Where Are the T-14 Tanks? 

Thanks CovertCabal your material is very well researched. 😊

You have been asking stupid questions for several videos now, you simply refuse to accept that Ukraine is going to lose that war.

Hey bro, do you have other channels? I heard your voice on something totally non-military related.

@@anfrex3342 +15 rubles

​@@anfrex3342kherson had billboards saying "forever Russia ". How did that work out? Also, Russia is literally not able to steamroll Ukraine even though they are literally next door. Admit it. Russia would be nothing without some nukes.

Can't be hit if you never show up

Very rare when a youtube comment makes me audibly laugh

@@archdornan8349 Just ask the F-22.

@@Valoriusay ay ay hold there buddy! It shot down a balloon alright?!

@@vinhhoangkhai8329 Believe it or not, that is the only air to air kill over CONUS in history. All hail the mighty F-22! :D

😂

It was announced quite some time ago that due to economic situation as a result of sanctions T14s won't be produced in intended numbers, and that T90 and modernized versions of T72 will remain as a backbone of Russian tank units.

T-90s are okay though... i saw a video earlier, 1 russian tank annihilated an mechanized assault... not sure it it was a T-90 though

Don't worry. Russia is making upgrades for T14. These new upgrades will be call,"T14MXBM323ZAB4".

😂😂😂

Temporary LOL

Russians in general mothball absolutely everything.

Double correction: The Soviets never stopped using the T-55, the T-55 stopped using the Soviet Union in 1991.

Word👍👍😂😂

The Russians stopped using the Soviets , 😂

I still remember the one that caught fire at a parade...🤣🤣

@@dieterdodel835 source: trust me bro

@@Meyohe well it didnt catch fire, but it hilariously broke down

@@Helperbot-2000no it didn’t you idiot, the driver put it in park. ITS A TANK IF YOU PUT A TANK IN PARK THAT TANK ISNT GOING TO MOVE AN INCH

@@britishgaming2 Yeah and when did it catch fire?

So secret that neither specs, nor location is known. One babushka in vodka infused dream told me about T-14 being hidden under rock near Moskva ship. Suposedly.

@@idontknowhowtonamemychannelmy God one cannot be this useless

@@idontknowhowtonamemychannel If the babushka drank Putinka vodka, the information must be correct. At least in the Russian world.

@@idontknowhowtonamemychannel😅

wrong, it was in stealth mode along with the SU-57s

@@apsoypike1956 True, but you also have a destroyed tank

@@apsoypike1956 Blowout panels on what? If the main ammo in the autoloader gets hit, the turret will rocket off. If you’re talking about the bustle storage, I guess it could but it’s unlikely it would get hit in the first place

@@mintsamich If the ammo in the auto-loader gets hit, the flying turret is merely a signal that the crew needs burial and cremation already has taken place. Then again a hit there would be rather fatal for the crew anyways, even if there wasn't an autoloader installed.

​@@apsoypike1956the engine might be improved by an explosion. 😂😂

@@apsoypike1956 oh I see, the separate compartment. Is that the upgraded Soyuz capsule?

Which should tell you what's coming. Don't poke the bear

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 /poke

​@@alexnderrrthewoke4479the oncoming collapse of Russa is coming

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 The total defeat of the Russian forces, that's the only thing that's coming.

Prob just wanted to make the parade as short as possible, i remember last year and every other year one being a few hours long. A lot of new vehicles that arent in ukraine but are paraded through moscow on victory day like the Kurganets-25 , bumerang and T-15 werent present to. Plus wasnt there like a few ukrainian drone strike on moscow like the week before parade day ?

With a premium version at 6.3 with 1mm less armour on the back

@@mig0150 nah, premium version would have the 152mm gun and be same BR like the Su9 and Su11 situation

Woundnt suprise me

@mankeil4468 i think it fita better at 1.3

No no it should be 2.0

God im not safe anywhere am i? I just want to build Canadian space marines but im too shit to make it work.

They also still seem to have some Infantry Equipment ‘45 in service

Problem is overproduction of previous versions of the T-series. Why build new tanks when you have thousands of old ones collecting dust. Russia is not alone here, US got rid of its Abrams production line, Brits don't make new tanks, Germans can probably produce 1 a month...

​@@victorzvyagintsev1325 because a lot of the old ones collecting dust are shit compared to modern tanks. The difference is that the US, UK and Germany aren't in an active war where you would expect a significant scale up in production.

