Where is God to be found when you are told your cancer is terminal? Steve Legg and Allan Finnegan 

ALL metanarratives, philosophies, worldviews and religions are faith-based. Science itself is based on unprovable philosophical assumptions that are simply accepted a priori. Confidence = Latin con fide = "with faith." atheism is silly, toddler-tantrumish blind-faith based nonsense.

You are right: there is no "god." No Christian believes in or worships "god." Category fallacy error.

Your claims and assertions are just that….YOURS. I’m willing to bet that you think that an hour with Jesus at Starbucks over coffee would be the same as an hour of prayer and Bible reading.

The answer to your question "Why God?" is "God does not exist, and this has been proven." If God did exist, you would have the answers. You wouldn't be in mystery or just guessing. You don't have a personal relationship with Jesus. He is dead. You can't have a relationship with a dead person. Duh.

​@@whittfamily1What false and hateful rhetoric you atheist trolls spew. Begone.

​@@mr.c2485Begone, hateful atheist troll. Why do you feel the need to spew your despairing nonsense all over these message boards?

Yes, God does not even exist. This has been proven.

Go figure….it’s called indoctrination. Terrible disease!

It’s not positivity….it’s wishful thinking.

​@mr.c2485 It's ATHEISM that is "wishful thinking." atheism lived out consistently is also hopeless horror and despair. Take your hateful, satanic horror somewhere else and stop trolling people who possess REAL Hope, meaning, purpose, joy, love and gratitude.

Pain and suffering are a blessing…wtf? Your god is a narcissistic douche!

Sadly, God does not exist. This has been proven.

People do take comfort in bullsh*t. It’s a human thing.

Thanks for listening!

​@@mr.c2485Why are you so angry and full of cursing? If you ever get redpilled by Holy Spirit, you will lose your hateful bitterness.

Nothing is possible with God since God does not exist. This has been proven.

@@whittfamily1So where's your proof?

@@dissidentfairy4264 I am happy to present one of the proofs to you, but in return I expect you to make thoughtful replies. Ok? Notice: After you read the argument below, please provide answers to these questions: 1. Do you understand the argument? If not, what specifically do you not understand? 2. Is there an error in the argument? If so, what is it? 3. Do you agree that the argument and its conclusion are correct? If not, why not? The Three-Way Argument Against the Existence of God Based on the Holocaust: By Gary Whittenberger, Copyright 1-29-2023, 7-13-2023, 7-29-2023, 8-14-2023 1. Definition: God is 1) the hypothetical, unique, exclusive, supernatural, independent, spiritual, normally invisible person, conscious intelligent agent, or sentient entity. He is OMNI lasting (eternal), present, knowing, powerful, intelligent, rational, creative, and resilient (invincible). He is also OMNI loving, compassionate, and moral with respect to other persons. He fills the roles of cosmos designer and producer (creator), occasional interventionist in the world, and afterlife manager who decides the favorable or unfavorable disposition of human souls after they die. or 2) the greatest imaginable possible person (the “GIPPer”) who, if he existed, would possess all desirable traits to their highest degrees and no undesirable traits, and who would be worthy of our greatest respect, admiration, and worship. The First Way 2. If God can and does exist, because of his nature he would have attempted to prevent the Holocaust and he would have succeeded. Consequently, the Holocaust would not have occurred. 3. But the Holocaust did occur. 4. Therefore, God cannot and does not exist. The Second Way 5. If God can and does exist, and if the Holocaust did occur, then because of his nature God had at least one morally justified reason to allow the Holocaust. 6. The Holocaust did occur. 7. Thus, if God can and does exist, then he had at least one morally justified reason to allow the Holocaust. 8. There are specific morally justified reasons for some persons to allow the horrible harm of the Holocaust to occur, but God would not have any of them; none would be available to him. A. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they did not know that the Holocaust was going to occur. But this could not be a reason for God since he would be all-knowing. B. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they did not have the power to prevent it or immediately stop it. But this could not be a reason for God since he would be all-powerful. C. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they knew that somebody else was in the process of preventing it and the other was likely to succeed. But this could not be a reason for God since he would know about the Holocaust ready to happen before anyone else would know since he would be all-knowing. Also, God would know that a successful prevention of the Holocaust by human beings was very unlikely. (Note that there were at least 15 attempts to assassinate Hitler and they were all unsuccessful.) D. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they would have been killed in an attempt to prevent or stop it. But this could not be a reason for God since he would be invulnerable, all-powerful, and eternal. E. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they would have been significantly injured in an attempt to prevent or stop it. But this could not be a reason for God since he would be invulnerable and all-powerful. F. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they would have significantly suffered in an attempt to prevent or stop it. But this could not be a reason for God since he would be invulnerable and all-powerful. G. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because allowing it would be necessary for them to prevent some greater harm than the Holocaust itself. But this could not be a reason for God since nothing at all would be necessary for him to allow in order to prevent some greater harm since he would be all-powerful. God would have dominion over all metaphysical and natural necessities, contingencies, and laws. H. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because allowing it would be necessary for them to produce a benefit which outweighed the Holocaust. But this could not be a reason for God since nothing at all would be necessary for him to allow in order to produce some benefit that would outweigh the Holocaust since he would be all-powerful. God would have dominion over all metaphysical and natural necessities, contingencies, and laws. I. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because it resulted in perfect punishments for all the victims for their past immoral behaviors. But the Holocaust did not have the features of perfect punishments for all victims. For example, it lacked advance rule declaration, administration by proper authority, individualized proportional severity, and the least severity effective for all victims. Since the Holocaust harms did not exhibit the features of perfect punishments for all victims, the harms could not have been punishments from God. Hitler thought that annihilation of the Jewish people would be a morally justified and deserved punishment. He was wrong, and God would never agree with him on this point. J. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust if they pre-arranged for all potential victims to experience benefits after the Holocaust which were logically contingent on the harms (e.g. care, character development, criminal justice, and compensation), which outweighed any harms from the Holocaust, and which occurred in life on Earth. But after the Holocaust, a substantial proportion of the victims received no logically contingent benefits and for most of them who did, the benefits were outweighed by the harms. And so, God would have had no involvement with this. K. Other persons might justly allow the Holocaust because they acquired the advance informed consent of all potential victims to experience the harms of the Holocaust in exchange for assured consequent benefits. But there is no good evidence that such consent was acquired by anyone, even God, from any victim. 9. And so, God could not and did not have even one morally justified reason to allow the Holocaust. 10. Therefore, God cannot and does not exist. The Third Way 11. Furthermore, if any tribunal is investigating or evaluating the occurrence of any horrible harm to a group of persons, then any person who has knowledge of any detail related to that occurrence should offer or present their testimony about what they know. Every person knowledgeable of the occurrence has a moral duty to come forward to the tribunal and testify to what they know, telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth. 12. The Nuremberg Trials constituted a tribunal investigating or evaluating the occurrence of the Holocaust. 13. And so, if God can exist and does exist, because he would be both omni-powerful and omni-moral, then at the Nuremberg Trials he would have testified as a witness, sworn to tell “the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me myself,” and this truth would have included any reasons for his allowing the Holocaust. 14. But God did not testify at the Nuremberg Trials. 15. Once again, therefore, God cannot and does not exist.

