Тёмный

Where is Russia's "Missing" SU-57 Stealth Fighter? 

Task & Purpose
Подписаться 1,7 млн
Просмотров 1,2 млн
50% 1

Video Sponsored by Ridge. Check them out here: ridge.com/TASK.... Use my code “TASKANDPURPOSE” for 10% off your order and for an entry to win a Hennessey Ford Bronco or $75K through September 30th! US Only
Russia claims their Sukhoi Su-57 multirole fighter jet is a state of the art fifth generation stealth aircraft. But have we ever seen the Russian plane out in public in actual combat before? Or is this like the Russian T-14 tank with wings? What is the story behind Sukhoi SU fighters vs. Mikoyan MIG fighters?
Written by: Chris Cappy and Josh Simpson
Edited by: Maksym
The work for what would eventually become the Su-57 began in 1979 when the Soviet Union outlined a need for a next-generation fighter aircraft to enter service in the 1990s. They launched the I-90 program in the eighties with the aim of developing a multi-role fighter with substantial ground attack capabilities to replace the MiG-29 and Su-27 in frontline tactical aviation service. Two projects were designed to fulfill this need: The MFI or Multifunctional Frontlight Fighter program and the LFI, a program designed to make a lighter fighter jet with respectable air-to-ground capabilities.
But wait slow down for the slow learning soldiers like myself in the back of the class. What the heck is a multirole fighter. BAE systems labels it as “Swing role aircraft” quote: “An aircraft that can accomplish both air-to-air and air-to-surface roles on the same mission and swing between these roles instantly offers true flexibility. This reduces cost, increases effectiveness and enhances interoperability with allied air forces' ' So pilots can take on all enemies, generals can send one aircraft for all jobs and the military industrial complex gets to save money… Everyone wins!
XM30 Bradley Replacement video: • Meet the XM30 Replacin...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @taskandpurpose
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.

Опубликовано:

 

27 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3,9 тыс.   
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose Год назад
Video Sponsored by Ridge. Check them out here: ridge.com/TASKANDPURPOSE. Use my code “TASKANDPURPOSE” for 10% off your order and for an entry to win a Hennessey Ford Bronco or $75K through September 30th! US Only
@Das1
@Das1 Год назад
He is stealthy, so u can't see him
@TheRezro
@TheRezro Год назад
To be honest we need congratulate Russia creating fighter as stealthy as F/A-18 (minus Gravler).
@rocko7711
@rocko7711 Год назад
😂😂
@dorjedriftwood2731
@dorjedriftwood2731 Год назад
The first video you have made in a long time where you really focused on the facts and reality not just the propaganda. I really appreciate it.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro Год назад
Wait... Anti-Air and Anti-Ship? Like? Didn't A-6 Intruder already could do that 🤨
@rjjm88
@rjjm88 Год назад
If we haven't observed it, it's clearly the best stealth fighter ever!
@sharpstriker1559
@sharpstriker1559 Год назад
Amerikkka will never be able to destroy even a single Su-57 squadron! ……because there isn’t one.
@tellyboy17
@tellyboy17 Год назад
That must be why they are only used outside air defense range...
@Snp2024
@Snp2024 Год назад
How can u shoot it down if it doesn't exist
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
Does that mean my dad is using stealth technology?
@admiral_ikea5243
@admiral_ikea5243 Год назад
@@trolleriffic xD
@Jagrofes
@Jagrofes Год назад
For reference, the MoD quoted 0.1-1m RCS is comparable to the F/A 18. A plane that wasn’t designed for stealth.
@JohnFrumFromAmerica
@JohnFrumFromAmerica Год назад
The super Hornet was designed to lower signatures it apparently has a frontal radar cross section an order of magnitude less than the legacy f18. That doesn't happen by accident
@smokescreen100
@smokescreen100 Год назад
​@JohnFrumFromAmerica I believe the f18 super hornet is considered low visibility
@JohnFrumFromAmerica
@JohnFrumFromAmerica Год назад
@@smokescreen100 I know that is what I am saying
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@smokescreen100 Typhoon and Rafale have similar features to hide the front of the engines and reduce RCS significantly compared to comparable previous generation aircraft. They're a long way off the radar signature of a "stealth" aircraft like F-22 or F-35 but it's a worthwhile improvement nonetheless, especially when combined with a good ECM system.
@Vexas345
@Vexas345 Год назад
​@@JohnFrumFromAmericaAll modern aircraft designs are going to take RCS into account because it's just good practice. Non-stealth aircraft just won't trade cost and functionality for it.
@AnaInTh3Sky
@AnaInTh3Sky Год назад
The SU57 is performing a recon mission in Monaco disguised as a Yacht.
@vaastafraja5685
@vaastafraja5685 Год назад
The F22 is being used to either shoot spy baloons, or against bare handed desert people in the middle-east. lol
@Deckzwabber
@Deckzwabber Год назад
Not only is the Su-57 the stealthiest aircraft ever, it also protects against dragons.
@mattdowning7281
@mattdowning7281 Год назад
And Griffins; you forgot Griffins.
@amn0940
@amn0940 Год назад
But there are no dragons around
@ct-7822
@ct-7822 Год назад
Apperently it can sumon stalin from his grave to purge the russian army
@flyingfloorboard4097
@flyingfloorboard4097 Год назад
@@amn0940 because it protected against them
@Arachnoid_of_the_underverse
Theyre that stealthy no one has seen them.😅
@almasbaibolov1446
@almasbaibolov1446 Год назад
Sukhoi Su-57 is like John Cena, you simply cannot see it. That is how stealthy it is.
@nelsonta00
@nelsonta00 Год назад
There is a running joke: US's F-35s are incapable of destroying a squadron of SU-57 because Russia doesn't even have a squadron of them.
@loxx3r
@loxx3r Год назад
notfunny didntlaugh
@pablodelsegundo9502
@pablodelsegundo9502 Год назад
I cackled.
@MasayaShida
@MasayaShida Год назад
Lol
@nolongerblocked6210
@nolongerblocked6210 Год назад
It's not so much a joke... as it's just a statement of fact
@Valhura77
@Valhura77 Год назад
wow a country that has people shitting on the streets of Portland and San Francisco and has terrible life expectancy, education when compared to the other OECD countries, that spends nearly a Trillion dollars a year, that it prints out of thin air and is over 30 Trillion in debt can afford to spend more on R&D and have a bigger military than a country with a population only 40% the size of the US and actually carry's very little debt, I am shocked, next you will tell me that Iceland probably would lose a war with Canada.
@eyasjas8098
@eyasjas8098 9 месяцев назад
SU-57 is so good as a stealth fighter. No one has seen it since the beginning of the Russo-Ukraine war.
@DreamyCheshire-up9rf
@DreamyCheshire-up9rf 8 месяцев назад
No F35 seen protecting Ukraine airspace either.
@SmithenJW04k
@SmithenJW04k 8 месяцев назад
@@DreamyCheshire-up9rf Yea, and nobody has claimed to have deployed F35s so whats your point.