@@buckshot9113 Considering the shit the Germans were sending the Ukrainians I doubt either side is much better in this aspect

Lol

Yeah, that caught my eye. Either the stabilization system was not installed or it was not functional. Either way, you would think they would have censored that clip.

​@@ColonelSandersLitefor them it was probably stable when editing the video

​@@ColonelSandersLitestabilization system is usually not online until crew decides to. We all live in post-war Era, where costs of maintenance is the determinator of the way things are used.

@@worldoftancraft That's utter nonsense. Along with wear on the drive system, the part of that demonstration that would be causing actual significant wear and tear is traversing the turret. Which they were doing anyways.

@@dxenomorph [sarcasm]Yeah, I know what you mean. I posted a video of Usain Bolt walking in a parking lot but it really seemed like he was running pretty dang fast when I edited the video.[/sarcasm]

That very few have

Russian taxpayers pay for 2000 T14 tanks, one billionaire get’s a new super yacht. Welcome to Russia. Have another sip of Vodka.

Which they don’t build. Has anyone ever bought something made in Russia other than an AK or vodka?

@@buckbenelli8 Escorts.

Sure, western build yachts be premium for sure. And those corrupt and stealing russian oligarchs can afford them. They have the billions.

Die you get this information from zelensky?

@@start2957 The fact Russia is unable to use them in Ukraine proves his point.

@@start2957234 people involved in the T-14 got arrested under corruption charges… all got released lol

​@@start2957no we got this based off of every single production line in russia... Since before the cold war started... That's literally how everything they do works...

@@start2957 No from inside Russia itself. Everyone helps themselves to everything. Hence a military order results in a billion USD yacht being ordered by the factory owner.

Maus would be entertaining to see half buried in the middle of the road like a bunker like the germans did in Berlin with panthers

I know it won't happen, but just the thought of lossing all those historical tanks hurt.

along with the LEO's and the Bradleys and the rest of the western junk........

Tbh, I don't think a Battle of Moscow will happen. An assassination will probably happen before it gets to that point.

​​@@jblob5764We have seen the Ghost of Kiev, now get ready for the Maus of Moscow

Exactly what the Americans are doing with declining fleet of Raptors.

@@worldoftancraft What will the 6 working Su57 going to do against 180 F-22's and 400 F-35's ?

@@zebra6636 meet

@@zebra6636 Cause some infighting because only one of them can become an ace.

@@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleineI’ll bet that after you typed that, you liked in the mirror so you could tip your fedora to yourself. You’re so confident in a platform that is objectively worse along every metric that matters, when Russia isn’t even that confident and that’s why they haven’t made enough of them to be noteworthy.

Probably not shipped west, anyway.

We’ve already seen it as the bmp3 terminator

Maybe if the factory becomes a battlefield?

They don’t need to use it, 50 year old equipment is dissolving Ukrainian forces.

@@ohgeazy Lies! The entire Ukrainian army was destroyed last year, all the Russians day so! Go, drive forward with open hatches, and you leading them, all you need is some courage!

Heck, even saying its on the production floor is generous. Its mostly still in blueprints.

It's not even very good at being a parade float, since one of them actually broke down during the Victory Day parade.

You guys ever heard of the term Ricer car? Yeah. Russia's T14 is a ricer tank.

@@ExUSSailor it didn't broke, the crew didn't knew how to properly operate the tank, to be honest that's the main problem with the Armata

@@rincontibio7664so the crew picked from the elite of the Russian military were too dumb to operate the tank…….that explains a lot.

such a fresh joke. one more about flying turret please

​@@watchingvids9899one more about shovels please

​@@watchingvids9899Cope more Ivan

@@watchingvids9899Because thats true, u r just mad

@@watchingvids9899 I will stfu if it appears en mass on the battlefield? Deal?

Don't forget about that one Saturday when Guy Fieri took his Flavortown PMC battalion back across the US border and drove to DC because he was fed up with his men being shelled by the US Army.

@@Trisket Yeah, that fits the paradigm perfectly, too!

this is a spy outfit.

What your saying is.. if a RU-vider can't find it then a KGB officer can't find it?

​@@thehusketeers4319he was not a high ranking kgb officer he was a street spy in Berlin, so yeah covert cabal is more sophisticated than putin

@@thehusketeers4319 It's FAB now and yes that's what he is saying.

