This is what happened when the Pope met the Archbishop of Canterbury in a defining moment for Christianity. Subscribe for more from ITV News: bit.ly/1T6j3WJ
I find the Archbishop of Canterbury an extraordinary man, so humble and mild. I have been struck by him checking up on Pope Francis as he was stepping up the stairs, he cared about his safety. Lovely person indeed.
As a Anglican, from the Church of Ireland, we have had our particular divisions between Church and people. It is throughly encouraging to see Christian faith leaders meeting, sharing and understanding our common bond, as people of Christ
Dear brothers and sisters, I’m a Roman Catholic by birth - at least my parents and grandparents were so. In my teenage, I felt incomplete and chose to practice Hinduism. I even practised Kundalini yoga, but found that Yoga is just occultism. Also, I never felt complete either. Then I thought Islam must be the true religion as they follow everything strict, but later found a Muslim Imam (Priest) who got converted to Christianity. I finally found solace in Roman Catholicism again. This time, I didn’t come back just by my instincts, but with innumerable reasons and I am still getting deeper into the subjects of Catholicism. Also helping people who are in the phase where they need a bit of guidance to help them understand what they really need, with regards to faith. I’m about to become a Catholic Priest as well. Please pray for me.
Yoel, you are an inspiration to many people. Have you ever considered going on the show called "Journey Home". You may have heard of it before but it discusses how people come back to the faith after going through many struggles and trials
You just come to the Lord most high Yahweh and Yeshua Hamashiah and the Holy Spirith than you will fee whole again. It's all abouth The Lord no religious organisations.
@@robertaliastibob931 Brother, I'm late vocation. I joined the seminary while I was 27 years old, after having completed my graduation in Civil Engineering and working for 5 years. I have joined the Dominican Order. For your surprise, it was started in the year 1216 by St. Dominican de Guzman in Toulouse, France. I am happy to see your message and I will keep you in my prayers, Robert. Try praying Rosary wherein you meditate on the life, death, and Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ (which indeed is scripture). Also, know the scriptural reference whenever you pray on that particular mystery. E.g. Joyful Mystery: 3 - Birth of Jesus (You must bring to your mind all that happened since Angel Gabriel told about the good news, travelling to Bethlehem, Manger and so on).
No disrespect but I really don't understand your conviction here!? Look was religion stands for and how's it run an absolute mockery throughout our lives. Our children are under threat by these animals yet so many still look past it. How can people still praise the Vatican? Surely this proves indoctrination beyond our wildest dreams. They project maddness onto us, yet we cry tears of joy when a new pope is bought in. Wtf! How is this possible?
Yeah we are very similar, unlike other Protestants (who went so far they started doing what they said they were running away from). Anglicans retain the Catholic heart beat. The Anglicans coming home with their modernised approach would breathe much needed life into Catholicism. Much needed bravery to show adaption does not mean leaving Christ behind. Full communion while retaining differences is good not bad. The Queen could even still be in place easy enough. This is the first arch bishop I’ve seen who is not just cardinal level but Pope level. He’s an equal of our Pope. It’s not been since Wolsey you had this. God has gave you a great Shepard. You could easily see him sitting on the throne of St. Peter. A Godly man. I think he’s modest when he talks and charitable and just like Pope Francis lives for Jesus.
@@michaelkavanagh5947 the difference is the queen has no role in god or governance of god because no man is above Christ. The holy father Pope Francis is the Shepard of gods church and guides in the right direction. The pope is elected through prayer not through the queen or prime minister. While women cannot become priests because the apostles were all men. While both churches could reconcile with allowing priests to marry because it’s only just a catholic tradition and not cannon law. The pope is also Christ’s representative on earth and the Holy Ghost works miracles through him. The pope is fallible though not all is right.
God opposes proud but give the glory to the himble. Humble yourself before God, stop to be proud, associates with Christ who came down from heaven to save us from slavery in sin. Repent, confess your sins before Christ for your salvation. Read New Tesrament to know Jesus' and knowing that you must be born again from Spirit and water to inherit the kingdom of God. John 3:1-7 NOT TO BE A PROUD ANGLICAN !!! God is not the author of confusion or religions. He is the author of our salvation in Jesus Christ and we all should belong to Christ NOT ANY RELIGION !!! May God open your eyes for your salvation in Jesus Christ who will come soon to take His truth church (Church is not building) who obey His teaching. Anglicans or other denomination are human made organization and have nothing with God. God is calling people to come to Him to receive remmision of sins and live for Him.
