and Prosperity👑 Thanks for letting me in the club in Atlanta years ago I told you I was going to be a Music Producer and I now Have my Bachelor's in Audio Production. You have always been real and a great person Salute God 💯🎆👑 I told you thanks for doing hustle and flow when I caught you coming up the stairs at the club I had my laptop in my hand making beats if you don't remember. 🎆

The flower of life starts from a single circle at the centre of the symbol, meaning life from a single circle from creation onward

Gorgeous man

I neva fell in love at the “the ater” Lol bless this god but hood etiquette (I needed auto spell to get that) way better then fancy etikit.

If you type that equation into your calculators, you will ping yourself to the government and will be added to a list of people to have your memories wiped!!

Here’s them problem in his logic imo. In much simpler terms than anyone else I’ve seen comment. The square root of 2 is 1.4etc. Meaning if you take 1.4etc and add .4etc of 1.4etc to 1.4etc you will get 2. Now when you cube 1.4etc, first you are taking 1.4etc and multiplying it by 1.4etc like I did before equaling 2 and then multiplying by 1.4etc again. Making the operation 2x1.4etc giving you 2.8etc now when you do what he told the other person to do you are simply multiplying 1.4etc x2 which is the exact operation you are performing in the set of operations he told the first person to do. Meaning he told them to do the exact same thing but made it convoluted enough that they didn’t realize they were performing the exact same operations and leaving them baffled as if they witnessed some flaw in basic mathematics. Someone who believes he is right please enlighten me.

i like to think in new ways especially when trying to understand reality, and as mad as this all sounds it has made me think. (dont read this high) When thinking of multiplication as grouping, I'm aware that the equation of 1 apple multiplied by 1 is 1(1(apple)) , which in reality is not actually just 1 apple.. In this case the apple is a subject (of which there is 1) and the other 1 is a mathematical concept just as much as 0 and infinity.. it is separate to the 1 apple, or subject. So now when contrarily thinking about 1 apple multiplied by 1 apple - not 1 group of 1 apple - i can imagine how these two circumstances are completely separate cases in terms of reality/energy. increasing 1 apple by 1 apple shouldn't essentially remove the energy of either apple, and this is different to having 1 set of 1 apple. Our actual concept of 1 multiplied by itself and not an external subject should then also create a greater version of itself. Visually, 2 of something expanding by 2 of themselves would appear as 4 of those things together, 3 by 3 would appear as 9, and 1 expanding by 1 would appear as 2 (like if my iphone increased by one of itself it would look like a malformed double iphone). If so could the true 0 multiplied by the true 0 possibly equal 1, or in less mathematical terms "something"? Especially as its apparent that our concept of 0 is equally as small and large as infinity. What does this kind of unimaginable reaction cause outside of our comprehension? I believe that mathematics is our minds true language, and terminology can cause a lot of confusion. I think there's a fundamental difference between thinking of multiplication as creating baskets/groups, and thinking of multiplication as accumulation - or increasing - of the self/subject. There are things science/religion may never be able to explain - like how in our reality at some point something had to come from nothing - So i'm open to exploring possibilities and new ways of thinking like this that could help to explain these unknowns in our understanding. Thanks for reading my ted talks, I could be crazy or a genius.

Sir , I wish to tell you a little of what I have found in my studies since ending my 33 year career in and upon the Sea Bering crew engineer captain owner. I was interested in Law and started down that rabbit hole as after listening to you , you did the same with math and I find the flower of life most interesting and you are a wise man sir , and dedicated to your pursuit and seem to be selfless in sharing now you said you patented your work and that is wise sir as most are selfish , I comprehend fully that we all must be to be able to help others . What I found disturbs me and last year in June I wrote 2 affidavits and had them notarized ( notary public sits higher upon the judicial chain of command than the 2 lower court justices) 1 proclamation of Emancipation of legal and legal entity upon the grounds that ownership of legal (fake contractual law , note lower case) it is secret as was with the birth certificate legal entity unknowing by the parents or guardian signing that document pledges the baby legal entity , prior th 1938 you are born Law est. Free .