Wym? All T-14 is currently stored with Heavy Cruiser Moskva

The purges are already happening, just to consolidate power.

well putin is a stalinist.

actually they would ethier be worse off or the same i doubt he would be any different a country ran the way putin and stallin want doesn't work today infact it barely worked in 1940

Yea they have way too few purges, a 100% purge of the power elite would be adequate.

@@popinmo Have you heard of this hip, new thing all the cool kids are doing? PUNCTUATION. 😬

no nation wants to buy that thing in the 1st place already :)

Russia recently made an arms deal with African Nations. Russians really hit bottom.

So like leopards

​@@off6848 except leopards aren't cowering in fear like t14

@@mitchellhermansen1836 there’s no reason to rush out an expensive tank like that any tank will be destroyed by 155mm guns They aren’t retarded like NATO

fr

T-35 probably has more videos on it, yet also was a rare beast.

Bob Semple wants to have a word

does not exist* The capabilities are only on paper. It is a victory day (lol) parade show piece, nothing else.

Ok Ukrainian puppet. But NATO IS loosing in Ukrainian war

Lol, but yes actually. The engine, for example, simply does not exist in any sort of operational form. It's literally mostly fantasy.

The T-14 physically exists (barely).

@@RedXlV The engine most certainly does not exist in a service-ready state. They had a prototype fail on the Red Square during a parade. Showing off Wunderwaffen during parades is 90% of what the Russian army does. That's pretty much the whole reason why it exists. If the T-14 couldn't even manage that then for all intents and purposes it does not exist. It's a psyop.

​@@TohaBgood2How did you come to that conclusion?

Correction - 500,000 of Armata already in Ukraine CHECKMATE WESTOID

Yeah with a complement of Romans with photon torpedos lol ji jk.

"N rEal lIfe it w0nt bE 1 oN 0nE!". ----->Russian tank fan boys in a nut shell.

ONE MILLION Armatas in ukraine...ALL with Poseidon Nuclear Torpedoes!

Just like the ukrainian BM-OPLOT 😂 the ukrainian mod told me they had deployed 5000 of them but wr havent even seen a single one

Then why build new tanks? What are they going to do, have them sit around for 20 years until they are completely outdated and then use them? Might as well just build them 20 years from now when their technology will be much cheaper to manufacture.

Pretty much why everyone has nuclear weapons. Almost every authoritarian or communist country that’s run afoul the US has not survived to this day.

​@@baronvonlimbourgh1716russians are creating anti drones built in to each tank. Dont worry. Russians focus on countering tech this is why we are in a trench warfare. Nato didnt expect it will be this kind of war. So you can have all the advance tech in the world if you cant use it then you are back to the oldways

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 that's a good question. It might be that we see the end of an era at the moment. The Ukrainians have shown in their successful defence that Tanks might be no longer the kings of the battlefield. On the other hand without Tanks a counteroffensive is also not feasible it seems.

@@habi0187 the tank isn't going anywhere. Active defences will just have to catch up. Reytheons hel system for example is a direct counter to these threats.

@@thorru3638 ka-52's are getting shot down pretty easy also. Just more russian junk.

​@thorru3638 over 25% of KA 52s are dead

​@@thorru363840 out of 133 in service are scrap

Kurganec, Koaliciâ.

Added to which India is more than capable of designing and building its own tanks. If they can build an aircraft carrier from scratch they can certainly build a decent tank. If they really wanted to buy a decent tank they could choose an excellent one from S.Korea.

Uhmm maaaybe you're delusional, or maybe you are high on American and Ukrop propaganda. The Ruble is the best preforming currency and the Russian economy is growing. Western Sanctions weakened the West, and released Russia from the noose that is the Petro Dollar. And guess what, BRICS is expanding rapidly and lots of IMF addicted countries are looking for a way out.

​@@phbrinsdenprObAblEe build a tank. From the creators of "they are going to build the high tech technology despite being a colonial shithole and it'll eliminate their poverty". An assumption. Their MBT was produced in number slightly higher per year, than Armata. That's already enough. Not to mention that all truly hard to engineer things are questionable: propulsion and FCS.

Give me a break Russia has the best tank crews on earth right now just off of experience

@@off6848 The trouble is most russian tank crews are no longer on earth, after they get hit they get launched into orbit.

