I like Highways what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Seismosaurus grew bigger than that . Since you said the biggest LIVING THING u prob don't mean biggest in volume so a seismosaurus might not be as BIG and a blue whale in VOLUME but it's bigger in length and height. So blue whale is not the biggest ANIMAL in history ok.
Most massive living animal, that would have been more accurate, as it is unknown how many extinct fossilized species have yet to be discovered... sitting on the ocean floor or other places we have not had access to.
Actually the Blue Whale is referred to as the largest ANIMAL on earth not the largest organism.But I can see that a majority of people believe that the blue whale is the largest organism,so I thank you for clearing that up. :-)
Might as well call it Monster world. The new movies are just like b grade monster movies. They have nothing to do with dinosaurs. The velociraptors have become Pokemon. Owen Grady is Ash Ketchum
@@KingofKran It was never really about accuracy or having dinosaurs come back, as they never were actual real dinosaurs or accurate, it was all an illusion.
The whole goal of this video is just to keep you watching as long as possible for that tasty add revenue. This video could have been 30 seconds long, there is so much irrelevant information just to fill time. Also no one ever claimed the Blue Whale is the "largest thing to ever live" it is the largest animal, you did not debunk anything you nubs.
To be fair Godzilla's size has actually varied in adaptation, it's supposedly only 40m in the original movie. As for Jurassic World, clearly that Mosasaur was genetically engineered to be that huge for much the same reason they created Indominus Rex. Blue Whale is still the largest animal to ever live on Earth unless 1 counts Coral the same way they count those Fungi & Trees.
04:15 Debunked need to be debunked here: Aside from semiaquatic dinosaurs like members of the Spinosauridae family and halszkaraptor, there are no known marine or fully aquatic dinosaurs. Ichthyosaurus is a marine reptile.
6 MYTHS ABOUT THE HUMAN BODY... DEBUNKED! Just how unique are your fingerprints? Appendix’s purpose? Why aren’t we totally human? How do we really taste things? Plus a couple more myths and misconceptions you thought were true! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-atmaFsb11rg.html
This video is misleading. The Blue Whale is the largest known animal period. But if you expand the criteria to all living things, then it’s not much because you have those clone forests that are made of one single connected entity. In fact, the fungus and the aspen forest might not be the largest either. Bamboo (grass), for example, also live in this form. In the past before modern human expansions, there were reported bamboo forests in China that grew across mountains that were actually a single connected living entity. If you start counting those in the “living things” category, then we would not know which particular forest in the past had been the largest living thing in the history of Earth.
Agreed @warset - the title is a semantics trick (I immediately thought it was discussing animals), and if you do include non-animals then its not the largest living thing EVER - there was no theorizing about about how big these organisms could have gotten in the past, or what other organisms could have been even bigger.
This comment section is making me lose all faith in humanity. "Plants aren't living beings" "Mosasaurus is bigger than a blue whale" "Dinosaurs are bigger" JFC people, never reproduce
I know man, just because it was in a movie doesn’t mean it’s real. I think it’s silly how people trust Hollywood movies more than actual scientific discoveries and palaeontology
Or the fungus if you consider mushrooms are on the animal side (opisthokonts) of eukariots. Plants and seaweeds belong to the other big group (archaeplastids) with a totally different cell structure and metabolism.
Wait wait... did you say "What was the largest dinosaur to swim in our oceans?" *backs video up to **04:15* Yes. Yes you did. The answer is "Trick question! There were no aquatic dinosaurs! All dinosaurs walked on land. There were aquatic reptiles, and other reptiles that could fly or glide, but none of them are actually dinosaurs."
There might have been semi-aquatic dinosaurs though, like the Spinosaur. But yes, of course ichtyosaurs are not dinosaurs. I had to undo my like because of this.
tl;dr: video puts reptiles and shit in thumbnail and says blue whale isn't the largest living thing, but then proceeds to show how the only things bigger than blue whale are fungi and trees.
@@RedBlue4you they aren't animals, and i've never heard anyone believe that the blue whale is the largest living organism. The thumbnail was obviously meant to make the viewer believe it was about the blue whale not being the largest animal ever
1. How do you modify something to be way bigger than the biggest animal? 2. Feeding such a beast would cost a lot and it would be better to have more actual sized sea creatures than one giant one. I bet if they had a realistic mosa, a megalodon, other plesiosaurs etc they would profit more than with a single giant mosa.
A huge park on an island based on recreating dinosaurs... And you think the food would be a problem? Like, it's fiction, they probably know how to make synthetic meat or animals that are ready for butchering in days.
@@damnsonwheredyoufindthis.3830 we're talking about a movie that features a bald, t-rex sized velociraptor raptor that that can hide itself from predator vision. and you think size alone is too unrealistic....lol for reference to how difficult it is to hide from predator vision, your average flir camera will easily highlight a low powered mobile device while its in sleep mode, from ambient.