@DreamyCheshire-up9rf
@DreamyCheshire-up9rf 8 месяцев назад
@@SmithenJW04k My point ? For USA and Russia point of view, no need to deploy F35 to help, and SU57 against Ukraine.
@loganbaileysfunwithtrains606
If it’s “missing” then it must be the best stealth jet ever
@doodsrem
@doodsrem Год назад
So stealthy even the Ruskies themselves don’t know where it is
@atsonaga5520
@atsonaga5520 Год назад
Aha!
@wyskass861
@wyskass861 Год назад
It's so good, it can't be used for fear of revealing how good it is.
@omnadrener1
@omnadrener1 Год назад
It’s been used more than any F-22 has in its 20 years of service
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@omnadrener1 In your dreams Kremlinbot.
@squidcaps4308
@squidcaps4308 Год назад
Aerobatic fighter is such an archaic concept, a missile fired from 50 miles away doesn't care how many flips you make....
@kevinspacey5325
@kevinspacey5325 9 месяцев назад
Russia: "Am I a joke to you" Everyone else: "Yes, Yes you are"
@SolomonSamson747
@SolomonSamson747 Год назад
The S-37 became the Su-47. The Su-37 was a Thrust vectoring technology demonstrator that paved the way for the Su-30SM and later the Su-35BM which became the Su-35S.
@kicksnarehats11
@kicksnarehats11 Год назад
Exactly right!
@MoskusMoskiferus1611
@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Год назад
Why the fact has always get few likes
@Shinobubu
@Shinobubu Год назад
I always laugh at this. How can thrust vectoring help you when your RWR can't even tell you where a missile is about to hit you. I guess they just instinctively do cobra maneuvers when the little russian computer starts panicking.
@cheekybastard99
@cheekybastard99 11 месяцев назад
That's a common and enduring myth.
@momcilopucar8749
@momcilopucar8749 10 месяцев назад
​@@ShinobubuI would suggest you to read my comment to get educated then comment. Till then.🤫🤐
@T33K3SS3LCH3N
@T33K3SS3LCH3N Год назад
This is basically the Russian version of the F-22 Raptor: an extremely ambitious aircraft that took a long time to develop and struggles to be produced at scale. ...only that it's less capable, not produced at scale at all, and all of that 20 years later when the US already phase it out again.
@cesaravegah3787
@cesaravegah3787 Год назад
The F22 is extremly capable
@bluemarlin8138
@bluemarlin8138 Год назад
The F-22 didn’t struggle to be produced at scale. Obama and Robert Gates just killed the program prematurely because they stupidly thought we’d only be fighting terrorists until the end of time.
@jayfron6012
@jayfron6012 Год назад
@@cesaravegah3787he’s saying the SU-57 isn’t capable while the raptor actually is. The raptor is just slightly similar in terms of lengthy development and difficulty producing at scale, but the US still made it happen on some scale
@Barbaroossa
@Barbaroossa Год назад
It's being produced at a homeopatic scale. XD
@deanminer2340
@deanminer2340 Год назад
A poor copy
@HugoFuentes
@HugoFuentes Год назад
A little error: The S-37 prototype that became the Su-47 was developed much earlier than the Su-27M (later known as Su-37) and even it has shared components, they're not on the same branch of plane development
@fowti1470
@fowti1470 Год назад
also while talking about the Su-47, not a frame of this aircraft is shown
@paolonicolini1055
@paolonicolini1055 Год назад
The mighty Berkut
@darkspine1052
@darkspine1052 Год назад
Plus isn't the Su-47 used as a technology demonstrator now? Also, I'm pretty sure there is only one Su-47.
@gravyd316
@gravyd316 Год назад
​@@darkspine1052there were a few but they're so unstable that they crashed a few getting it to fly properly.
@darkspine1052
@darkspine1052 Год назад
@@gravyd316 figures
@ihavetowait90daystochangem67
So stealthy that the Pilots haven’t even seen it yet
@FakeSchrodingersCat
@FakeSchrodingersCat Год назад
It is all Ivan's fault he left the stealth system on, and now they can't find it.
@winterinvicta
@winterinvicta Год назад
It’s been used to the pilots have probably seen it although with your pro I can’t blame you.
@tomk3732
@tomk3732 Год назад
LOL, yet 5 are parked just outside on the tarmac - now that is stealth!
@azurelectrium1100
@azurelectrium1100 Год назад
​@@tomk3732then why won't it fight my f22😠
@worldspam5682
@worldspam5682 Год назад
@@winterinvicta there was a video of one crashing, so yes, they have seen it before
@shawnameri2660
@shawnameri2660 Год назад
As Sun Tzu wrote in “The art of war:” If a you can’t spot a Russian plane, it’s because it doesn’t exist or they aren’t using it, not because it is stealth.
@CedarHunt
@CedarHunt Год назад
Well, yeah, even the Russians aren't claiming the plane is invisible. 😂
@nemiw4429
@nemiw4429 Год назад
​@@CedarHuntand Serbia was never told the F-117 is invisible. Shows u that we need to better our communication skills.
@CedarHunt
@CedarHunt Год назад
​@@nemiw4429The F117 isn't even in service anymore. Where is your "cutting edge" fighter, vatnik? 😂
@nemiw4429
@nemiw4429 Год назад
@@CedarHunt we sadly also got ur useless f35. But people are working to overturn it and buy rafale 4. F35 is useless. Murricans are useless.ä
@nolongerblocked6210
@nolongerblocked6210 Год назад
I didn't realize Sun Tzu was Italian: "if a you..." Jk jk
@theunkownbanana1823
@theunkownbanana1823 Год назад
T-14, BMPT, Su-57. When your toys are so precious that you put them on a shelf instead of using them.
@xLeeroycranex
@xLeeroycranex Год назад
The actual truth is that the Russians recently lost their entire SU-57 fleet in Iran when an F-14 and Super Hornet took them down.
@zach11241
@zach11241 Год назад
Hey now! That’s top secret info!
@limitlesscash2771
@limitlesscash2771 Год назад
Thank God that we have other media apart from western MSM. If someone read your comment they will think that what you are saying is true.
@MrMontanaNights
@MrMontanaNights Год назад
@@zach11241 He must have heard it from an Admiral's daughter.
@thanhtong2281
@thanhtong2281 Год назад
@@limitlesscash2771- thank God we have RU-vid fact checkers
@CaptainHarris-ip2kg
@CaptainHarris-ip2kg Год назад
Tomcats are now Super Hornets?
@into_the_void
@into_the_void Год назад
Giving credit where its due .. the Russians do make some gorgeous fighter jets
@CakeofWisdom
@CakeofWisdom Год назад
Though, where national security is generally concerned, most buyers are looking for functionality.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro Год назад
@@CakeofWisdom Or buy cope
@thomaszhang3101
@thomaszhang3101 Год назад
It’s because good looking planes usually fly well. Russian fighters lacked behind the west in avionics even during the USSR period, so Soviet designers had to compensate for that with their strong trait - aerodynamics. Soviets were actually ahead of the West in lifting body and wing body fusion designs, and Russians today still are in some aspects. Su-27 was given a small leading edge extension and relaxed instability, just like the contemporary F-16, but it also had a wing body fusion design that was only implementing on the F-22. F-22 had to implement that to save its aerodynamics because stealth shape isn’t aerodynamic friendly, but Su-27 totally didn’t need to do it but its designers went that extra mile to make its shape perfect for 4th gen fighters. Flanker family probably has the best conventional layout of any 4th gen fighter, and only canard deltas can even begin to compare.