@@xxyyyxxyyy9532 why u anti Catholics always target and criticize the Catholic Church did the pope and the church done anything wrong to you shame on u who criticize our Catholic Church you should criticize the one who killed thousands of Christianity and the one who persecuted christian,but no you will never do that because in your minds the first thing is to target the Catholic Church and Interpret in the wrong way, from your comments only it reflects what type of person you are
@@arolemaprarath6615 the Roman Catholic home of child molesters rapist Vatican is full of mafia money, murders. Many europy Catholic countries colonised Africa and Asia to spread the work of Lucifer starting with Italy. The pope basically sold out heaven for money.
I call myself a "Traditionalist Anglican" because I embrace the 39 Articles of Religion, through which the Anglican Church exposed the heresies of Romanism and restored the true Catholic faith. You probably know that many well-known Angicans (including the current Archbishop of Canterbury) have abandoned some of the 39 Articles in deference to ecumenism and/or modernism. The 39 Articles make no reference to the Apostolic Succession because although Anglican bishops are part of this historic succession, such a succession is not central to the Catholic faith. However, if one had to trace a historic Apostolic Succession, it would lead to the Eastern (Orthodox) Church. Historically, the Orthodox Church is the original Church because just as the Sun rises in the East, the Church started in the East, not in the West and Jerusalem is an older See than Rome which is the usurper and pretender predicted in the Apocalypse. Also, the Bible clearly states that Peter was the Apostle to the Circumcised (the East), not to the unCircumcised (the West). At the Great Schism of 1054, the Romanists became the original schismatics. Thus, the idea of the RCC as the continuing church is a false myth. After the Great Schism, the part of the Church which remained papist became a new Church - better called the Western Romanist Church (which continued to call itself "the Catholic Church"). After the glorious Reformation, a new papist Church began again. All those who chose obedience to the Papacy over and above the core "solas" of the Primitive Church (which were restored at the Reformation) became part of a new papist Church (which once again continues to use the misnomer "the Catholic Church"). Protestant/Reformed Christianity is older than Romanism precisely because the restored ethos (the "solas") of the Apostolic Church predates their corruption by apostate Romanism. However, it is not history that is important, but fidelity to Christ, the Word of God. In fact, the import of the clear teachings of Our Lord (see, for e.g., John 8:39), St. John the Baptist (Matthew 3:9-10), and St. Paul (Romans 9:7 ff, Galatians 3:29 ff), etc is that God loves the preservation of a spiritual apostolic succession rather than hankering after a so-called historic succession. Thus, genuine Apostolic Succession is found neither in Romanism nor in Orthodoxy, but in Reformed Christianity (including, pre-eminently, Anglicanism). The Roman Church is apostate, because it has DELIBERATELY rejected God's Word, in the quest of its leaders for MONEY, SEX and POWER.
Ironically, the Church of England of Henry VIII could be readily reunited with Rome since it had no doctrinal differences other than the schism. It was during the reigns of his children Edward and Elizabeth in which the Church of England truly became Protestant.
Very true. England was considered to be reconciled with Rome under Mary Tudor. Basically, Queen Elizabeth reestablished the Church of England. If Edward had lived longer, England may have gone Calvinist.
@@oliverwashington8108 You need to read more history if you believe this. Cranmer didn't change the Mass until after Henry's death. Henry was Catholic in every way except for his rejection of Papal authority. Henry had Catholic beliefs concerning the Blessed Mother and the Sacraments for example. It was his son Edward under the influence of his Protestant uncles who unleashed Cranmer.
Elizabeth's view is kinda debatable but we can't really view it the same way with Edward whose style is more protestant compared to Henry. I bet even Jane Seymour who was a Catholic and Ally of Mary I would be disgusted by what Edward did.
@@richyburnett Yes. It is okay if you are an Anglican. I’m a Catholic. Let us not be proud of it. I have my own reasons to be a Catholic and so do you - I presume.