The longest indeed was 33,85m. But it wasn’t the largest. Size is measured in volume, thus in kilograms. And that was indeed the 190 tonnes female whale of 27,6m
This entire channel is based on the "gotcha" premise of taking the commonly understood sense of a question, redefining (or "properly defining") the terms, and then explaining why you are wrong. Example: Q. What's the deepest point on Earth? A: Oh, you thought it was the Challenger Deep ocean trench. No, that's just the deepest naturally occurring point on the surface. The deepest point is *THE CENTER OF THE EARTH'S CORE!*
DesertScorpionKSA yeah this felt a little bit clickbait, it is obviously the super fungi and large aspen conglomerations are a whole lot bigger than any animal, but the idea is that the blue whale is the largest animal, not largest living creature
@@sambradley9091 I know. It's click bait because most people are thinking animal. Everyone knows that a giant redwood is bigger than any animal. It was waste of my time. And, yes, I know that a giant redwood still isn't the largest living thing.
@@bjorncattell-ravdal2992 the title matches the content just fine, you just didn't get what you wanted, assuming you even knew what that was. Just because you didn't like it doesn't make it clickbait.
@@toxic_shr00m Right, so? :D you want to debate that your binomial nomenclature "twist" means that those two families are related, or are you merely being a little smartass? ;) Pick your battles wisely pal. You're gonna lose that "discussion".
@@toxic_shr00m quick Google search. www.google.com/search?q=are+marine+reptiles+dinosaurs&oq=are+marine+reptiles+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3.5270j0j4&client=ms-android-huawei&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 "dinosaurs had neither wings nor flippers." that settles it, plus... Everyone knows that fact. At least everyone who's interested in the matter. So no, marine reptiles were NOT dinosaurs.
@@CedricDelany Microraptor had feathered wings. Yi qi had wings like a bat. Both were dinosaurs, so some dinosaurs did have wings. But you're right that no dinosaurs had flippers. Mosasaurs were quite unrelated to dinosaurs, having evolved from lizards. Plesiosaurs are more closely related to dinosaurs than to mosasaurs, but they weren't dinosaurs either. As yet, we still don't know where ichthyosaurs fit into the reptilian family tree but, again, they definitely were not dinosaurs.
@RxbelBro were talking about the possibilities of structures. You can't be that large because you'd be crushed. You're never gonna get a land animal big enough to top the whale, because their structure couldn't hold it together. Hence why the only thing bigger are fungi/trees.
I would have been satisfied with the largest animal on land or water but he goes out of his way to frame it like hes about to explain something most people dont know but, I knew literally everything he said already and thats not impressive. Of course the the blue whale isnt the largest organism of all time, who the hell actually thought it was? But yeah OrbitSloth is right too, no reason to insult the guy, just offer criticism if you dont like it
I love how colonizers cut down entire forests with trees as big or maybe bigger the those Sequoias. Even on the east coast we had giant cedars. They also over fished rivers that had salmon the size of a cow. Destroying turtle island since the got here. Imagine how old they must've been.... The trees n the fish.
Yes but in that JP movie they stated that they messed with the DNA of some of the dinos to make them more impressive for tourists. So the big guy in the tank is that big probably on purpose.
Siobhan Bradley You seriously white knighting Amy Schumer? What a low thing to do. Listen if she’s so underweight why does she joke about her weight and size? And also being overweight? Do you have the wrong celeb?
The Mosasaur in Jurassic World was genetically engineered and modified, so that's the reason why it's so large. InGen used genetic modification to super-duper the Mosasaur.
Well, the movie is fictional. The featherless dinosaurs, and other ancient animals, places and incidents either are products of the film maker's imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons, or Archosaurs, living or extinct, is entirely coincidental.
Well, according to Jurrasic Park lore, the scientists purposely changed certain parts of the dinosaurs' characteristics to make them "bigger, with more teeth, and a lot more frightening" in order to appeal to an already decreasing amount of audience. That's why the mosasaur was grotesquely huge in the film.
@@Steyurgal Well, the smartphone is an amazing invention but now that we have it, almost nobody ever thinks much of it. I noticed that no matter how amazing or revolutionary a new kind of technology or a new kind of attraction are made, people will start taking it for granted or become bored of it. I think the same will happen with dinosaurs. There'll be a dinosaur craze at first when the first Jurassic Parks open but after a while people won't see them as something special anymore. I know my analogy with the smartphone isn't that good of an analogy but I just wanted to point out that even the most amazing human achievements like building a computer that fits in your hand, or recreating prehistoric lifeforms, people gradually lose interest or they don't appreciate them anymore.
What happened to this hellscape of a comment section, it's either 9 year-old children making your mom jokes or people who think they have debunked the video even though they watched it for 13 seconds then commented about how the Mosasaur in the thumbnail was wrong even though it only represented the one from Jurassic World and was later shown to be only around 18 meters.
Not really there was an icthyosaur that is WAY bigger found in the uk, but they have only found fragments of the jaw so they're not sure how big they actually were but the recreated size was like 130 feet and like same weight as blue whale maybe bigger.
Interesting video, but I think most people can agree that this idea refers specifically to animals, found the video a little bit pedantic by taking all organisms into account
I don't know what you are complaining about, he answered for the largest living animal as well as for the largest living organism (which, by the way, is the title of the video), why aren't you happy with that ?
Not to nitpick, but dinosaurs were almost exclusively terrestrial. Marine reptiles weren't dinosaurs. However, it looks like one of the largest carnivorous dinosaurs, Spinosaurus, was actually aquatic, so that's pretty cool!