@holy3979
@holy3979 Год назад
Was about to say that as well, Russia has some of the most beautiful and some of the most wacky planes every produced.
@DigitalNomadOnFIRE
@DigitalNomadOnFIRE Год назад
Hard disagree, they all look very badly made when you get close up, and extremely dated.
@michaelarenas9185
@michaelarenas9185 Год назад
The F-22 " SU-57 Come out and PLAAAAYYYYYY"
@SawdEndymon
@SawdEndymon Год назад
Top Gun Maverick made this jet *far cooler than what it is.*
@Scultura400
@Scultura400 Год назад
Top Gun Maverick with F-35: „Wait…is that a F-3…“
@sugandesenuds6663
@sugandesenuds6663 Год назад
@@Scultura400 BOOM
@alexv3357
@alexv3357 Год назад
Top Gun: Maverick made them _look_ cool, and then proceeded to show two of them get clapped by an unupgraded F-14 from the 1970s in a gunfight
@danielch6662
@danielch6662 Год назад
​@@alexv3357🇮🇷👏👏👏
@alexv3357
@alexv3357 Год назад
@@danielch6662 Why the Iranian flag? It was the 'enemy' (obviously Iran) that bought the Su-57s and then lost them all to an American pilot in an F-14.
@marathi22
@marathi22 Год назад
The Su-37 is a Flanker like the Su-27 and the Su-35. The Su-47 was a completely different aircraft that was first designated the S-37, NOT Su-37. These are two different aircraft. Just saying...
@Tbal_96
@Tbal_96 Год назад
Yeah I caught that too and it irked me
@ApacheVR-4
@ApacheVR-4 Год назад
Same. Especially since the SU-37 was only ever meant to be a technology demonstrator for upgrading the existing SU-27 family of aircraft. The SU-47 is an almost completely new design to explore both Low-Observable technologies, as well as the potential benefits of forward swept wings.
@martindione386
@martindione386 Год назад
this is a channel for war-is-like-call-of-duty kiddies, don't expect a serious analysis
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
@BoraHorzaGobuchul Год назад
​@@ApacheVR-4the s/su-47 is basically a copy of X-29.
@martindione386
@martindione386 Год назад
@@BoraHorzaGobuchul absolutely not, similar aerodynamic configuration, nothing else
@koerrie
@koerrie 9 месяцев назад
As far as I've heard, SU-5 is on a vacation trip to it's best buddy, the T-14 Armata tank.
@v3700
@v3700 Год назад
"its got the best avionics" it upgraded from a tom tom to a garmin
@TheReubenShow
@TheReubenShow Год назад
Sir, you are far from average. Your humility alone is top of the line. You say a lot, giving us something to think about instead of telling us what to think. You do good work, I hope your people are proud of you.
@bebo4374
@bebo4374 Год назад
Maybe he’ll send you a shirtless photo of himself.
@TheReubenShow
@TheReubenShow Год назад
@@bebo4374 Maybe holding one of those goat guns. hot
@genxiong2695
@genxiong2695 Год назад
The only time we saw the SU-57 in "real" combat was Top Gun 2.0
@ScottPerkinsLCMT
@ScottPerkinsLCMT Год назад
Meanwhile the U.S. completes one F35 every 2 days the worlds most advanced fighter jet
@doublehelix7880
@doublehelix7880 Год назад
The most advanced regarding the count of known and not yet fixed problems? The last time I checked, the official number was 800+.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@doublehelix7880 Still vastly better than any of the garbage Russia will produce for the next 30 years at least. Try making a decent plane and then you can diss other combat jets.
@jansenart0
@jansenart0 Год назад
5:45 Fyre Festival was depicted, though I agree Firefly needed at least 56 more seasons.
@rogerhinman5427
@rogerhinman5427 Год назад
Kudos to whomever decided "Felon" should be the codename.
@lexwaldez
@lexwaldez Год назад
You want it to sound dangerous if you're the Pentagon so you can pump up your R&D requests from Congress. If it was the SU-57 Flounder it wouldn't get much press. You think they sit at a table drinking beer and shouting out names or does a computer just spit a codename out? Good question.
@StephanieKFaust
@StephanieKFaust Год назад
You're going to love the Su-75 "Femboy" then 😂
@rogerhinman5427
@rogerhinman5427 Год назад
@@StephanieKFaust LOL
@KamiKaZantA
@KamiKaZantA Год назад
Concerning stealth: according to Sukhois own papers, the Su57 has the same radar cross section as any 4th gen fighter, like the JAS 39 Gripen... which ISN'T a stealth fighter.
@phunkracy
@phunkracy Год назад
According to an old early patent, not sukhoi papers lol RCS are NEVER public
@NahIdWin995
@NahIdWin995 Год назад
Questionable papers. Russia wouldn't reveal a plane capability especially its RCS that still is in mainly testing phase. Interested in the source tho may u send me a link to them would be very interested to have a read through.
@jeromeace1282
@jeromeace1282 Год назад
​@@julianpetkov8320it's kind of hard for the f22 to see use when the enemy they were intended to fight... Imploded from spending too much money on their army. Also, how was the weather balloon mission a failure? They popped it, without blowing it up, and whatever remained of their fancy spy balloon sensors after it fell down was promptly picked up and looked over by... Whoever's job that is.
@blink182bfsftw
@blink182bfsftw Год назад
​@@julianpetkov8320would love to hear a vatnik's explanation of how that was a failure lol delusional
@blink182bfsftw
@blink182bfsftw Год назад
@@julianpetkov8320 shouldn't you be on the front lines getting shot at for your leader?
@col.waltervonschonkopf69
@col.waltervonschonkopf69 Месяц назад
They are so stealthy that even Russia can't find it. 😂
@HexLabz
@HexLabz Год назад
A Cappy video right when I wake up? It's going to be a good day. Hurricane be damned.
@christopherlane5238
@christopherlane5238 Год назад
Hope you stay safe.
@Barbaroossa
@Barbaroossa Год назад
One thing that must be noticed about the Mig 1.44 is that it was not stealthy in any aspect whatsoever. One simple look at the airframe's design can show that there are no serpentine-shaped air intakes for example.
@aidanconnor2274
@aidanconnor2274 Год назад
Yeah, kinda similarly to the Horton flying wing from the Germans; being even slightly stealthy is more of a side effect than an intention. The MiG 1.44 could’ve been a good plane, but it would be more like a 4+ Generation aircraft
@dzapper7
@dzapper7 Год назад
For the record the SU-57 doesn't have those either.
@Max_Da_G
@Max_Da_G Год назад
That plane was all about supersonic flight. Whole fuselage is area-ruled and aerodynamics are heavily skewed for supersonic efficiency.