No my friend they are not. Catholicism was started by Jesus Himself. The Anglican so called church was started because Henry VIII wanted to divorce his wife. Huuuugeee difference.
The head of the Church of England is the reigning monarch sitting on the throne of Great Britain. What happens when the present monarch does not allow the unity between the two churches to take place. It is not allowed by British constitution for the monarch to be Catholic. In fact, any one in the list to the British throne who becomes Catholic is stricken off that list.
obviously such a constitution would need to be changed... its not probable ... but it is possible... the next monarch in line has already stated he wants to change it to something along the lines of him being the head of all religions in his country or something to that effect.
@Bishop Angaelos shame on you , you old fraud.... no better than old hag with a crystal ball charging exhorbent amounts for fake bullshit,,, **** you will be reported ***
💐🌿💛🇻🇦✝️🇻🇦💛🌿💐DIEU PROTÈGEZ TOUS VOS VICAIRES 🇻🇦💞🇻🇦AUTHENTIQUES🇻🇦⛑🇻🇦 ET UNIQUES🌿🇻🇦🌿 SUR LA TERRE💐🇻🇦💐, LES SOUVERAINS💛🇻🇦💛 PONTIFES LES PAPES🌻⛑🇻🇦💞💒💛🌿🇻🇦💮💐✝️🇻🇦💮🙋♂️ !!!
I was born as a catholi I was raised as a catholic I live as a catholic and I will die as a catholic....i found God only in catholic in the mystery of Eucharist.
For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. Matthew 24:24
We can easily be all unified as Christians but still have the wrong doctrine. When we depend on the Truth of Scripture alone and not the opinions of men, then we are in full and complete communion with the Heavenly Father.
Hitler was a christian as were the nazi soldiers who marched 6 million Jews to the gas chambers. Its Christians who invaded Iraq, Afganistan, Libya etc etc. Its crazy bloody thirsty Christians who started both world wars. It's crazy Christian's who committed genocide against the native Americans.
In contary to bad relationships between Lutheran Protestants and Catholics, the relationship beteen Anglicans and the Catholics were much closer. In the beginning of the Church of England which is 1538, this church was actually called a reformed Catholic Church. And also Henry Viii when he split with Rome, he remained hostile against the European Reformation. So was also the Elisabeth I the first official Governor of the Church of England.
I call myself a "Traditionalist Anglican" because I embrace the 39 Articles of Religion, through which the Anglican Church exposed the heresies of Romanism and restored the true Catholic faith. You probably know that many well-known Angicans (including the current Archbishop of Canterbury) have abandoned some of the 39 Articles in deference to ecumenism and/or modernism. The 39 Articles make no reference to the Apostolic Succession because although Anglican bishops are part of this historic succession, such a succession is not central to the Catholic faith. However, if one had to trace a historic Apostolic Succession, it would lead to the Eastern (Orthodox) Church. Historically, the Orthodox Church is the original Church because just as the Sun rises in the East, the Church started in the East, not in the West and Jerusalem is an older See than Rome which is the usurper and pretender predicted in the Apocalypse. Also, the Bible clearly states that Peter was the Apostle to the Circumcised (the East), not to the unCircumcised (the West). At the Great Schism of 1054, the Romanists became the original schismatics. Thus, the idea of the RCC as the continuing church is a false myth. After the Great Schism, the part of the Church which remained papist became a new Church - better called the Western Romanist Church (which continued to call itself "the Catholic Church"). After the glorious Reformation, a new papist Church began again. All those who chose obedience to the Papacy over and above the core "solas" of the Primitive Church (which were restored at the Reformation) became part of a new papist Church (which once again continues to use the misnomer "the Catholic Church"). Protestant/Reformed Christianity is older than Romanism precisely because the restored ethos (the "solas") of the Apostolic Church predates their corruption by apostate Romanism. However, it is not history that is important, but fidelity to Christ, the Word of God. In fact, the import of the clear teachings of Our Lord (see, for e.g., John 8:39), St. John the Baptist (Matthew 3:9-10), and St. Paul (Romans 9:7 ff, Galatians 3:29 ff), etc is that God loves the preservation of a spiritual apostolic succession rather than hankering after a so-called historic succession. Thus, genuine Apostolic Succession is found neither in Romanism nor in Orthodoxy, but in Reformed Christianity (including, pre-eminently, Anglicanism). The Roman Church is apostate, because it has DELIBERATELY rejected God's Word, in the quest of its leaders for MONEY, SEX and POWER.