@@chrisb7198no, the problem is your brains are washed. Ukraine has no trained personnel because all are dead. Russians does rotate…

​@@off6848I think you're off by about 2 meters. At least with those tankers who weren't cremated at least.

They teach you how to drive and how to shoot, pat you on the back and spray paint on a Z.

This is russian propaganda

@@noop9k The Kremlin should sack him immediately. He's the worst Russian Propagandist I've ever seen. He keeps posting negative information about Russia and positive information about Ukraine.

Is that why the F-22 was never committed in the war on terror?

​@@Valoriuswhy would it be? How many 5th gen fighters do the Taliban or Al Qaeda have?

@@Valorius I think that's more akin to not issuing RPGs to meter maids.

@@DAndyLord Very possibly 🤣

@@nicolomatias2223 If Warheads on foreheads is the mantra then the F-22 is perfectly qualified to perform that mission....allegedly. Russia seems to be doing fine without their T-14s, so why commit them?

And the one cardboard SU-75 Femboi

Is it more stealthy than an Abrams or challenger though?

​@@CyrilSneer123well, no. And considering that nazi germany have built better engines than what is used in your sad attemt in making a tank. So its quite likely that you just could not manage to drive it to the front. 😂

How’s the Ukrainian spring offensive doing?

@@orenalbertmeisel3127Better than russias last offensive

@@orenalbertmeisel3127how’s that 3 day special military operation going my guy? Keep crying Boris. 😂

@@ShitboxFlyer LMAO. When did Russia go on an offensive? Oh it’s an offensive you just made up. And oh btw during this summer Ukraine has lost more Leopard 2's than what Russia has lost of its T-90's during the entire war. And they haven’t reached Melitopol. Now that’s what I call winning.

The ukrainian trolls say Ukraine is winning, but in reality their much awaited counteroffensive has been a colossal failure.

It doesn't matter what the politics are. If a potential supplier may not be available in the future that's a problem. However, if the current supplier can't meet the needs today, then that's a much larger issue. Whatever can be said about western arms sales, the US and Europe is not in the habit of taking already sold equipment for their own armies.

To attack Ukraine must have been the mistake of the century, it is almost unbelievable how it is possible to have so little common sense, I think most people was really afraid of Russia and its military might, now we see miserable "wineos" stealing toilets, same with the status the regime in Kreml had, even I considered them as pretty capable and with a better grasp of reality than the west, and by actually going to war we can see it is all an illusion, plus, Lavrov that had a very high authority in the world act like an insane fool, had it been a movie I would said it was ridiculous

Brazilian POV: China still have to vastly improve their customer service and deal flexibility, Russia was bad at it, when Brazil bought Mi-35Ms they were quickly out of service cause Russia wouldn't allow for the training of Brazilian industries to build its own parts. To the point where if the Brazilian air force needed some heavy maintenance on those they had to be shipped back to Russia! That was completely unacceptable for the Brazilian AF and those gunships were retired. China, from our experience, so far is the same if you want you can cheaply buy heavy quantities of said material but you would resort to canibalize those vehicles for parts and maintenance very soon as china is very secretive and won't train your industries/ground crews for more than light maintenance. That's why most neutral countries are refraining from buying anything Chinese in it's current open contracts. When China modernize it's current customer service I can't a reason why they wouldn't be able to take over the arms contracts for neutral countries.

Just 1 of manny problems being created by this war for russia. Some of which will have large ongoing concequences far into the future.

Aside from China's competition, the three day special operation was the most expensive advert ever produced for NATO weapons.

There are actually 115

Like the Terminators, they have only been deployed to the NE section of the luhansk region because they don't have enough of either to have maintenance logistics for them.. so when the Terminators break down, they are just hauled back to belgorod and are never seen again.

Or just that it barely works and still needs to be developed.

They have 18 of them. Only half those run. The engine is an EXACT copy of the POS in a German Tiger 85 years ago. It is a fake tank.

​@@troymash8109Nothing against Lazerpig or his vids but his T-14 Armata video was far from his best work. You're thinking of the German SLA 16 engine which wasnt ever approved for service in any german combat vehicles outside being tested in a jagdtiger and fitted in a Tiger II hull. The Maybach V-12 was the renowned "shitty tiger engine" and the 12H360 engine from the T-14 is far from being based on either design. The original article used by lazerpig that claimed all of this may as well have put their sources as "we made it the fuck up" because they had none. T-14 is still overhyped as shit tho

@@skeeyee5477 its still using the V2 engine from the 30s. Albeit the engine has been continuously upgraded it's still a 1930s engine with better parts.