@Ag3nt0fCha0s
@Ag3nt0fCha0s Год назад
It used plasma stealth
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic 11 месяцев назад
@@Ag3nt0fCha0s No it didn't. And that's assuming plasma stealth actually works in the first place.
@PlugInRides
@PlugInRides Год назад
The MiG-29 and Su-27 were not in operational use until 1983 and 1985 respectively. Both were only flying as prototype/development aircraft since 1977 until their initial introductions, and were reactive designs to the 4th Gen American F-16 and F-15 fighters.
@РитаИвантаева-з1х
@РитаИвантаева-з1х 11 месяцев назад
ну и продаваться су 57 не планируется) для индии есть су 75)
@PlugInRides
@PlugInRides 11 месяцев назад
@@РитаИвантаева-з1х The Su-75 Checkmate doesn't really exist, even in prototype form. It is only a mockup. India has already rejected the Su-57 as it lacked true stealth, and did not have the capabilities Russia promised.
@РитаИвантаева-з1х
@РитаИвантаева-з1х 11 месяцев назад
@@PlugInRides су 75 конечно еще не существует как и самолета 6 поколения) су 75 это однодвигательный су 57 ) он специально изготовлен для продажи) скоро и ф35 не будут существовать) их слишком часто теряют как сша так и страны которые приобрели самолеты у сша)
@PlugInRides
@PlugInRides 11 месяцев назад
@@РитаИвантаева-з1х Just like the F-14 and F-16 didn't last very long? Both fighters had higher accident rates when they were new. Actually, the F-35A has a lower Class A Mishap rate than either the F-22 or the F-16, at least in USAF service. Every F-35 crash gets more attention than older fighters, especially since the program is still politically controversial. Israel likes their F-35s so well, they increased their orders from 50 to 75 aircraft.
@РитаИвантаева-з1х
@РитаИвантаева-з1х 11 месяцев назад
ну и 75 из 75 не проживут и 10 лет) лол @@PlugInRides
@colindavis1496
@colindavis1496 Год назад
What an absolutely beautiful aircraft, the most graceful craft to ever cruise the skies...!!!
@Blodhelm
@Blodhelm Год назад
In dreams, on the wings of butterflies!
@jloiben12
@jloiben12 Год назад
Why avoid using their 4th gen, maybe 4.5 gen, figuter when they are claiming it is a 5th gen fighter that will be able to be upgraded to 6th gen? Ego and hubris
@JAlucard77
@JAlucard77 Год назад
Gotta love the rivets
@geesehoward700
@geesehoward700 Год назад
Is it protecting the t-14 armata tank in the astral realm?
@Whisper555
@Whisper555 Год назад
The United States has more Super Carriers than Russia has SU-57's. That is how slowly Russia is building them.
@rosswalkman9652
@rosswalkman9652 Год назад
“The only stealth plane that everyone can pick up on radar” GUARANTEED!!!
@simonwoess5679
@simonwoess5679 Год назад
Big suka Sukoi scams!!
@rosswalkman9652
@rosswalkman9652 Год назад
“IT’S BACK!” “ALSO THE RETURN OF STUPID FUCK-FUCK GAMES!!!”
@BrianKedersha
@BrianKedersha Год назад
There is usually no s after aircraft, it is plural Also, it is spelled Mach after Dr. Ernst Waldfried Josef Wenzel Mach
@slavak9123
@slavak9123 Год назад
10:09 F-35 is a stealthy brick. No one has ever claimed it being maneuverable. You must have meant F-22, which is a pure beast when it comes to maneuverability
@goose2088
@goose2088 Год назад
The F-35 has roughly has the same maneuverability as the F-15
@slavak9123
@slavak9123 Год назад
@@goose2088 in the first turn, maybe. However, the design coupled with a single engine makes it bleed speed and energy very quickly and makes it nearly unsurvivable in a dogfight. Fortunately or not, it was not designed for within visual range fights. If it does find itself in one, many things have gone very very wrong.
@dementesf
@dementesf Год назад
No weapon system, no matter how advanced, can make a difference in a warzone if you can´t have all too many of them. Both NATO and Russia are learning that more important than how deadly a system is, is how fast can you build/replace them. I wouldn´t be surprised at all if Russia drops the Su-57 completely. "Too expensive to lose" is not a desirable trait in a war asset.
@5tre55full
@5tre55full 11 месяцев назад
Su57 Cost as F15. So no. It is not Holly grail Like f22 pr f35.
@wherezthebeef
@wherezthebeef 11 месяцев назад
Their 'fleet' of 10 prototypes... which will never see combat.. are for propaganda, recruitment, air shows, and if they can ever 'deep fake' an Su-57 engagement with a western F-35, F-22, etc., and show it shooting down a Western fighter, then maybe foreign sales.. after Ukraine War, as Russia currently has not capacity to fulfill foreign purchases.
@sithassassinstl7864
@sithassassinstl7864 11 месяцев назад
@@5tre55full and yet they still cannot afford to mass produce them. It's not about how much they cost, it's about how much you can afford to spend.
@5tre55full
@5tre55full 11 месяцев назад
@@sithassassinstl7864 changing the goal post? Russia has aloe plan to modernise their flert but now with war at Hand they have pushed harder and producing pretty fast. You do know that there is no Rush in peace ? So no.. my Point is still solid . And Save US virtually one can affor f22 or f35 but countries have to buy due to the US pressure . P.S. US can't afford them either . Look how US fleet is getting smaller
@sithassassinstl7864
@sithassassinstl7864 11 месяцев назад
@@5tre55full Russia's budget had nothing to do with them being "at peace". Russia has been fighting as much as the US has since the cold war. Let's not play like they have been nice for the last 40 years. When the SU57 went into it's concept phase Russia was selling off it's military because it had no money. They are only now doing it at a massive deficit to their GDP. The US is down sizing the entire military because the technology (which caused the DOD budget to increase) makes the need for a massively fleet of aircraft obsolete. I don't think you understand how technology works. The better the tech the less you need to be effective. That has been they way of things for hundreds of years. By your argument the fact that we don't maintain millions of active duty soldier is due to budget issues. We don't do it because technology eliminated most of their jobs.
@Magnus-v9x
@Magnus-v9x Месяц назад
If the SU-57 is so good,why did they only build 22?
@manofwar556
@manofwar556 Год назад
So no one has seen it, does that not prove how good at stealth it is?
@bradenmchenry995
@bradenmchenry995 Год назад
The exposed rivets and rcs of an aircraft carrier say otherwise
@dharmdevil
@dharmdevil Год назад
@@bradenmchenry995 design was focused on frontal stealth. it could hardly care about being detected when it's going back home.
@tomk3732
@tomk3732 Год назад
Not really - Russians did not see too many HIMARS systems - so are they good at stealth?
@MrDJAK777
@MrDJAK777 Год назад
​​​@@dharmdevilthat's a laugh given its S shaped intake duct was designed so poorly that the whole point of that geometry was somehow missed and the engine's face/internals were not obscured fully, defeating the whole point. They had to make an insert later on. Edit also missiles can catch up to them sooo not being a giant radar return from the rear is quite handy.