The Anglican church is closest to the Catholic church, it's inspiring if you want to be a female ministrie there's a place in the Lutheran church,but because a priest does everything symbolic,in persona Christi, it's more complex,it would take an entire ECHUMENICLE council...not like Vatican 2 but a council that proclaimes by definition before they do that, from the appostles the council's go back
Great work between ordinary men of God working in CHRIST. The way of Christ is seeking God in humanity & failure to restore peace. Amen! For CHRIST is the centre of our existence...matter most.
I call myself a "Traditionalist Anglican" because I embrace the 39 Articles of Religion, through which the Anglican Church exposed the heresies of Romanism and restored the true Catholic faith. You probably know that many well-known Angicans (including the current Archbishop of Canterbury) have abandoned some of the 39 Articles in deference to ecumenism and/or modernism. The 39 Articles make no reference to the Apostolic Succession because although Anglican bishops are part of this historic succession, such a succession is not central to the Catholic faith. However, if one had to trace a historic Apostolic Succession, it would lead to the Eastern (Orthodox) Church. Historically, the Orthodox Church is the original Church because just as the Sun rises in the East, the Church started in the East, not in the West and Jerusalem is an older See than Rome which is the usurper and pretender predicted in the Apocalypse. Also, the Bible clearly states that Peter was the Apostle to the Circumcised (the East), not to the unCircumcised (the West). At the Great Schism of 1054, the Romanists became the original schismatics. Thus, the idea of the RCC as the continuing church is a false myth. After the Great Schism, the part of the Church which remained papist became a new Church - better called the Western Romanist Church (which continued to call itself "the Catholic Church"). After the glorious Reformation, a new papist Church began again. All those who chose obedience to the Papacy over and above the core "solas" of the Primitive Church (which were restored at the Reformation) became part of a new papist Church (which once again continues to use the misnomer "the Catholic Church"). Protestant/Reformed Christianity is older than Romanism precisely because the restored ethos (the "solas") of the Apostolic Church predates their corruption by apostate Romanism. However, it is not history that is important, but fidelity to Christ, the Word of God. In fact, the import of the clear teachings of Our Lord (see, for e.g., John 8:39), St. John the Baptist (Matthew 3:9-10), and St. Paul (Romans 9:7 ff, Galatians 3:29 ff), etc is that God loves the preservation of a spiritual apostolic succession rather than hankering after a so-called historic succession. Thus, genuine Apostolic Succession is found neither in Romanism nor in Orthodoxy, but in Reformed Christianity (including, pre-eminently, Anglicanism). The Roman Church is apostate, because it has DELIBERATELY rejected God's Word, in the quest of its leaders for MONEY, SEX and POWER.
@@annefranciselizabeth3840 So you are admitting the schismatic position. Just because the church originated in the east does not mean that Apostle Peter had no keys. The church started in the east and the roman rite is of the western culture in the eastern faith the Roman rite is not anymore better than the eastern rites, but its bishop is the highest bishop. The Roman church never rejected Gods word it fulfilled everything taught and the eastern Catholic churches have returned to Rome so I suggest you do the same
I was racially abused and discriminated against for being the only Asian Muslim working in a predominantly white Christian organisation, the Diocese of London. I hope that Justin Welby acknowledges this issue instead of brushing it under the carpet as did many of the staff members that work there, and I hope he takes active measures to encourage the racist members of his church to overcome their insular views of the BAME community.
As a catholic if we let women become priests, then we would have ito allow priests to get married. And I see this being that the catholics do ntoo think jesus would marry, and priests are sort of Jesus so ergo, why would priests get married. It is something the Anglicans do better then the Catholics, I say as a Catholic. The protestants are very more traditional then the Catholics, which I think is better having tradition.
Catholic priests do marry in many of the Eastern/Oriental rites and churches in communion with Rome; marriage is only forbidden in the Latin province. Marriage is merely a discipline of the Latins: it has no such theological barrier such as women's ordination.