It is the same problem that Ukraine has to overcome when dealing with so many varieties of western tanks. Tanks are very maintenance heavy, and you need to keep a unique logistics system in place for each type of tank. It would be nearly impossible for Russia to keep a maintenance system in place for T14s on the southern front, just not worth it for so few tanks.

​@@PeterSedesseyeah but Ukraine has the support of NATO so spare parts is something I'm not worried about

@@donkey459 it isn't something that can't overcome, especially since they have a shorter and easier logistics line. For T14s, Russia would have to go from belgorod, all the way around the Donbas to get to the southern front...for maybe a handful of tanks. More than likely they are just keeping the T14s and the Terminators in NE luhansk.

@@PeterSedesse There are no T-14s anywhere in Ukraine, and the few dozen Terminators Russia does have are just T-72s with some laughably inaccurate autocannons and some ATGMs on the top.

They even designed engine for T14 armata.😂

Not nescecarlly! Russia has yet to enter actual war economy. War economy is a state in which all industries are "drafted" in to the war efort. Car manufacturers produce spare parts for tanks, food manufacturers produce MRE's, fabric manufacturers produce parachutes, mashining places turn shells, chemical plants make explosives and so on. Russia is not elocating resources for tank development because they have no factory to make them. It is also more complicated to produce modern equipment of any sort. Its not joust a armored tractor with a gun that about hits where you aim anymore. You cant joust make a new tank by sticking a biger gun or puting more metal on a tank. It is also especially dificult for russia. Most modern technology requires semi conductors..........you know the thing the west produces and is now witholding from russia. So they would have to: 1st: Research how to manufactor semiconductors and build production factorys after the research. 2nd: Design a modern tank. 3rd: Develop equipment for the tank which is no longer 20 to 30 years behind. 4th: Build the factorys then the tanks and then test them. 5th: Ensure that the funding does not get embezzeld during the whole process to ensure a quality product. 1, 3 and 4 would take time while 5 is imposible.

@@Manuelslayorslava shovels 🙌🏽🙌🏽💪🏽💪🏽

​@@halthammerzeitAre we really bringing up that myth. If you want to criticize the engine, be accurate.

​@@voidtempering8700it's not an upgraded Tiger Porsche engine?

T-14 isn’t based on anything previous. It’s T-90M which is an upgrade of an upgrade.

@@JustAsPlanned1 Oh my sweet summer child. The T-14 is a development of the Object 195 (which despite what lazerpig says was actually a program). The Object 195 is a development of the Object 187M, seeking to take that design and give it a crew capsule. The Object 187M is a development of the Object 187, which lengthened the hull by a road wheel. The Object 187 is a massive Late-Soviet early Russian program which was a development of the T-72B. Honestly the 187 is one of the most interesting Late-Soviet Tanks, and is related to almost every tank project the Russians have undertaken post collapse. Relikt (Potentially); the A-85 Engine; Welded Turrets; Digital FCS; the 2A66 Anker Gun (Tho this didn't go anywhere); that camo net they put over T-72B2 and some of the T-90Ms. I could talk about the 187 for hours. But yeah, that's how it's a development of a development of a development of a T-72B. I'm happy to link this google doc I've got of my schitso research if you'd like.

@@betsylatimer-sayer7161 Sounds like Theseus Ship dilemma to me. Of course we can say that most tanks are designed with previous models in mind.

@@betsylatimer-sayer7161 Ferrari is designed around the development of the wheel 4,000 years ago

@@betsylatimer-sayer7161 and all your tanks too

Purchase power parity means that their budget is equivalent to a third of the US DoD budget. The US spends more, but the US has to pay American workers, unreal upcharging due to regulations and the nature of business in the West.

The budget also has to support “leakage” into a number of pockets.

​@@ChucksSEADnDEAD ppp isn't 10 to 1 between the usa and russia. And it isn't just the defense budget. A lot of money is spent on other technology and science that allow these systems to be built in the first place which is in essence "freely available" to these companies but are essential to the product. That only increases the difference between both countries budgets but also capability.