Yes, Terrence… come on with that Union!! You have the power… don’t need permission!!!

This Man Is Genius!!! The flower of life is Created By Frequencies. IF you take a small Bluetooth and set a metal round Pizza pan on top of it, then sprinkle salt all over the pan, turn a frequency on over the Bluetooth, the salt will begin to rearrange it's form into the the flower of Life... its very satisfying to watch different frequencies and how they can change things from the inside out and the outside in..

I pretty much dig everything my dude says, and I really respect and am inspired by everything he is doing- however my perspective on the whole 1x0 thing [because no one asked for it;] - I learned multiplications by teaching myself that it asks a question: "what's inside ___ groups of some number"? You might have been taught this way also. So, it obviously goes like this 2X3 = 2 groups of 3 (of something) = 6 things total in these groups. 1x1 = 1 group of 1 (something). getting to the point 1x0 = 1 group of nothing means no group- so yeah it sounds like a trick question so we rewrite it to sound more logical; 0x1 = 0 groups of 1 (aka what's inside of zero groups of 1) = still sounding like a trick question but it still tells you that basically you already know that there is either "nothing there" [but since "nothing" doesn't exist] or its "saying you did not create a group". Basically, it's a question that should not be asked. Or it's a rhetorical question at best. But the world likes to see complete patterns "everything must be included" so 0x1 must be included in the times table. But why ask the question? It's like asking "if I stand still- how fast did I run- or how far did I go"? Again "nothing" doesn't exist. Nothing would be an oxymoron to the concept of existence itself. 0 is basically no more than a place holder for mental constructs - or as mentioned before, it represents the absence of action/creation/manifestation; "you created 0 groups of one or 1 group of 0". It's still a statement being made, equivalent to "at the start of the timer til the end, you did not take any action". zero represents everything that was not done. Which in the case it's almost a synonym for infinity; because there will always be an infinite number of things that does not happen. If at the fork in the road, you go left, well you did not go right. Thus, "not going right" is represented as 0

A group is more than to put several things together that are similar

Of course 1x1 is one. One times a unit of one is... one. I.e I want one time of a unit of a crate of milk, so I get one crate. If I want two times a crate of milk, I get 2 crates...

if you have 2 apples once you have 2 apples. 2 apple twice you have 4 apple, that's simple and satisfied bro. 1 apple once you have One apple still. 1 apple 4 times you have 4 apples

Anybody else here after seein Terrance Howard interview wit the wig on 😅

Every movie Hes in He them my favorites but I love to hear him talk Physics, Math and Reason 😱🤯 Am I Crazy or is the Calculator Broke? 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Multiplication is about adding a "group of". For example 1x1. The #1 here before the multiplication sign is the multiplicand and the #1 after is the multiplier. So 1x1 means there's only one group of 1 here so there's nothing to add here. That's why the answer is 1. 1x2=1+1=2 means there's two group of 1 here. Remember multiplication is adding a "group of".

24:11 🧠 1x1 Equation Begins

I’d like to see a third grader with a reaction video showing all the ways Terrance might comprehend 1x1

I would love to be in some conversations with this man

18:00 EXACTLY

As he talks about hustle and flow, describing, is white magic, it’s real, it’s truth, it’s life. If you enjoy movies, this movie is inspiring. If you aren’t inspired and if you haven’t done similar to try and get what you want out of life, you aren’t doing it correctly.

Also I would like to say . A number multiplied by the same number equals that number squared. Speaking on a specific instance.

