Actually it verbally placed him under arrest, that Actually qualifies for technical arrest even more than cuffing while saying detained. Legally it deprived him of his rights under color of law the second it ordered him something under threat of arrest without legal authority, but it actually told him he was under arrest and to turn around while getting its cuffs and even though it folded nearly instantly when it's bluff threat was called, it actually did initiate the process of arrest and he was momentarily under arrest even though it was false and should have been filed on. We've recovered a significant amount of settlements regarding false arrest that didn't ultimately result in beibg cuffed or actually moved while in custody for various reasons such as bluff called or superiors intervening or getting what they wanted etc. The words alone are how majority of arrests and detentions are conducted as most people don't resist and comply to some degree if only upon actual threat being issued etc.
Post office .....USPS website = ""requests for filming and still photography on postal service premises"" ,,, = all news media MUST make a request via the local public affairs and communications representative ,,,,, for personal use = NO IMAGES OF post office employees, customers, security cameras, the cover of mail (names adresses))..... Our right to free speech and our right to film ""in public"" means in a TRADITIONAL public forum = sidewalks, streets, public parks, plazas etc , outdoor public areas, that is where our rights are protected by the first amendment, NOT inside a building owned by the government, state, county, city, town..............""To date, there is no U.S. Supreme Court case establishing a right to film public officials engaged in carrying out their official duties or a right to film inside public buildings, cases in which U.S. Courts of Appeals have recognized a “right to record” concerns one category of public employees (police officers) engaged in one type of activity (carrying out public duties) in one type of area (traditional public forums).""..... UNC School of Government Nov 2022,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,""public building"" , and ""public property"" are literally and legally property/buildings owned by the government/state/county/city/town, and they have the right to enforce their own regulations in/on their property in exactly the same manner as the owners of private property...........CASE LAW ......."The First Amendment does not give citizens the right to exercise free speech rights on any government property at any time. “The State, no less than a private owner of property, has power to preserve the property under its control for the use to which it is lawfully dedicated.”,,,,, Adderley v. State of Florida, 385 US 39, 47 (1967)............""[T]he FirstAmendment does not guarantee access to property simply because it is owned or controlled by the government.”,,,,United States Postal Service v. Greenburgh Civic Association, 453 US 114, 129 (1981).........That means that ""public buildings"" , and ""public property"" have the same rights as the owners of private property, they can enforce regulations without violating anyone's rights, ""no shirt, no shoes, no service"" , there does not have to be a law or statute which states that shoes and shirts are mandatory, the owners, building managers have every right to apply and enforce restrictions on their property, including "no filming"......Anyone can be trespassed from any property by the owner or manager of the property/building , ""auditors"" often claim that they cannot be trespassed from a ""public building" or "public property"" without having committed a crime , this is total BS, they are trying to intimidate employees and police by lying and threatening retaliation by prosecuting ,,,, there does NOT have to be a crime to trespass someone , there does NOT have to be a sign saying private access, authorized personnel only etc , anyone can be verbally informed that an area is restricted, and that is legally binding and has the same value as a sign.,,,,,,,copying videos and repeating lies for clickbait and rambling , talking without knowing the law or what you're saying just proves what a pointless activity you have chose,n ,,,,,, defending and supporting criminals and liars for clickbait ....
Grandma did not get arrested that day. You need to watch the full videos from the original source. You’ve done that a few times lately. Not trying to criticize you or this channel because I like it, but you may want to check into each incident a little more thoroughly. Lies don’t help even if it meant to do good
THE HOST IS BEING DISENGENUOUS WHEN HE ASKS THE VIEWERS TO LET HIM KNOW IN THE COMMENTS WHETHER THE COPS WERE RIGHT OR WRONG WHEN THEY ENTERED THE WRONG HOUSE WITHOUT A WARENT AND KILLED ALL 11 PEOPLE THERE AT THE BIRTHDAY PARTY FOR THE TWIN ONE YEAR OLDS .