@Devantejah
@Devantejah Год назад
@@dharmdevil Even if that is correct about the front the jet has more sides than just the front and rear.
@mightyherc1
@mightyherc1 Год назад
“Mach” is the term for the speed of sound. Most 4th and 5th Generation fighters can operate at up to Mach 2 in typical operations.
@Blodhelm
@Blodhelm Год назад
And the Russians say this thing can cruise at Mach 12, right up there with the T-14 having energy shields.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
They can hit their max speeds at 40,000ft or more when carrying no weapons or fuel tanks, while a few can exceed Mach 2 with a small weapons load but any real world combat configuration limits their top speed to much less than this. Most fighters will never reach those speeds during operational flights.
@claymclaren5788
@claymclaren5788 Год назад
Except the F-35 which is said to tap out at 1.6. So hopefully it will never have to try and outrun something.
@ShadowFalcon
@ShadowFalcon Год назад
​@@claymclaren5788 That's the thing with these top speeds though. Usually, they're given for an aircraft in a clean configuration (meaning no weapons, or sensor pods, or fuel tanks). So, a clean F-16 will do Mach 2. A fully loaded F-16 will struggle to break the sound barrier. And the F-35 will do Mach 1.6 with, or without weapons in a stealth config, meaning it's actually useful if it has access to its top speed.
@AbundantChris
@AbundantChris Год назад
@@claymclaren5788do you think this is The Fast & Furious or something? The F35 is not going to be chased by any aircraft. It will blow yours up beyond visual range and if by some stroke of luck you manage to track it down, there will be 4 more F35s on your tail ready to make you pay for your silly mistake.
@24x7locks5
@24x7locks5 Год назад
RCS of F35 is approx. .05 m² The F22 is approx. .001 m² The SU57 is approx .5 m² The Felon is actually very maneuverable, it is quick as well. But it is not stealth. It is classed as low observable. The cantered, hyper thrust vector cones/nozzles makes the Felon impressive to fly and a worthy opponent to raid against. It is not really a dog fighter, but can do it well and win. It is one of those things that do a lot of things well but nothing really great. The Soviet mentality of quantity is still there. The Felon sacrifices stealth for quantity of weapons.
@nolongerblocked6210
@nolongerblocked6210 Год назад
The SU57 is so stealthy it's rarely ever seen
@fallinginthed33p
@fallinginthed33p Год назад
It has an SEP field. Hitchhiker's Guide...
@zx3215
@zx3215 Год назад
I've never seen F22. I think this is all hoax.
@incubus_the_man
@incubus_the_man Год назад
That's the secret to their stealth. They're so stealthy that they don't even exist.
@legend9805
@legend9805 Год назад
​@@incubus_the_manF22 stealthy shooting chinese baloon
@HuseinB58
@HuseinB58 Год назад
Sure bro!
@riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip
@riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip Год назад
Yet another great video. Not sure if it's intentional or not but whoever did the on-screen text made quite a few spelling errors lol.
@harrisonlichtenberg3162
@harrisonlichtenberg3162 7 месяцев назад
The 57 in Su-57 is in reference to 2057, the year it will enter service. Just in time to get erased by a 7th gen aircraft armed with directed energy weaponry being piloted by an AI replicant of a WWIII Ace.
@Fersman1972
@Fersman1972 Год назад
Loved the video. Keep up the awesome work
@jameslewis2635
@jameslewis2635 Год назад
I imagine the truth is something similar to the T-14 Armata where they have this forward thinking list of features but messed up on the basic engine design and probably lack the manufacturing capacity needed to produce all the various components.
@michaelccozens
@michaelccozens Год назад
I'm guessing it's maybe also that Putin is being very Hitlerian in having arbitrary preferences for certain approaches and units. Plus, Putin's generally more interested in his domestic appearance than in making anything that actually works. He's promised to make Russia a perceived superpower like the USSR once was, and showing that Russia, under his leadership, can lead the world in weapons design is a big part of that. But when you're trying to convince your domestic base of your technological superiority, as opposed to convincing your enemy of the fact on the battlefield, you tend to get flashy hunks of junk. That Russia appears terrified to try their flagship units in real combat suggests exactly that situation, as people who have designed a weapon they're convinced in good-faith will work want to see it exposed to scrutiny, especially in these exceedingly-rare near-peer conditions. The West is getting a ton of good data out of this conflict, and Putin seems to be actively avoiding getting any of it. That's not a great strategy, as you can hide from reality for a while, but it always finds you. Also, given the general level of corruption in Putin's fascist regime, guessing that every ounce of cash that could be stripped from either project ended-up in some Putin crony's Swiss bank account.
@jasonrhodes9726
@jasonrhodes9726 Год назад
The announcer said it could fly supersonic without afterburner. Super cruise engines require extremely tight tolerances that the Russians most likely can't even come close to. With the embargos, even if they could build the aircraft, they don't have access to the components they would need.
@HuseinB58
@HuseinB58 Год назад
Or they have enough cheaper and still effective T-72s, T-80s, and T-90s that they don't need to deploy the Armata tanks because they wouldn't be a game changer and would only bolster Ukrainian propaganda if one did get taken out. AND it would get taken out eventually like all tanks if deployed in a war like THIS. The T-90s will do just fine. You Americans just can't understand this simple reason. It baffles me. Why would they deploy expensive Armatas and test them in a REAL war when they have plenty of T-90s? A tank isn't ever gonna be a game changer in modern warfare. Also they don't have an unlimited and printed budget like the US does.
@OsX86H3AvY
@OsX86H3AvY Год назад
@@michaelccozens i think thats why Ukraine was the target in the first place - he thought itd be an easy win - hes been using Ukraine for hacking practice since the 2000's and then took Crimea in '14, hes been setting this up for over a decade so it probably shouldve been an easy W but Western suport and russias mismanagement and corruption were things that never made it into comrade putins equation, likely because anyone who told him the truth wouldve been shot on sight and knew it...anyways, grand scheme and all, yea it was all a show of force with little real interests or gains otherwise...control of the Black Sea Exclusive Economic Zone sure, that would've hurt the motherland if Ukraine had exploited it but '14 put the kaybash on that anyway...this was a "see NATO i really AM tough just like my mom says" move that backfired spectacularly when putin punched himself in his freshly botox'ed face
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@HuseinB58 The US Air Force deployed its expensive F-117 Nighthawks to Iraq in the first Gulf War despite having very few of them and knowing that a loss would be a massive propaganda victory for Iraq and the USSR. They went ahead and used them because they were a game-changer and force multiplier that made the entire coalition air forces far more powerful. If the T-14 was actually good then Russia would follow the American example and deploy it - losing one or two wouldn't matter if they'd destroyed loads of Ukrainian armour in return because unlike aircraft, people expect tanks to get destroyed or knocked out. It's not in Ukraine because it's junk like the rest of Russia's tanks. You say that T-90s and the rest are doing just fine but they're not, they're getting slaughtered and Russia has lost over 4000 armed vehicles to date and it's still in retreat. Russia needs something to turn the war around and its existing tanks aren't nearly good enough to make it happen.