How many times do you see the letter T in the name Terrence? One. T x T= T? Think on this. Why would T x T even be an equation when it is a simple observation? Observations of singularity, are not equations if there are no other variables to observe. If we are multiplying as a means of rapid calculation, T x T = TT or T to the 2nd power. Does everything else in the world work not this way? $1x$1= $2. $2x$2=$4. In 2x1=2. This is the point where "how many times does 2 appear" become a valid question. As the observation is no longer of singularity. It is of multiples. However, this is still a matter of perspective because where 2x3=6, we are not asking how many times can we observe 2, or 3. We are asking what is 2 when we multiply it 3 times and vice versa. We are calculating, we are not observing. Calculations are the product of multiple data sets to construct a unified, applicable, and expedient result, or in the case of mathematics, a singular solution to a complex problem, wherein the complexity of the problem contains several observable data. It is only the perspective of an observer to ask how many times has it observed an occurrence. An observation of several repeat occurrences can be made without arithmetic. Arithmetic however, cannot occur without an observation of several components, or several observations over time of singular components. As such, calculating several observations over time even where they may be repeat occurrences, is called tracking, which is used for statistics in a previous or current application. Statistics naturally provides an aggregation, average or mean of data points. This does not imply uniformity. Conversely, calculating a single observation of several phenomena or variables is fundamentally what constitutes a solution to what is now an organized equation. So 1 x 1 is multiplication. Multiplication is a method of finding a singular result or product of....any observable, multiple variables. Multiplication is not, how many times do we observe an occurrence. That is called division because it is an action of separating a variable in an equation containing multiple variables. Even our division is wrong at a fundamental level. Humans have an uncanny ability to complicate simple observations. They are so intelligent, that they are predictably stupid....read that again. Humans are predictably stupid. Which is why they are conditioned to believe multiplying one with another one....gives them one, instead of another one. This is incredibly bizarre that an entire species accepts this. My question is, why are humans always readily defensive of information that is not intrinsic unto them, yet impartial to their own intuition. That is quite an inverted way to have an experience.

Dear Mr. Sound Mixer, the host is blasting way above Mr. Howrd. Great show, else-wise.

So if 1x1=2 than 1÷1=0. So any number multiplied by 1 is not multiplication but addition. And dividing by 1 is subtraction.

The story about Hotel Chateau Mon Mon, is such a Cold pimping life!! Trick that was just, absolutely the funniest story I’ve ever heard!!

9:57 now I’m curious at this part not about what the interview or follow up with… I want to know what the first page script said verbatim.

Is any one how i can contact him , or try call and talk for few minuts? I think i know what he is missing in his approch.

18:09 YES❤

The point is, the math we have works but it's incomplete. Mathematics is not congruent with the laws of motion and relativity. Creative minds have been debating for centuries to unite these three disciplines. The fact we can't interstellar travel is based on our understanding of the universe and mathematical principles of space travel. This will require precision that we don't have currently with the system.

Shoulda known a strange story was coming when he said he was going to get breakfast on Sunset lol😅

I like his spiritual energy. Logically his concept not sound. Even if you want to change the definitions in math, you have to test its consistency. 1x1=2 fails.

Terrance you are spot on it! As a young girl, learning multiplication was a challenge for me because I couldn’t get past 1x1 =1 , I would say two, or 0x1 = 0 🧐🤔, but I was always corrected. So I shyed away from Math as a whole. I also, practiced using both hands because my brother was a lefty, and practiced using his right hand and was a self taught Artist, painting from site. Thanks for confirming what I always Knew Inside!👍🏼❤️😁 Keep Exposing the TRUTH! This is Your Time to SHINE Thanks❤️

OK, so 2X2 is 2 then. This only occurs with 1X1. 2X2 is 4 and 3x3 is 9, 4X4 16. It is expanding. We agree that multiplication is exaggerated/shorter version of addition. Or is 3x3 =6. Please explain. 1X1 is 2 if you add or multiply right. The same is true if you do 2x2. It's 4 whether you add or multiply. Is that what he is saying although he does not talk investigate 2. But once you get to 3, then 3X3 is 9 and it cannot be 6 if you decide to add the two numbers. But if you do 3X3X3 which is what 3X3 means it is 27.

#1x1=2 Thank you, Terrence Howard.

1 TIMES ANY NUMBER, IS ITSELF. pretty simple to understand. He says 1x1 fails to satisfy the term "multiply. Multiply means obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times. Obtain from (1) another that contains the fist number (1) a specified number of times (1). one 1 is 1...