I call myself a "Traditionalist Anglican" because I embrace the 39 Articles of Religion, through which the Anglican Church exposed the heresies of Romanism and restored the true Catholic faith. You probably know that many well-known Angicans (including the current Archbishop of Canterbury) have abandoned some of the 39 Articles in deference to ecumenism and/or modernism. The 39 Articles make no reference to the Apostolic Succession because although Anglican bishops are part of this historic succession, such a succession is not central to the Catholic faith. However, if one had to trace a historic Apostolic Succession, it would lead to the Eastern (Orthodox) Church. Historically, the Orthodox Church is the original Church because just as the Sun rises in the East, the Church started in the East, not in the West and Jerusalem is an older See than Rome which is the usurper and pretender predicted in the Apocalypse. Also, the Bible clearly states that Peter was the Apostle to the Circumcised (the East), not to the unCircumcised (the West). At the Great Schism of 1054, the Romanists became the original schismatics. Thus, the idea of the RCC as the continuing church is a false myth. After the Great Schism, the part of the Church which remained papist became a new Church - better called the Western Romanist Church (which continued to call itself "the Catholic Church"). After the glorious Reformation, a new papist Church began again. All those who chose obedience to the Papacy over and above the core "solas" of the Primitive Church (which were restored at the Reformation) became part of a new papist Church (which once again continues to use the misnomer "the Catholic Church"). Protestant/Reformed Christianity is older than Romanism precisely because the restored ethos (the "solas") of the Apostolic Church predates their corruption by apostate Romanism. However, it is not history that is important, but fidelity to Christ, the Word of God. In fact, the import of the clear teachings of Our Lord (see, for e.g., John 8:39), St. John the Baptist (Matthew 3:9-10), and St. Paul (Romans 9:7 ff, Galatians 3:29 ff), etc is that God loves the preservation of a spiritual apostolic succession rather than hankering after a so-called historic succession. Thus, genuine Apostolic Succession is found neither in Romanism nor in Orthodoxy, but in Reformed Christianity (including, pre-eminently, Anglicanism). The Roman Church is apostate, because it has DELIBERATELY rejected God's Word, in the quest of its leaders for MONEY, SEX and POWER.
I call myself a "Traditionalist Anglican" because I embrace the 39 Articles of Religion, through which the Anglican Church exposed the heresies of Romanism and restored the true Catholic faith. You probably know that many well-known Angicans (including the current Archbishop of Canterbury) have abandoned some of the 39 Articles in deference to ecumenism and/or modernism. The 39 Articles make no reference to the Apostolic Succession because although Anglican bishops are part of this historic succession, such a succession is not central to the Catholic faith. However, if one had to trace a historic Apostolic Succession, it would lead to the Eastern (Orthodox) Church. Historically, the Orthodox Church is the original Church because just as the Sun rises in the East, the Church started in the East, not in the West and Jerusalem is an older See than Rome which is the usurper and pretender predicted in the Apocalypse. Also, the Bible clearly states that Peter was the Apostle to the Circumcised (the East), not to the unCircumcised (the West). At the Great Schism of 1054, the Romanists became the original schismatics. Thus, the idea of the RCC as the continuing church is a false myth. After the Great Schism, the part of the Church which remained papist became a new Church - better called the Western Romanist Church (which continued to call itself "the Catholic Church"). After the glorious Reformation, a new papist Church began again. All those who chose obedience to the Papacy over and above the core "solas" of the Primitive Church (which were restored at the Reformation) became part of a new papist Church (which once again continues to use the misnomer "the Catholic Church"). Protestant/Reformed Christianity is older than Romanism precisely because the restored ethos (the "solas") of the Apostolic Church predates their corruption by apostate Romanism. However, it is not history that is important, but fidelity to Christ, the Word of God. In fact, the import of the clear teachings of Our Lord (see, for e.g., John 8:39), St. John the Baptist (Matthew 3:9-10), and St. Paul (Romans 9:7 ff, Galatians 3:29 ff), etc is that God loves the preservation of a spiritual apostolic succession rather than hankering after a so-called historic succession. Thus, genuine Apostolic Succession is found neither in Romanism nor in Orthodoxy, but in Reformed Christianity (including, pre-eminently, Anglicanism). The Roman Church is apostate, because it has DELIBERATELY rejected God's Word, in the quest of its leaders for MONEY, SEX and POWER.
