You keep cutting off the best part of the video and talking what's going to happen. The video speaks for themselves and don't have to reiterate what happens.
I can understand what I see, I don't need anyone to explain it to me. I would prefer to see the materials alone without the comments, which by the way ruins the fun of what I'm watching.
Way to cut off every single one of these clips off after 2 seconds so we miss more than half of the hilarious interactions. Instead of explaining every single clip, just show the entire clip! Thankfully I've seen almost all of these on other RU-vid vids but I feel bad for other viewers that don't get to see the full interactions.
the best part of those bloopers are watching the anchor's laugh uncontrollably ... your video would much better if you didn't cut to a different clip the second they start to laugh .... leave in the laughing sunshine! or some at least some of it, eh!
Carl Stefanovic and Lisa Wilkinson are not news anchors. They are hosts on moning TV. Lisa is the queen of the double entendre. Carl always loses it on live TV. It's their stich. And they are so funny together. Except Lisa ended up quitting when she found out Carl earned more than here. Such a shame. They were great together.
There's nothing accidental about the double entendres on the bogan Today Show. There's more of their "bloopers" on RU-vid than most other such shows, combined. They're just waiting for the next opportunity to present itself.
To be fair I would have had the same reaction seeing "Swinging" as the days activity. I would have been awfully confused Why the hell the government was promoting that for fitness😂 although to be fair it does burn quite a few calories
This is the definition of 'click bait'. Show a picture of Fox's Bill Hemmer & Julie Banderas to get your attention, and then never show a clip involving them!
Almost all of the Australian "Today" gags are planned. They're not unintentional. Same, I'd suggest about the British "This Morning". Sure, some slip-ups are real.
This would be 10x funnier without you trying to explain every single one, especially since you seem completely oblivious that the Australian "Today" show _purposely_ skirts the line on sexual innuendo and double entendres.
You're talking over the funny parts of the videos which makes it hard to watch and it loses the humor.You don't have to explain every detail to the viewer. We get it
So you start off by showing the punchline, then you voice over whats left of anything that might have been funny, then you abrubtly cut out any payoff that might have been salvaged. Very strange indeed.