1x1=1 Let's talk it

1 group of 1 apple gives… 1 apple in total. I think. Let me just check my work here. Oh yep, still equals 1 😂

if you have 1 ink pen and need to multiply it by 1 more ink pen, ur adding an inkpen to the 1st.- therefore it would equal 2 Inkpens.

I think this is why I was on the Deans list in JC till I took a math class… 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️💯

Watching Terence makes me think of 3rd body problem.

How can 1 x 1 = 1. If you have 1 of sum thing; U simply have 1. It’s impossible to “times sumthing” by itself ; you have to multiply it by sumthing else. This thinking is soooo profound. . .

“You will find the rest of my work in the Flat Earth section of the library “

Any maths major knows what he's talking about. In your 1st year, your teacher shud let u know that 1=0 if u give it no context. What Terrance is talking about is context, not numbers, because thats what maths is. He is saying that people mismatch the context and get misleading numbers E.g 0.25 dollars x 0.25 dollars = 0.0625 dollars.... but (25 cents) x (25 cents) = 625 cents = 6.25 dollars . This example illustrates the context of the decimal in relation to 0.25 dollars VS 25 cents. Since the contradiction is: 25*25 cents ≠ 0.25*0.25 dollars; 25 cents = 0.25 dollars

I love your scarf

Never thought Howard would be blowing my mind on some math ish🤯🤯

0 cannot exist. 0 represents the void. In nature there is no void. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

how come when I go to the shop with 1 trolley and I put 1 item in it ... I only have 1 item in my trolley ... shouldn't there be 2 items in my trolley if ... 1 x 1 = 2

So if I go 1mph for 1 hr(1mi/hr x 1hr), how far have I gone? 1 x 1 = 1 AND (mi/hr) x (hr) = miles. So if you go 1 mi/hr for 1 hr, you have gone a distance of 1 mile in that time. If you turn on your faucet and put a pitcher underneath and it's flowing 1 L/min of water for 1 min, you will have a volume of 1L in that pitcher. L/min × min = L.

Did this get edited?

New math Square root 2 = 1.4142135623 1.4142135623 X to the third 3rd Power = 2.28427121746190 Now divided by 2 Hit Equal now Cube it again hit x to the 3 yeah Do You See that Loop? Yeah that's saying X Cub is equal to 2x which is equal to x + x that's an Unnatural Equation that's a Mathematical Fallacy that's the "beginning of your math" that's how I invented tangential flight.

10:23 and also birth of you turning another major chapter whatever that means my good sir

The real War Machine in Ironman.

x³ = 2x Divide both sides by x: x² = 2 x = ±√2 Wow, Terrence has discovered 3rd grade algebra, what a genius 😂😂😂

I think the question here is can 1 penny be considered a group in any way? Thats where different perspectives seem to come into play.

Its math in motion(in space, in creation), not linear math.

Hes sayin the world is a stage!

FACTS 💯😇🙏🏽👑💝

I would pay to be listening to Howard speak, a true genius

I think he’s mistaking 1 x 1 with 1 + 1. 1 item + 1 item means that you have 2 items which have been put together. 1 x 1 means that you have 1 item which grows to the amount of the other item. 1 item grows to the amount of 1 which equals 1. 10 items grow to the amount of 10 which equals 100 100 items grows to the amount of 100 which equals 10,000 With addition you have 2 items in the equation being added into eachother. 5 + 5 = 10 With multiplication you have 1 item which is growing by the other number in the equation by that many times. 5 x 5 = 25 Tho 0 is still an annoying number for me because if you have 1 item which grows by 0 times then you still have the 1 item. It only works if you say that you have 0 items which grow 1 times then you still have 0 items. Math is interesting and just because it’s old doesn’t mean that we have it all figured out. We need to keep testing out our obvious assumptions and never get complacent. There’s always something we’re missing and always something more to learn. We don’t know everything within the universe yet. ✌️😊

26:52 Pick it up here: "Because somebody programed that lie in there." 🎤 Terrence Howard (He's unveiling a critical portion of the truth, which is prophesied to set us free.)