@myplane150
@myplane150 Год назад
Hey Cappy. I'm guessin' you meant the F22 and not the F35 (10:11) and a Mach 12 speed (10:21) is certainly not possible (unless the Russians have alien tech we don't know about???). BTW, what does the sign behind your left shoulder say. Something about Saturday... I've been trying to read it for weeks. ☺
@SirDeadPuppy
@SirDeadPuppy Год назад
mach 12 LOL dame
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
F-35 is very manoeuvrable, especially compared to legacy fighters in real-world combat configurations where it can fly clean with a useful weapons loadout, while they're carrying multiple tanks, targeting and ECM pods, plus weapons that massively increase drag. The test that saw an F-35 outperformed by an F-16 was an early airframe during testing and software development that was artificially limited in its turning performance and allowable g-forces. Once these restrictions were removed for production airframes it was as good as an F-16 in clean configuration. Flying clean is something you'll never see an operational F-16 do - it's useless outside of test flights and airshows and represents a theoretical upper limit of aircraft performance that's never reached in combat.
@myplane150
@myplane150 Год назад
@@trolleriffic Yep, but it would never outmaneuver a Felon. That's really the only thing the SU57 has going for it.
@Blodhelm
@Blodhelm Год назад
Ruskies always claim amazing stats. Then we build things that can defeat them. Then we find out their tech was garbage barely better than WWII all along.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
@@myplane150 With the helmet mounted targeting system it shouldn't need to even if it did find itself in a WVR fight. That said, Sukhoi have made some incredible aircraft and have talented engineers but they can only work with the resources available. I doubt the designers of the Su-57 think it's a match for F-35 or F-22 even if it is a big improvement over older Soviet and Russian jets.
@itsallgoodaversa
@itsallgoodaversa Год назад
Love your videos Cappy. The more serious and longer form videos are great, love when you keep the humor in too! 0:30 made me laugh lol.
@moapqd1
@moapqd1 Год назад
Deployed to Syria in 2018 and 2019, Tested weapon systems, hot-dry weather performance, US and Israely radar detection, performed same tasks of Israely F-35A deployment in 2018 and US F-22 and F35 deployments to Syria this year.
@MolsonCnM
@MolsonCnM Год назад
Always enjoy your videos Chris, but just wanted to mention, the plural of aircraft, is simply aircraft.
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
@BoraHorzaGobuchul Год назад
And "mok" is actually "mach" :)
@KaiDidumaNx
@KaiDidumaNx Год назад
So they used "Super advanced jet" to launch longa range weapons, which could have been launched by any other "Super regular jet"???
@TheSanien
@TheSanien 11 месяцев назад
SU 57 so stealth it's like it doesn't even exist 🤣
@mikel1062
@mikel1062 Год назад
The mig 31 is very active in this conflict but is rarely seen. Why? Because the tactics used are flying high 30000feet + using the radar and long range missle to take long distance shots then reset. If your dog fighting in an interceptor your doing it wrong.
@tomk3732
@tomk3732 Год назад
Yep, 80 air sorties per day in Zaporozia alone by RAF.
@bob38028
@bob38028 Год назад
@@tomk3732 You mean VVS? I don't think Britain is using any Su-57's.
@knoll9812
@knoll9812 4 месяца назад
How do you see them?
@wannabegeek519
@wannabegeek519 9 месяцев назад
SU-57 is like your wife when she is "getting ready" to go out on the town, but it takes FOREVER. And she's not going out until she is READY. Waiting, waiting, waiting......
@epi2045
@epi2045 Год назад
Interesting how it’s less capable than the Raptor and 20 years later as the F22 is already being phased out with the NGAD.
@arthas640
@arthas640 10 месяцев назад
Pretty standard for Russia really. Putin's stressing out over Ukraine getting F-16s and they're a 50 year old design. Russia and the Soviets are always a generation behind, the "cutting edge" Su-57 was designed in part as a counter to the F-15 and F-16 but like you said the US was building the F-22 at the time and _that's_ already being replaced while Russia cant even build the Su-57. China meanwhile stole a lot of the Su-57 for their J-20 and they're acting like the J-20 can compete with the F-22 and F-35...
@12123188
@12123188 10 месяцев назад
​@@arthas640nobody is stressing out about the F16. The only reason for being worried is the type of missiles the F16 can carry. The plane itself is no match for modernized SU27 derivatives.
@aminesheridi995
@aminesheridi995 Год назад
the F 22 is so sthealty that USA stopped producing it 20 millions for 2 hours of flight
@codeforme8860
@codeforme8860 Год назад
The SU-57 is so stealthy It has never been seen
@Flippyrock2011
@Flippyrock2011 Год назад
As a military aviation fan it's is kinda sad that we don't get to see much of the Russian next gen jet ie. MIG141 SU47 and SU57 But the chronic lack of RnD money seem to be a running theme for them since the 90s
@Max_Da_G
@Max_Da_G Год назад
True for MiG-1.44 Su-47 on the other hand was always a tech demonstrator. There were never any plans to put combat systems into it despite all the media speculation. As for Su-57, at the moment it's in low-rate initial production and all the birds are going to Lipetsk Combat Application and Aircrew Conversion Centre where they are making tactics and procedures for it. And occasionally some of the later-model prototypes that are property of UAC would fly a demo.
@ivicamilosavljevic4706
@ivicamilosavljevic4706 Год назад
Here are, obviously, two grown up people, that comment seriously on this subject. Not kids, like in the rest of comments, fighting around stupid jokes... Also, I will add one comment - Actually , Russians "invented" stealth, and Idea around it... if they didn't produce it, that Is another reason (maybe lack of funds, maybe they think that stealth Is unneeded, or history...). But for sure they know how..!
@arthas640
@arthas640 10 месяцев назад
@@ivicamilosavljevic4706 they came up with some of the theory, but only some, and there's a handful of different bits of tech that goes into stealth from the design to the materials and the Soviets only theorized about some of the design portion. The Germans were already making radar absorbing materials in the 40s with the U-480 and the US was independently developing stealth technologies. There was radar absorbing paint being developed during WW2 and the US was developing their own radar absorbing materials for the U2 along with other technology like printed circuit board materials that absorbed radar. Those Soviet theories didnt leave the USSR until the 70s but that was decades after the German and American developments of the 40s and 50s.
@ivicamilosavljevic4706
@ivicamilosavljevic4706 10 месяцев назад
@@arthas640 - What is Your PERSONAL comment on that idea that "Russians didn't developed further stealth technology, because they tough it's obsolete and unneeded.." !? Reagrds from Serbia (IvicaM)
@Depressed_Ferrari_Fan_16
@Depressed_Ferrari_Fan_16 Год назад
Russia made a jet so stealthy we haven't even seen it in action yet. 💀
@Thomas_Geist
@Thomas_Geist Год назад
The reason is both simple and smart: The Russians do not want to expose the SU-57’s capabilities or how to target them to USAF ISR engineers in Ukraine. They are held in reserve until strategically necessary. The US made the mistake of deploying the F-117 in Bosnia when F-15’s were doing just fine, thus exposing it to Russian GRU engineers who then had a good enough look at it to figure out how to design radar and procedures to detect them and even shot one down to make the point. Such advanced war-winning technologies should never be deployed unless the conflict reaches to our own national security. The conflict in Bosnia did not; and at this point the scale of the Ukraine conflict does not threaten Russia. Always wise to save the best wine for last. Regardless of how stealthy it is, not knowing for sure makes it difficult to plan counter measures and tactics. This is Military Strategy 101 going back to, The Art of War. No fighter is invisible. The purpose of Stealth is to be able to launch missiles before being detected and fired upon, not sneak into the girl’s locker room. The other half of that strategy is to develop longer range missiles and better targeting radar.