​@@whittfamily1atheism is silly, toddler-tantrumish nonsense. EVERYTHING is proof of God. atheists put blind faith in the belief that a non-programmed-by-a-Mind, unguided-by-a-Mind accident, the brain according to atheism, can be "trusted" to give them "truth." Now THAT is BLIND faith. I don't have enough blind faith to be an atheist, but apparently YOU do!!

Hope in a heaven gives people comfort. Unfortunately, there is nothing to falsify that claim. Your god is silent 🤫

Live your life in a fictional future…your prerogative.

@@mr.c2485 You can only live now. With hope or without. Everyone's choice.

@@mr.c2485 Not silent at all. He communes with his people directly always. We are never alone.

You are confusing two different persons. Jesus was a real human being who was crucified by the Romans. God is just a hypothetical supernatural being, who has been proven not to exist.

I’ve “crossed over” on a DMT trip. No god necessary..

@@mr.c2485 Not the same thing, Buddy. Not even close!

There is no good evidence for "crossing over," souls, spirits, heaven, or hell.

Judge nothing before it’s time.

@@kenbarber6592 What do you think would make up for God doing nothing while a million children died in gas chambers?

​@@davethebrahman9870 that's the difference, if bad things happen, you blame God, if he doesn't do anything you still blame Him. True Christian's trust God regardless of circumstances, that's why you keep hearing stories such as this on the video. God is the author of life, and certainly can give it back. This life we have is temporary.

@@grayfoxart2268 What has any of that got to do with God’s culpability for the enormous amount of human suffering? Thank God he doesn’t exist, he would have to be a monster.

@@davethebrahman9870 You will see. By that I mean, you will see them all. Why do you think God was doing nothing?

You have “it” bad. Your momma really taught you well. 😊

OR, your thinking is in error...Nice try though...

Or simply God is impersonal.

Religious bullsh*t starts at childhood…the ultimate abuse. Should be laws against it..

@@El_Paracleto Who knows? Your god is silent and indifferent.

God doesn't exist. This has been proven.