Bored in quarantine, or is your area opened up again? I recall being (as usual) the only debater present with the slightest shred of evidence backing his claims, with no allies on my side, surrounded by a small army rabid fanboys who loved ignoring evidence and claiming they "won" because they could up-vote each other. Typical.
If anyone wonders, this is consistent in Idazmi''s content canon, since Jedi masters can enhance their lightsabers with the force in different ways, more so if they know a couple direct energy projection Sith tricks. A Jedi as powerful as Luke, with such a long sword, could accurately put even a Galaxy class in peril.
LOL at _Idazmi''s content canon._ In these sillier videos, I honestly don't think beyond the joke. If you were trying to say this is canonically possible, it isn't, for a whole heap of reasons. The first being Star Wars takes place long before the Enterprise-D was launched.
Hey Idazmi, you should really post a collection of clips on examples of feats in Star Trek. I know you have the Die is Cast as a higher end firepower feat, but we also have The Skin of Evil, Perpetual Infinity, and Children of Mars as examples of standard weapons causing a lot of damage. I feel like an organized compilation of these things would give us an easier time rather than have seperate videos for each one.
@@Idazmi7 ah alright. I loathe both Discovery and Picard for many reasons, but those 2 specific episodes did give us a better look at standard torpedo yields in nicer VFX, especially when a bunch of rabbid Warsies keep saying that TDiC is just a "VFX error".
@@homelessend8557 _"(...) especially when a bunch of rabbid Warsies keep saying that TDiC is just a "VFX error"."_ Pfft. Then they have the gall to rely on the EU for their Jedi feats and pretend that the films don't contradict planet-destroying Jedi with millisecond reflexes *(laughs in Order 66).* Even Palpatine in _Rise of Skywalker_ wasn't a millionth of that. The fact is, they can say whatever they want: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UWDMkp1_F3g.html I don't know if you've seen that one before, but this is just a straight canon comparison of TOS and Pre-TOS era planetary bombardment vs Star Wars, and Star Wars *_STILL_* gets casually wrecked. Of course they will have stronger weapons by TDiC. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-I70WjsmOqGU.html
@@Idazmi7 That actually sounds like a good idea. A vid of feats that any ship in Trek can do would be really good for a compilation of what they can do. This thread on spacebattles has quite a lot of feats to get from, such as Enterprise D pushing a neutron star fragment to the orbital bombardment of Mars using only phasers and photon torpedoes: forums.spacebattles.com/threads/star-trek-feats-and-resources-thread.430094/ Even if both Picard and Discovery (and maybe even Lower Decks) suck and have continuity errors that ruin everything, I do believe they are good places to also feats since the shows are still part of the overall Trek canon, such as the Mars bombardment scene or the Perpetual Infinity orbital bombardment. A video on all the feats sound pretty good so it can be organized in one place
@@mlglieutenantmress7647 _"Even if both Picard and Discovery (and maybe even Lower Decks) suck and have continuity errors that ruin everything, I do believe they are good places to also feats"_ That sets a *_VERY BAD_* precedent, not unlike using the EU for Star Wars feats. Those shows are too brazenly incompetent to take seriously. For example, STD strongly implies that only a Spore empowered ship can do as much damage as we saw on Harlak, even though we see regular ships doing damage like that all the time in canon. Put simply, *any* feats in the CBS shows are inherently questionable. You can't dismiss classic lore the same way because it actually had consistency. _"A video on all the feats sound pretty good so it can be organized in one place"_ That's true, and I've made a few such compilations before. I think you're talking about more of a Star Trek version of ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YW0kuf2Lx-Q.html right?
@@robinhyperlord9053 Unlike those comparisons you posted, I used the feats we see directly in the canon instead of using fanmade calcs (like your first video - Han Solo said the Falcon goes "point-five past lightspeed", not that it has a "class .5 hyperdrive") Or making silly assumptions, like Eckharts Ladder did through his entire video: he seems to not know that Star Trek ships can fire weapons from lightspeed, and that all of those weapons are more powerful than nukes. Be honest with me: when was the last time you saw a _regular_ Star Destroyer melt a planet? I can show you Star Trek doing that casually with ships that aren't even made for war. Like I did in that video I linked you: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UWDMkp1_F3g.html A picture is worth a thousand words.