@chadbernard2641
@chadbernard2641 Год назад
The Su-57 as it was deigned to work closely alongside ground based air defence systems such as S-400s, which form the backbone of the Russian Air Defence capability alongside which air superiority fighters and interceptors play a more secondary supporting role. Unlike Cold War era heavyweight fighters such as the Su-27, the Su-57 was not primarily designed for deep penetration flights into NATO airspace but instead to close gaps in the ground based air defence network with its own powerful sensors and armaments. Ground based long range air defence systems boast far larger sensor suites that operate in more wavebands and can deploy a wider range of anti air missile classes, with the Su-57’s own suite of six radars able to provide highly complementary information to this from elevated positions in the stratosphere.
@simul8guy75
@simul8guy75 Год назад
And of course it fulfills NONE of those roles because there all of half a dozen Felons fit to fly (maybe less than that)....
@princesofthepower3690
@princesofthepower3690 11 месяцев назад
Saw your comments on quora. They were good but I just think this video is another example of the West complete ignorance and arrogance regarding anything high-tech coming out of Russia.
@frankgerlach4467
@frankgerlach4467 11 месяцев назад
Highly advanced Radar as compared to the Mig21 ?
@chadbernard2641
@chadbernard2641 11 месяцев назад
@@frankgerlach4467 no compared to any radar.
@5tre55full
@5tre55full 10 месяцев назад
​@@frankgerlach4467when f35 get something atleast as advanced as radar on mig 21 it could actually participate in action . (We Will ignore Israeli ones since Israel modernised theirs instantly)
@sheep3866
@sheep3866 Год назад
HEADLINE: Russia makes F-22 20 years later, then... doesn't
@rick7424
@rick7424 Год назад
It does not matter how good your plane is if you have fewer than 20 while the US already operates 535 F-35s and plans to operate over 2,000 of them.
@klt479
@klt479 Год назад
The SU-57's stealth signatures are somewhat similar to the F-18. However, no one ever sees it, lol.
@lexwaldez
@lexwaldez Год назад
That's probably a fair assessment. Missiles slung underwings and stored internally (what is the number stored internally?), leading edge slats (not good for stealth), MASSIVE IR signature off those engines from the rear, excellent aerodynamics, great flight envelope, no idea what the range is but she looks like a gas guzzler, great IR target acquisition, meh radar and electronics suite... I think the real weakness are her pilots. Russia lost a ton of their best and brightest pilots in Ukraine and their training budget is a joke. Doesn't matter how good your plane is if nearest well-trained fighter pilot is Swedish or Chinese.
@knoll9812
@knoll9812 4 месяца назад
I have seen several f18s
@Oplix
@Oplix 11 месяцев назад
Serial production of SU-57 has begun with first batch already being delivered.
@scottbrookes3492
@scottbrookes3492 Год назад
Thanks a lot @Taskandpurpose for making this video about one of my favourite planes. Believe it or not, my son and I found out about this plane while visiting the local model shop, as an Airfix model. Attracted primarily because of its looks, it's interesting to find out its delays in production, how ambitious it is but also its potential failings. You have a knack of creating vids that are light-hearted, and translating a lot of the serious stuff for easy understanding. Keep up the great work! Any chance of teaching us a bit about another Airfix beauty, the Russian Kamov Ka-58 Stealth helicopter??
@josiahgibson6373
@josiahgibson6373 Год назад
The Kamov Ka-58 is completely imaginary, invented as a "what if" scenario to make toys and models. It's kind of based off the Ka-52, which is in turn a 2 seater based off the 1 seat Ka-50. Ka-52s and Ka-50s are both quite common in the real world.
@sigma_six
@sigma_six Год назад
At least it doesn't have the inherent design flaws of the F-35... which are permanently baked in... another 20 year, obsolete by the time they made it, underpowered, flying brick of a stealth fighter...
@bruderschweigen6889
@bruderschweigen6889 11 месяцев назад
​@sigma_six Who are you talking to? Lol why did you just randomly bring up the f35? And if we're fighting Russia we could use a rc plane and win I wouldn't worry about the f 35 Russians are incompetent at everything
@CptJistuce
@CptJistuce 11 месяцев назад
​@@sigma_sixEasy to never be obsolete when you never go into production, but I'll take an obsolete design that exists in quantity over a one-off technology demonstrator.
@arthas640
@arthas640 10 месяцев назад
I do love his motto/catchphrase of boiling stuff down to be understandable for "the average infantryman" since that also makes it understandable for the average civilian most of the time too. I dont know how often they do it IRL but i know in the past at least they used to teach soldiers some basic theory on the enemy and why the US is fighting a conflict and things like the theory behind different designs on equipment.
@topiasr628
@topiasr628 Год назад
Up until very recently I thought multi-role meant it could roll multiple times 😅
@cinemantics231
@cinemantics231 Год назад
So stealthy, it makes Wonder Woman's invisible jet look like a joke.
@JohnBarrios-x7l
@JohnBarrios-x7l Год назад
Wow 1979 I was still in high school. No heart attack, no knee surgeries....
@kma3647
@kma3647 Год назад
I figured if the Russians aren't showcasing the Su-57, they're not confident about it's capabilities. There are lots of reasons for that, and let's be honest, the F-35 wasn't exactly ready for combat when it went live too, and it costs 3x as much. Good update. Wonder if you've got something similar planned for the J-20?
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Год назад
The F-35A is now selling for less than $80M so does that mean that Su-57 is only around $27M?
@D4ll4s69
@D4ll4s69 11 месяцев назад
It’s so stealthy NOBODY has ever seen it. It’s called optical camouflage. :)
@Thunderbox247
@Thunderbox247 Год назад
I've been sceptical of the Felons stealth capability since watching Real Engineering's video on the F-35, a lot of the design features that reduce RCS seem to be lacking on the 57, but China's J-20 has these features so that's a skill issue for Russia
@Thunderbox247
@Thunderbox247 Год назад
@@Tyneras still better than the 57, but yeah the J-20's not the best 5th gen
@Ieo9017
@Ieo9017 Год назад
@@Tyneras As is tradition in authoritarian hellholes
@ray4ix
@ray4ix Год назад
@@Thunderbox247 J20 can carry internally longer range air to air missiles, that's a big bonus for it, that's why US is rushing their own longer air to air prototype. But ofc the detection range against F35 might be issue, and those beyond visible range rockets might be splashed with the jet without ever been used.