​@@Nick-mt4wkyou can say the same thing with the US MIC contractors. Those guys want a guaranteed profit for any item of Procurement provided. If there isn't sufficient profit, the contractor will not sign the contract. In Russia, especially in wartime, they produce materials for the benefit of the nation and not the benefit of the shareholders. You can see now with the Lancet 53 drone, that Russia is producing and now working on a fully autonomous loitering drone.

@@Toronto-Brad About a decade ago, the Russian chief military prosecutor Sergei Fridinsky did an investigation on where the military budget went and it was pretty damn bad. According to him, 20% of every single Ruble spent on the military just vanished. Not to overpriced equipment or the like, just vanished. Fake companies, fake contracts, kickbacks for members of government. It isn't surprising to see why. There is zero transparency. The American budget, for example, you can know so much. You can see exactly how much we are spending for GMLRS rockets, F-35 production, maintenance of tanks, procurement of new tanks etc. For Russia, it is little more than a blank check to do with whatever the Russian government wants. Everyone who has power in Russia is getting their cut of the pie, to the point where what remains for the actual military is cut down extensively.

Didn’t one of the prototypes catch on fire?

The SU 57 is so fucking big you can see it on every fucking radar, the f22 is a already a very big jet, but you could mistake the su57 for a fucking bomber xdd

They have fucking wood screws in it.

@@CassKix By Sukhoi's own materials, the radar cross section of the Su-57 is about equal to an F-18... A plane that's definitely not stealthy.

​@@CassKixF-22 may be big, but that radar cross-section is ridiculously small. More than what can be said for the Su-57.

you are wrong. there is only one and it is in the parade warehouse waiting for the next parade.

A hover tank worthy of the name would still produce a lot of ground vibration from the lift fans/jets, and it would still be made of metal. Anti tank mines with magnetic or seismic trigger mechanisms would probably work against it. The armor would also have to be quite thin since by necessity a hover tank would have to be substantially lighter than a modern MBT.

@JoeBLOWFHB I also noticed that, yet: if the turret points rearwards, the gun can not be leveled horizontally or aimed lower, so if an enemy (tank) is behind you, you can not shoot it. Seems strange.

As a red Intel specialist... I've seen your msg and will pass it on 😂

They are so new, they dont even exist yet.

like the SU-57

Ironically, have you seen the new active IR systems on western tanks which can change their heat signature to look like a car? That's nuts

@@Whiskey11Gaming and have you seen this crazy thing called crew survivability that was supposed to be in the T-14? Wierd.

Shell trapping isn't really a thing anymore since modern Tanks use dart Rounds that very rarely bounce

“The Femboy” xd

SU57, SU75 and MIG41. Lol

It's only a concept. The Su-57 and Armata were "supposed" to be in production.

They drank all the vodka…😔

lol, what documented proof? Where the quotes and/or references from qualified sources to the T-14 **actually** being used in Ukraine, where, what days, what locations, which units? There's a lot of conjecture and assumptions, but not much solid info.

​@@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders...did you even WATCH the video? He specifically talks about how the T-14 is NOT in ukraine.

@@capncrispypoo9342 5:07 *He* makes the statement, he doesn't attribute it to TASS. Have you *actually* watched the video?? If you decide to watch this video, keep an ear out for it from 5:00 onwards.

@@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders You're still on about this? You deleted your old comment saying the same thing to replace it with another saying the same exact thing but in a ruder way.

@@capncrispypoo9342 Yeah. It didn't feel sufficiently sarcastic enough. I'm happier with the revision. It's important to have a zero tolerance with people who celebrate mediocrity like this video. This channel **could** be great if he didn't cut corners the way he has been over his last several videos. Also, it's infuriating listening to him mispronounce the word 'leopard'.

As a 71 year old former tanker and novice bassist, I concur heartily.

Better hope the tank crews turn off the “emergency brake” first. Lol it still sounds so stupid that people believe a tank crew would be stupid and incompetent enough to hit the emergency brake while driving on a straight line in parade.

I have seen a video of one in a forest a few months ago, it was firing at some Ukrainian vehicles or something, that was the last time I saw it.

It’s up there

There were only 20 or so terminators made (sofar), I think 13 or so were sold to Algeria, 10 in service of Russia.. +- a few. If they have those, they are rare.

We do know one was destroyed, but yeah not a lot has been seen of them.

Lmao