@phunkracy
@phunkracy Год назад
Such as?
@thomaszhang3101
@thomaszhang3101 Год назад
@@Tyneras J-20’s stealth debate and already been settled by the academic part of internet since mid 2010s, how are peoples today still thinking that J-20 is severely handicapped when it comes to stealth? The geometry of J-20 presents virtually no major hindrance to stealth from any angle compared to F-35 and F-22. The only thing that differentiates their RCS will be technology applied in material science and active electronic measures, both of which cannot be obtained via a RCS simulation in the public.
@ewlchen
@ewlchen Год назад
Glad to see cost overruns in the defense industry are similar problems in both Russian and NATO countries
@molf1588
@molf1588 Год назад
Nothing special. Cost overruns are literally in every country in every industry.
@jameshetfield3105
@jameshetfield3105 10 месяцев назад
A mistake: the "Su-57" that crashed was actually an Su-25 frogfoot
@brunoflausinodasilva7372
@brunoflausinodasilva7372 Год назад
It's not about reputation damage, it's about not being enough tested. You can't just take an airplane and go to a battle field without enough experience on it. It's real life, not a video game.
@frankgerlach4467
@frankgerlach4467 11 месяцев назад
Especially if 99% of your money was burned on BMWs, iphones and superyachts.
@georgewakefield6764
@georgewakefield6764 Год назад
Maybe the should have a "Where's my SU-57 Function" so when they lose them they can find them. Or maybe it should be a "SU-57 Call Home" feature? Just asking?
@TiocfaidhArLa34
@TiocfaidhArLa34 Год назад
Its so stealthy that even the russians cant find it.
@saiprateek5779
@saiprateek5779 Год назад
Hey Cappy,Make a video on export of ATAGS to Armenia by India..🙏🙇🇮🇳
@CaptainHarris-ip2kg
@CaptainHarris-ip2kg Год назад
Russia / Soviet Union engineers always come up with unique solutions, but their production methods still hold onto Soviet philosophy, and so you get philps head screws in their final product. And the IRST ... is interesting, but a liability. To be honest I'm surprised the SU57 saw the light if day given how the nation is still run.
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
@BoraHorzaGobuchul Год назад
Soviet engineers were quite proficient at copying and adapting western aircraft designs, but the current state of the Russian economy, total corruption, loyalty based negative selection has further degraded capability for r&d and manufacturing. Even without the sanctions, they wouldn't be able to field the plane (which is basically far from finished product but rather a tech demonstrator), even in its current inferior form.
@johnsch1988
@johnsch1988 Год назад
​@@BoraHorzaGobuchulThe USSR would be the first in space while American engineers brought from Germany were shooting cartoons in Hollywood😂
@CaptainHarris-ip2kg
@CaptainHarris-ip2kg 11 месяцев назад
@@johnsch1988 The Russians took their share of German rocket scientists, and the US had rocketeers long before either White Russia or the Soviet Union.
@johnsch1988
@johnsch1988 11 месяцев назад
@@CaptainHarris-ip2kg The United States took out of Germany all the scientists involved in rockets, including von Braun, and still the USSR was the first in space. Therefore, the USA only had to make fantastic films about the landing on the moon in this USA, well done Stanley Kubrick did a good job
@calibravn
@calibravn 8 месяцев назад
If you ask why they are not in the Russian Air Force, they simply do not need them! And other armies have not yet ordered them. The situation is the same with all new generation aircraft (F-22, F-35, KF-21 Boramae ,MIG-35...) regardless of which military industry introduced them to the light of day. Every person who does not use their head only for decoration knows this!
@JeffBourke
@JeffBourke Год назад
It’s a propaganda unit.
@anaxis
@anaxis Год назад
The Go-Pro video of a pilot ejecting was from an Su-25; over Ukraine. Not the Su-57.
@TiernanWilkinson
@TiernanWilkinson Год назад
Can't shoot down a squadron of SU-57s if there is no squad of SU-57s
@dirrrtydawg9772
@dirrrtydawg9772 5 месяцев назад
Regardless of capabilities that is a damn beautiful plane.
@tritium1998
@tritium1998 Год назад
It's literally more of a 4th-generation fighter, but both America and Russia like to exaggerate Russian weapons.
@deven6518
@deven6518 Год назад
F35 is 4th gen plus 😅 Doesn't achieve the flight characteristics laid out for 5th gen.
@AH6man
@AH6man Год назад
Pretty sure the Su-57 costs more than $35 million. The Su-30sm is like $40 million per unit.
@rayanalzahrani8756
@rayanalzahrani8756 Год назад
They also forget it’s not part of the Russian Air Force and is still in testing phases just 2 weeks ago they announced it would join the Russian Air Force and will be making 76 of them which is not impressive compared to the other jets but this was made only by Russians while the f35 was made with 14 countries and all other 4.5 fighter jets are replicas of the f-35 just cheaper
@joshuawoo1630
@joshuawoo1630 Год назад
It's so nice of Russia to give their officers nicer parts to strip
@DavidFMayerPhD
@DavidFMayerPhD Месяц назад
It is BLUFFWARE: a weapon which is claimed to exist but does NOT in the form claimed by Russian braggadocio.
@simonelliott2945
@simonelliott2945 Год назад
It’s definitely not a paper dragon because Russia says so.
@markalbert9011
@markalbert9011 3 дня назад
Where is the Su-57....it's in the same barn where the unicorn's are getting their horns sharpened and the minotaur's are getting their hooves trimmed.
@ron56pvi13
@ron56pvi13 11 месяцев назад
Tom Clancy once said that there are stealth fighters and the rest are targets. The SU 57 is a target.
@ΣΤΕΡΓΙΟΣΚΟΣΜΙΔΗΣ
When an aircraft supposed to be stealth and you hear absolutely nothing about it, either it's already in action and accomplishing every mission with success or the only other possibility is it's a hoax.
@RNJuiceable
@RNJuiceable Год назад
pretty sure Maverick and Rooster know where this missing SU-57 is...
@MURALITA51
@MURALITA51 Год назад
If you haven’t seen it, it’s because it’s super stealthy.
Далее
What Happened to Russia's Doomsday Submarine?
19:30
Просмотров 1,2 млн
RIP Nighthawk Stealth Attack Aircraft...or not?
20:27
Просмотров 849 тыс.
Help Me Celebrate! 😍🙏
00:35
Просмотров 17 млн
Is the Apache Attack Helicopter Really Obsolete?
20:48
Su-57 - Russia's 5th Gen Fighter
17:53
Просмотров 205 тыс.
Israel Strikes Back, Everything You Need to Know
53:53
The Truth About Russia's T-14 Armata Tank
22:34
Просмотров 2,1 млн
America's NEW F-15-EX Dominates Disputed Air Space
18:34
Where is Russia's ‘PAK DA’ Stealth Bomber?
18:20
Просмотров 726 тыс.
Israel’s Home-Built Merkava Tank Tactics
28:27
Просмотров 1,5 млн
Help Me Celebrate! 😍🙏
00:35
Просмотров 17 млн